UTE INDIAN WATER COMPACT. Purpose of Compact. Legal Basis for Compact. Water

Similar documents
SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN IN NEW MEXICO NAVAJO NATION WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

III. SUMMARY OF TULE RIVER TRIBE'S HISTORIC AND FUTURE MONEY DAMAGES CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES

CHIPPEWA CREE TRIBE OF THE ROCKY BOY S RESERVATION INDIAN RESERVED WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AND WATER SUPPLY ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 1999

Supreme Court of the United States

1. "Bear River" means the Bear River and its tributaries from its source in the Uinta Mountains to its mouth in Great Salt Lake;

DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY: The United States responses to interrogatories of the Cities of Aztec and Bloomfield

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. SEPTEMBER 29, 1996 Referred to the Committtee on Resources AN ACT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

In The Supreme Court of the United States

LOWER BASIN DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN AGREEMENT. This LOWER BASIN DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN AGREEMENT ( LB DCP Agreement ) is

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION BOULDER CANYON PROJECT

APALACHICOLA-CHATTAHOOCHEE-FLINT RIVER BASIN COMPACT

American Legal History Russell

COMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT

In The Supreme Court of the United States

2018 Utah Legislative Update

ONLINE VERSION STATE/FEDERAL/FEE EXPLORATORY UNIT UNIT AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE NO.

Arkansas River Compact Kansas-Colorado 1949 ARKANSAS RIVER COMPACT

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO REFER TRIBAL MEMBERS CHARGED WITH MISDEMEANOR OFFENSES TO TRIBAL COURT FOR PROSECUTION

New Mexico State Land Office Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division Revised Feb. 2013

CITY OF ST. GEORGE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMP MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH OWNER'S NAME FOR PROJECT NAME

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT

AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF WATER FROM THE NORTH SAN JOAQUIN WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT BY THE CITY OF LODI

In the Supreme Court of the United States

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America

Congressional Record -- Senate. Thursday, October 8, 1992 (Legislative day of Wednesday, September 30, 1992) 102nd Cong. 2nd Sess.

Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal

CHAPTER 3 - TOHONO O ODHAM NATION WATER CODE

Vague and Ambiguous. The terms market and marketing are not defined.as such, the

Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. UTE DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, a Utah corporation, Plaintiff - Appellant,

No. 137, Original STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF WYOMING. and. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants.

LINKAGE TO STRATEGIC PLAN, POLICY, STATUTE OR GUIDING PRINCIPLE:

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

COLORADO CANYONS NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA AND BLACK RIDGE CANYONS WILDERNESS ACT OF 2000

Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division Revised March 2017 COMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT

In the Supreme Court of the United States

BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MARICOPA COUNTY

Joint Resolution. Joint Resolution

H. R. 356 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. MAY 16, 2013 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources AN ACT

Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Water Transmission System Capacity Allocation During Temporary Impairment

CHAPTER House Bill No. 1205

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 43 - PUBLIC LANDS CHAPTER 12B COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT

In The Supreme Court Of The United States

Case 2:13-cv DB Document 2 Filed 12/03/13 Page 1 of 10

OJITO WILDERNESS ACT

340.. OCTOBER TERM, 1963.

Potential Investment Agreement. Dated as of, 2017

RULES AND REGULATIONS BEAUMONT BASIN WATERMASTER

Case 2:16-cv CW Document 85 Filed 02/17/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

CITY OF ENID RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT

Water Rights: Is the Quechan Tribe Barred from Seeking a Determination of Reservation Boundaries in Indian Country

Case 2:08-cv TS Document 97 Filed 11/16/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

ORDINANCE NO OF THE BOROUGH COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF EPHRATA LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:06-cv CW Document 135 Filed 03/12/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Treaty of the Tribal Internet Gaming Alliance

Supreme Court of the United States

APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONSTITUTES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 68 OF TITLE 24, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, AS AMENDED

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

City of Orem TIMPANOGOS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK Appendix E DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS

(2) MAP. The term Map means the map entitled Proposed Pine Forest Wilderness Area and dated October 28, 2013.

UNITED STATES et al. v. McINTIRE et al. FLATHEAD IRR. DIST. v. SAME.

JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 279 RELATED TO THE FERNBROOK FIELD COMPLEX

ONLINE VERSION STATE/FEE WATERFLOOD UNIT UNIT AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA:

AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN MANAGING ATTORNEY AND SPONSOR 1

STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF [ ], TEXAS AND [WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OR MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT]

When used in sections 371, 376, 377, 412, 417, 433, 462, 466, 478, 493, 494, 500, 501, and 526 of this title

SURETY BOND-MINING (SUBSIDENCE) License No. Permit No. Bond No. (Name of Mine Operator)

In re Crow Water Compact

Southern Ute Indian Tribe

Honorable James J. Wechler. Richard T. C. Tully, Esq., hereby certifies the original of this Certificate of Service TULLY LAW FIRM, P. A.

THE WATER UTILIZATION (CONTROL AND REGULATION) ACT, 1974 PART I

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

This Agreement, originally entered on the 15 th day of June, 2010, as amended this. day of,, is entered into by and among the City of Oklahoma

TRIBAL LABOR RELATIONS ORDINANCE September 14, 1999

New Mexico Water Law Case Capsules 2-1

The Rio Grande flows for approximately 1,900 miles from the

1 of 2 DOCUMENTS. Copyright (c) 2002 University of Denver (Colorado Seminary) College of Law University of Denver Water Law Review.

Facility Crossing Agreement

Intergovernmental Memorandum of Agreement Camp 4 County of Santa Barbara & Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians. Public Meeting September 25, 2017

Water and Growth Issues for Tribes and Pueblos in New Mexico Legal Considerations

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. ) No. 1:02 CV 2156 (RWR)

Case 6:68-cv BB Document 2720 Filed 03/01/2010 Page 1 of 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

SILVERADO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. Advanced Board Package. Board of Supervisors Meeting. Tuesday April 24, :00 a.m.

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

WATER PROVISION AGREEMENT

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1975 SESSION CHAPTER 186 HOUSE BILL 266

LIQUOR CODE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION

PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant,

NEW MEXICO S EXPERIENCE WITH INTERSTATE WATER AGREEMENTS

NATURE OF THE ACTION. enforcement of the Arbitration Award entered November 24, 2015 styled In the

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, AB-07-1 Claims of Navajo Nation

Case 2:17-cv DN Document 47 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 13

CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR. Dinosaur Crossing 24 Material Supply Inquiry No St. George, Utah 08/16/16. Prepared By: John Cazier

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. CROW ALLOTTEES ASSOCIATION, et al.,

mew Doc 354 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 10:23:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 15

The Aamodt case is a complex, long-running adjudication of water

Transcription:

Available at http://le.utah.gov/~code/title73/73_21.htm Utah Code 73-21-1. Approval of Ute Indian Water Compact. The within Compact, the Ute Indian Water Compact, providing for the execution by the State of Utah, the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservations, Utah, and the United States of America, through their various representatives, is hereby authorized, confirmed, and approved for the State of Utah. Enacted by Chapter 74, 1980 General Session The text of the Ute Indian Water Compact is as follows: UTE INDIAN WATER COMPACT The State of Utah, the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, Utah, and the United States of America, acting through their respective representatives agree to a Ute Indian Water Compact as follows: ARTICLE I Purpose of Compact The purpose of this Compact is to remove the causes of present and future controversy over the quantification, distribution, and use of all waters claimed by or through the Ute Indian Tribe. ARTICLE II Legal Basis for Compact This Compact is made in accordance with the Constitution and Laws of the United States, the State of Utah, and the Ute Indian Tribe. ARTICLE III Water There is hereby apportioned, confirmed, and recognized from the waters apportioned to the State of Utah from the Colorado River System to the United States of America in perpetuity, in trust, for the Ute Indian Tribe and others, the depletion of water in the amount of 248,943 acrefeet per annum, and the related gross diversion requirement of 471,035 acre-feet per annum, from all sources in accordance with and as more fully set out in the "Tabulation of Ute Indian Water Rights" attached hereto and on file with the Utah State Engineer. The priority date of October 3, 1861, is recognized for land groups 1 through 5, except for water supplied from storage in the Central Utah Project, and the priority date of January 5, 1882, is recognized for land groups 6 and 7, unless indicated otherwise in the Tabulation. Tables 1, 2, and 3 of the Tabulation list the total irrigable acreage, maximum allowable depletions and diversion requirements, respectively, for each of the land groups by stream. No water rights held in trust can be transferred from the lands listed in said groups without approval of the Secretary of the

Interior. All water delivered to groups 1 and 5 lands from storage under the Central Utah Project shall be assigned the priority date of the Water and Power Resources Service filing to accomplish the equitable allocation of water to all subscribers of the Project. In addition to the water allocated under the previous paragraph, there is hereby apportioned, confirmed, and recognized to the United States of America in perpetuity, in trust, for the Ute Indian Tribe the depletion of 10,000 acre-feet of water annually having a priority date of October 3, 1861, for municipal and industrial purposes, which shall be diverted from the Green River. To the extent that the Tribe or its members use reserved water for domestic, municipal, industrial, or related uses, the quantity so used shall be included within said 10,000 acre-feet unless a transfer of water from land listed in the Tabulation is properly made. No water allocated pursuant to this Compact shall be subject to loss or forfeiture under the laws of the State of Utah or otherwise. Further, the water allocated herein shall not be restricted to any particular use, but may be used for any purpose selected by the Tribe in accordance with the procedures provided for in this agreement. The quantities of water apportioned hereby include all water rights of every nature and description derived from the reserved water rights doctrine, from all sources of water, both surface and underground, and includes all types and kinds of uses, whether municipal, industrial, recreational, in-stream uses, sale, lease, or any other use whatsoever, and encompasses all claims asserted by or through the Ute Indian Tribe, and all persons and entities other than the Tribe whose claims or rights are derived, directly or indirectly, from the reserved water rights of the Tribe. Thus, any water rights adjudicated or otherwise established in the future on behalf of any person or entity and based upon a claim, directly or indirectly, through any reserved water rights of the Tribe shall be included within and as a part of the water quantified by this Compact. Any state water rights acquired by the Tribe for land to which a reserved right is recognized herein shall be forfeited. Included within the practicably irrigable acreages recognized are (1) tribal lands and individual Indian allotments; (2) Uintah Indian Irrigation Project lands, which include tribal lands, allotments, and some private lands which were originally allotted lands; and (3) some few lands distributed to former tribal members terminated in accordance with the Ute Partition Act, approved August 27, 1954, P.L. 83-671, 68 Stat. 868, 25 U.S.C. Sections 677-677aa. Nothing in this Compact shall enlarge or diminish the scope of or otherwise affect either the United States' trust responsibility or the Ute Indian Tribe's responsibility to those persons who have been designated as mixed-bloods under the Act of August 27, 1954 (68 Stat. 868). The total acreage under irrigation or susceptible to sustained production of agricultural crops by means of irrigation is recognized as 129,201 acres, reduced by 7% to 120,157 acres to reflect roads, yards, fences, rights-of-way, and other non-productive lands. All lands in the Uintah Indian Irrigation Project are designated assessible or non-assessible. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to change the designation from one to the other. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to preclude the United States as Trustee for the Ute Indian Tribe, the Ute Indian Tribe, or any of its members from filing application with the Utah State Engineer for the appropriation of additional water under the laws of the State of Utah. The diversion and depletion requirements for the water rights apportioned under this Compact are set forth in Tables 1, 2, and 3 of the Tabulation, consisting of acreage, diversion, and depletion schedules. The delivery schedules set forth in Tables 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the Tabulation shall determine the distribution of the water allocated hereunder. The Utah State Engineer, in a manner consistent with the agreements and covenants contained herein, shall have general

administrative supervision of all surface and ground waters apportioned to the United States in trust for the Ute Indian Tribe and others, including measurement, apportionment, and distribution thereof, to the points of diversion from the main sources. The United States and the Tribe shall have general administrative supervision of all water apportioned to the United States, including measurement, apportionment, and distribution thereof, within the canal distribution systems from the various points of river diversion. The United States on behalf of the Tribe, or the Tribe shall comply with the provisions of Section 73-3-3, Utah Code Annotated 1953, with regard to any change in the point of diversion, place, or nature of use; except that neither the United States nor the Tribe need make application to the State Engineer for change of place of use when the new place of use is within the same canal system. The Parties agree to use their best efforts in the expeditious planning and development of water projects for all group 5 lands, or substitute lands, including the Uintah and Upalco Units, the Leland Bench Project, or other similar projects of the Central Utah Project. This Article is not intended to relieve the responsibility of the parties involved in the Midview Exchange Agreement and the Agreement dated the 20th day of September, 1965, among the United States of America, the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, and the Central Utah Water Conservancy District. The provisions of said Agreement of September 20, 1965, shall remain binding upon the parties thereto and continue in full force and effect. ARTICLE IV Enforcement For purposes of compelling compliance with the terms of this Compact, each party waives the defense of sovereign immunity as to actions brought by any other party, including any defense under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. The United States District Court for the District of Utah is hereby granted jurisdiction to adjudicate any claim made by a party to this Compact that any other party, or its officials, are acting to impair or violate any right or privilege in this Compact. ARTICLE V Ratification and Amendment Each party acknowledges that in order for this Compact to constitute a final and permanent settlement of tribal reserved water rights, this Compact must be ratified by the United States, the State of Utah, and the Ute Indian Tribe through referendum of the Tribe's membership. The parties shall use their best efforts to have the ratifications undertaken as expeditiously as possible. The parties hereto agree that the terms of this Compact have the force and effect of law and agree to adopt all statutes, regulations and ordinances that are, or may be, necessary to harmonize existing statutes, regulations and ordinances with this Compact, and agree that this Compact may be included within any general stream adjudication. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to implement this Compact by appropriate regulations. DATED: UTE INDIAN TRIBE By

STATE OF UTAH By UNITED STATES OF AMERICA By Amended by Chapter 20, 1995 General Session