Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 12 Filed 08/17/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Similar documents
Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 239 Filed 07/03/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 214 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 224 Filed 07/05/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 40 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 90 Filed 10/31/11 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1338 Filed 01/02/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 170 Filed 03/22/13 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 832 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 10

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1319 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 247 Filed 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 41 Filed 10/24/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 105 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 137 Filed 01/10/12 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 171 Filed 02/01/12 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RMC-DST-RLW Document 24 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 16

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1036 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 10

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 127 Filed 08/08/11 Page 1 of 15

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1323 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 9

CASE ARGUED APRIL 21, 2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

CASE ARGUED APRIL 21, 2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 63 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 536 Filed 11/25/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 135 Filed 02/10/12 Page 1 of 10

In the United States Court of Appeals For the District of Columbia Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv ABJ-DBS-RJL Document 5 Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1375 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:17-cv RMC Document 12 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF TEXAS,

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 77 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv ESH -HHK Document 31 Filed 08/03/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:14-cv JA Document 251 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:12-cv EGS-TBG-RMC Document 16 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11

PlainSite. Legal Document

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 916 Filed 10/02/13 Page 1 of 21

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 614 Filed 02/09/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 36 Filed 04/04/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:12-cv UATC-MCR Document 31 Filed 09/13/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2192

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 664 Filed 02/20/12 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:11-cv AJT-MSN Document 188 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 2278

Case 1:11-cv CKK-MG-ESH Document 77 Filed 03/02/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC12-1 THE FLORIDA SENATE S REPSONSE TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED EXPERT AFFIDAVIT

Case 2:13-cv Document 1057 Filed in TXSD on 07/12/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:11-cv CKK-MG-ESH Document 45 Filed 10/19/11 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

SENATOR KEL SELIGER 5/20/2014

PLAINITFF MALC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv RMC-DST-RLW Document 338 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv ESH -TBG -HHK Document 51 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 131 Filed 01/04/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

In the. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas JOINT APPELLEES REPLY BRIEF AS TO INTERIM CONGRESSIONAL PLAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 100 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 269 Filed 09/06/12 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:14-cv CMH-TRJ Document 14 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 83

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. Case No CA

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1613 Filed 01/29/19 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:14-cv REP-AWA-BMK Document Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 9479

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 29 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 11

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 4:11-cv Document 1 Filed 02/10/11 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv PLF-EGS Document 96 Filed 05/15/2007 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cv PLF-EGS Document 70-1 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 13 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

COURT CASES OF INTEREST September 2013

Case 4:11-cv RAS Document 37 Filed 06/16/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM DIVISION Civil Action No. 1:13-CV-00949

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 176 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cv PLF-EGS-DST Document 136 Filed 06/13/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 851 Filed 08/09/13 Page 1 of 3

Case 5:12-cv KHV-JWL- Document 53 Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 48 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv WJZ Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2012 Page 1 of 5

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1366 Filed 04/21/17 Page 1 of 12

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 860 Filed 08/19/13 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:14-cv REP-AWA-BMK Document 208 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 7264

Case 5:11-cv Document 1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 7-1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

Transcription:

Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 12 Filed 08/17/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, No. 1:11-cv-01303 (RMC Defendant, and SENATOR WENDY DAVIS, REPRESENTATIVE MARC VEASEY, JOHN JENKINS, VICKI BARGAS, and ROMEO MUÑOZ, Proposed Defendant-Intervenors. ANSWER OF DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS NOW COME The Honorable WENDY DAVIS, The Honorable MARC VEASEY, JOHN JENKINS, VICKI BARGAS and ROMEO MUÑOZ, Defendant-Intervenors in the abovecaptioned action, and answer Plaintiff s Complaint as follows: First Affirmative Defense The State of Texas proposed State Senate Plan and the proposed Congressional Plan violate Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1793c. The declaratory relief requested in Plaintiff s complaint should, therefore, be denied. Answers to Allegations

Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 12 Filed 08/17/11 Page 2 of 6 1. Intervenors admit the allegations of paragraph 1. 2. Intervenors admit the allegations of paragraph 2. 3. Intervenors admit the allegations of paragraph 3, but deny the Court is authorized to declare Plaintiff s redistricting plans compliant with Section 5. 4. Intervenors admit the allegations of paragraph 4. 5. Intervenors admit that Texas gained four new congressional districts following the release of the 2010 census and admit the total population of Texas set forth in this paragraph. Intervenors assert that the 2010 United States Census statistics speak for themselves. 6. Intervenors admit the allegations of paragraph 6. 7. Intervenors admit the allegations of paragraph 7. 8. Intervenors admit the allegations of paragraph 8. 9. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 10. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 11. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 12. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 12 as to the effective date of the State Board of Education Plan. The State Board of Education Plan is legally unenforceable as law unless and until preclearance is obtained under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the other allegations asserted in this paragraph and therefore deny the same. 2

Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 12 Filed 08/17/11 Page 3 of 6 13. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 14. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 15. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 16. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 17. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 18. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 19. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 19. The State House map is legally unenforceable as law unless and until preclearance is obtained under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. 20. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 21. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 22. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 23. Intervenors admit the allegations of paragraph 23. 3

Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 12 Filed 08/17/11 Page 4 of 6 24. This paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, Intervenors deny the allegations of this paragraph. 25. Intervenors admit to the substantive allegations of paragraph 25. Intervenors do not admit to the accuracy of Attachment 4 to Plaintiff s Complaint. 26. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 26. The State Senate map is legally unenforceable as law unless and until preclearance is obtained under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. 27. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 27. 28. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 28. 29. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 29. 30. Intervenors admit that Texas gained four new congressional districts following the release of the 2010 census and admit the total population of Texas set forth in this paragraph. Intervenors assert that the 2010 United States Census statistics speak for themselves and denies the remaining parts of paragraph 30. 31. Intervenors admit the allegations of paragraph 31. 32. Intervenors admit the allegations of paragraph 32 33. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 34. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 34. 35. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 35. 36. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 36. 37. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 37. 4

Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 12 Filed 08/17/11 Page 5 of 6 38. This paragraph contains no factual allegations and thus requires no response. To the extent that there are any factual allegations contained in paragraph 38, Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 38.. 39. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 40. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 41. This paragraph contains no factual allegations and thus requires no response. To the extent that there are any factual allegations contained in paragraph 41, Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 41. 42. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 43. Intervenors are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 44. This paragraph contains no factual allegations and thus requires no response. To the extent that there are any factual allegations contained in paragraph 44, Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 44. 45. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 45. 46. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 46. 47. This paragraph contains no factual allegations and thus requires no response. To the extent that there are any factual allegations contained in paragraph 47, Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 47. 48. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 48. 5

Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 12 Filed 08/17/11 Page 6 of 6 49. Intervenors deny the allegations of paragraph 49. Respectfully submitted, /s/ J. Gerald Hebert J. GERALD HEBERT D.C. Bar #447676 Attorney at Law 191 Somerville Street, #405 Alexandria, VA 22304 Telephone: 703-628-4673 Email: hebert@voterlaw.com PAUL M. SMITH MICHAEL B. DESANCTIS JESSICA RING AMUNSON CAROLINE D.LOPEZ Jenner & Block LLP 1099 New York Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Tel: (202 639-6000 Fax: (202 639-6066 Attorneys for Proposed Defendant-Intervenors 6