Criminal Law: Implications after road death or injury

Similar documents
Criminal Law Implications after Road Death or Injury.

ROAD SAFETY ACT 2006: IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTIONS 20 & 21

Causing death by driving, England and Wales (2015) 1,

Part of the requirement for a criminal offence. It is the guilty act.


The Code. for Crown Prosecutors

Doogue O Brien George Defence Lawyers. Criminal Law Specialists in Melbourne

Catching up with crime and sentencing. Catching up with crime and sentencing

THE ROAD TRANSPORT ACT 2013; NAVIGATING THE NEW REGIME

JUSTICES CLERKS SOCIETY SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE (CHIEF MAGISTRATE)

Working at Height Seminar. The Kube, Leicester Racecourse 4 October 2018

S G C. Reduction in Sentence. for a Guilty Plea. Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council

Jury Amendment Act 2010 No 55

EXPLAINING THE COURTS AN INFORMATION BOOKLET

Dangerous Dog. Offences Definitive Guideline

Law Commission consultation on the Sentencing Code Law Society response

Introduction to Criminal Law

Environmental Offences Definitive Guideline

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 92

Guide to Jury Summons

Spent or Unspent? This document should be considered a guide to the position in England and Wales only.

2004 No (N.I. 15) NORTHERN IRELAND. The Criminal Justice (No. 2) (Northern Ireland) Order 2004

An introduction to English sentencing

MAGISTRATES COURT SENTENCING GUIDELINES. SENTENCING COUNCIL UPDATE 7 March 2012

English Law and Terminology. JUSTINE K. COLLINS

A GUIDE TO CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE

Anonymity (Arrested Persons) Bill [HL]

David Baines. David enjoys a mixed common law practice, largely comprising criminal and civil law.

Unit One Introduction to law

Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court

ROAD SAFETY ACT 2006

Type of law: CRIMINAL LAW. A 2015 Alberta Guide to the Law TRAFFIC OFFENCES. Student Legal Services of Edmonton

CRIMINAL LITIGATION PRE-COURSE MATERIALS

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

3.9 TYPES OF OFFENCES. CLU3M Criminal Law

holder of a probationary driving licence is convicted under this

Section I 20 marks (pages 2 6) Attempt Questions 1 20 Allow about 30 minutes for this section

CRIMINAL LEGISLATION (AMENDMENT) ACT 1992 No. 2

قانون اساءة استخدام الكمبيوتر البريطاني COMPUTER MISUSE ACT 1990 (UK) Commencement 29 August 1990

Simple Cautions for Adult Offenders

Enforcement and prosecution policy

Supplement No. 1 published with Extraordinary Gazette No.9 dated 31 st January, 2017.

THE CRIMINAL EQUATION

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 158

NO MEANS NO. Understanding Consent to Sexual Activity. Public Legal Education and Information Service of New Brunswick

Crimes Amendment (Road Accidents) (Brendan s Law) Act 2005 No 74

FINAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT: BLADED ARTICLES AND OFFENSIVE WEAPONS OFFENCES

PROCEDURE Simple Cautions. Number: F 0102 Date Published: 9 September 2015

Introduction. Deciding to report abuse. Reporting to police

Police and Criminal Matters

STUDENT LEGAL SERVICES TRAFFIC OFFENCES A GUIDE TO THE LAW IN ALBERTA REGARDING OF EDMONTON COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER

ODCE Auditor Reporting. What happens next. February ODCE consideration of Process

Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Bill [HL]

Criminal Procedure Act 2009

Justice Committee. Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill. Written submission the Law Society of Scotland

Unfit through drink or drugs (drive/ attempt to drive) (Revised 2017)

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM. provide for a reduction in the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) level for drivers;

Council meeting 15 September 2011

Consultation Response

This Bill would amend the Magistrate s Courts Act, Cap. 116A to (a)

Surname. Other Names. Candidate Signature

Civil Law is known as Private Law. Regulates disputes between individuals; between parties; and between individuals and parties.

Consultation Guideline

Criminal Procedure Amendment (Mandatory Pre-trial Defence Disclosure) Act 2013 No 10

Index. Abbreviations/meanings

Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2004

BERMUDA CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE (DISCLOSURE AND CRIMINAL REFORM ACT 2015) REGULATIONS 2015 BR 89 / 2015

PROCEDURE Conditional Cautioning. Number: F 0103 Date Published: 23 August 2016

Health and Character Declarations Policy

In the Courtroom What to expect if your son/daughter with a learning disability has to go to court

Ethics and Values: The Criminal Justice System. Version 2.2

Candidate Surname. Candidate Number

AN BILLE UM THRÁCHT AR BHÓITHRE 2009 ROAD TRAFFIC BILL Mar a ritheadh ag dhá Theach an Oireachtais As passed by both Houses of the Oireachtas

ADULT COURT PRONOUNCEMENT CARDS

EDITORIAL NOTE: NO SUPPRESSION APPLIED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT TAURANGA CRI [2016] NZDC NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor

Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2016

SENTENCES FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR (PRINCIPAL OFFENCE)

ASSAULTS ON EMERGENCY WORKERS (OFFENCES) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

Counter-Terrorism Bill

LISTING PROCEDURE FOR SUMMARY CRIMINAL TRIALS

A GUIDE TO THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2015 (S.I. 2015/1490)

Home Office Statistical Bulletin

In Defence of the Safety Adviser Chris Hopkins, Associate, Barrister for Pinsent Masons LLP

MARINE (BOATING SAFETY ALCOHOL AND DRUGS) ACT 1991 No. 80

Computer Misuse Act 1990

Legal Studies. Total marks 100. Section I Pages marks Attempt Questions 1 20 Allow about 30 minutes for this section. Section II Pages 9 21

Final Stage Resource Assessment: Summary offences in the Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines (MCSG)

Supplement No. 3 published with Gazette No. 12 dated 4 th June, 2018.

Initial Court Hearing

Dangerous Dog Offences Consultation CONSULTATION

PART I. PRELIMINARY. 1. Interpretation.

Criminal record check

Heavy Vehicle National Law and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018

Quick Reference Guides to Out of Court Disposals

London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association. Response to the Sentencing Advisory Panel Consultation Paper on Bail Act Offences

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

FINAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT: FAILING TO SURRENDER TO BAIL

Sergeants OSPRE Part 1 Statistics - Evidence

NOTICE OF APPEAL BY PERSON CONVICTED. Part 6, Criminal Procedure Act In the Court of Appeal of New Zealand. [Name] v [R or Police or prosecutor]

Second Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No. 9 of 2017

Transcription:

InformatIon Handbook 1 Criminal Law: Implications after road death or injury Produced in partnership with www.emsleys.co.uk

Criminal Law: Implications after road death or injury CONTENTS: Introduction..............................................................3 Parties Involved.........................................................3 Burden & Standard of Proof......................................4 Common Offences....................................................4 Procedure..................................................................5 Magistrates Court & the Crown Court.....................5 Sentences...................................................................6 Appeals......................................................................6 Time Limit.................................................................6 2

1. Introduction Following an incident on the road, involving a motor vehicle and a serious or fatally injured person, the Police will be called upon to investigate the circumstances of the incident. Depending on the seriousness of the incident, a Senior Road Traffic Officer (usually of Sergeant rank or above) will take on the Senior Investigator s role. He or she will be assisted by a member of the Collision Investigation Unit or Accident Investigation Branch These are highly trained and technically proficient road traffic officers. Together, the Police will gather evidence with the aim of passing a file of papers containing all the evidence which they have obtained to the Crown Prosecution Service. The Crown Prosecution Service is the Government department responsible for prosecuting criminal cases investigated by the Police in England and Wales. As the principal prosecuting authority in England and Wales, the Crown Prosecution Service is responsible for advising the Police on cases for possible prosecution, reviewing cases submitted by the Police, deciding any charges in all but the most minor cases (in these cases, the Police themselves can decide on what charge is to be preferred). The Crown Prosecution Service prepares cases for Court and presents cases at Court also. The Crown Prosecution Service is independent of the Police. They are not obliged to follow the Police s own observations or opinions. The Parties Involved The Crown Prosecution Service will handle the prosecution and will prosecute a Defendant. The Defendant in road traffic collisions will usually be the driver of the vehicle involved. Whilst the vast majority of prosecutions are undertaken this way, there is still the right for a private individual to commence a criminal prosecution. There is an evidential burden which remains on the private individual who would have to satisfy the Magistrates Court that there is a prima facie case for a defendant to answer before a proper prosecution would be allowed to proceed. This evidential burden, coupled with the fact that there is no legal aid available means that usually the cost of such legal representation and thus the private prosecution is beyond the means of most people. The Crown Prosecution Service is normally quite approachable, particularly if you approach them with your lawyer. Meetings can be arranged to explain why actions are being taken and most Crown Prosecution Service lawyers are happy to discuss the case with you. We would always recommend using this opportunity to meet the Crown Prosecution lawyers since it provides an insight into the procedure and the approach of the Prosecution Service. 3

Burden & Standard of Proof The first stage in the process is the decision to prosecute. The Prosecution Service has to be satisfied that there is enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction against the Defendant. They have to consider whether evidence is reliable and safe, and they also have to consider what the Defendant s case may be to answer the prosecution. It is an objective test. There is a subtle but important difference in the evidential test which the Crown Prosecution applies before a prosecution will be undertaken ( a realistic prospect of conviction ) and the formal criminal law standard of proof which is that a person must be convicted only if a Jury or a Magistrate s Court is satisfied beyond all reasonable doubt of a Defendant s guilt. If the Crown Prosecution Service is not satisfied that the case would not pass that evidential test, it would not proceed. Once the Crown Prosecution Service is satisfied that the evidential test is passed, then they have to decide whether a prosecution is needed in the public interest. They balance factors for and against prosecution. The code for the Crown Prosecutors is available to view at www.cps.gov.uk/publications/code_for_crown _prosecutors/index.html The burden of proof in the Criminal Courts remains on the prosecution in nearly all cases. Only in very rare circumstances does the burden shift to the Defendant. As explained above, the standard of proof is that the prosecution has to prove its case beyond all reasonable doubt. In simple terms, therefore, if a Defendant can demonstrate an element of doubt or fallibility in the Prosecution s case, then the Defendant is entitled to be acquitted. Common Offences The main Act which governs criminal driving offences is the Road Traffic Act 1988. You will hear the Crown Prosecution Lawyers and Police Officers talking about various sections of this act, including Section 1, Causing Death by Dangerous Driving; Section 2, Dangerous Driving; Section 3, Careless or Inconsiderate Driving; Section 3A, Causing Death by Careless Driving whilst under the influence of Drink or Drugs. The offence of causing death by dangerous driving carries a maximum 14 years in prison. The meaning of dangerous driving which applies to both Sections 1 and 2 of the Road Traffic Act (as amended by the Road Traffic Act 1991) means that a person is to be regarded as driving dangerously if the way that person drives falls far below what would have been expected of a competent and careful driver and that it would be obvious to a competent and careful driver that driving in that way would be dangerous. The meaning of dangerous driving also extends to the situation where it would be obvious to a competent and careful driver that driving that vehicle in its current state would be dangerous too. Careless driving involves a person driving a vehicle without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration. The Road Safety Act 2006 introduced new offences of causing death by careless driving and causing death by driving whilst unlicensed, uninsured or disqualified. They came into force in August 2008. Now, causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving (a new Section 2 B was inserted into the Road Traffic Act 1988) permits a maximum sentence of 5 years imprisonment if the matter is dealt with at the Crown Court or 12 months maximum if the matter is dealt with in the Magistrates Court. 4

Section 21 of the Road Safety Act 2006 Section 21 of the Road Safety Act 2006 introduces a new charge into the Road Traffic Act 1988 of causing death by driving whilst unlicensed, disqualified or uninsured. Maximum sentence is 2 years in the Crown Court or 12 months in the Magistrates Court. Procedure All criminal offences in England and Wales must start in the Magistrates Court that is local to the place where the incident occurred, in other words, it matters not where the deceased or the injured person lived, nor where the Defendant lives, but where the incident occurred. Some criminal driving offences are called indictable only. This means that they must be heard at a Crown Court before a Crown Court Judge who passes sentence. If a trial occurs in the Crown Court it occurs before a Jury who decide guilt, not the Judge. The case goes before a Jury only if a person is pleading not guilty to an offence. If a person pleads guilty to an indictable only offence, then he or she receives their sentence from a Crown Court Judge. Whereas indictable only offences have to be heard in the Crown Court, a lower Court (the Magistrates Court) can hear offences which are summary only offences (careless driving) or offences which are either way, that is, they can be tried and heard either in the Magistrates Court or the Crown Court. Causing death by dangerous driving is indictable only, and all the other offences mentioned above are either way offences, save for careless driving which is summary only and therefore can only be dealt with by the Magistrates Court. The Magistrates Court, when dealing with an either way offence, may decide that its powers of punishment are too low and they will then send the Defendant to the Crown Court so that a greater sentence can be passed than they otherwise would have been able to pass. Magistrates Court & the Crown Court The Magistrates Court normally comprises of three lay Magistrates who are not legally trained and who receive assistance in legal technical points by a Court Official known as a legal adviser. A Magistrate (Justice of the Peace) receives some training and will be given sentencing guidelines so that he or she has an idea of the standard tariff for any individual offence. It is a quirk of the English Legal System that there are sometimes differing approaches in differing areas, so that certain Magistrates Courts would appear to be more severe than others who would be regarded as more lenient. In some larger Magistrates Courts, there are District Judges who are professional Judges, Senior Criminal Solicitors or Barristers who are paid a salary and who sit as a Judge determining Magistrates Court criminal matters. The Crown Courts are presided over by Crown Court Judges who are usually senior Barristers or senior Solicitors and who have specialised in criminal law for many years. They have access to tariff guidelines and because of the severity of the charges which the Defendants face in the Crown Court, it is much more customary for a custodial sentence to be handed down by Crown Court Judges by lay Magistrates. Whilst a Judge deals with the sentencing of an individual, an individual of course is only sentenced once he or she is found guilty. That role of determining guilt is left to the Jury which consists of 12 individuals, each of whom is selected at random for Jury Service. A Jury can make no recommendation about sentence to the Judge; their role is simply the determination of guilt. 5

Sentences Section 1 offences carry a maximum of 14 years imprisonment and a minimum of 2 years disqualification from driving, the requirement to sit a test before any new driving licence is granted after disqualification and an unlimited fine. A dangerous driving offence carries a maximum of 2 years imprisonment if dealt with by the Crown Court and a maximum of 6 months imprisonment if dealt with by the Magistrates Court. There is a mandatory disqualification and the requirement for a re-test. There is also an unlimited fine in the Crown Court and a maximum fine of 5,000.00 in the Magistrates Court. Causing death by careless driving whilst under the influence of drink or drugs (Section 3A of the Road Traffic Act) is indictable only and carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment and disqualification for 2 years followed by an extended re-test. Section 2B of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving) is an either way offence and carries a maximum of 5 years imprisonment in the Crown Court or 12 months in the Magistrates Court. There is a 12 month minimum disqualification. Causing death by driving unlicensed, uninsured or disqualified is an either way offence. In the Crown Court it carries a maximum sentence of 2 years and in the Magistrates Court a 6 month prison sentence. Disqualification is for a minimum of 12 months. Careless driving under Section 3 of the Road Traffic Act is a summary only matter and can therefore only be tried in the Magistrates Court. The offence is not imprisonable and disqualification is only discretionary. Appeals If the Defendant is unhappy about a decision the Magistrate s Court has made, then subject to legal tests being satisfied, an Appeal can be made. From the Magistrates Court, an Appeal could be made to the Crown Court by the Defendant where a Crown Court Judge sits usually with two Magistrates and determines the Appeal jointly with them. If the Defence is unhappy about a Crown Court decision, then an Appeal can be made, subject again to legal tests, to the Court of Criminal Appeals sitting in London. The Appeal is initially normally dealt with on paper, but occasionally requires a hearing. The right for the Crown Prosecution to Appeal in relation to a conviction or sentence is more limited than that available to a Defendant. Time Limits All summary only offences, for example, some Section 3 or simple speeding offences, must be charged in a Magistrates Court within a 6 month period of the incident which is the subject of the complaint. Once this 6 months period has lapsed, no summary offence can be charged. On the other hand, indictable only offences have no such time limit. 6

If you have any questions about the contents of this book please call our help line 0845 1235542 7

Our help line is staffed all day every day. Please call if you think we may be able to help, or if you would just like someone to talk to. 0845 1235542 Calls are charged at local rates This information booklet has been written by Andrew Greenwood solicitor at Emsleys for SCARD. Other information booklets produced by SCARD include: No.2 Civil Law - Compensating the Victims of Death & Injury No.3 Inquests & Coroner s Courts These titles are available from the address below. SCARD, PO Box 62, Brighouse, HD6 3YY www.scard.org.uk email: info@scard.org.uk Office phone 0845 1235541/3 Office fax 0845 1235541/3 Registered Charity 1081572