Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

Similar documents
JOINT RULE 16(b)/26(f) REPORT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant/s.

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s), vs. Case No: 6:07-CV-6149-HO. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Civil No. 1:13-CV-1211 vs. GLS/TWD Andrew Cuomo, et al.

Case 9:01-cv MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 460 Filed: 09/25/15 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15864

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

Case 2:18-cv KOB Document 49 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 7

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Los Angeles Superior Court Limited Jurisdiction Department 77

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

ONONDAGA COUNTY JUSTICES AND LOCAL RULES

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION DIVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT. 16 AMERICA UNITES FOR KIDS, et al., CASE NO. 2:15-cv PA-AJW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:10 cv 00071

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Honorable R. Stanton Wettick, Jr. COMPLEX CASES. See Local Rule 249(1).

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed.

Case 1:13-cv WYD-MEH Document 28 Filed 02/20/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

Case 5:16-cv CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

STANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

JURISDICTION AND LOCAL RULES. Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. 28 U.S.C.A This is called federal

PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIALS)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT-LAW DIVISION COMMERCIAL CALENDAR V Judge Joan E. Powell

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES. Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective November 17, 2010)

Judge Mary L. Mikva CALENDAR 6 - ROOM 2508 Telephone: 312/ Fax: 312/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : :

CALENDAR Q. JUDGE PATRICK J. SHERLOCK 2007 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS fax

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 5:5. PRETRIAL PROCEDURES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO CERTAIN JUDGMENTS

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

Mastering Civil Procedure Checklist

George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. Classroom 329 SYLLABUS

Case: 2:15-cv MHW-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 143

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective February 8, 2013)

CIVIL DIVISION I PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012)

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS

ADAMS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BUSINESS OF COURTS

Case 2:18-cv PSG-FFM Document 24 Filed 10/11/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:219. Deadline

Guidelines & Procedures Orange Civil- Division 33

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. No. CV JH/DJS NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s) vs. Case No: 3:09-CV-642-HU. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. MDL No SCHEDULING ORDER NO. 2

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

THERE ARE NO SUBMITTED MOTIONS IN THIS PART AND ALL MOTIONS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, MUST BE ORALLY ARGUED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHELLE FLANAGAN, et al.,, vs. KAMALA HARRIS, et al.,. Case No.: LA CV-0 JAK (ASx ORDER SETTING RULE (b/(f SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Date: February, 0 Time: :0 AM Report Due: February, 0 0 This case has been assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt. This Order applies to all parties in this action, whether or not they are represented by counsel. Counsel, as used in this Order, also refers to parties who are representing themselves. If plaintiff has not already served the complaint (or any amendment thereto on each defendant, plaintiff shall promptly do so and shall file proofs of service within three ( days thereafter. also shall timely serve and file their responsive pleadings and file proofs of service within three ( days thereafter. This matter is set for a scheduling conference on the above date. The conference will be held pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. and Fed. R. Civ. P. (a. The parties are reminded of their obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P. (a to disclose information (without awaiting a discovery request and under Rule (f to confer on a discovery plan not later than twenty-one ( days

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 prior to the scheduling conference and to file a report with the Court entitled Joint Rule (b/(f Report not later than ten ( calendar days before the date set for the scheduling conference. Please comply with these requirements; it will simplify the Scheduling Conference. The Court encourages counsel to begin to conduct discovery actively before the Scheduling Conference. The Court encourages prompt, early discovery because at the Scheduling Conference the Court will set firm deadlines to complete discovery. The parties shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of Fed. R. Civ. P. (a and thereby obtain and produce most of what would be produced in the early stage of discovery. Discovery is not stayed prior to the Scheduling Conference or after dates have been set unless otherwise ordered by the Court.. Joint Rule (b/(f Report The Joint Rule (b/(f Report, which shall be filed not later than ten ( calendar days before the scheduling conference, shall be drafted by plaintiff s counsel (unless the parties agree otherwise or unless plaintiff is self-represented, in which case defendant s counsel, but shall be submitted and signed jointly. Jointly contemplates a single report, regardless of how many separately-represented parties there are. The Joint Rule (b/(f Report shall report on all matters enumerated below, which include those required to be discussed by Rule (f and Local Rule. The Joint Rule (b/(f Report should set forth the following information under section headings corresponding to those in this Order: a. Statement of the Case: A short synopsis (not to exceed two ( pages of the main claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses. b. Subject Matter Jurisdiction: A statement of the specific basis of federal jurisdiction, including supplemental jurisdiction. c. Legal Issues: A brief description of the key legal issues, including any unusual substantive, procedural or evidentiary issues.

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 d. Parties, and Non-Party Witnesses: A list of parties and percipient witnesses on the main issues in the case. For conflict purposes, corporate parties must identify all subsidiaries, parents and affiliates. e. Damages: The realistic range of provable damages. f. Insurance: Whether there is insurance coverage. g. Motions: A statement of the likelihood of motions seeking to add other parties or claims, file amended pleadings or transfer venue. h. Manual for Complex Litigation: Whether all or part of the procedures of the Manual for Complex Litigation should be utilized. i. Status of Discovery: A discussion of the present state of discovery, including a summary of completed discovery. j. Discovery Plan: A detailed discovery plan, as contemplated by Rule (f, including the identity of all anticipated deponents and dates by which their depositions are to be completed (if possible, anticipated written discovery requests, including requests for admission, document requests, and interrogatories, and a schedule for completion of all discovery. State what, if any, changes in the disclosures under Rule (a should be made, the subjects on which discovery may be needed and whether discovery should be conducted in phases or limited in some manner, whether applicable limitations should be changed or other limitations imposed, and whether the Court should enter other orders. Please note that a statement to the effect that discovery will be conducted as to all claims and defenses, will not satisfy this requirement. k. Discovery Cut-Off: A proposed discovery cut-off date. This means the final day for completion of non-expert discovery, including resolution of all discovery motions. The last day to hear discovery motions shall be the same as the last day to hear all motions. See Exh. C-. l. Expert Discovery: Proposed dates for expert witness disclosures (initial and rebuttal and expert discovery cut-off under Rule (a(.

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 m. Dispositive Motions: A description of the issues or claims that any party believes may be determined by motion for summary judgment or motion in limine. n. Settlement: A statement of what settlement discussions or written communications have occurred (excluding any disclosure or discussion of the substantive matters or terms discussed and a statement pursuant to Local Rule -. about selecting a settlement mechanism under that Rule. In light of the Court s participation in the ADR Program, no case will proceed to trial unless all parties with full authority to settle the case including, as to each corporate party, an officer who has such authority have appeared personally at a settlement conference. The Court will discuss the proposed ADR procedure with the parties at the time of the Scheduling Conference and will issue the ADR- order once the settlement method is selected. For information about the Court s ADR Program, review General Order -, which is located on the ADR page of the Court s website. o. Trial Estimate: A realistic estimate of the time required for trial and whether trial will be by jury or by the Court. Each side should specify (by number, not by name how many witnesses it contemplates calling. If the time estimate for trial given in the Joint Rule (f Report exceeds five ( court days, counsel shall be prepared to discuss in detail the estimate. p. Trial Counsel: The name(s of the attorney(s who will try the case, including those who will be lead trial counsel. q. Independent Expert or Master: Whether this is a case in which the Court should consider appointing a Master pursuant to Rule or an independent scientific expert. r. Timetable: Please complete the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates form attached as Exhibit A to this Order (Exhibit C- and attach it to the Joint Rule (b/(f Report. The entries in the Weeks Before Trial column reflect what the Court believes are appropriate for most cases and will allow the Court to rule on potentially dispositive motions sufficiently far in advance of the pretrial conference. The form is designed to enable counsel to ask the Court to

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 set different last dates by which the key requirements must be completed. Each side should fill in the month, day and year it requests for each event. E.g., for the expert discovery cut-off it might be // for plaintiff and // for defendant, if they cannot agree. Each entry proposing a Court date shall be on a Monday, except the trial date, which will be a Tuesday. Counsel should ensure that requested dates do not fall on a court holiday. At the conference, the Court will review this form with counsel in determining the dates that will be set in the case. The cut-off date for motions is the last date on which motions may be heard, not filed. The Court is not likely to continue this date, and will not do so unless the trial date is also continued. Counsel shall refer to the Court s Order on Court/Jury Trial. See Exh. D. This Order will set forth all pre-trial and trial obligations of counsel, and, where applicable, the deadlines for each. s. Other Issues: A statement of any other issues affecting the status or management of the case (e.g., unusually complicated technical or technological issues, disputes over protective orders, extraordinarily voluminous document production, non-english speaking witnesses, ADArelated issues, discovery in foreign jurisdictions and any proposals concerning severance, bifurcation or other ordering of proof. t. Patent Cases: Propose dates and methodology for claim construction and Markman hearings. See also Exh. B. u. Whether the Parties Wish to Have a Magistrate Judge Preside: Under U.S.C., the parties may consent to have a Magistrate Judge preside over an entire action, not just discovery. See General Order -0 and General Order -0. The parties may select a Magistrate Judge from the Voluntary Consent List and comply with the requirements outlined in General Order -0 and General Order -0 and those outlined on the Court s website: http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/judges-requirements/court-programs/voluntary-consent-list-civilcases-magistrate-judges-program.

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0. Scheduling Conference The Scheduling Conference will be held in Courtroom 0 of the Roybal Federal Courthouse at East Temple Street. Counsel shall comply with the following with respect to the Scheduling Conference: a. Participation: The lead trial attorney for each party shall attend the Scheduling Conference unless such counsel is engaged in trial, or has good cause following a request to the Clerk by either telephone or email in advance of the Scheduling Conference. b. Continuance: A continuance of the Scheduling Conference will be granted only for good cause, following a written request with a proposed order to be e-filed at least one ( week in advance of the Scheduling Conference. c. Use of Conference Telephone: In general, the Court prefers in-person appearances. However, if one or more of the lead counsel has his or her office outside of Los Angeles County, or under other appropriate circumstances, the Court may, upon the request of one or more counsel, conduct the status conference by conference telephone call. Any request for a telephonic appearance must be made at least two ( court days before the scheduled hearing by contacting the Courtroom Deputy Clerk for further instructions. The Court does not entertain a telephonic appearance if the Scheduling Conference is set at the same date and time as a motion unless it is an exceptional and unanticipated circumstance. Any request for a telephonic appearance at a motion hearing must be made in writing and e-filed at least seven ( calendar days before the scheduled hearing and shall include a declaration from counsel setting forth the basis for the request with a proposed order. The Court does not use Court Call. If the request is granted, the order will include the information for the call. Please note that cell phones or the use of speaker phones are not permitted for any telephonic appearance.

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:. Protective Orders If you seek a protective order, please use your best efforts to propose it to opposing counsel before the Scheduling Conference. Protective orders are considered discovery and shall be prepared and submitted to the assigned Magistrate Judge.. Notice to be Provided by Counsel Plaintiff s counsel or, if plaintiff is self-represented, defendant s counsel, shall serve this Order on any parties who first appear after the date of this Order and to parties who are known to exist but have not yet entered appearances.. Disclosures to Clients Counsel are ordered to deliver to their respective clients a copy of this Order and of the Court s Scheduling and Case Management Order, which will set forth the schedule that the Court establishes at the Scheduling Conference. 0 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October, 0 JOHN A. KRONSTADT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: EXHIBIT C- EXHIBIT A TO ORDER SETTING RULE (b/(f SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES FOR:. CIVIL CASES. PATENT CASES. ERISA CASES 0

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: EXHIBIT A - SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES FOR CIVIL CASES Case No.: Case Name: Hearings: Jury Trial Court Trial (Tuesday at :00 a.m. Duration Estimate: Days Weeks Final Pretrial Conference ( FPTC & Status Conference re Disputed Exhibits: (Monday at :00 p.m.: Two weeks before the trial Deadlines for Bench Trials Only: Anticipated Ruling to be Issued by Court Weeks Before FPTC Same date Last Date to File Objections to Direct Testimony Declarations 0 Last Date to File Direct Testimony Declarations Proposed Motion Practice for Motions for Summary Judgment & Motions for Class Certification: Hearing on Motion Reply to Motion Weeks Before FPTC Response to Motion Last day to File Motion

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: Deadlines: Weeks Before FPTC Anticipated Ruling on All Motions Last Date to Hear Motions (including discovery motions Last Date to File Motions (including discovery motions 0 Expert Discovery Cut-Off 0 Expert Disclosure (Rebuttal Expert Disclosure (Initial Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off Last Date to Add Parties/Amend Pleadings Settlement Procedure Selection: (ADR- Form will be completed by Court after scheduling conference 0. Magistrate Judge. Attorney Settlement Officer Panel. Outside ADR/Non-Judicial (Private Last day to conduct settlement conference/mediation Notice of Settlement / Joint Report re Settlement ( days before PMSC Post Mediation Status Conference: (Monday at :0 pm: days after the last day to conduct settlement

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:00 EXHIBIT A - SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES FOR PATENT CASES Case No.: Case Name: Hearings: Jury Trial Court Trial (Tuesday at :00 a.m. Duration Estimate: Days Weeks Final Pretrial Conference ( FPTC & Status Conference re Disputed Exhibits: (Monday at :00 p.m.: Two weeks before the trial Deadlines for Bench Trials Only: Anticipated Ruling to be Issued by Court Weeks Before FPTC Same date 0 Last Date to File Objections to Direct Testimony Declarations Last Date to File Direct Testimony Declarations Deadlines: Infringement Contentions (S.P.R..,. Early Meeting of the Parties, Initial Disclosures (S.P.R.. Weeks After Listed Event (After Order Setting Scheduling Conference (After Order Setting Scheduling Conference Joint Rule (f Report (S.P.R.. (After Order Setting Scheduling Conference

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 Scheduling Conference (S.P.R.. Invalidity Contentions (S.P.R..,. Exchange of Claim Terms (S.P.R.. Exchange Proposed Constructions and Evidence (S.P.R.. Complete Claim Construction Discovery (S.P.R.. Joint Markman Prehearing Statement (S.P.R.. Simultaneous Opening Markman Briefs (S.P.R.. Simultaneously Responding Markman Briefs, Tutorials, and Presentation Materials (S.P.R.. Markman Hearing (S.P.R.. Markman Decision Patentee Files Final Infringement Contentions, Expert Reports on issues Where Patentee has Burden of Proof, All Parties File Advice of Counsel Disclosures (S.P.R..,. Accused Infringer Files Final Invalidity Contentions, Rebuttal Expert Reports, and Opening Expert Reports Where Accused Infringer has Burden of Proof (S.P.R.. [set by Court] (After Scheduling Conference (After Scheduling Conference (After Scheduling Conference (After Scheduling Conference (After Scheduling Conference (After Scheduling Conference (After Scheduling Conference (After Scheduling Conference [set by Court] (After Markman Decision (After Markman Decision

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 Patentee s Rebuttal Expert Reports on Issues Where Accused Infringer has Burden of Proof (S.P.R.. Discovery Cut-Off (S.P.R.. Last Date to File Dispositive Motions (S.P.R.. (After Markman Decision (After Markman Decision 0 (After Markman Decision Last Date to Hear Motions (not file (After Markman Decision Last Date to Add Parties/Amend Pleadings Settlement Procedure Selection: (ADR- Form will be completed by Court after scheduling conference. Magistrate Judge. Attorney Settlement Officer Panel. Outside ADR/Non-Judicial (Private Last day to conduct settlement conference/mediation 0 Notice of Settlement / Joint Report re Settlement ( days before PMSC Post Mediation Status Conference: (Monday at :0 pm: days after the last day to conduct settlement

Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 EXHIBIT A - SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES FOR ERISA CASES Case No.: Case Name: Hearings: Court Trial/Hearing on Administrative Record: (Tuesday at :00 a.m. Duration Estimate: Days / Weeks Final Pretrial Conference: (Monday at :00 p.m. (Two weeks before the trial Simultaneous Responsive Briefs Simultaneous Opening Briefs Last Date to Add Parties/Amend Pleadings Settlement Procedure Selection: (ADR- Form will be completed by Court after scheduling conference. Magistrate Judge. Attorney Settlement Officer Panel. Outside ADR/Non-Judicial (Private 0 Last day to conduct settlement conference/mediation Notice of Settlement / Joint Report re Settlement ( days before PMSC Post Mediation Status Conference: (Monday at :0 pm ( days after the last day to conduct settlement