PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE REPORT (Criminal Code, s )

Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (ONTARIO) PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE REPORT

Form 23 PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE REPORT FOR CROWN APPLICATIONS

CRIMINAL RULES OF THE ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE RULE 1 GENERAL. (2) Dealing with proceedings justly and efficiently includes

York Regional Police. Rules for Discipline Hearings under Part V the Police Services Act

Table of Contents. Table of Cases... TC-1 Introduction...INT-1 CHAPTER 1

Criminal Law Table of Contents

NOVA SCOTIA PROVINCIAL COURT RULES

PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA

15A-903. Disclosure of evidence by the State Information subject to disclosure. (a) Upon motion of the defendant, the court must order:

PRACTICE CHECKLISTS MANUAL

Criminal Procedure Act 2009

Bill C-2: Highlights and Issues

Defenses for the Accused. Chapter 10

Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses Adult VUL 1 CHA 1 DIR 1. March 1, Principle

Table of Contents. Dedication... iii Preface... v Table of Cases... xv. A. General Principles... 1

Date (yyyy-mm-dd) PART 2 TRIAL SCHEDULING ENDORSEMENT FORM

Index. All references are to page numbers. assault de minimis non curat lex defence, 32 police officer, on a, 7

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

2 [4] And further that Angelica Cechirc, Alexander Verbon, and Pavel Muzhikov and Stanislav Kavalenka, between October the 28 th, 2003, and March the

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Table of Contents. CON-1 (Mental Disorder) (2013-3)

BY-LAW NO. 44 ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS - RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.

Index. Current to Release accused subject to a hospital detention

Mid case management eligibility criteria. Mid case management budget. CM authorizations hours: Factors to be considered

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS INDEX

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF REGISTERED PSYCHOTHERAPISTS AND REGISTERED MENTAL HEALTH THERAPISTS OF ONTARIO INDEX

PUBLIC INFORMATION FUNCTION

SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR. PRACTICE DIRECTIVE P.D. (Crim.) No

Criminal Procedure Amendment (Mandatory Pre-trial Defence Disclosure) Act 2013 No 10

Criminal Procedure Amendment (Domestic Violence Complainants) Act 2014 No 83

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THECOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO INDEX

National Legal Framework- Albania

IC Chapter 5. Search and Seizure

PORTAGE la PRAIRIE RESOLUTION DOCKET PROTOCOL ADULT CHARGES

Administrative Appeal Procedures. Effective July 1, 2015

Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial

DEFENDING DRINKING AND DRIVING CASES

CRIMINAL LAW PROFESSIONAL STANDARD #2

NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES BENCHBOOK VOIR DIRE ON PRETRIAL AND IN-COURT IDENTIFICATION

Rule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL Introduction Definitions General Principles

Regulations of the Court

ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION

ARBITRATION RULES OF PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS... 4

F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant.

PROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Longaphy, 2017 NSPC 67. v. Christopher Longaphy. Section 11(B) Charter - Decision - Unreasonable Delay

Between Regina, and Uyen Bao Luu and Sarilynn Meiyung Chan. [2002] B.C.J. No BCPC 67. Burnaby Registry No

Impeachment in Louisiana State Courts:

PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS

PRELIMINARY INQUIRIES

INDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources...

Introduction to Wiretap Law

The Correctional Services Administration, Discipline and Security Regulations, 2003

TurboLaw Software. Massachusetts Criminal Law Document Library. (800) AFFIDAVITS AGREEMENTS CORRESPONDENCE

CITY OF BELLINGHAM HEARING EXAMINER RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

NEW YORK STATE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL TOURNAMENT RULES

This Bill would amend the Magistrate s Courts Act, Cap. 116A to (a)

ISSUES. Saskatoon Criminal Defence Lawyers Association December 1, Fall Seminar, 1998: Bail Hearings and Sentencing. Prepared by: Andrew Mason

Number 14 of Criminal Justice Act 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

IC Chapter 5. Search and Seizure

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS

LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Canadian Criminal Law and Impaired Driving

PRE-TRIAL COORDINATION PROTOCOL ADULT CHARGES

September 1, 2015 Le 1 er septembre 2015 DISCLOSURE

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 505

Legal Studies. Total marks 100. Section I Pages marks Attempt Questions 1 20 Allow about 30 minutes for this section. Section II Pages 9 21

acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

1. The location or site where a criminal offence has taken place is called a(n)?

PROCEDURE Simple Cautions. Number: F 0102 Date Published: 9 September 2015

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:13. DEPOSITIONS; DISCOVERY

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Codeluppi, Slip Opinion No Ohio-1574.

Crimes (Sexual Offences) Act 1991

American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary

THE HONORABLE MEL DICKSTEIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT PRACTICE POINTERS & PREFERENCES

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

Number 27 of 2010 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. PART 1 Preliminary and General. PART 2 Impact of Crime on Victim

Criminal Pre-Trial Conference Pilot Project Evaluation Report

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Civil No. 1:13-CV-1211 vs. GLS/TWD Andrew Cuomo, et al.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON C ATLANTA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF GEORGIA * * * JUDGE SHAWN ELLEN LaGRUA

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...17 FORWARD...23

ACPO Position Statement: Necessity to Arrest

Criminal Procedure Further Amendment (Evidence) Act 2005 No 25

Vermont Bar Association Seminar Materials. 62nd Mid-Year Meeting. Criminal Law 101

CHAPTER 3.04 SAINT LUCIA. Revised Edition Showing the law as at 31 December 2008

Section 1: Statement of Purpose Section 2: Voluntary Discovery Section 3: Discovery by Order of the Court... 2

PROVINCIAL OFFENCES PROCEDURE ACT

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE & FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE

Written Submissions to the Standing Committee on Human Rights Dated September 1, 2018

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON

UNDCP MODEL FOREIGN EVIDENCE BILL,2000

Getting it Right First Time Case Ownership Duty of Direct Engagement Consistent judicial case management

Transcription:

Page 1 of 17 NOTE: PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE REPORT (Criminal Code, s. 625.1) 1. This form must be completed in full in all cases, and signed by the assigned counsel, or a counsel authorized to bind the, and by counsel of record for each accused person, before the first judicial pre-trial conference, unless otherwise ordered. 2. and defence counsel are encouraged to discuss the issues to be addressed at the pre-hearing conference in advance of the conference. 3. Counsel must provide their position on each issue, and not indicate they will advise, or not as yet, etc. 4. must complete this form and fax or deliver it to defence counsel of record. counsel must fax or deliver their report to the Attorney, regardless of whether the has filed a form. In cases where the has not filed the form, or has filed it late, defence counsel should complete the form to the extent possible. Report, prepared by: Report, prepared by:

Page 2 of 17 (Counsel for: if multiple accused.) Have counsel discussed the issues raised in this form after the committal for trial? Charges: 1. Chronology: a. Date(s) of Offence(s): b. Date Charged: 2. For of Judicial Interim Release a. Is the accused detained in custody on this/these charges? b. Was bail applied for and denied? c. Is the accused detained in custody on any other charges? 3. Disclosure: Complete a. Outstanding issues b. Lost/destroyed: c. Withheld/delayed: 4. Pre-Trial Motions a. Quash comittal for trial b. Quash indictment c. Quash a count(s) in indictment: i. Relying on s. 581(1) ii. Relying on s. 581(3)

Page 3 of 17 d. Sever count(s) in indictment e. Sever accused f. Particulars g. Amendment(s) pre-trial motions 5. Statements of the Accused a. Is the seeking to obtain rulings as to the admissibility of Statements to Persons in Authority? b. Is the seeking to introduce the statement? Yes c. Is the seeking only a ruling as to admissibility? d. Does the defence dispute admissibility? e. Form of statement: Oral Written Audiotaped Videotaped f. If the statement is audio or video taped, is there a transcript? g. If no transcript is available, will the provide one in advance of trial? h. Date to be made available? i. Length of statement(s) j. Voir dire required? k. Voir dire issues: i. Recipient as a person in authority ii. Voluntariness iii. S. 10(a) iv. S. 10(b) v. S. 7 Yes

Page 4 of 17 l. Number of witnesses to be called on voir dire: m. Time estimate for voir dire: n. If there is more than one issue, do counsel agree that a blended voir dire is appropriate? 6. Other Disreputable Conduct, including Similar Fact a. Is the seeking to introduce prior disreputable conduct evidence, relying on incidents not covered by the indictment? b. Nature of : c. Does the seek to have admissibility determined in pre-trial motion? d. If the does not seek to obtain a ruling before trial starts, when does the wish to have the voir dire? e. Does the defence dispute admissibility? f. How does the seek to introduce the evidence on the voir dire? i. Viva Voce evidence ii. Agreed Statement of facts iii. Witness Statements iv. Transcripts g. Does the defence consent to the manner in which the seeks to introduce the evidence on the voir dire? h. Comment:

Page 5 of 17 i. Time estimate for voir dire j. Is the seeking to rely on disreputable conduct evidence, relying only on the counts in the indictment? 7. Principled Exception to the Hearsay Rule a. Does the seek to introduce any evidence relying upon the principled exception to the hearsay rule? b. If so, what is the nature of the evidence? c. Does the defence contest admissibility? d. If yes, does the defence contest: necessity Reliability Prejudicial effect/probative value e. How does the propose to introduce the evidence on the voir dire? i. Viva Voce evidence ii. Agreed Statement of facts iii. Witness Statements iv. Transcripts f. Does the defence consent to the manner in which the seeks to introduce the evidence on the voir dire? g. Comment: h. Time estimate for voir dire?

Page 6 of 17 8. After the Fact Conduct a. Will the be seeking to tender any evidence of after the fact conduct by the accused? b. If so, what is the nature of the evidence? c. Does the defence contest admissibility? d. How does the propose to introduce the evidence on the voir dire? i. Viva Voce evidence ii. Agreed Statement of facts iii. Witness Statements iv. Transcripts e. Does the defence consent to the manner in which the seeks to introduce the evidence on the voir dire? f. Comment: g. Time estimate for voir dire: 9. Intercepted Private Communications a. Does the seek to introduce wiretap evidence? b. Brief overview of evidence c. Does the defence require a voir dire to determine admissibility? d. Brief overview of defence position: e. Authorization: consent, s. 184.2 Authorization s. 186 f. Other g. Issue to be litigated: facial validity Sub-facial validity

Page 7 of 17 h. Other: i. Time estimate for voir dire: 10. Other legal issues requiring rulings Counsel anticipates will arise: a. b. Time estimate for voir dire: 11. Competency of Witnesses a. Does the /defence intend to call any witness who is under the age of 14? b. Does the /defence intend to challenge the capacity of any witness on the basis of mental capacity? c. Name of witness, and basis of challenge: 12. Manner in which evidence is to be introduced a. Does the or defence seek to have any witness s evidence introduced: i. By video link, pursuant to s. 714.1? ii. By reading in evidence previously taken pursuant to s. 715? iii. By videotaped evidence, pursuant to s. 715.1? iv. By videotaped evidence, pursuant to s. 715.2? v. Other means? Details

Page 8 of 17 b. Does the opposing party consent to the admissibility of the evidence in the manner proposed? c. If opposed, estimated time for: 13. Testimonial Aids a. Will the apply to have a witness testify with a support person, pursuant to s. 486.1(1)? Details: b. Will the apply to have a witness testify with a support person, pursuant to s. 486.1(2)? Details: c. Does the defence oppose the order? d. Will the apply to have a witness testify with a screen or from outside the courtroom, pursuant to s. 486.2? Details: e. Does the defence oppose the order? 14. Exclusion of Public/Publication Bans/Deferred Publication Orders a. Will the apply to have the public excluded or to have a witness identity shielded from the public for all or part of the proceeding, pursuant to s. 486? b. Does the defence oppose the order?

Page 9 of 17 c. Does the seek an order pursuant to ss. 486.31, 486.4 or 486.5 banning the publication of the complainant s identity? d. Does the defence oppose the order? e. If opposed, estimated time for: f. Does either party seek other publication bans or deferred publication orders? g. If yes, provide details of order sought, media to be notified, timing of hearing, time estimate for hearing: h. Does the other party oppose the application? i. If opposed, provide time estimate for evidence and separate time estimate for argument: 15. Privilege Issues a. Will the be raising issues of privilege? b. Will the defence be raising issues of privilege? c. If yes, please specify the nature of evidence and issue of privilege. d. Basis upon which the party seeking admission rely: e. How does the party claiming privilege seek to introduce the evidence on the voir dire?

Page 10 of 17 i. Viva Voce evidence ii. Agreed Statement of facts iii. Witness Statements iv. Transcripts f. Does the other party consent to the manner in which the evidence will be introduced on the voir dire? g. Comment: h. Time estimate for voir dire: 16. Application to Stay Proceeding based upon: a. Abuse of Process b. Contravention of Charter section: s. 7 c. S. 11(b) d. Other e. Estimate time for voir dire (evidence and argument) 17. Applications to Exclude based upon s. 24(2) alleging breaches of: a. S. 7 S. 8 warrantless search search warrant Order authorization Issue: facial validity Sub-facial validity execution other s. 9 s. 10(a) s. 10(b) other

Page 11 of 17 b. sought to be excluded: c. Nature of breach: d. Time estimate for voir dire: 18. Third Party Records Applications a. Relying upon: Mills, s. 278.2 b. Nature of Records: c. Time estimate for voir dire: O Connor d. How long prior to trial does the applicant propose the motion be heard? 19. of the Complainant s Prior Sexual Activity s. 276 a. Nature of : b. Manner in which defence seeks to establish evidentiary basis on application: c. Time estimate for voir dire: 20. of Other Suspects

Page 12 of 17 a. Nature of : b. How does defence propose to introduce evidence on voir dire? i. Viva Voce evidence ii. Agreed Statement of facts iii. Witness Statements iv. Other c. Does the oppose admissibility? d. Time estimate for voir dire: 21. Character of Victim a. Nature of : b. Time estimate for voir dire: 22. Other Legal Issues defence counsel anticipate will arise at trial (e.g. Corbett application) a. Time estimate for voir dire: 23. Expert witnesses

Page 13 of 17 24. Witnesses a. Does the intend to call expert witnesses? b. Field(s) of expertise: c. Issues upon which the evidence will be introduced: d. Does the defence contest the admissibility of the expert evidence? e. Basis upon which admissibility of evidence contested: i. Witness is not an expert ii. Area of expertise requires a voir dire iii. Witness cannot give evidence sought f. Comments: g. Time estimate for voir dire; 25. Witnesses a. Does the defence intend to call expert witnesses? b. Field of expertise: c. Issues upon which the evidence will be introduced? d. Does the contest the admissibility of the expert evidence? e. Basis upon which admissibility of evidence contested: i. Witness is not an expert ii. Area of expertise requires a voir dire iii. Witness cannot give evidence sought f. Comments:

Page 14 of 17 g. Time estimate for voir dire; 26. Position of Accused in Court a. Will there be an application to have the accused sit at counsel table? b. Does the consent? 27. Absence of Accused from the Court a. Will there be an application for the accused to be absent from the trial, pursuant to s. 486.2? b. If yes, what is the basis for the application? 28. Position of the Parties a. : upon what evidentiary basis does the seek to establish liability of each accused? b. Upon which section(s) of the Criminal Code does the rely, to establish the liability of each accused? c. Does the submit any offences are included in the count(s) in the Information? d. Does the defence submit any offences are included in the count(s) in the Information? e. : What is the position of the defence? 29. Fitness to Stand Trial a. Will the raise the issue of the accused s fitness to stand trial? b. Will the defence raise the issue of the accused s fitness to stand trial? c. If raised, will the application be opposed?

Page 15 of 17 d. Time estimate for voir dire: 30. Interpreters a. Does the accused require an interpreter? If yes, for which language(s)? b. Do any witnesses require an interpreter? If yes, for which language(s)? c. Should two interpreters be required? 31. Courtroom Equipment Required a. Elmo projector b. Television and VCR c. Television and CD player d. Hearing devices e. Other 32. Other Potential Legal Issues 33. Is it reasonably anticipated that any of the following defences/triable issues will be raised? Accident Intoxication Alibis Drugs Automatism Alcohol Compulsion Knowledge of property Necessity Diminished capacity t criminally responsible

Page 16 of 17 Duress Possession Entrapment Provocation Consent- Honest, but mistaken belief in consent Self-defence Identity 34. Non-contentious Issues: Admitted Not contested Jurisdiction Identity of the accused Continuity of exhibits Medical Documentary Ownership Value of Property Accused as Driver Death/injuries caused by accused Expert s report Age of Complainant Nature of drug Amount of drug is for the purpose of trafficking Value of drug Service of Notice Photographs 35. Other factual, evidentiary or legal admissions sought by the, or conceded by defence: Item Does the agree?

Page 17 of 17 36. Affidavit a. Does the intend to file affidavit evidence? b. If so, please specify c. Will the defence seek leave to have the witness testify? 37. Time Estimates a. Anticipate Number of Witnesses b. estimate for voir dires c. time estimate for trial d. time estimate for voir dires e. Time estimate for trial Dated: Signed: