Case 2:12-cv ODW-MRW Document 306 Filed 08/14/17 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:14387

Similar documents
Case No. 2:12-CV GHK(MRW) [PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER. Hon. George H. King CASE NO. 2:12-CV GHK (MRW)

United States District Court Central District of California

Case No. 2:12-CV GHK(MRW) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT. Hon. George H. King STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 2:12-CV GHK (MRW)

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS

Case 2:12-cv GHK-MRW Document 275 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:13111

Case 1:16-cv TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 1372

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:13-cv BAS-RBB Document Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT 8

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case 2:14-cv RJS Document 67 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2016 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 98 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 11

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

cag Doc#413 Filed 04/02/18 Entered 04/02/18 13:54:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 87 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 127 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

mg Doc 5954 Filed 11/26/13 Entered 11/26/13 14:41:13 Main Document Pg 1 of 7 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtors.

BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

: : : : : : CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Class Action Settlement Agreement (the Agreement or Settlement Agreement )

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURIAA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:15-cv ODW-PLA Document Filed 02/15/17 Page 2 of 78 Page ID #:4469 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 127 Filed: 03/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:2172

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-1

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314


PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

Case 2:11-cv JLL-JAD Document 81 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 963

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv DPG Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2018 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:14-cv TJC-JBT Document 173 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6189

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv RNS Document 191 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/29/2017 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

All. final approval a proposed settlement of this class action, which is unopposed by Defendants

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

Attorneys for Defendants AM RETAIL GROUP, INC. AND G-III APPAREL GROUP, LTD. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-odw-mrw Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 00) L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) 0 North California Boulevard, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: () 00- E-Mail: scott@bursor.com ltfisher@bursor.com Co-Lead Class Counsel JS- 0 0 NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP Jeffrey Margulies, State Bar No. 00 Spencer Persson, State Bar No. 0 Stephanie Stroup, State Bar No. 0 Jade Jurdi, State Bar No.0 South Flower Street Forty-First Floor Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: () -00 E-Mail: jeff.margulies@nortonrosefulbright.com spencer.persson@nortonrosefulbright.com stephanie.stroup@nortonrosefulbright.com jade.jurdi@nortonrosefulbright.com Attorneys for Defendants [Additional counsel on signature page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ENZO FORCELLATI and LISA ROEMMICH, on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. HYLAND S, INC., STANDARD HOMEOPATHIC LABORATORIES, INC., and STANDARD HOMEOPATHIC COMPANY, Defendants. Case No. :-CV-0 ODW (MRW) [PROPOSED] SETTLEMENT APPROVAL ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT Hon. Otis D. Wright, II CASE NO. :-CV-0 ODW (MRW)

Case :-cv-0-odw-mrw Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 On February, 0, this Court granted preliminary approval of a proposed class action settlement between the parties in this Consolidated Action. In the Preliminary Approval Order, the Court provisionally certified a Settlement Class of all persons in the United States who purchased the following Hyland s products on or after March, 00: (i) Cold n Cough Kids, (ii) Cough Syrup with 00% Natural Honey, (iii) Sniffles n Sneezes Kids, (iv) Cold Relief Strips Kids with Zinc, (v) Nighttime Cold n Cough Kids, (vi) Complete Flu Care Kids, (vii) Baby Teething Gel, (viii) Baby Cough Syrup, (ix) Baby Gas Drops, (x) Baby Infant Earache Drops, and (xi) Baby Nighttime Tiny Cold Syrup. The Court also approved the procedures for giving notice and the forms of notice. Additionally, in the Preliminary Approval Order, the Court concluded that the parties proposed settlement, as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement, was within range of possible final approval. Now, pending before the Court is the parties Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, and Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Attorneys Fees, Costs, and Incentive Awards. In accordance with the Preliminary Approval Order and the parties Stipulation of Settlement, on August, 0, the Court held a duly noticed Fairness Hearing for purposes of: (a) determining the fairness, adequacy, and reasonableness of the settlement; and (b) ruling upon an application by Class Counsel for a Fee and Expense Award and Plaintiffs Incentive Awards. The Court, having reviewed the papers filed in support of the Motions, heard the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby GRANTS the Excluded from the provisionally certified Settlement Class are: (a) Hyland s employees, officers and directors, (b) persons or entities who purchased the Products for the purpose of re-sale, (c) retailers or re-sellers of the Products, (d) governmental entities, (e) persons who timely and properly exclude themselves from the Class as provided herein, and (f) the Court, the Court s immediate family, and Court staff. See Stipulation of Settlement Sections I-II. CASE NO. :-CV-0 ODW (MRW)

Case :-cv-0-odw-mrw Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Motion for Final Approval and Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Attorneys Fees, Costs, and Incentive Awards and hereby FINDS and ORDERS as follows:. This Court has personal jurisdiction over all Settlement Class Members, and subject matter jurisdiction over the claims asserted in the Consolidated Action. Venue is proper.. The parties have agreed to settle this Consolidated Action upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement, which has been filed with the Court.. The Court has carefully reviewed the Stipulation of Settlement, as well as the files, records, and proceedings to date in this matter. The definitions in the Stipulation of Settlement are hereby incorporated as though fully set forth in this Settlement Approval Order, and capitalized terms shall have the meanings attributed to them in the Stipulation of Settlement.. Class Notice was given substantially in the form approved by the Court, and in the manner approved by the Court. CASE NO. :-CV-0 ODW (MRW) The Court-approved notice to the Settlement Class, as set forth in the Preliminary Approval Order, was the best notice practicable under the circumstances. Notice included direct mail and email notice, publication in a national edition of USA Today, and online publication. Notice has been successfully implemented and satisfies the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. and due process. The Court further finds that Notice was sent in accordance with the Class Action Fairness Act of 00 ( CAFA ), U.S.C... The Court affirms certification of the Settlement Class for settlement purposes only. Settlement Class Members who have excluded themselves from the settlement, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section VI of the Stipulation of Settlement, shall no longer be considered Settlement Class Members and shall not be bound by the Stipulation of Settlement or be eligible to make a claim for any benefit under the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement.

Case :-cv-0-odw-mrw Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 0. The Court appoints Enzo Forcellati, and Lisa Roemmich as Class Representatives.. The Court appoints Bursor & Fisher, P.A., Vozzolo LLC, and Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP as Class Counsel.. The Class Representatives and Class Counsel adequately represented the Settlement Class for purposes of entering into and implementing the Stipulation of Settlement.. The Court finds that the settlement set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement is fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class. The settlement set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement provides meaningful relief to the Class including, cash relief, and injunctive relief, and certainly falls within the range of possible recoveries by the Class. Additionally, among other things, the fact that the parties agreement is the result of arm s length negotiations, the risk of trial, and the complex legal and factual posture of this Consolidated Action support the finding that the settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable. Any objections to the settlement are overruled as without merit. 0. Accordingly, the Stipulation of Settlement is hereby finally approved in all respects, and the Parties are hereby directed to perform its terms.. The Court awards to Class Counsel $. million, which includes reimbursement of Class Counsel s costs and expenses, as attorney s fees and costs.. The Court awards to the Class Representatives $,000 as an Incentive Award for their roles in this Action.. Defendants shall pay the Fee Award and Incentive Awards pursuant to and in the manner provided by the Stipulation of Settlement.. Effective as of the Final Settlement Approval Date, each and every Settlement Class Members (except any such person who has filed a proper and timely Request for Exclusion) shall release and forever discharge, and shall be CASE NO. :-CV-0 ODW (MRW)

Case :-cv-0-odw-mrw Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 forever barred from asserting, instituting or maintaining against any or all of the Released Persons, any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, lawsuits, arbitrations, damages, or liabilities whether legal, equitable, or otherwise, relating in any way to the claims asserted or the factual allegations made in the Consolidated Action, including without limitation the allegation that Settlement Class Products ingredients are ineffective, the allegation that the Settlement Class Products are not all natural, and/or the purchase of any of the Settlement Class Products during the Settlement Class Period (collectively, the Claims ).. Upon the Final Settlement Approval Date, the above release of claims and the Stipulation of Settlement will be binding on, and have res judicata and preclusive effect in all pending and future lawsuits or other proceedings maintained by or on behalf of all Plaintiffs, Class Representatives, and Settlement Class Members, and their predecessors, successors, assigns, heirs, or executors. Settlement Class Members who have not been properly excluded themselves from the Settlement Class are hereby permanently barred and enjoined from filing, commencing, prosecuting, intervening in, or participating (as class members or otherwise) in any lawsuit or other action in any jurisdiction based on or arising out of the Released Claims.. Neither the Stipulation of Settlement nor the releases given therein, nor any consideration therefor, nor any actions taken to carry out the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement, are intended to be, nor may they be deemed or construed to be, an admission or concession of liability, or the validity of any claim, defense, or of any point of fact or law on the part of any party. Hyland s denies the material allegations of the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint and the Second Amended Complaint.. The parties are hereby authorized, without needing further approval from the Court, to agree to written amendments, modifications, or expansions of the CASE NO. :-CV-0 ODW (MRW) All

Case :-cv-0-odw-mrw Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Stipulation of Settlement and its implementing documents (including all exhibits) without further notice to the Settlement Class or approval by the Court if such changes are consistent with this Settlement Approval Order and Final Judgment and do not materially alter, reduce, or limit the rights of Settlement Class Members under the Stipulation of Settlement.. This Settlement Approval Order and Final Judgment constitutes a judgment within the meaning and for purposes of Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation of Settlement, this Court hereby dismisses the Action on the merits with prejudice except that, without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over, (a) implementation, enforcement, administration of the settlement, including any releases in connection therewith; (b) resolution of any disputes concerning class membership or entitlement to benefits under the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement; and (c) all parties hereto, for the purpose of enforcing and administering the settlement and the Action until each and every act agreed to be performed by the parties has been performed pursuant to the Stipulation of Settlement. IT IS SO ORDERED. August, 0 Dated: By: Hon. Otis D. Wright, II United States District Judge CASE NO. :-CV-0 ODW (MRW)