Michigan Redistricting Ballot Proposal (VNP)

Similar documents
VNP Policy Overview. Davia Downey, Ph.D Grand Valley State University

INITIATIVE PETITION AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION

CITY OF SACRAMENTO MEASURE L

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. July 26, 2016

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

H 7749 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

AN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY COSTA, FONTANA, STREET, BOSCOLA AND BREWSTER, JUNE 15, 2017 AN ACT

3 2fl17 (0:9901. Colorado Secretary of State Be it Enacted by the People ofthe State ofcolorado:

CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

WHERE WE STAND.. ON REDISTRICTING REFORM

Colorado Secretary of State Toni Larson League of Women Voters of Colorado 1410 Grant, Suite B204, Denver, Co Toni.Larsongmail.

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

REDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?

100TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois 2017 and 2018

Summary of the Fair Congressional Districts for Ohio Initiative Proposal

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

JANUARY 5, 2108 FINAL

ILLINOIS (status quo)

Congressional and Legislative Appointments

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1448

In the constitution of the state of Colorado, add section 43.5 to article V as. Congressional and Legislative Appointments

Local Opportunities for Redistricting Reform

(132nd General Assembly) (Substitute Senate Joint Resolution Number 5) A JOINT RESOLUTION

Nonpartisan Services for Colorado's Legislature. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: The fiscal note reflects the introduced resolution.

Redrawing the Map: Redistricting Issues in Michigan. Jordon Newton Research Associate Citizens Research Council of Michigan

CIRCULATOR S AFFIDAVIT

In the constitution of the state of Colorado, add section 43.5 to article V as. Congressional and Legislative Appointments

CALIFORNIA S VOTERS FIRST ACT. CALIFORNIA STATE AUDITOR Elaine M. Howle Presented by Sharon Reilly Chief Counsel

TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. J. R. No A J O I N T R E S O L U T I O N

Background Information on Redistricting

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 1 SENATE BILL 702. Short Title: Independent Redistricting Commission. (Public)

November 6, 2018 General Election Official List of Proposals

CHARTER OF THE COUNTY OF FRESNO

STATE OF TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE ORDER BY THE GOVERNOR. No. 41

ILLINOIS (status quo)

Reading Between the Lines Congressional and State Legislative Redistricting

16 Ohio U.S. Congressional Districts: What s wrong with this picture?

STATE OF TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE ORDER BY THE GOVERNOR. No. 54

TENTATIVE CALENDAR OF EVENTS

H.B. 69 Feb 13, 2019 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK

activist handbook to

NEW YORK STATE SENATE PUBLIC MEETING ON REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 14, 2010

at New York University School of Law A 50 state guide to redistricting

State Qualifying Handbook

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

Nonpartisan Services for Colorado's Legislature. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: The fiscal note reflects the introduced resolution.

Putting an end to Gerrymandering in Ohio: A new citizens initiative

BENTON COUNTY HOME RULE COUNTY CHARTER

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF MINNESOTA CONSTITUTION

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER. Congressional Redistricting What is redistricting and why does it matter? A Moderated Discussion

activists handbook to

REDISTRICTING. STATE SENATE DISTRICTS.

AMENDED CHARTER OF THE CITY OF WAUCHULA, COUNTY OF HARDEE, STATE OF FLORIDA 2004

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

(2) public hearings and by an affirmative vote of at least thirteen (13) of the nineteen (19)

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

Constitutional Amendment Language. Be it resolved by the people of the state of Missouri that the Constitution be amended:

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018

The 2020 Census, Gerrymandering, and Voter Suppression

HOME RULE CHARTER OF UMATILLA COUNTY, OREGON

Redistricting in Michigan

Candidate Filings and Financial Disclosure Requirements

BY-LAWS OF THE KENTUCKY DEMOCRATIC PARTY. Ratified by the State Convention of the Kentucky Democratic Party June 4, 2016

CITY OF TANGENT CHARTER 1982 REVISED 1992

Supervisor s Handbook on Candidate Petitions

DATE ISSUED: 12/12/ of 22 UPDATE 33 BBB(LEGAL)-LJC

The Rules of the Indiana Democratic Party shall be governed as follows:

Sec moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

POLK COUNTY CHARTER AS AMENDED November 4, 2008

Polk County Charter. As Amended. November 6, 2018

City Charter. Mankato City Charter Section 2. 07: Vacancies, Forfeiture of Office, Filling of Vacancies. Page 1 of 1

GIS in Redistricting Jack Dohrman, GIS Analyst Nebraska Legislature Legislative Research Office

The Next Swing Region: Reapportionment and Redistricting in the Intermountain West

IC Chapter Election of School Board Members in East Chicago

Massachusetts Democratic Party Charter. Updated: November 22, 2017

CALIFORNIA INITIATIVE REVIEW

OFFICIAL GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT

Section 3. City Charter Article II, Section 3, is amended as follows:

SENATE SPONSORSHIP. Bill Summary. Restoration of the presidential primary election

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

The State of Illinois General Not-For-Profit Corporation Act of 1986 shall be the clarifying document for any issues not clarified in these bylaws.

What do the letters and numbers on my ballot mean?

Sully District Fairfax County. Prepared by Ralph Hubbard Sully Supervisor Representative Fairfax County Redistricting Committee 3/23/2011

CLAY COUNTY HOME RULE CHARTER Interim Edition

IC Application Sec. 1. IC does not apply to this chapter. As added by P.L , SEC.12.

Rules of the Indiana Democratic Party

A Bill Regular Session, 2013 HOUSE BILL 1743

Charter of the City of Bremerton

BYLAWS OF THE DAVIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY January 2016

TENTATIVE CALENDAR OF EVENTS

Elimination Round Format and Rules

Republican Party of Minnesota

BYLAWS OF THE ARIZONA SOCIETY FOR RESPIRATORY CARE, INC. A CHARTERED AFFILIATE OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESPIRATORY CARE

GOVERNMENT INTEGRITY 14

APPORTIONMENT Statement of Position As announced by the State Board, 1966

Transcription:

Michigan Redistricting Ballot Proposal (VNP) Summary A citizen-led organization called Voters Not Politicians has filed a ballot initiative that would create a thirteen member citizens redistricting commission to draw the state s congressional and legislative boundaries. If approved, citizens commission would draw districts starting in 2021. Here is an overview of the proposal. Overview of Key Features What Maps the Commission Will Draw Congress and state legislature Commission Size Thirteen members (4 Democrats, 4 Republicans, 5 unaffiliated or affiliated with a minor party) How Commissioners are Selected Michigan s secretary of state (SOS) would be responsible for circulating applications for the commission in various regions of the state and mailing applications to 10,000 registered voters selected at random. The secretary of state must continue to mail applications until thirty individuals from each of the two largest parties in the state and forty individuals affiliated with neither of the two largest parties have responded to the mailings. Applicants must attest under oath their partisan affiliation or non-affiliation, and confirm they meet the necessary qualifications. The secretary of state would then review the applications received to verify applicants eligibility to serve on the commission and their partisan affiliation, if any. By July 1, the secretary of state will eliminate any applicants that do not meet the necessary qualifications, and divide the remaining applicants into three pools by partisan affiliation (sixty Democrats, sixty Republicans, and eighty unaffiliated applicants). Half of the pools must be comprised of applicants who responded to the mailings. If fewer than thirty applicants from each party and forty unaffiliated applicants respond to the random mailings, the pool will be populated by the remaining qualified applicants. The secretary of state must use accepted statistical weighting methods to ensure that the pools mirror the demographic and geographic makeup of the state.

The randomly selected pools will be presented to the majority and minority legislative leaders of each chamber of the Michigan Legislature, who each may strike up to five applicants, for a maximum of twenty strikes total. From the remaining pool of applicants, the secretary of state will randomly draw the names of four Democrats, four Republicans, and five independent or third-party members. Who is Eligible to Be a Commissioner Commissioners must be registered and eligible to vote in Michigan. The proposal would impose several restrictions on who can serve on the commission which would also apply to relatives, eliminating potential conflicts of interest of those that might have a vested interest in the process from serving on the commission. Within six years prior to their appointment, commissioners may not have been: Declared candidates for or elected officials to partisan state, federal, or local office; Officers of or members of the governing body of a national, state, or local political party; Paid consultants or employees of a federal, state, or local elected official or political candidate, of a federal, state, or local political candidate s campaign, or of a political action committee; Employees of the legislature; A registered lobbyist with the Michigan Bureau of Elections or an employee of a registered lobbyist, or; An unclassified state employee who is exempt from classification in state civil service except for employees of courts of record, employees of the state institutions of higher education, and persons in the armed forces of the state. Parents, stepparents, children, stepchildren, or spouses of any of the individuals disqualified from the above section and individuals disqualified for appointed or elected office by the state constitution are also ineligible to serve on the commission. Commissioners are ineligible from holding partisan elective office at the state, county, city, village, or township level five years after serving on the commission. How a Map Gets Approved A majority vote of the commission is required to approve a plan, which must include at least two commissioners affiliated with each major political party, and two commissioners affiliated with neither party. If no plan receives the required majority vote, each commissioner may submit a proposed plan to the commission for consideration. Each commissioner shall rank each plan according to her/his preference. The commission will adopt the plan receiving the highest points that is also ranked among the top half of plans by at least two commissioners not affiliated with the party of the commissioner submitting the plan, or by at least two commissioners affiliated with a major party, 2

in the case of plans submitted by a non-affiliated commissioner. In the event of a tie, all plans are submitted to the secretary of state who will select a plan at random. All final decisions regarding other commission proceedings must be made with a majority of commission members, with the exception of the firing or retention of professional staff, consultants, or experts, which requires approval from at least one commissioner from each of the two largest parties and one commissioner affiliated with neither party. All final decisions are recorded and the record must be made available to the public upon request. The Rules That Must Be Followed in Drawing a Map The commission must use the following criteria in drawing maps in the order of priority listed: 1. Districts shall be of equal population, mandated by the U.S. Constitution and must comply with the Voting Rights Act and other federal laws. 2. Districts shall be geographically contiguous districts. Islands are considered contiguous by land to the county of which they are a part. 3. Districts shall reflect the state s diverse population and respect communities of interest. 4. Districts may not provide a disproportionate advantage to any political party, determined by using accepted measures of partisan fairness. 5. Districts may not be drawn to (dis)favor any candidate or incumbent. 6. Districts shall reflect county, city, and township boundaries. 7. Districts shall be compact. Communities of interest are defined as, but not limited to, populations with shared cultural or historic characteristics or economic interests. Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates. Before voting on a map, the commission must test the map using the appropriate technology to determine compliance with the goals and rules listed above. The commission must publish the results of those tests and any computer source code used to conduct the test in advance of the meeting to vote on the proposed maps. Public Input and Transparency Nine members, including one from each subpool, constitutes a quorum, and all commission meetings require a quorum. Commission meetings are open to the public, and the commission is required to hold at least ten public hearings to solicit input both before, and five public hearings after drawing proposed maps in different geographic locations across the state. The commission must provide advanced notice of all its meetings. Commission meetings must also use technology to provide a method for the public to watch hearings and submit comments in real time. 3

The commission, its staff, attorneys, and consultants may not discuss redistricting matters outside of public hearings unless the communication occurs in writing or at a previously public forum and will help the commissioner gain information relevant to the performance of their duties. The public may also submit plans and any other supporting materials, including any underlying data, for the commission to consider. The commission must publish the proposed plans and allow at least forty-five days for public comment. Within thirty days of adopting a final plan, the commission must publish the plans, and issue a public report, including an explanation for their decisions and the materials used to draw the plans. Timing By January 1, 2020 and every census year thereafter: The secretary of state will publish and mail applications. June 1, 2020: Deadline for applications to serve on commission. July 1, 2020: The secretary of state will eliminate any applicants that do not meet the necessary qualifications, separate the remaining applicants into three pools, and submit the pools to the legislative leaders. August 1, 2020: The legislative leaders may make up to five strikes, or twenty strikes total. September 1, 2020: The secretary of state will randomly select the thirteen members of the commission. November 1, 2021: Final redistricting plans must be adopted. A redistricting plan becomes law sixty days after publication. Terms of Office The terms of the commissioners expire once the commission completes drawing maps, but not before completion of any judicial review. 4

Funding The proposal mandates that the Michigan Legislature appropriate sufficient funds to enable the commission to carry out its activities at an amount equal to but not less than twenty-five percent of the general fund for the secretary of state for that fiscal year. These required appropriations include funds adequate to pay each commissioner a stipend of at least twenty-five percent of the governor s salary, retain independent legal and technical experts, conduct meetings, and maintain records. A copy of the ballot proposal can be found here. This is proposal overview is informational and does not imply endorsement by the Brennan Center for Justice. Prepared: August 2017 5