Report on the national implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention and its two (1954 and 1999) Protocols

Similar documents
FORMAT FOR NATIONAL REPORTS. Four-year cycle

Periodic Report by Canada on Implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention and its Protocols

FORMAT FOR NATIONAL REPORTS. Four-year cycle

PERIODIC REPORT BY ESTONIA

Contact Person Surname Solomidou-Ieronymidou First Name Marina Address 1 Museum Street Postal Code 1516

Contact Person. Address nam. SNP 33 Postal Code

I. The 1954 Hague Convention

XVIII MODEL LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

UNESCO CONCEPT PAPER

- 1 - Implementing the 1954 Hague Convention and its Protocols: legal and practical implications. Patrick J Boylan, City University London, UK

FORMAT FOR NATIONAL REPORTS

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT SIXTH MEETING OF THE PARTIES

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

The Hague Convention of 1954 and its two Protocols (1954 and 1999) Revised format for national reports. Written observations received from the Parties

In Belgium, several national texts exist, including a Federal Act on conservation of

Permanent Mission of Mexico

COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE

The protection of cultural property in Romania is ensured through an extensive and complex normative system (Annex I).

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Executive Board

REPORTING COUNTRY: The Republic of Lithuania REPORTING PERIOD:

The present Questionnaire is prepared in application of the aforementioned decision of the Subsidiary Committee.

SLOVAKIA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of Ratification of the Convention

Federal Act on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, Disaster or Emergency Situations*

Geneva Conventions of 1949 and relating to the protection of victims of armed

Directive for the Military Protection of Cultural Property and the Military Safeguarding of Cultural Heritage

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

MODEL LAW ON THE EMBLEMS

[No. 73 of 2016] Mar a tionscnaíodh. As initiated

Model law 1 concerning the use and the protection of the emblem of the red cross, the red crescent and the red crystal 2

A/CONF.192/2006/RC/WP.4

Guidelines for Assessing the Compatibility between National Law and Obligations under Treaties of International Humanitarian Law

WHC-12/36.COM/INF.5A.1

(Unofficial translation)

3 MSP. C70/15/3.MSP/RESOLUTIONS Paris, May 2015 Original English/ French. Limited distribution

PROPOSAL FOR A NON-BINDING STANDARD-SETTING INSTRUMENT ON THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE ROLE OF MUSEUMS AND COLLECTIONS

Paris, January 2005 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

Protocol Supplementary to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft

SUMMARY. This agenda item has no financial and administrative implications. Action expected of the Executive Board: proposed decision in paragraph 3.

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

th Anniversary

Measures undertaken by the Government of Romania in order to disseminate and implement the international humanitarian law

International assistance and cooperation

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review*

Implementation of International Humanitarian Law. Dr. Benarji Chakka Associate Professor

MACEDONIA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970

OUTLINE. Source: 177 EX/Decision 35 (I and II) and 187 EX/Decision 20 (III).

INITIATIVE FOR A DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Protection Order

ICC Implementation & compliance with Article 9 STATE OF PALESTINE

Note verbale dated 25 June 2013 from the Permanent Mission of Luxembourg to the United Nations addressed to the Chair of the Committee

Patrick Boylan, Professor Emeritus of Heritage Policy and Management, City University London

A. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE ARCHEOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, AND ARTISTIC HERITAGE OF THE AMERICAN NATIONS

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December [on the report of the Third Committee (A/69/489)]

Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage

ANNEX I: APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK

International UNESCO-related listing systems, registries or networks in the field of heritage

International legal assistance in criminal matters

CONVENTION FOR THE SAFEGUARDING OF THE INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE

The Legal Effects of the Pact

Trainers and facilitators:

The Permanent Mission of Peru to the United Nations presents its compliments to the

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

Diversity of cultural expressions

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Third Committee (A/58/499)]

entry into force 7 December 1978, in accordance with Article 23

(Section I) 1.Introduction State Party. Your comment:

COVER PAGE 1 OF THE ANNUAL ARTICLE 7 REPORT NAME OF STATE [PARTY]: ESTONIA. REPORTING PERIOD: to

ICC Implementation & compliance with Article 9 - AFGHANISTAN

Prepared by : The Department of Antiquities of Jordan. (A) In Terms of Inventories of cultural property

PROTECTING CULTURAL HERITAGE

7. The Group welcomes the theme for this Congress, entitled: Integrating Crime prevention and criminal justice into the wider United Nations agenda to

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

The provisions in this Treaty follow generally the form and content of extradition treaties recently concluded by the United States.

Official Journal of the European Union COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION OF TERRORISM

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

Development of the UNESCO Database of National Cultural Heritage Laws Phase III. Project proposal

Concluding observations on the report submitted by Belgium under article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention*

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

Concluding observations on the report submitted by Portugal under article 29 (1) of the Convention*

CRC/C/OPSC/SLV/CO/1. Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations

03/07/08 1 KAMEN 21.08D final

SUPPORTING POLICY DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE IN AFRICA: A WORKSHOP FOR EXPERT FACILITATORS FROM THE REGION

23/06/05 1 KAMEN 8.05D

Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft SIGNED AT THE HAGUE, ON 16 DECEMBER 1970 (THE HAGUE CONVENTION 1970)

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970 (with reference to its provisions)

Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism *

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

Memorandum. I. Accession to international instruments on international humanitarian law

Draft Protocol on cluster munitions. 26 August 2011, 3:00 p.m. Submitted by the Chairperson

Organization of American States OAS Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission CICAD. Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism MEM. Trinidad and Tobago

NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

REPUBLIC OF KOREA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970

-1- Translated from Spanish. [Original: Spanish] Costa Rica

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

Model Law Convention on Cluster Munitions

Transcription:

2013-2016 Report on the national implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention and its two (1954 and 1999) Protocols Area : [Drop down list] Member state : Submission prepared by: Institution : FEDERAL MINISTRY OF TOURISM,CULTURE & NATIONAL ORIENTATION Name : AUGUSTUS BABAJIDE AJIBOLA Address : E-mail : ajibloecr@yahoo.com Fax : Telephone : +2348036247206 I. The 1954 Hague Convention 1. Article 3 Safeguarding of cultural property This Article provides for the obligation of the High Contracting Parties to adopt relevant peacetime safeguarding measures against the foreseeable effects of an armed conflict. Have you undertaken such measures? X Provision of traditional security guards for palaces, shrines and sacred grooves. Legislative mechanism for protection of cultural properties. (iii) Use of Modern security forces ( Police&SSS) to secure the premises of Museums,other important Monuments and sites. (iv) Adoption of community awareness and policing 1

2. Article 7 Military Measures (in peace time) This Article provides for the obligations of the High Contracting Parties to introduce into their military regulations or instructions provisions that may ensure observance of the Convention, as well as to plan or establish within their armed forces services or specialists whose purpose will be to secure respect for cultural property. Have you introduced such provisions into your military regulations and instructions? Not that I am aware of Have you created such services or appointed specialists in your country? 3. Chapter V The distinctive emblem Do you mark cultural property with the distinctive emblem of the Convention? If not, please state the reasons you have not done so. 4. Article 25 Dissemination of the Convention Knowledge of the laws of armed conflict is of capital importance for the civilian and military personnel required to apply them. Have you disseminated the provisions of the Convention within armed forces as well as among target groups and the general public? (The word dissemination is to be understood in a broad sense: information, training, education, exercises, etc.) Not that I am aware of as the authority in charge of this convention. If not, please state the reasons you have not done so. 5. Article 26 (1) Official translations The Secretariat has received many official translations of the Convention and of the Regulations for its execution. For reference, please visit: Linguistic versions of the Hague Convention and its Protocol of 1954 2

Are your country s official translations of the Convention and the Regulations for its execution included in these lists? If yes, could you please provide the Secretariat with an electronic copy of the translation(s), if you have not already done so? 6. Article 28 Sanctions This Article provides for the obligations of the High Contracting Parties to take, within the framework of their ordinary criminal jurisdiction, all necessary steps to prosecute and impose penal or disciplinary sanctions upon those persons, of whatever nationality, who commit or order to be committed a breach of the Convention. Have you introduced this provision into your penal code? If yes, we would be grateful if you could kindly provide the Secretariat with a copy of the relevant provision(s) in English or French. II. Resolution II of the 1954 Conference Have you established a national advisory committee in accordance with the wish expressed by the Conference in Resolution II? Is such a committee a part of the national commission on the implementation of international humanitarian law (NCIHL)? 3

III. 1954 (First) Protocol [to be filled in only by the High Contracting Parties party to the 1954 Protocol] The Protocol provides for the obligation of the High Contracting Parties to prevent the exportation of cultural property from a territory occupied by it and requires the return of such property to the territory of the State from which it was removed. Have you complied with these provisions? X In particular, have you implemented its provisions in your national legislation? (iii) Have you have taken into custody cultural property imported into your territory from an occupied territory? If yes, please provide more specific information, including what steps you have taken to return this property at the close of a conflict. IV. The 1999 Second Protocol [to be filled in only by the High Contracting Parties party to the 1999 Protocol] 1. General provisions Article 5 Safeguarding of cultural property Article 5 of the Second Protocol complements Article 3 of the Hague Convention by providing concrete examples of peacetime preparatory measures, such as the preparations of inventories of cultural property or the designation of competent authorities responsible for the safeguarding of cultural property. Have you undertaken these preparatory measures? 4

Article 9 Protection of cultural property in occupied territory Article 9 of the Second Protocol complements the provisions in Article 5 of the Hague Convention by imposing a number of prohibitive measures on the occupying power. If applicable, please describe the implementation of such measures. Have you implemented these prohibitive measures? If yes, please provide more specific information, describing the implementation of such measures. 2. Enhanced protection(chapter 3) The Second Protocol establishes an enhanced protection regime for cultural property, provided that the property is cultural heritage of the greatest importance for humanity, is properly protected by administrative and legal measures, and is not and will not be used for a military purpose or to shield military sites. Do you intend to request the granting of enhanced protection for a cultural property? X Name of the cultural property: S Do cultural property under enhanced protection and the protection afforded to it by your state still meet the conditions for granting enhanced protection under Articles 10(a), 10(b), 10(c) of the Second Protocol and the relevant paragraphs of the Guidelines? (iii) Have you set up a specific monitoring mechanism of cultural property under enhanced protection? For example, have you set up a periodic control? (iv) Do you intend to use the distinctive emblem to mark cultural property under enhanced protection? X After a committe is inaugurated for this purpose,an inventory will be created If yes, please provide more specific information, stating the reasons for this intention. 5

(v) Do you intend to inscribe cultural property on the tentative list for the granting of enhanced protection? Not yet Name of the cultural property: 3. Articles 15 et 21 Serious violations of this Protocol and measures regarding other violations, respectively Article 15 obligates Parties to establish certain acts listed under its first paragraph as criminal offences under domestic law and to make them punishable by appropriate penalties. Article 21 obligates Parties to adopt relevant legislative, administrative or disciplinary measures to suppress any intentional use of cultural property, illicit export, or other removal or transfer of ownership of cultural property from occupied territory, in violation of the Hague Convention or the Second Protocol. Have you penalized each of these offences and adopted the above-mentioned measures? If not, please state the reasons you have not done so. 4. Article 16 Jurisdiction Have you taken the necessary measures to establish jurisdiction over offenses mentioned in Article 15? 5. Articles 29 (The Fund for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict), 32 (International assistance) and 33 (Assistance of UNESCO) Article 29 : Are you currently receiving international assistance from the Fund? If yes, please describe the project for which funds were received. Article 32 and 33 : Are you currently providing or planning to provide international or technical assistance on a bilateral or multilateral level? 6

If yes, please provide more details. If not, please state rhe reasons you have not done so. 6. Article 30 Dissemination Article 30 calls for, among other things, the strengthening of the appreciation and the respect for cultural property, the dissemination of the Protocol and the establishment of military instructions, training and communication facilities. Did you take any measures concerning the above-mentioned obligations? If yes, please provide more details. 7. The Fund for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict Have you contributed to the Fund? Not that I am aware If yes, please provide more details. If not, would you consider the possibility of contributing to the Fund in the future? X 8. National focal point According to Article 103 of the Guidelines for the Implementation of the Second Protocol Unless the Parties agree otherwise, the focal point are the Parties Permanent Delegations to the UNESCO. If applicable, you are invited to provide the Secretariat with the name and address of a national focal point which will also be the recipient of all official documents and all correspondence related to the implementation of the Second Protocol. Institution : Name: AUGUSTUS BABAJIDE AJIBOLA Address : E-mail : ajibloecr@yahoo.com Phone :+2348033018985 Fax : 7

V. Other issues related to the implementation of the Hague Convention and its two Protocols. The Secretariat would appreciate it if you could provide us with a copy of the following documents in English and/or French: the relevant administrative civilian and military regulations; PDF-document Web Page national laws on the protection of cultural property as well as penal provisions not covered by Article 28 of the Hague Convention and Articles 15, 16, 21 of the Second Protocol; and,case-law on the protection of cultural property related to the implementation of the Hague Convention and its two Protocols. PDF-document Web Page VI. Official Translations of the Second Protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention The Secretariat has received many official translations of the Second Protocol. For reference, please visit: Linguistic versions of the 2 nd Protocol Are your country s official translations of Second Protocol included in these lists? If yes, could you please provide the Secretariat with an electronic copy of the translation, if ou have not already done so? Signature 8