UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Attorney for Plaintiff TIPSY ELVES LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:13-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 10/17/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv VEC Document 1 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

USDC IN/ND case 4:18-cv JVB-JEM document 1 filed 11/01/18 page 1 of 7

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/18/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv TLS-SLC document 1 filed 11/29/18 page 1 of 6. Defendant. COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv TWP-DML Document 1 Filed 01/06/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

USDC IN/ND case 4:18-cv JVB-JEM document 1 filed 09/16/18 page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Civil Case No. : 5:16-cv-872 NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

1. The Plaintiff, Richard N. Bell, took photograph of the Indianapolis Skyline in

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LARRY KING ENTERPRISES, INC. and ORA MEDIA LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:15-cv SVW-AS Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/04/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv RP-SBJ Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv Doc #: 1 Filed 03/07/18 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:18-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 8:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/25/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:15-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 12

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-fmo-pla Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Stephen M. Doniger (SBN ) stephen@donigerlawfirm.com Scott Alan Burroughs (SBN ) scott@donigerlawfirm.com Howard S. Han (SBN 0) hhan@donigerlawfirm.com DONIGER / BURROUGHS 0 Rose Avenue Venice California 0 Telephone: (0) 0-0 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. HAPPY MUTANTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES through 0, Defendants. Case No. :-cv-00-fmo-pla Hon. Fernando M. Olguin Presiding FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT Jury Trial Demanded PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. hereby prays to this honorable Court for relief based on the following: et seq. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This action arises under the Copyright Act of, Title U.S.C., 0. This Court has federal question jurisdiction under U.S.C. and (a) and (b).

Case :-cv-00-fmo-pla Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0. Venue in this judicial district is proper under U.S.C. (c) and 00(a) in that this is the judicial district in which a substantial part of the acts and omissions giving rise to the claims occurred. PARTIES. Plaintiff PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. ( PLAYBOY ) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at Civic Center Drive, Beverly Hills, California 00.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant HAPPY MUTANTS, LLC ( MUTANTS ) is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 00 Lovell Avenue, Mill Valley, California.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants DOES through 0, inclusive, are other parties not yet identified who have infringed Plaintiff s copyrights, have contributed to the infringement of Plaintiff s copyrights, or have engaged in one or more of the wrongful practices alleged herein. The true names, whether corporate, individual or otherwise, of Defendants through 0, inclusive, are presently unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sues said Defendants by such fictitious names, and will seek leave to amend this Complaint to show their true names and capacities when same have been ascertained.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that at all times relevant hereto each of the Defendants was the agent, affiliate, officer, director, manager, principal, alter-ego, and/or employee of the remaining Defendants and was at all times acting within the scope of such agency, affiliation, alter-ego relationship and/or employment; and actively participated in or subsequently ratified and/or adopted each of the acts or conduct alleged, with full knowledge of all the facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, full knowledge of each violation of Plaintiff s rights and the damages to Plaintiff proximately caused thereby.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-pla Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (For Copyright Infringement - Against All Defendants, and Each). Plaintiff PLAYBOY owns the exclusive rights attendant to original photographs commonly referred to as Playboy Centerfolds ( Centerfolds ), each of which has been duly registered with the United States Copyright Office. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a chart listing the Centerfolds.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that following its publication of the Centerfolds, a third party made unauthorized copies of the Centerfolds and then, without PLAYBOY s consent, uploaded scans of each of the Centerfolds to the website imgur.com. 0. Plaintiff is further informed and believes and thereon alleges that a thirdparty made unauthorized copies of the Centerfolds and incorporated said unauthorized copies into a video that was posted on YouTube without PLAYBOY s consent.. On information and belief, MUTANT s Boing Boing wesite is a commercial website established in and relaunched in 000 as a weblog featuring a self-proclaimed directory of wonderful things.. On information and belief, by the mid-000s, Boing Boing had become one of the most-read and linked-to blogs in the world according to one report, leading it to begin adding advertising by late 00. Said advertising continued through the time of the Infringing Post, with paid advertising placed above and to the left and right of the posted material.. On information and belief MUTANT generates substantial revenues each year based on its popularity and the number of viewers it can attract with its content by selling and displaying advertisements and marketing and selling product.. On or about February, 0, Xeni Jardin, the co-editor of Boing Boing, created a post featuring and promoting said unauthorized reproductions and touting

Case :-cv-00-fmo-pla Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: the availability of Every Playboy Playmate Centerfold Ever for viewing or download (hereinafter, Infringing Post ), as shown below: 0 0. Defendants knew or had reason to know that the Infringing Post linked to and promoted material that was posted without PLAYBOY s consent and in violation of its copyrights. Specifically, Defendants knew or had reason to know that the reproductions of the Centerfolds was neither posted nor authorized by PLAYBOY, and that the use of the Centerfolds did not constitute fair use because, inter alia, each and every Centerfold was reproduced far more than reasonably necessary for any claimed editorial purposes.. By undertaking substantial promotional efforts to encourage visits to the infringing material, MUTANT materially contributed to the infringing conduct.. Defendants conduct has also adversely affected the market for or value of the Centerfolds. PLAYBOY has generated, and has a reasonable expectation of generating into the future, significant revenue from the distribution and display of the Centerfolds, as it has monetized and continues to monetize said works through

Case :-cv-00-fmo-pla Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 sales of books, magazines and other publications (including Playboy: The Compete Centerfolds, -0), DVDs and other recorded video formats, and on the subscription website PlayboyPlus.com. MUTANT s promotion of the unauthorized free publication of the Centerfolds thus does great harm to their marketability by PLAYBOY.. Defendants had reason to know that linking to infringing content may result in copyright infringement liability. Amongst other things, including the obviously infringing nature of the linked content and the dubious context in which it was posted a sophisticated web publisher would not believe that PLAYBOY would post, or authorize the posting of, its content in the manner it was posted Boing Boing posted an article relating to liability related to linking, albeit in connection with EU Courts, in 0 at https://boingboing.net/0/0/0/european-court-rulesthat-maki.html.. PLAYBOY is informed and believes that the infringing materials on imgur and YouTube were available for download and/or viewing such that, by directing its viewers to those infringing materials, Defendants induced the impermissible reproduction, display, and/or distribution of the Centerfolds. Furthermore, Defendants clearly expressed their intention to promote the infringement of PLAYBOY s copyrights, as evidenced by their affirmative communication of praise for the wonderful person who made the Centerfolds freely available on Imgur, and the public acknowledgement of the YouTuber who created the infringing video. So owing, Defendants are also liable for copyright infringement under the inducement theory of liability. 0. Due to Defendants, and each of their, acts of infringement, including contributory infringement, Plaintiff has suffered damages in an amount to be established at trial.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-pla Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0. Due to Defendants, and each of their, acts of copyright infringement as alleged herein, Defendants, and each of them, have obtained profits they would not otherwise have realized but for their infringement of the Centerfolds. As such, Plaintiff is entitled to disgorgement of Defendants, and each of their, profits attributable to the infringement, including contributory infringement, of Centerfolds in an amount to be established at trial.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants, and each of them, have committed copyright infringement, including contributory infringement, with actual or constructive knowledge of Plaintiff s rights such that said acts of infringement were, and continue to be, willful. 0 each: PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, Plaintiff prays for judgment as follows against all Defendants and a. That Defendants, and each of them, as well as their employees, agents, or anyone acting in concert with them, be enjoined from infringing Plaintiff s copyrights in the Centerfolds, including without limitation an order requiring Defendants, and each of them, to remove any content incorporating, in whole or in part, the Centerfolds from any print, web, or other publication owned, operated, or controlled by any Defendant; b. That Plaintiff be awarded all profits of Defendants, and each of them, plus all losses of Plaintiff, plus any other monetary advantage gained by the Defendants, and each of them, through their infringement, the exact sum to be proven at the time of trial, and, to the extent available, statutory damages as available under the U.S.C. 0 and other applicable law;

Case :-cv-00-fmo-pla Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #:0 0 c. That Plaintiff be awarded his costs and attorneys fees, including as available under the Copyright Act U.S.C. 0 et seq.; d. That Plaintiff be awarded statutory damages and/or penalties under the statues set forth above; e. That Plaintiff be awarded pre-judgment interest as allowed by law; f. That Plaintiff be awarded such further legal and equitable relief as the Court deems proper. Plaintiff demands a jury trial on all issues so triable pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. and the th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Respectfully submitted, Dated: January, 0 By: /s/ Stephen M. Doniger Stephen M. Doniger, Esq. Howard S. Han, Esq. DONIGER / BURROUGHS Attorneys for Plaintiff 0