UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Similar documents
FILED 2015 Mar-25 PM 03:41 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

Case 2:10-cv GW-PLA Document 89 Filed 05/12/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:455

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 2:10-cv TJW-CE Document 1 Filed 05/19/10 Page 1 of 10

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 08/01/18 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv PMW Document 4 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 20

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/23/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:13-cv GMS Document 23 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv GMS Document 35 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 195 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:10-cv TJW Document 1 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ENDEAVOR MESHTECH, INC., Plaintiff, v. TANTALUS SYSTEMS, INC. Civil Action No. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. ( Plaintiff or Endeavor ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this Original Complaint for Patent Infringement against Defendant Tantalus Systems, Inc. ( Defendant or Tantalus ) as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a patent infringement action to stop Defendant s infringement of Plaintiff s United States Patent No. 7,379,981 entitled Wireless Communication Enabled Meter and Network (hereinafter, the 981 Patent ), United States Patent No. 8,700,749 (hereinafter, the 749 Patent ) and United States Patent No. 8,855,019 (hereinafter, the 981 Patent, 749 Patent and 019 Patent, respectively, or Patents-in-Suit ; copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits A-C, respectively). Plaintiff is the owner of the Patents-in-Suit. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages. PARTIES 2. Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Plaintiff maintains its principal place of business at 3140 Broadway, 46 th Floor, New York, NY, 10005. Plaintiff is the owner of the Patents-in-Suit, and possesses all E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 1 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 1 of 12

rights thereto, including the exclusive right to exclude Defendant from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing in this district and elsewhere into the United States the patented invention(s) of the Patents-in-Suit, the right to license the Patents-in-Suit, and to sue the Defendant for infringement and recover past damages. 3. Upon information and belief, Tantalus is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware since May 12, 2010 and having its principal place of business located at 1121 Situs Court, Suite 190, Raleigh, NC 27606. Defendant may be served through its registered agent RL&F Service Corp., 920 N. King St. Fl. 2, Wilmington, DE 19801. 4. Upon information and belief, Tantalus ships, distributes, makes, uses, offers for sale, sells, and/or advertises its products under its TUNet brand name system. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq., including 35 U.S.C. 271, 281, 283, 284, and 285. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case for patent infringement under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 6. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Tantalus because: Defendant has minimum contacts within the State of North Carolina and in the Eastern District of North Carolina; Defendant has purposefully availed itself of the privileges of conducting business in the State of North Carolina and in the Eastern District of North Carolina; Defendant has sought protection and benefit from the laws of the State of North Carolina; Defendant regularly conducts business within the State of North Carolina and within the Eastern District of North Carolina, and Plaintiff s causes of action arise directly from Defendant s business contacts and other activities in the State of North Carolina and in the Eastern District of North Carolina. E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 2 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 2 of 12

7. More specifically, Defendant, directly and/or through its intermediaries, ships, distributes, makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, sells, and/or advertises its products and affiliated services in the United States, the State of North Carolina, and the Eastern District of North Carolina. Upon information and belief, Defendant has committed patent infringement in the State of North Carolina and in the Eastern District of North Carolina. Defendant solicits customers in the State of North Carolina and in the Eastern District of North Carolina. Defendant has many paying customers who are residents of the State of North Carolina and the Eastern District of North Carolina and who use Defendant s products in the State of North Carolina and in the Eastern District of North Carolina. 8. Venue is proper in the Eastern District of North Carolina pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b). BACKGROUND INFORMATION 9. The Patents-in-Suit were duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 27, 2008 (the 981 Patent), April 15, 2014 (the 749 Patent) and October 7, 2014 (the 019 Patent) after full and fair examinations. Plaintiff is the owner of the Patents-in-Suit, and possesses all right, title and interest in the Patent-in-Suit including the right to enforce the Patents-in-Suit, and the right to sue Defendant for infringement and recover past damages. 10. On information and belief, Tantalus owns, operates, advertises, and/or controls the website www.tantalus.com, through which Defendant advertises, sells, offers to sell, provides and/or educates customers about its products and services, including but not limited to the TUNet brand name system, modules, devices, and services ( Accused Products and Services ). E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 3 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 3 of 12

COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,379,981 11. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference each of Paragraphs 1-10 above. 12. Plaintiff is informed and believes that Tantalus has infringed and continues to infringe the 981 Patent either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents through the manufacture and sale of infringing products under the TUNet brand name and affiliated services. Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the 981 Patent because it ships distributes, makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, sells, and/or advertises a self-configuring wireless network, including but not limited to Tantalus TUNet system architecture. Defendant provides a self-configuring wireless network that incorporates a network cluster, virtual gate, and virtual network operations entity through the use of devices which include at least Tantalus TUNet End Points, Transceivers, Smart Meter Modules, C&I Communication Modules, Versatile Collectors, Repeaters, Transceivers, Demand Response devices, In-Home Display devices, WAN RF Network Controllers, and Network Servers like the TUNet Control Center. Specifically, Defendant s Accused Products and Services, infringes one or more of the claims of the 981 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendant s Accused Products and Services are available for sale on its website and through various retailers located in this district and throughout the United States. 13. Upon information and belief, Defendant has intentionally induced and continues to induce infringement of one or more claims of the 981 Patent in this district and elsewhere in the United States, by its intentional acts which have successfully, among other things, encouraged, instructed, enabled, and otherwise caused Defendant s customers to use the Accused Products and Services in an infringing manner. Despite knowledge of the 981 Patent as early as the date of service of the Original Complaint in this action, Defendant, upon information and E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 4 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 4 of 12

belief, continues to encourage, instruct, enable, and otherwise cause its customers to use its systems and methods, in a manner which infringes the 981 Patent. Based upon information and belief, Defendant s source of revenue and business focus is on the provision of and sale of the Accused Products and Services. Upon information and belief, Defendant has specifically intended its customers to use its systems and methods in such a way that infringes the 981 Patent by, at a minimum, providing and supporting the Accused Products and Services and instructing its customers on how to use them in an infringing manner, at least through information available on Defendant s website including information brochures, promotional material, and contact information. Defendant knew that its actions, including, but not limited to any of the aforementioned systems and methods, would induce, have induced, and will continue to induce infringement by its customers by continuing to sell, support, and instruct its customers on using the Accused Products and Services. Plaintiff. 14. Defendant s aforesaid activities have been without authority and/or license from 15. Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendant the damages sustained by Plaintiff as a result of Defendant s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. 284. 16. Defendant s infringement of Plaintiff s rights under the 981 Patent will continue to damage Plaintiff, causing irreparable harm to Plaintiff for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. COUNT II INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,700,749 17. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference each of Paragraphs 1-10 above. E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 5 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 5 of 12

18. Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe the 749 Patent either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents through the manufacture and sale of infringing products under the TUNet brand and affiliated services. Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the 749 Patent, because it ships distributes, makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, sells, and/or advertises a self-configuring wireless network, including but not limited to Tantalus TUNet system architecture and the methods incorporated therein. Defendant provides a selfconfiguring wireless network and attendant methods that incorporate virtual network nodes and a gateway, wherein the nodes use messaging to form an organized network in communication with the gateway, and additional nodes may be added to the network to communicate with the gateway utilizing the existing communication route, such network being composed of Tantalus TUNet End Points, Transceivers, Smart Meter Modules, C&I Communication Modules, Versatile Collectors, Repeaters, Transceivers, Demand Response devices, In-Home Display devices, WAN RF Network Controllers, and Network Servers like the TUNet Control Center. Specifically, Defendant s Accused Products and Services infringes one or more of the claims of 749 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendant s Accused Products and Services are available for sale on its website and through various retailers located in this district and throughout the United States. 19. Upon information and belief, Defendant has intentionally induced and continues to induce infringement of one or more claims of the 749 Patent in this district and elsewhere in the United States, by its intentional acts which have successfully, among other things, encouraged, instructed, enabled, and otherwise caused Defendant s customers to use the Accused Products and Services in an infringing manner. Despite knowledge of the 749 Patent as early as E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 6 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 6 of 12

the date of service of the Original Complaint in this action, Defendant, upon information and belief, continues to encourage, instruct, enable, and otherwise cause its customers to use its systems and methods, in a manner which infringes the 749 Patent. Based upon information and belief, Defendant s source of revenue and business focus is on the provision of and sale of the Accused Products and Services. Upon information and belief, Defendant has specifically intended its customers to use its systems and methods in such a way that infringes the 749 Patent by, at a minimum, providing and supporting the Accused Products and Services and instructing its customers on how to use them in an infringing manner, at least through information available on Defendant s website including information brochures, promotional material, and contact information. Defendant knew that its actions, including, but not limited to any of the aforementioned systems and methods, would induce, have induced, and will continue to induce infringement by its customers by continuing to sell, support, and instruct its customers on using the Accused Products and Services. 20. Defendant s aforesaid activities have been without authority and/or license from Plaintiff. 21. Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendant the damages sustained by Plaintiff as a result of Defendant s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. 284. 22. Defendant s infringement of Plaintiff s rights under the 749 Patent will continue to damage Plaintiff, causing irreparable harm to Plaintiff for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 7 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 7 of 12

COUNT III INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,855,019 23. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference each of Paragraphs 1-10 above. 24. Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe the 019 Patent either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents through the manufacture and sale of infringing products under the TUNet brand and affiliated services. Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the 019 Patent, because it ships distributes, makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, sells, and/or advertises an organized network, including but not limited to Tantalus TUNet system architecture and the methods incorporated therein. Defendant provides an organized network and attendant methods that incorporate wireless network nodes and one or more gateways, wherein such nodes are configured to form an organized network in communication with the one or more gateways, with such nodes being provided a communication access point to an external network through said one or more gateways, such network being composed of at least Tantalus TUNet End Points, Transceivers, Smart Meter Modules, C&I Communication Modules, Versatile Collectors, Repeaters, Transceivers, Demand Response devices, In-Home Display devices, WAN RF Network Controllers, and Network Servers like the TUNet Control Center. Specifically, Defendant s Accused Products and Services infringes one or more of the claims of 019 Patent. Upon information and belief, Defendant s Accused Products and Services are available for sale on its website and through various retailers located in this district and throughout the United States. 25. Upon information and belief, Defendant has intentionally induced and continues to induce infringement of one or more claims of the 019 Patent in this district and elsewhere in the United States, by its intentional acts which have successfully, among other things, E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 8 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 8 of 12

encouraged, instructed, enabled, and otherwise caused Defendant s customers to use the Accused Products and Services in an infringing manner. Despite knowledge of the 019 Patent as early as the date of service of the Original Complaint in this action, Defendant, upon information and belief, continues to encourage, instruct, enable, and otherwise cause its customers to use its systems and methods, in a manner which infringes the 019 Patent. Based upon information and belief, Defendant s source of revenue and business focus is on the provision of and sale of the Accused Products and Services. Upon information and belief, Defendant has specifically intended its customers to use its systems and methods in such a way that infringes the 019 Patent by, at a minimum, providing and supporting the Accused Products and Services and instructing its customers on how to use them in an infringing manner, at least through information available on Defendant s website including information brochures, promotional material, and contact information. Defendant knew that its actions, including, but not limited to any of the aforementioned systems and methods, would induce, have induced, and will continue to induce infringement by its customers by continuing to sell, support, and instruct its customers on using the Accused Products and Services. 26. Defendant s aforesaid activities have been without authority and/or license from Plaintiff. 27. Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendant the damages sustained by Plaintiff as a result of Defendant s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. 284. E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 9 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 9 of 12

28. Defendant s infringement of Plaintiff s rights under the 019 Patent will continue to damage Plaintiff, causing irreparable harm to Plaintiff for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. JURY DEMAND 29. Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Plaintiff respectfully requests the following relief: A. An adjudication that one or more claims of the Patents-in-Suit has been infringed, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by the Defendant; B. An adjudication that Defendant has induced infringement of one or more claims of the Patents-in-Suit; C. An award of damages to be paid by Defendant adequate to compensate Plaintiff for its past infringement and any continuing or future infringement up until the date such judgment is entered, including interest, costs, and disbursements as justified under 35 U.S.C. 284 and, if necessary to adequately compensate Plaintiff for Defendant's infringement, an accounting of all infringing sales including, but not limited to, those sales not presented at trial; D. A grant of permanent injunction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283, enjoining the Defendant and its respective officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by personal service or otherwise, from further acts of infringement with respect to any one or more of the claims of the Patents-in-Suit; E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 10 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 10 of 12

E. That this Court declare this to be an exceptional case and award Plaintiff its reasonable attorneys fees and costs in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 285; and, F. Any further relief that this Court deems just and proper. E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 11 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 11 of 12

Respectfully submitted this 25th day of March, 2014. Attorneys for Plaintiff Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. CRUMLEY ROBERTS, LLP /s/ Brian L. Kinsley Brian L. Kinsley blkinsley@crumleyroberts.com Crumley Roberts, LLP 2400 Freeman Mill Road Greensboro, NC 27406 Telephone: (336) 333-9899 Facsimile: (336) 333-9894 NC State Bar No. 38683 Local Civil Rule 83.1 Counsel HENINGER GARRISON DAVIS, LLC Jacqueline K. Burt, Appearance Anticipated Email: jburt@hgdlawfirm.com James F. McDonough, Appearance Anticipated Email: jmcdonough@hgdlawfirm.com Jonathan R. Miller, Appearance Anticipated Email: jmiller@hgdlawfirm.com 3621 Vinings Slope, Suite 4320 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 Telephone: (404) 996-0861, 0869, 0863 Facsimile: (205) 547-5502, 5515 René A. Vazquez, Appearance Anticipated Email: rvazquez@hgdlawfirm.com 18326 Buccaneer Terrace Leesburg, Virginia 20176 Telephone: (571) 206-1375 Facsimile: (205) 327-9114 E.D.N.C: Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Tantalus Systems, Inc. Page 12 Case 4:15-cv-00051-BO Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 12 of 12