Case 2:13-cv JAK-AGR Document 457 Filed 12/07/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:13889

Similar documents
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Pharrell Williams et al v. Bridgeport Music Inc et al, Docket No. 2:13-cv (C.D. Cal. Aug 15, 2013), Court Docket

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc, et al Doc. 8 Case 2:10-cv JLR Document 319 Filed 05/16/12 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/29/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 570 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/29/2018

Case3:12-cv VC Document21 Filed06/09/14 Page1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPELLANT S OPENING BRIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

scc Doc 74 Filed 10/13/17 Entered 10/13/17 14:26:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHELLE FLANAGAN, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Chapter 11

Case 2:12-cv SVW-PLA Document 21 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:204

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case GMB Doc 207 Filed 12/21/13 Entered 12/21/13 14:45:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA C O M P L A I N T. COMES NOW, Plaintiff, JUAN ANTONIO CASTRO RIOS, (hereinafter

Case 2:16-cv APG-GWF Document 3 Filed 04/24/16 Page 1 of 7

Case4:10-cv CW Document205 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT United States Courthouse 219 S Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois DOCKETING STATEMENT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/07/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 98 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/07/2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No TODD S. GLASSEY AND MICHAEL E. MCNEIL,

Case 2:10-cv RLH -GWF Document 63-1 Filed 01/28/11 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT A

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

) (CV9316, CV9383, CV045760)

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 3:14-cv L-NLS Document 60 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

Case KG Doc 200 Filed 09/19/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Motion Picture Association of America v. CrystalTech Web Hosting Inc. Doc. 769

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the Complaint in this action and to serve a

Case 5:15-cv RGK-SP Document 99 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:1395 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

Case 1:18-cv KBF Document 83 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 5:08-CV D

Case 8:15-cv DOC-KES Document 184 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4371

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv LHK Document 3322 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 7

$ Attorneys for Defendants PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and 9 PG&E CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Appeal Nos , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT APPLE INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2017 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case5:08-cv PSG Document498 Filed08/15/13 Page1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

Case 2:07-cv JBF-TEM Document 45 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

Case 1:17-cv WYD-MEH Document 9 Filed 09/22/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-4 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Case 2:08-cv R-E Document 179 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:3675 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:12-cv VC Document46 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

March 11, Re: Realtek Semiconductor Corp. v. LSI Corp. et al., No Panel: Judges Farris, Reinhardt & Tashima

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 798 Filed 09/26/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:16-cv FAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2016 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Attorneys for Respondent and Defendant Metropolitan Water District of Southern California SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

EXHIBIT E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Sample STATE OF NEW YORK CREDITOR. ,, SUMMONS Plaintiff, Index No. -vs- Date Filed: DEBTOR d/b/a. ,, Defendant. TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT:

Case 4:10-cv Y Document 23 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID 156

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:10-cv Agence France Presse v. Morel. Document 259.

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/18 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Transcription:

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 KING, HOLMES, PATERNO & SORIANO, LLP HOWARD E. KING, ESQ., STATE BAR NO. 0 STEPHEN D. ROTHSCHILD, ESQ., STATE BAR NO. SROTHSCHILD@KHPSLAW.COM SETH MILLER, ESQ., STATE BAR NO. 0 SMILLER@KHPSLAW.COM 00 AVENUE OF THE STARS, TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 00-0 TELEPHONE: (0) - FACSIMILE: (0) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter- Defendants PHARRELL WILLIAMS, ROBIN THICKE and CLIFFORD HARRIS, JR. and Counter-Defendants MORE WATER FROM NAZARETH PUBLISHING, INC., STAR TRAK ENTERTAINMENT, INTERSCOPE RECORDS, UMG RECORDINGS, INC., and UNIVERSAL MUSIC DISTRIBUTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION PHARRELL WILLIAMS, an individual; ROBIN THICKE, an individual; and CLIFFORD HARRIS, JR., an individual, vs. Plaintiffs, BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC., a Michigan corporation; FRANKIE CHRISTIAN GAYE, an individual; MARVIN GAYE III, an individual; NONA MARVISA GAYE, an individual; and DOES through 0, inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. CASE NO. CV-000-JAK (AGRx) Hon. John A. Kronstadt, Ctrm 0 NOTICE OF APPEAL Action Commenced: August, Trial Date: February,.00/0.

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #:0 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke, individually and d/b/a I Like 'Em Thicke Music, and Clifford Harris, Jr., and Counter-Defendants More Water From Nazareth Publishing, Inc., Star Trak Entertainment, Interscope Records, UMG Recordings, Inc., and Universal Music Distribution, hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from the final judgment entered on December,, as well as any and all interlocutory rulings, decisions, and orders that gave rise to the judgment and are merged therein. A true and correct copy of the final judgment is 0 attached hereto as Exhibit A. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule -, a Representation Statement identifying all parties to the action, along with the names, addresses, and telephone number of their respective counsel, is attached hereto as Exhibit B. DATED: December, KING, HOLMES, PATERNO & SORIANO, LLP By: HOWARD E. KING SETH MILLER Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants PHARRELL WILLIAMS, et al. KING, H OLMES, PATERNO & S ORIANO, llp 00/0.

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: EXHIBIT A

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document 0 Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 PHARRELL WILLIAMS, an individual; ROBIN THICKE, an individual; and CLIFFORD HARRIS, JR., an individual, vs. Plaintiffs, BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC., a Michigan corporation; FRANKIE CHRISTIAN GAYE, an individual; MARVIN GAYE III, an individual; NONA MARVISA GAYE, an individual; and DOES through 0, inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. CV-000-JAK (AGRx) JUDGMENT JS-

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document 0 Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #:0 Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 This action was tried by a jury, which rendered a verdict. Based on that verdict, IT IS NOW HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and Counter-Claimants Nona Marvisa Gaye, Frankie Christian Gaye, and Marvin Gaye III (collectively, the Gaye Parties ) and against Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Robin Thicke; Pharrell Williams; Clifford Harris, Jr.; More Water From Nazareth Publishing, Inc.; Interscope Records; Star Trak Entertainment; UMG Recordings, Inc.; and Universal Music Distribution (collectively, Counter-Defendants ) on the First Claim for Relief, the Gaye Parties counterclaim for copyright infringement of the work Got to Give It Up by the work Blurred Lines. It is further declared that any past and ongoing reproduction, preparation of derivative works, distribution, sale or other transfer of ownership, rental, lease, lending or public performance of Blurred Lines, or any authorization of these activities, by any of the Counter-Defendants, individually or in combination, infringes the Gaye Parties copyright in Got to Give It Up ; provided, however, that Counter-Defendants or their licensees and other authorized users shall not be liable for damages or subject to suit under U.S.C. 0 with respect to exploitations of the work Blurred Lines occurring after the date of this judgment, so long as the running royalty provided in this judgment is timely paid to the Gaye Parties or their successors in interest. For the First Claim for Relief, Counter-Defendants, jointly and severally, shall pay $,,.0 in actual damages to the Gaye Parties. In addition, Robin Thicke shall pay $,,., and Pharrell Williams and More Water From Nazareth Publishing, Inc. (collectively, the Williams Parties ) shall pay $,0. to the Gaye Parties in separate awards of profits attributable to infringement. Counter-Defendants shall pay prejudgment interest to the Gaye Parties on the actual damages award, and Robin Thicke and the Williams Parties shall pay prejudgment interest to the Gaye Parties on the respective profits awards against each of them, as calculated from the date of the jury s verdict, March 0,, through the date of entry of this judgment, at the rate of 0.% per annum simple interest. - -

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document 0 Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 The Gaye Parties are awarded their costs incurred and unique as to the First Claim for Relief, in an amount to be determined by the Court, to be paid by Counter- Defendants, who are jointly and severally liable. The Gaye Parties are awarded a running royalty in the amount of fifty percent (0%) of the songwriter and publishing revenue, i.e., net of third party administration costs, received by Counter-Defendants Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke, and Clifford Harris, Jr., and/or their successors and assigns, from exploitation of the musical composition Blurred Lines, occurring after the date of entry of this judgment. Such running royalty shall be paid to the Gaye Parties by Counter-Defendants Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke, and Clifford Harris, Jr., who are jointly and severally liable. Judgment is entered in favor of Counter-Defendants Robin Thicke, individually and d/b/a I Like Em Thicke Music; Paula Maxine Patton, individually and d/b/a Haddington Music; Geffen Records; Star Trak Entertainment; UMG Recordings, Inc.; and Universal Music Distribution, and against the Gaye Parties on the Second Claim for Relief, the Gaye Parties counterclaim for copyright infringement of the work After the Dance by the work Love After War. The Gaye Parties shall recover nothing for the Second Claim for Relief. Counter-Defendants are awarded their costs incurred and unique as to the Second Claim for Relief, in an amount to be determined by the Court, to be paid by the Gaye Parties, who are jointly and severally liable. The request for declaratory relief by Robin Thicke, Pharrell Williams, and Clifford Harris, Jr. is denied. The Clerk shall enter this Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December, JOHN A. KRONSTADT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE - -

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: EXHIBIT B

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 KING, HOLMES, PATERNO & SORIANO, LLP HOWARD E. KING, ESQ., STATE BAR NO. 0 STEPHEN D. ROTHSCHILD, ESQ., STATE BAR NO. SROTHSCHILD@KHPSLAW.COM SETH MILLER, ESQ., STATE BAR NO. 0 SMILLER@KHPSLAW.COM 00 AVENUE OF THE STARS, TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 00-0 TELEPHONE: (0) - FACSIMILE: (0) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counter- Defendants/Appellants PHARRELL WILLIAMS, ROBIN THICKE and CLIFFORD HARRIS, JR. and Counter- Defendants/Appellants MORE WATER FROM NAZARETH PUBLISHING, INC., STAR TRAK ENTERTAINMENT, INTERSCOPE RECORDS, UMG RECORDINGS, INC., and UNIVERSAL MUSIC DISTRIBUTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION PHARRELL WILLIAMS, an individual; ROBIN THICKE, an individual; and CLIFFORD HARRIS, JR., an individual, vs. Plaintiffs, BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC., a Michigan corporation; FRANKIE CHRISTIAN GAYE, an individual; MARVIN GAYE III, an individual; NONA MARVISA GAYE, an individual; and DOES through 0, inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. CASE NO. CV-000-JAK (AGRx) Hon. John A. Kronstadt, Ctrm 0 REPRESENTATION STATEMENT OF PLAINTIFFS/COUNTER- DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS Action Commenced: August, Trial Date: February,.00/0.

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: KING, HOLMES, PATERNO & SORIANO, LLP 0 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: Ninth Circuit Rule - states that a party filing an appeal shall attach to the notice a Representation Statement that identifies all parties to the action along with the names, addresses and telephone numbers of their respective counsel, if any. Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Appellants Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke, individually and d/b/a I Like Em Thicke Music, and Clifford Harris, Jr., and Counter-Defendant/Appellant More Water From Nazareth Publishing, Inc. are represented by the following counsel: KING, HOLMES, PATERNO & SORIANO, LLP Howard E. King, Esq. Seth Miller, Esq. 00 Avenue of the Stars, th Floor Los Angeles, California 00-0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Daniel C. Posner, Esq. South Figueroa Street, 0th Floor Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: () -000 Facsimile: () -00 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Kathleen M. Sullivan, Esq. Madison Avenue, nd Floor New York, New York 000 Telephone: () -000 Facsimile: () -00 Counter-Defendants/Appellants Interscope Records, Star Trak Entertainment, UMG Recordings, Inc., and Universal Music Distribution are represented by the following counsel: KING, HOLMES, PATERNO & SORIANO, LLP Howard E. King, Esq. Seth Miller, Esq. 00 Avenue of the Stars, th Floor Los Angeles, California 00-0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0.00/0.

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page 0 of Page ID #: KING, HOLMES, PATERNO & SORIANO, LLP 0 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Mark E. Haddad, Esq. Michelle Goodman, Esq. West Fifth Street Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () -00 Defendants/Counterclaimants/Appellees Nona Marvisa Gaye and Frankie Christian Gaye are represented by the following counsel: KING & BALLOW Richard S. Busch, Esq. Sara R. Ellis, Esq. Union Street, Suite 00 Nashville, Tennessee Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - KING & BALLOW Paul H. Duvall, Esq. 0 Lusk Boulevard, Suite 0 San Diego, California Telephone: () -000 Facsimile: () -00 WARGO & FRENCH LLP Mark L. Block, Esq. Century Park East, Suite Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) - ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Martin R. Glick, Esq. Daniel B. Asimow, Esq. Three Embarcadero Center, 0th Floor San Francisco, California -0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -00.00/0.

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: KING, HOLMES, PATERNO & S ORIANO, LLP Defendant/Counterclaimant/ Appellee Marvin Gaye III is represented by the following counsel: 0 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL N. PHILIPS, APLC Paul N. Philips, Esq. West Sunset Boulevard, Suite West Hollywood, California 00 Telephone: () - Facsimile: ( 0) -0 DATED: December, I 00/0. KING, HOLMES, PATERNO & SORIANO, LLP. (._~---'-!~:\\'-=------- V" - By: HowARD E. KING SETH MILLER Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/ Appellants PHARRELL WILLIAMS, et al.

Case :-cv-000-jak-agr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #:00 K ING, H OLMES, PATERNO & S ORIANO, llp 0 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December,, I electronically filed the foregoing NOTICE OF APPEAL with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. ~~;e~cvmjt I.00/0. I