UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA : : : : : : : : CONSENT JUDGMENT

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION

DOCKET NO. D DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. RIVER WATCH, non-profit

DOCKET NO. D DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

CITY OF FORTUNA, Defendant. /

DOCKET NO. D DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Discharge to a Tributary of Special Protection Waters

Case 2:10-cv JCZ-JCW Document 87 Filed 02/01/12 Page 1 of 3

DOCKET NO. D CP-3 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

DOCKET NO. D CP-3 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

DOCKET NO. D DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Discharge to a Tributary of Special Protection Waters

DOCKET NO. D DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

DOCKET NO. D CP-2 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Discharge to a Tributary of Special Protection Waters

DOCKET NO. D DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Discharge to a Tributary of Special Protection Waters

DOCKET NO. D DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Discharge to a Tributary of Special Protection Waters

DOCKET NO. D CP-4 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

DOCKET NO. D CP-3 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Discharge to a Tributary of Special Protection Waters

ORDINANCE NO O -

DOCKET NO. D CP-2 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Discharge to a Tributary of Special Protection Waters

DOCKET NO. D CP-3 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2013 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 719

Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards Certification Regulations

DOCKET NO. D CP-2 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Discharge to a Tributary of Special Protection Waters

DOCKET NO. D CP-4 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Drainage Area to Special Protection Waters

ORDINANCE. 1.1 Title This ordinance shall be known as the "Illicit Discharge and Illegal Connection Ordinance of the City of Sugar Hill, Georgia".

Stream Pollution Control in Indiana

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 49 Filed: 08/21/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1179 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 2:15-cv SMJ Document 42 Filed 01/09/17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON I. INTRODUCTION

FIRST READING: SECOND READING: PUBLISHED: PASSED: TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTEWATER BY LAND APPLICATION

DOCKET NO. D DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Discharge to a Tributary of Special Protection Waters

Case 2:14-cv LMA-SS Document 120 Filed 08/18/15 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

ARTICLE II. - ILLICIT DISCHARGE AND ILLEGAL CONNECTION

Case 2:08-cv RTH-PJH Document 1 Filed 06/24/08 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

DOCKET NO. D CP-3 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Discharge to a Tributary of Special Protection Waters

1 of 1 DOCUMENT. Enforcement Tracking No. WE-C , Agency Interest No Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality

DOCKET NO. D CP-2 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Discharge to a Tributary of Special Protection Waters

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Non-Stormwater Discharge Ordinance

Case 2:13-cv NJB-DEK Document Filed 08/05/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY

4 Sec. 102 FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT

APALACHICOLA-CHATTAHOOCHEE-FLINT RIVER BASIN COMPACT

ORDINANCE 1772 ADOPTED 7/16/2018 PUBLISHED 7/18/2018

STORMWATER DISCHARGE Town of Brunswick. Table of Contents

RULES GOVERNING THE CONSTRUCTION, USE, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF DISPOSAL SYSTEMS WITHIN ANY AREA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, IOWA

CHAPTER 23: DETENTION BASIN STANDARDS Introduction and Goals Administration Standards Standard Attachments 23.

Case 2:15-cv SMJ Document 75 Filed 05/03/17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Environmental & Energy Advisory

JOHNSON COUNTY CODE OF REGULATIONS FOR PRIVATE INFILTRATION AND INFLOW 2010 EDITION

Case 2:10-cv Document 59-1 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 819

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 8 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

IN RE: OIL SPILL BY THE OIL RIG MDL NO DEEPWATER HORIZON IN THE GULF OF MEXICO ON APRIL 20, 2010 SECTION J

Case 2:12-cv SM-KWR Document Filed 09/03/15 Page 1 of 8 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT OF ON-SITE SEWAGE FACILITY REGULATIONS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:08-cv EJL Document 97 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 12

Case: 3:14-cv Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 08/04/14 1 of 9. PageID #: 3

WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT

US ARMY CORPS Reply To: Public Notice No. OF ENGINEERS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P-3104

http: //www. waterboards.ca.gov/sandiego

Case 3:01-cv RGJ-JDK Document Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. D CP-2 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

S th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 787 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. April 2, 2009

Clean Water Act Section 303: Water Quality Standards Regulation and TMDLs. San Francisco BayKeeper v. Whitman. 297 F.3d 877 (9 th Cir.

4 ~ 0~0RK I Dep.artment of CERTIFIED - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED August 12, 2015

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH ADDING CHAPTER TO THE LAGUNA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING SECTION

ENVIRONMENTAL CODE SUMNER COUNTY, KANSAS CHAPTER 2 ON-SITE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT

MODEL STREAM BUFFER PROTECTION ORDINANCE

AGENDA REQUEST AGENDA ITEM NO: IV.A.2. Consent Agenda No. 1. February 20, 2018 BY Utilities Mitt Tidwell Utilities Director Riebe SUBJECT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO ORDER AND REASONS ON MOTION

Case 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 467 Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No GOLD (and consolidated cases)

Ordinance Regulating Onsite Wastewater Disposal in Logan County, Illinois

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MILWAUKEE COUNTY. CLEAN WATER ACTION COUNCIL OF NORTHEAST WISCONSIN P.O. Box 9144 Green Bay, WI 54308;

PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ORDINANCE

RESOLUTION NO CLARION BOROUGH STORMWATER AUTHORITY Clarion County, Pennsylvania

Article 7. Department of Environmental Quality. Part 1. General Provisions.

ORDINANCE NO Charter to adopt and implement necessary and reasonable ordinances in the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Charter Township of Orion

Village of Suamico. Chapter 9 SEWER UTILITY

DECEMBER 13, 2005 GREAT LAKES ST. LAWRENCE RIVER BASIN SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Charlotte County, Florida:

A Practitioner s Guide to Instream Flow Transactions in California

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

Model Illicit Discharge and Connection Stormwater Ordinance ORDINANCE NO.

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

DOCKET NO. D CP-5 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Special Protection Waters

SECTION 9. FEEDLOT REGULATIONS

806 F.Supp. 225 BACKGROUND

FIRST CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA NO CW 1709

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2260

A LOCAL LAW entitled Illicit Discharges to the Town of Guilderland Storm Water System.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

OFF-LICENSE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND THE KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS

Transcription:

Case 212-cv-01923-NJB-JCW Document 50-1 56 Filed 10/18/13 08/16/13 Page 1 of of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LITTLE TCHEFUNCTE RIVER ASSOCIATION and GULF RESTORATION NETWORK, Plaintiff, VERSUS ARTESIAN UTILITY, INC., Defendant. NO. 212-CV-01923-NJB-JCW JUDGE NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN MAGISTRATE JOSEPH C. WILKINSON, JR. CONSENT JUDGMENT WHEREAS the Plaintiffs, Little Tchefuncte River Association and Gulf Restoration Network, filed the Complaint on July 24, 2012 and served the Defendant, Artesian Utility, Inc. ( Artesian Utility or Defendant ) on or about September 6, 2012; and WHEREAS, Defendant has made upgrades to its facility so that that it can and will consistently meet applicable Clean Water Act 402 permit effluent limitations; and WHEREAS the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality ( LDEQ ) has issued Artesian Utility a Clean Water Act 402 permit for effluent discharges from its Lake Ramsey Subdivision wastewater treatment facility ( Facility ), Permit No LA0105520, effective March 1, 2013; and WHEREAS on February 5, 2013, Defendant met with LDEQ and discussed the assessment of civil penalties for technical violations of the Louisiana Environmental Quality Act and the Clean Water Act; WHEREAS, the Defendant warrants that it will work with LDEQ to arrive at a mutually agreeable solution for the allegations described herein and as set forth in Consolidated Compliance Order & Notice of Potential Penalty, Nos. WE-CN-08-0442, dated June 1, 2010, and No. WE-CN-12-00542, dated July 6, 2012; 1

Case 212-cv-01923-NJB-JCW Document 50-1 56 Filed 10/18/13 08/16/13 Page 2 of of 8 WHEREAS Plaintiff Little Tchefuncte River Association is a not-for-profit association dedicated to the protection of the Tchefuncte River and its tributaries and Plaintiff Gulf Restoration Network is a non-profit organization composed of environmental, social justice, and citizen s groups and individuals committed to restoring the Gulf of Mexico to an ecologically and biologically sustainable condition; and WHEREAS, without admission of liability by Artesian Utility, the Parties wish to resolve this lawsuit cooperatively, without further litigation, and request that the Court enter this Consent Judgment; and WHEREAS the Clean Water Act 505(c), 33 U.S.C. 1365(c) provides No consent judgment shall be entered in an action in which the United States is not a party prior to 45 days following the receipt of a copy of the proposed consent judgment by the Attorney General and the Administrator [of EPA], and the Parties represent that they will promptly send a copy of the proposed judgment via certified mail to the Attorney General and the Administrator and that they will notify the Court when the 45-day waiting period has elapsed; WHEREAS the Parties have agreed to take all such further acts and execute all such further documents, as may reasonably be required, to give effect to the terms of this Consent Judgment. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree and the Court hereby orders Compliance, Upgrades, & Information (1) Artesian Utility shall comply with all terms and limitations of its Clean Water Act 402 permit, Permit No. LA0105520 (the Permit ). (2) For a period of one year from the date of this agreement, Artesian Utility shall provide to Plaintiffs a copy of any and all the discharge monitoring reports that it sends to 2

Case 212-cv-01923-NJB-JCW Document 50-1 56 Filed 10/18/13 08/16/13 Page 3 of of 8 LDEQ, together with any attachments, within three (3) days of sending to LDEQ such monitoring reports. (3) Artesian Utility shall make the following improvements to the Facility within 30 days of entry of this Consent Judgment, if such improvements have not already been made, unless a different time is specified (a) For its treatment of algae and Total Suspended Solids (i) within 30 days of entry of this Consent Judgment, Artesian Utility shall investigate and complete a written report on whether the Facility can operate one or more of portions of the L-shaped ditch(es) that receive the effluent from the fourth cell of the two aerated treatment ponds and runs along the Facility s east and south boarders (described as the Constructed Ditch in Artesian Utilities court filings) so that water remains under a cover that is impermeable to light for 72 hours. If Artesian Utility can cost-effectively operate the Facility in such a manner, and the aquatics system currently in place is not achieving its intended purpose, then Artesian Utility shall, within 14 days of determining that the aquatics system currently in place is not achieving its intended purpose, apply to LDEQ to change its operating system to use such an impermeable cover in lieu of floating aquatics. Upon approval from LDEQ, Artesian shall implement the change in operations within 30 days. Artesian Utility shall provide to Plaintiffs promptly, and in no event later than 7 days from completion or receipt, A) a copy of the written report, and B) a copy of any application to and related correspondence with LDEQ; 3

Case 212-cv-01923-NJB-JCW Document 50-1 56 Filed 10/18/13 08/16/13 Page 4 of of 8 (ii) for any use of aquatics as part of its water treatment process, Artesian Utility shall only use native and non-invasive species; (b) add a T Inverter to the head of the intake pipes located at the end of the first and second ditches of the Constructed Ditch (i.e. those feeding into the second and third ditches, respectively) eighteen inches below the surface of the water to prevent intrusion of unwanted materials; (c) remove any grate intake filter and add a T Inverter to the head of the intake pipe that exits the third ditch of the Constructed Ditch ; (d) test the effluent as it exits the third ditch of the Constructed Ditch to determine whether the addition of chlorine is unnecessary to meet the Permit s fecal coliform effluent limitation; and (e) combine the two final effluent pipes to make a single discharge point. (4) Artesian Utility shall allow Plaintiffs representatives to visit the Facility to observe its water collection, treatment, and discharge system during, or reasonably close to, each of the months of August and October in 2013, and May in 2014. Additionally, Defendant shall allow additional visits by Plaintiffs upon Plaintiffs reasonable request at a date and time mutually agreed upon by both parties, with agreement not to be unreasonably withheld, for a period of two years from the date of this agreement. (5) Artesian Utility shall send all information required under this Consent Judgment to Plaintiffs at the following addresses Matthew Allen, President Little Tchefuncte River Association 72630 Clark Allen Lane Covington, LA 70433 4

Case 212-cv-01923-NJB-JCW Document 50-1 56 Filed 10/18/13 08/16/13 Page 5 of of 8 Matthew Rota Gulf Restoration Network 541 Julia St., Suite 300 New Orleans, LA 70130 Beneficial Environmental Project (6) Artesian Utility shall pay a total of $24,000, to be paid in three installments of $8,000 with the first installment due within 14 days of entry of this Consent Judgment and the second and third installments due on the same month and day one and two years later, respectively, to the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Foundation ( LPBF ). LPBF shall use the funds solely for the purpose of testing the water quality of the areas of the Tchefuncte River and its tributaries in areas at least one mile from the Facility s discharge point in the Tchefuncte River but in no instance shall it use the funds to test or sample in the ditch or stream between the Facility s outfall and the Tchefuncte River and its tributaries. If LPBF is unable to perform such testing, within 14 days of notice of such inability, the Parties shall agree upon a substitute organization (in no event the Plaintiffs), such agreement not to be unreasonably withheld. Artesian Utility shall pay the same amounts for the same purpose to that substitute organization within 14 days and thereafter follow the schedule described above for LPBF. In the event that the substitute organization in unable to perform the testing, the Parties will repeat the same process to determine and fund a different organization for the same purpose. (7) Both Parties shall agree to undertake any task that is reasonably required to give effect to this Consent Judgment. Costs of Litigation (8) Artesian Utility shall pay, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 1365(d), $20,000 for Plaintiffs costs of litigation, to be paid in three installments, as follows $10,000 due within 14 days of the Court s final entry of this Consent Judgment, $5,000 due within six months and 14 days of entry 5

Case 212-cv-01923-NJB-JCW Document 50-1 56 Filed 10/18/13 08/16/13 Page 6 of of 8

Case 212-cv-01923-NJB-JCW Document 50-1 56 Filed 10/18/13 08/16/13 Page 7 of of 8

Case 212-cv-01923-NJB-JCW Document 50-1 56 Filed 10/18/13 08/16/13 Page 8 of of 8 ENTRY OF ORDER This matter having come before this Court on the Parties' request for entry of this Consent Judgment, and the Court having reviewed the matter, the Court hereby finds that the terms and provisions of this Consent Judgment are a fair, reasonable and equitable settlement of this matter. The foregoing Consent Judgment is hereby adopted by and made an Order of this Court. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this day of, October 2013. BY THE COURT HONORABLE JUDGE NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8