CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

Similar documents
CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370,, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3730, Tallahassee, FL (904) / (800) * FAX (850)

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D & 5D06-874

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM F MATTHEW CHRISTOPHER HARGIS, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT

Eileen Sheil v. Regal Entertainment Group

Bauer v Chirichella 2011 NY Slip Op 30129(U) January 20, 2011 Sup Ct, Wayne County Docket Number: 68145/2010 Judge: Dennis M. Kehoe Republished from

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Case No.: SC nd DCA Case No.: 2D Lower Tribunal Case No.: G Hillsborough County, Florida Circuit Court

v. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY April 23, 2004 ALBERT R. MARSHALL

Complaint - Walmart Substance on Floor in Frozen Food Dept.

JURY SELECTION: YOUR LAST LINE OF DEFENSE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONERS BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER JUDGE

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F MARVIN G. WOODBERRY, EMPLOYEE H & H CONCRETE CO., EMPLOYER

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

However, he was unable to find an attorney who wished to undertake

Benyuan Zhou, Likang Zhou and Mansoor Bayat-Shahbazi, Defendants. Thomas Ozere and Erin Durant, for the Respondent ENDORSEMENT

Case 3:14-cv GAG-SCC Document 13 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 13

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS GAINESVILLE DISTRICT OFFICE

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

8/4/ :46:38 AM 16CV25037 FOR THE COUNTY OF MUL TNOMAH. 12 Comes now plaintiff and for claims for relief against the above named defendant,

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 80 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-49 ADAM W. MASON, Petitioner, vs. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. and ROCHE LABORATORIES INC., Respondents.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Research Total $ Verdict Case Type Subcategory Facts

Lindsay-Thompson v Montefiore Med. Ctr NY Slip Op 31761(U) August 19, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Douglas

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION. In re: Darryl Edwin Williams, Debtor.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. and MILLENNIUM PHYSICAN DCA Case No.: 2D GROUP, LLC,

Pursuant to Rule 50(b), Ala. R. Civ. Proc., Defendant, Mobile Infirmary Association,

v No Wayne Circuit Court

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR DAMAGES

An intellectual disability should make a person ineligible for the death penalty.

NORFOLK BEVERAGE COMPANY, INCORPORATED OPINION BY JUSTICE LEROY R. HASSELL, SR. v. Record No March 3, 2000

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MIAMI COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 30, 2006 Session

JOHN LEE TALBERT, JR. AND CYNTHIA TALBERT NO CA-1096 COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS

Case 4:18-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioners, CASE NOS.: 91,966 92,382 vs. 92,451 (Consolidated) JAMES S. PARHAM,

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013

Case 0:17-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2017 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

Catapano v Atlas Floral Decorators, Inc NY Slip Op 31487(U) June 8, 2010 Sup Ct, Richmond County Docket Number: /07 Judge: Joseph J.

Submitted: July 26, 2002 Bench Ruling: July 30, 2002 Written Decision: October 17, 2002

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Miami District FINAL MERITS ORDER

Present: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Millette, JJ., and Lacy, S.J.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 8, 2001 Session

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Terry P. Roberts, Special Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Shorter v Calderon 2014 NY Slip Op 30065(U) January 10, 2014 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 9133/2012 Judge: Robert J.

Case 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 15

Davila, Evodio v. iiversified Builders, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 23, 2010

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PA

FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/26/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/26/2016

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 25, 2014 Session

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

Mott v Buckley 2007 NY Slip Op 33359(U) October 17, 2007 Supreme Court, Greene County Docket Number: /6591 Judge: Joseph C. Teresi Republished

Case 9:16-cv KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2016 Page 1 of 9

COUNSEL: Counsel, for the plaintiffs: Adam Moras, Sokoloff Lawyers Fax:

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D & 5D

STATE OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Meredith, Graeff, Arthur,

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION (JUDGE HAYES)

[J ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : OPINION MR. JUSTICE CASTILLE DECIDED: FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Reyes v Tenrit Studios, Inc NY Slip Op 32364(U) December 11, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Barbara Jaffe

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: SCl AIMEE OSMULSKI, L.T. Case No.: 2D L.T. Case No.: CI-11

~/

MODEL JURY SELECTION QUESTIONS

Holmes Regional Medical Center v. Dumigan, 39 Fla. Law Weekly D2570 (Fla. 5 th DCA December 12, 2014):

HURT PROVING CAUSATION IN CHRONIC PAIN CASES


Transcription:

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266 COUNTY AND COURT: SEMINOLE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT NAME OF CASE: WILLIAM AND RHONDA WORLEY, v. Plaintiffs, PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., Defendant CASE DOCKET NO.: 06-CA-1488-11-W JUDGE: Alan A. Dickey PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY(S)/TRIAL COUNSEL: Mark A. Cornelius, Esquire D. Fuller Haring Bogin, Munns & Munns, P.A. DEFENDANT(S) ATTORNEY(S)/TRIAL COUNSEL: Art C. Young, Esquire Henry Skip W. Jewett II, Esquire Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue & McLain, P.A. AGE/SEX/OCCUPATION OF PLAINTIFF OR DECEDENT: William Worley is 55 years old and a former air conditioning repairman. Rhonda Worley is 52 years old and works for Tri-Tech Electronics on the assembly line.

FOR WRONGFUL DEATH CASES, PLEASE GIVE AGE AND RELATIONSHIP OF SURVIVORS: N/A DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF ACCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE: August 25, 2002 at approximately 11:30 a.m. at Publix Super Markets, Inc. located at 1801 E. Broadway St., Oviedo, FL 32765-8597. CAUSE OF INJURY: Slip and fall on a grape in the frozen food aisle, hitting his head on handle of a freezer door. NATURE OF INJURY: Plaintiff received nine sutures in his head after being transported by ambulance to Winter Park Memorial. Plaintiff claimed to be completely disabled as a result of injuries allegedly incurred in this fall. Mr. Worley claimed that he has closed head injury and Post Concussive Syndrome. He underwent a surgery by neurotologist, Dr. James Atkins, on July 23, 2003, for a fistula. That surgery later failed and Mr. Worley had a second surgery on February 13, 2004. Dr. Atkins gave him a 30% impairment rating. Plaintiff claimed odors make him nauseous; memory loss; vertigo; lost portion of sense of sight; hearing too well which interferes with normal ability to screen out unwanted noises; irritable; no patience; cannot tolerate sudden movements; motion sickness regularly; and depression. Mr. Worley claimed he was unable to work since the date of the accident as a result of his dizziness. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT WITNESSES: James S. Atkins, M.D. Florida Ear and Balance Center, P.A. Celebration, FL Otolaryngology 2

Dr. Atkins performed his surgery as a result of the patient having a fistula. Dr. Atkins first fistula surgery failed. The second surgery apparently had been successful, although the Plaintiff continued to have similar complaints after the surgery. He indicated that Plaintiff is capable of doing sedentary work such as painting, carpentry and air conditioning work as long as he was not on a ladder. Joseph Holzmacher, Psy.D. Neuropsychologist Dr. Holzmacher's testimony established that the Plaintiff's complaints did not fit well within a closed head injury diagnosis. He did not know if the patient had pre-existing Attention Deficit Disorder. He testified that most mild head injuries resolve within six months and there was no concrete evidence that the Plaintiff had a continuing brain injury. His IQ was 84 which Dr. Holzmacher felt was consistent with the Plaintiff's premorbid intelligence (low average). Hal Pineless, D.O. Neurocare Institute of Central Florida Winter Park, FL Neurologist Dr. Pineless' video testimony established that there were no objective findings to substantiate his continuing subjective complaints. Dr. Pineless also testified about the several diagnostic studies that he performed which were all normal. William Silverman, D.O. Lake Howell Family Medicine Associates Maitland, FL Family Medicine Dr. Silverman, a family practitioner, treated Plaintiff after the accident as a result of his recurring nausea, vomiting and dizziness. He believed that there were definite changes in Mr. Worley's personality which were related to his injuries. He was of the opinion that the patient's vertigo, as well as his memory issues, were related to the subject accident. Dr. Silverman agreed there were no objective findings to support Mr. Worley s current subjective complaints. 3

DEFENDANT'S EXPERT WITNESSES: John C. Lozito, M.D. Neurology Clinic Melbourne, FL Neurology Dr. Lozito testified that Mr. Worley had a mild closed head injury and that 90% of such closed head injuries completely resolve. He did not believe that Plaintiff had a true loss of consciousness as a result of the accident or true vertigo. Dr. Lozito had never seen a fistula secondary to a closed head injury since he had been treating closed head injuries beginning in 1973. Alan J. Raphael, Ph.D. International Assessment Systems, Inc. Miami, FL Neuropsychology Dr. Raphael performed a Compulsory Medical Examination. The IQ level was normal in Dr. Holzmacher's post-accident testing, although it was borderline retarded in Dr. Raphael's testing. Plaintiff had tested in the 2nd percentile range for reading in high school before he dropped out. The fact that Plaintiff had a Glasgow Coma score of 15 was significant to diminish the severity of the closed head injury. The lack of any significant loss of consciousness typically correlates to full recovery from any head trauma. CHECK APPROPRIATE SPACE: X Verdict DATE OF VERDICT: February 28, 2011 VERDICT AMOUNT: $6,079.19 COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: No. JUDGMENT: Plaintiff 4

DATE OF JUDGMENT: Pending DEFENDANT'S OFFER: $125,001.00 Proposal for Settlement on September 18, 2009. PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND: At trial Mr. Worley demanded $42,125.46 for past medicals; $28,000 to $80,000 for future medicals; $840,000 in past and future lost wages; $2,000,000 or more for pain and suffering. ATTORNEY'S COMMENTS: Plaintiffs demanded $3,200,000 in closing. The jury only awarded past medical bills apparently related to the emergency room treatment. The jury did not award any pain and suffering to Mr. Worley and denied Mrs. Worley s consortium claim, as well. Publix is in the process of enforcing its Proposal for Settlement for fees and costs. Submitted By: Firm: Art C. Young Date: May 9, 2011 Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue & McLain, P.A. Address: 201 E. Pine Street, Suite 1500 P.O. Box 4940 32802-4940 Telephone: (407) 839-0120 Fax: (407) 841-9726 ACY/khi 5