I COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

1 Justice, on January 9, A copy of the Proof of Service of Summons is attached hereto. 4 Dated: January 27, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

Case 2:04-cv ABC-Mc Document 171 Filed 05/01/06 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:126. UNITED STATES DISTRICT ( ClJIr1o;.~"';rj[~J!"";m1. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT (GLENDALE) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

TAKE ACTION NOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS!

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

Petition for Relief Packet

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Administrator (hereinafter collectively "TCERA") oppose the Motion to Reconsider filed by

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

By S. Lee, Deputy Clerk

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

CIV CIV DS ORDR Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

)

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

Sequoia Park Associates, a California limited partnership, Petitioner and Plaintiff,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

E-FILED 12/26/2017 4:20 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. Cogburn, Deputy

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LODGED. MHY p CLERK, QS DISTRICT COL VIRAL DISTRICT OF CA i, F,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT. Santa Clara Case No CV INCLUDED ACTIONS:

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

If you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ALTERNATIVE WRIT OF MANDATE NON DUI. Self Help Center Loca ons:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES r\eceiyeu WARNING liodesto CITY CLERK Be sure your claim is filed with the' -.. ment Code Section 910 et seq)

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D.

SEP Malta A. Ago. Responden ts/de fenthmts. VENTURA iuper1or COURT

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Case No. [redacted]

December 10, Cohen v. DIRECTV, No. S177734

Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION. Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FORTHECOUNTYOFSANTABARBARA

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

"Uge EB JAN Daie Prodessod - By: %I, Y-.sT. wij ~1 ~

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

STIPULATION FOR JOINT APPENDIX. KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California. DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT. Dept: "24" MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

BRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES. 1. Upon the filing of a divorce or custody action pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

PlainSite. Legal Document. Arizona District Court Case No. 4:11-cv Carreon v. Toyota Financial Services Corporation et al.

PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Investigations and Enforcement

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

GRAHAM E. BERRY, Bar No.203 Attorney at Law 334 McLaughlin Avenue 2 Los Angeles, California 00-200 Telephone: (3 4-3 3 Facsimile: (3 4-3 Email: grahamberry@.ca.n.com SUPEROR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALFORNA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DSTRCT KENDRCK MOXON 2 Plaintiff, 3 v. 4 GRAHAM BERRY, Defendants. GRAHAM E. BERRY, an individual; Cross-Complainant, v. KENDRCK L. MOXON, an individual; 20 Cross-Defendant. 2 Case No. BC4 NOTCE TO DEPARTMENTS & LST OF DOCUMENTS ETHER FLED OR LODGED N RELATON TO DEFENDANT'S REQUST TO FLE NEW LTGATON-JUDCAL COUNCL FORMMC0. Action filed: January, 20 2 2 2 2

WHEREAS, this proceeding has been assigned to Department ; and 2 WHEREAS, Defendant has filed a Judicial Council Fol MC-0 and supporting exhibits; and 3 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has opposed the filing of Defendant' s proposed compulsory cross- complaint; and WHEREAS, the Presiding Judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, sitting in Deparment, must first consider and rule upon the requ+ to file new litigation; and WHEREAS, some of the papers submitted to the court in relation to the pending request have been "filed," others "lodged," and some perhaps are not in Department where it is understood 2 they should be at this time; and 3 4 WHEREAS, for ruling; the Request to File New Litigation would now appear to be fully briefed and ready NOW THEREFORE the Defendant and proposed cross-defendant provides Departments and with this list of documents either filed or lodged herein and in the order they should be assembled: 20. Complaint to enforce judgment filed January, 20; 2 2. Request and Order to File New Litigation by Vexatious Litigant lodged February,20; 3. Unverified Answer and Verified Compulsory Cross-Complaint filed February,20; 2 4. Defendant and Cross-Complainant's Appendix No. of Exhibits and R.F.J.N. filed 2//; 2 2. Defendant and Cross-Complainant's Appendix No. of Exhibits and R.F.J.N. filed 2 2//; List of documents filed or lodged in connection wit Judicial Council Form MC-0

2 3 4. Defendant and Cross-Complainant's Appendix No. of Exhibits and R.F.J.N. filed 2//;. Defendant and Cross-Complainant's Appendix No. V of Exhibits and R.F.J.N. filed 2//;. Defendant and Cross-Complainants Reply in support of request re Moxon opposition received late Saturday 2/20/ but not filed by Plaintiff and superseded by Plaintiff's. Opposition to Vexatious Litigant's Request to File New Litigation filed February, 20;. Defendant and Cross-Complainant's Revised Reply in Support of Request to File New 2 Litigation and Rebuttal Exhibits. 3 4 Copies of the conformed caption pages of each of the above documents are attached hereto as Exhibit A. f any of the above-listed documents are not with epartment, as the Request to File New Litigation requires, Defendant and proposed cross-complainant Graham E. Berry will gladly deliver a conformed copy at the court's request. 20 2 Dated: February 2,20 2 2 GiE.BERRY Defendant and [proposed] Cross-complainant 2 2 List of documents filed or lodged in connection witll Judicial Council Form MC-0

2 3 4 2 3 4 20 2 2 2 EXHBT A 2 2 List of documents filed or lodged in connection with Judicial Council Form MC-0

-: 2.,. 4 Kendrick L. Moxon, State Bar No. 20 MOXON & KOBRN kmoxoniiiearthlink.net 30 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: (23 4-44 Facsimile: (23 4-3 Attorney for Plaintiff Pro se CONFORMED COpy OF ORG~NAL F~LEO Los Angeles Superior Court JAN 0 20 SUPEROR COURT OF THE STATf OF CALFORNA COUNTY OF LOS AN ELES 2 3 4 KENDRCK MOXON Plaintiff, vs. GRAHAM BERRY, Defendant. Case No. ----- COMPLANT TO ENFORCE JUDGMENT NTRODUCl ON 20 2 2. This is an action to enforce a judgment ag inst defendant Graham Berry, issued and assessed against him for acts of bad faith litigation. This action is brought pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 3.020 et seq. PARTES 2. Plaintiff, Kendrick Moxon ("Moxon", is an attorney, licensed to practice law in all state and federal courts of the State of California, and the District of Columbia. 2 2 2 He is a resident of Los Angeles County. COMPLA"''T

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WTHOUT ATTORNEY (Name. Slate Bar number, and address: Graham E. Berry SB No. 203 --334 McLaugWin Avenue Los Angeles, CA 00-200 FOR COURT USE ONL Y MC-0 TELEPHONE NO.: (3 4-3 FAX NO (optional}:(3 4-3 E MALADDRESS (Optional: graharnberryeaca.rr.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name: Defendant and cross-complainant pro se SUPEROR COURT OF CALFORNA, COUNTY OFLos Angeles STREET ADDRESS: N. Hill Street MALNG ADDRESS: CTY AND ZlP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 002 BRANCH NAME: Central ~t PLANTFF!PETTONER:Kendrick Moxon DEFENDANT!RESPONDENT:Graham Berry OTHER:And related compulsory cross-complaint ~ REQUEST AND ORDER TO FLE NEW'LTGATON BY VEXATOUS LTGANT FEB.... REC'O Type of case: 0 Limited Civil D Unlimited Civil D Small Claims D Family Law D Probate 0 Other e lolo U V\JUL W CASE NUMBER: BC4. have been determined to be a vexatious litigant and must obtain prior court approval to file any new litigation in which am not represented by an attorney. Filing new litigation means ( commencing any civilaction or proceeding, or (2 filing any petition, application, or motion (except a discovery motion under the Family or Probate Code, 2. have attached to this request a copy of the document to be filed and request approval from the presiding judge of the above court to file this document (name of document: Unverified answer and verified compulsory cross-complaint; Appen 'x No. - of documents filed to demonstrate the merits thereof & filed in connection with the responsive pleading & the pre-filing order. 3. The new filing has merit because (give reasons: Hurtado (Ex.A and Cipriano (Ex. E evidence unavailable at time of elevant underlying matters; Exs A-J show that absent criminal conduct by officer of court Moxon in underlying cases plaintiffs would have prevailed. Vexatious litigant order is erroneous upon face of Cts reco d. Matters in verified cross-complaint. 4. The new filing is not being filed to harass or to cause a delay because (give reasons: New filing is an answer and verified compulsory cross-complaint file defensively and to vacate "unjust judgments" obtained through "extrinsic fraud and/or mistake" by an a ficer ofthe court. declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foreg,. Date: February,20 Graham E. Berry, SB # 203 (TYPE OR PRNT NAME OF DECLARANT Approval to file the attached document is: a. 0 Granted b. 0 Denied c. 0 Other: ORDER o Attachment to order. Number of pages. Date: (PRESONG JUDGE Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC 0 [New January. 200] REQUEST AND ORDER TO FLE NEW LTGATON BY VEXATOUS LGANT Page of Code of Civil Procedure. 3. www.courtinfo.ca.gov

GRAHAM E. BERRY, Bar No.203 Attorney at Law 334 McLaughlin Avenue 2 Los Angeles, California 00-200 Telephone: (3 4-3 3 Facsimile: (3 4-3 Email: grahamben-v@ca.rr.com SUPEROR COURT OF CALFORNA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DSTRfT KENDRCK MOXON 2 Plaintiff, 3 4 v. GRAHAM BERRY, Defendants. --------------------------~.20 Cross-Defendant. 2-------------------------~ 2 2 2 2 GRAHAM E. BERRY, an individual; v. Cross-Complainant, KENDRCK L. MOXON, an individual; Action filed: January,20 Case. BC 4 Filed concurrently with: ( Ju! icial Council Form MC-0; (2 Appendix No. of Exhibits (Ex. A; (3 Appendix No. of Exhibits (Ex. B-D; (4 Appendix No. of Exhibits [Ex. E-J]. ANSWER & CROSS-COMPLANT

r. GRAHAM E. BERRY, Bar No.203 Attorney at Law 334 McLaughlin Avenue 2 Los Angeles, California 00-200 Telephone: (3 4-3 3 Facsimile: (3 4-3 Email: 2Tahamberrv@ca.rr.com SUPEROR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALFORNA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DSTRCT 2 3 KENDRCK MOXON Case No. BC4 Plaintiff, v. 4 GRAHAM BERRY, DEFENiUANT AND CROSS- COMPLANANT'S APPENDX NO. Defendants. OF E$BTS AND REQUEST FOR -------------- JUDCAL NOTCE FLED AS PART OF THE ~RFED ANSWER AND GRAHAM E. BERRY, an individual; Cross-Complainant, v. VERFED COMPULSARY CROSS- COMPLANT HEREN.. Action filed: January, 20 l [Filed loncurrently KENDRCK L. MOXON, an individual; with: ( Judicial Council 20 Cross-Defendant. ofcalifomiafonn MC-0 (C.C.P. 3.; (2 Appendix No. of Exhibits [Exhibits B- 2 D]; (4 Appendix No. of Exhibits [Exhibits E-J] ; Unverified answer and verifid d cross-complaint] 2 2 2 2 APPEND XOF EXHBTS

. F\ GRAHAM E. BERRY, Bar No.203 Attorney at Law. 334 McLaughlin Avenue 2 Los Angeles, California00(j-200 Telephone: (3 4-3. 3 Facsimile: (3 4-3 Emai: grahamberrv@ca.rr.com.. COUNTY OF LOS AN,ELES SUPEROR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALFORNA CENTRAL DSTR T. KENDRCK MOXON 2 Plaintiff, 3 v. 4 GRAHAM BERRY, Defendants. GRAHAM E. BERRY, an individual; Cross-Complainant, v. KENDRCK L. MOXON, an individual; 20 Cross-Defendant. 2 Case No. BC4 DEFE~ANT AND CROSSg~mt:fsN~f:~~~ ;R ll JUDCAL NOTCE FLED ASP ART OF THE UNVERFED ANSWER AND VERFED COMPULSARY CROSS-. COMPlANT HEREN. Action filed: January,20 [Filed concurrently with: ( Judicial Council of California Form MC-0 (C.C.P. 3.; (2 Appendix No. of Exhibits [Exhibit A];/ (4 Appendix No. of Exhibits [Exhibits. E-J] ;[Unverified answer and verified crosscomplaint] 2 2 2 2

GRAHAM E. BERRY, Bar No.203 Attorney at Law 334 McLaughlin Avenue 2 Los Angeles, California 00-200 Telephone: (3 4-3 3 Facsimile: (3 4-3 Email: grahamberrv@ca.rr.com CONFORMED copy (l~gnal ALED SUlLenor Coun of California t:ounty of Los Angeles FEB 20 John A C,~..'j.. ~Y'-e:-. scunve Offl!>"'/G/erk By ~.; "'" " GLOR/ETTA ROBNSON Deputy SUPERlOR COURT OF THE STATE\OF CALFORNA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DSTRCT 2 KENDRCK MOXON Plaintiff, 3 v. 4 GRAHAM BERRY, Case TO. BC4 DEFENDANT AND CROSS- COMPLANANT'S APPENDX NO. ill Defendants. OF EXHBTS AND REQUEST FOR ---------------.fljdcal NOTCE FLED AS PART OF. THE UNVERFED ANSWER AND 20 Cross-Defendant. --------------- 2 2 2 2 GRAHAM E. BERRY, an individual; v. Cross-Complainant, KENDRCK L. MOXON, an individual; 2 VERFED COMPULSARY CROSS- COMP~ANT leren. Action filed: January, 20 [Filed concurrently with: ( Judicial Council of California Form MC-0 (C.c.P. 3.; (2 Appendix No. of Exhibits [Exhibit A]; (4 Appendix No. of Exhibits [Exhibits B- D] ; Unverified answer and verified crosscomplaint] RE

GRAHAM E. BERRY, Bar No.203 Attorney at Law 334 McLaughlin Avenue 2 Los Angeles, California 00-200 Telephone: (3 4-3 3 Facsimile: (3 4-3 Email: m-ahamberrv(cij.ca.rr.com SUPEROR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALFORNA COUNTY OF LOS AN(!;ELES CENTRAL DSTRCT RE

232 2:40: p.m. 02--20 2/2 2 3 4 Kendrick. Moxon, State Bar No. 20 MOXON & KOBRN kmoxo"n(ci,earthlinlc. net 30 Wushire Boulevard, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: (23 4-44 Facsimile: (23 4-3 CONFORMED copy OF ORGNAL FLED rt LoS Angeles superior Col Attorney for Plaintiff Pro se SUPEROR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALFORNA COUNTY OF LOS ANGE~ES 2 3 KENDRCK MOXON Plaintiff, 4 vs. GRAHAM BERRY, Defendant. 20 Case No. BC4 OPPOSTON TO VEXATOUS LTGANT S REQUEST TO FLE NEW LTGATON; REQUEST FOR FNDNG OF CONTEMPT AGANST GRAHAM BERRY; NOTCE OF FLNG OF DENTFOATON OF VEXATOUS LTGANTPURSUANT TO C~C.P. 3.(C AND AUTOMATC STAY Dept: Date: N/A 2 NTRODUCTON n, Graham Berry, was found to have violate~rule, F.R.Civ.P., and 2 D_S.C. 2, through the filing of a frivolous and bad faith action against attorney, 2 plaintiff Kendrick Moxon, and was appropriated monetariy sanctioned. Thereafter, in 2 light of this and other bad faith litigation Mr. Berry pursued and lost, he was found to 2 be a "vexatious litigant" pursuant to C.C.P. 3, et seq. ~. Berry never paid the 2 ppostnon To Vexatious Litigant's Request For leave 0 ile Action FEE 20 2:33 232 PAGE. 02

GRAHAM E. BERRY, Bar No.203 Attorney at Law 334 Mcl.aughlin Avenue 2 Los Angeles, California 00-200 Telephone: (3 4-3 3 Facsimile: (3 4-3 Email: grahamberry@ca.rr.com SUPEROR COURT OF THE STAT OF CALFORNA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 2 3 Defendants. ---------------------------- GRAHAM E. BERRY, an individual; Cross-Complainant, v. KENDRCK L. MOXON, an individual; 20 Cross-Defendant. ------------------------------ 2 2 KENDRCK v. MOXON Plaintiff, 4 GRAHAM BERRY,?h CENTRAL DSTRCT l Case ' BC4 DEFENDANT AND CROSS- COMJ»LANANT'S REPLY N SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO FLE NEW LTGATON AND REBUTTAL EilTS. Action filed: January, 20 [Filed concurrently with Appendix No. V of Exhibits (K-Z and Request for Judicial Notife.l

'. ~", - #.: GRAHAM E. BERRY, Bar No. 203 Attorney at Law 334 McLaughlin Avenue 2 Los Angeles, California 00-200 Telephone: (3 4-3 3 Facsimile: (3 4-3 Email: grahambcn.(cil.ca.n-.com. _...j._,...~.,_co.:: _._ ":-. '..... ~ -:.-~'...... i ::-~f~: ',' -,~"~.... '- :.~-.;.i :#::'l'.;~2. SUPEROR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALFORNA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DSTRCT KENDRCK MOXON 2 Plaintiff, 3 v. 4 GRAHAM BERRY, Defendants. GRAHAM E. BERRY, an individual; Cross-Complainant, v. KENDRCK L. MOXON, an individual; 20 Cross-Defendant. 2 Case No. BC4 DEFENDANT AND CROSS- COMPLANANT'S REVSED REPLY N SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO FLE NEW LTGATON AND REBUTTAL EXHBTS. Action filed: January, 20 2 2 2 2

PROOF OF SERVCE BY MAL 2 3 STATE OF CALFORNA ss.: 4 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES MOXON V BERRY BC42 am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. am over the age of and not a party to the within action. My business address is 334 McLaughlin Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 00 On February 2,20, served on interested parties in said action the within: NOTCE TO DEPARTMENTS & 2 By email, fax and 3 4 by placing a true copy thereof in sealed envelope(s addressed as stated below. Kendrick L. Moxon, Esq, Moxon & Kobrin 30 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: (23 4-44 Facsimile: (23 4-3 Email: kmoxon@earthlink.net 20 am readily familiar with this firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited witth. the U.S. postal service on that same 2 day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California, in the ordinary course of business. am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than day fter date of deposit for mailing in affidavit, Executed on February 2,20, at Los Angeles, Califo ia. declare under penalty of perjury under the laws 2 foregoing is true and correct. 2 Graham E. Berry (Type or print name 2 2 List of documents filed or lodged in conn~tion with Judicial Council Form MC-0 _