STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
After due notice, the above styled matter came before the undersigned Judge of

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT

ORDER ON AWARD OF CLAIMANT'S APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE. Judge: W.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS PORT ST. LUCIE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Orlando District

was represented by Kate Albin Esq.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN/MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Miami District FINAL MERITS ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS DAYTONA BEACH DISTRICT

Pre and Post Conf Laredo Hearing Judge DAVID JONES, Laredo William E. Heitkamp, Trustee April 4, :00 pm. 1:00 pm

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE

F:INAL COMPENSATION ORDER

This matter came before me, the undersigned Judge of Compensation Claims, for a

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Laura Roesch, Judge.

petition for identification only but not as evidence and was proffered by Claimant FINAL MERITS ORDER

At the Final Hearing, the claimant sought the following benefits:

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Courtesy 440Authority.com

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ST. PETERSBURG DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS DAYTONA BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE

CITY OF MIAMI, PETITIONER, RESPONDENTS.

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Nolan S. Winn, Judge.

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. E. Douglas Spangler, Jr., Judge.

undersigned Judge of Compensation Claims on January 14, 2011 in Orlando, Orange County, Florida, pursuant to claims raised in a

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF SELF INSURANCE (FASI) FILED IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT

held on October 8, Present for the hearing were Martha Fornaris, Esq., counsel for the

2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1

STATE OF FLORIDA DNISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS DAYTONA BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Margaret E. Sojourner, Judge.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JORGE LUIS DOMINGUEZ, Respondent.

Order of the. Inter-American Court of Human Rights * of July 6, Case of Cantos v. Argentina

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES, AND MOBILE HOMES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) The Florida Bar File No ,076(11J) REPORT OF REFEREE

FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

Unemployment Compensation Discovery Request Instructions

Case 0:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2018 Page 1 of 5

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC ********************************************** EDWARD HOWLAND, Petitioner, vs.

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2017 Page 1 of 4

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. MYERS DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. John P. Thurman, Judge.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D., 2007

ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE. THIS COURT, having determined the need to facilitate an orderly progression of

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE

Watts v. Brunson, Robinson & Huffstutler, Attorneys, P.A. et al Doc. 55

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS GAINESVILLE DISTRICT OFFICE

CASE NO. 1D L. Barry Keyfetz of L. Barry Keyfetz, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Morningstar Document Research

Case 2:11-cv JEM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2011 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ORDER ADDRESSING THE MERITS OF A PETITION FOR BENEFITS FILED 12/17/2010

OF FLORIDA ** CASE NO. 3DO Garcia-Montes, for appellant

FNAL COMPENSATION ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No CIV-SEITZ/MCALILEY

Case 1:07-cv UU Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2008 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D CITY OF MIAMI. Petitioner. vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. MYERS DISTRICT OFFICE COMPENSATION ORDER

CASE NO. 1D Bradley Guy Smith, Lakeland, and Bill McCabe, Longwood, for Appellant.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Doris E. Jenkins, Judge.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC04-32 RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/20/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/20/2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No ,295(11L) REPORT OF REFEREE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Lower Tribunals Case No. 1D On Review from the District Court of Appeal, First District, State of Florida

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims Thomas W. Sculco, Judge.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) The Florida Bar File No ,045 (11E) REPORT OF REFEREE

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Henry H. Harnage, Judge.

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Thomas G. Portuallo, Judge.

HEARINGS FOR TUESDAY 10/30/2018 (PARTIAL TIMES StartTime SELECTED) JUDGE WENDEL W WURST 10:30 AM Rosas, Frank Pretrial Conference

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

CASE NO. 1D Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FOR FRAUD ON THE COURT AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND FOR CIVIL SANCTIONS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. Supreme Court Case No. SC BENJAMIN RAUL ALVAREZ, REPORT OF REFEREE

Case AJC Doc 250 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 3. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) The Florida Bar File No ,165(OSC) REPORT OF REFEREE

However, he was unable to find an attorney who wished to undertake

NOTICE OF APPEAL. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Respondent State of Florida, through the Attorney

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2009

MINUTES FLORIDA BARBERS BOARD CROWNE PLAZA HOTEL 200 E. GREGORY STREET PENSACOLA, FLORIDA Monday, August 4, 2014

Transcription:

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE Mirta Soto, vs. Employee/Claimant, U.S. Security Associates, and Employer, Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Carrier/Servicing Agent. OJCC Case No. 07-024965GCC Accident date: 6/28/2007 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND STRIKING "MOTION TO COMPEL UPDATED CARRIER FILE BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDEMNITY/MEDICAL PAYOUT, UPDATED MEDICAL RECORDS, AND SURVEILLANCE" (1 Claimant s counsel has filed a "Motion to Compel Updated Carrier File But Not Limited to Indemnity/Medical Payout, Updated Medical Records and Surveillance" dated December 30, 2009. (2 Claimant's counsel has filed the exact same motion in the following other matters in this division:

OJCC number Claimant's Name Date Motion filed 06-034364GCC Uribe, John 12/3/2009 06-008590GCC Valencia, Francia 12/3/2009 04-006070GCC Sanchez, Maria 12/24/2009 04-009518GCC Serrano, Angel 12/28/2009 99-015672GCC Shaw, Percell 12/28/2009 04-006106GCC Sainz, Lourdes 12/29/2009 07-012042GCC Suarez-Miralla, Michel O. 12/30/2009 06-026526GCC Sut De La Roca, Pablo 12/30/2009 04-021392GCC Soto, Susan 12/30/2009 03-002544GCC Sturrup, Wendell 12/30/2009 03-000878GCC St. Victor, Jean 12/30/2009 02-010778GCC Tavarez, Favio 12/30/2009 02-010664GCC Thaureaux, Ibrahim 12/30/2009 04-015354GCC Vazquez, Reyna 12/31/2009 04-009744GCC Turcios, Vicente 12/31/2009 03-028872GCC Valdes, Alberto 12/31/2009 02-011016GCC Vasquez, Sara 12/31/2009 02-002530GCC Valeriano, Mario R. 12/31/2009 06-024334GCC Viera-Tejera, Juan 1/6/2010 03-032182GCC Viamontes, Elsa 1/6/2010 02-032880GCC Yero, Jeisy 1/6/2010 00-003126GCC Villagra, Luis A. 1/6/2010 01-001494GCC Espinosa, Jesus 1/6/2010 07-004913 GCC Valdes, Roberto 12/3/2009 06-035545 GCC Zequeira, Ricardo 12/3/2009

05-033263 GCC Valdes, Jason 12/3/2009 03-031739 GCC Zuluaga, Nicolas 12/3/2009 08-008505 GCC Leal, Segundo Pablo 12/24/2009 05-017365 GCC Santana, Elaine 12/24/2009 04-024943 GCC Sanchez, Maria 12/24/2009 02-033913 GCC Santiago, Angel 12/24/2009 01-015183 GCC Santiago, Roberto 12/24/2009 02-047849 GCC Serrano, Jorge 12/28/2009 06-035363 GCC Salazar, Maria 12/29/2009 02-031239 GCC Solozano, Reina 12/29/2009 08-029887 GCC Santos Teletor, Genova 12/30/2009 07-003359 GCC Tejerino, Ramon E. 12/30/2009 04-031477 GCC Thomas, Rodney 12/30/2009 03-036929 GCC Sprovero, Michael 12/30/2009 04-002383 GCC Zamora, Laura 12/31/2009 03-017747 GCC Torres, Amado 12/31/2009 02-014943 GCC Torres, Luis 12/31/2009 06-027249 GCC Victoria, Eduardo 1/6/2010 02-046459 GCC Verdecia, Raul 1/6/2010 00-027351 GCC Fuerte, Julian 1/6/2010

(3 In each case where said motion has been filed, claimant makes the same generic requests. The motion is never tailored to the specific facts and issues of the matter in which the form motion is filed. The pleading filed in this case is no different and suffers from this same defect. (4 In each case, the motion filed is wholly premature. There is no basis to have filed the motion in the first place. There is no basis to file a Motion to Compel when there is no underlying Request for Production with which the E/C has not complied. In this case, as in each of the other matters involving claimant's form motions, there is no outstanding underlying Request for Production from which the E/C has failed to respond. In this case, as in each other matter, claimant's counsel has gone straight to filing a Motion to Compel. This is wholly inappropriate. (5 Additionally, the motion at issue fails to comply with the most basic of procedural rules. Rule 60Q-6.115(2 reads: (2 Except for motions to dismiss for lack of prosecution, prior to filing any motion, the movant shall personally confer with the opposing party or parties or, if represented, their attorneys of record to attempt to amicably resolve the subject matter of the motion. All motions shall include a statement that the movant has personally conferred or has used good-faith efforts to confer with all other parties or, if represented, their attorneys of record and shall state whether any party has an objection to the motion. This rule expressly requires an attorney to have consulted with opposing counsel prior to the filing of a motion. (6 In this case, as in all others, counsel has made no effort whatsoever to communicate with opposing counsel prior to filing a Motion to Compel. Instead, counsel attempts to circumvent the rule by pleading that the Motion itself represents an effort to resolve a conflict - a conflict that does not exist because no underlying production request remains pending. Undoubtedly, had counsel followed the rule, the error of proceeding to file a Motion to Compel without there being an underlying motion would have been brought to his attention. (7 Each of the motion filed by claimant's counsel imposes upon the Judge of Compensation Claims (hereinafter: JCC. While review of ripe motions certainly warrants the investment of the JCC's time, it is cumbersome and a waste of limited resources for JCCs to have to review one unripe motion after another. The latter is precisely what has unfolded herein - all because counsel disregarded explicit requirements imposed by rule. It is hereby Ordered: (1 Claimant's Motion to Compel Updated Carrier File But Not Limited to Indemnity/Medical Payout, Updated Medical Records, and Surveillance is STRICKEN. (2 Claimant's counsel has ten (10 days to show good cause via pleading filed with this division

as to why he should not be sanctioned for disregarding the explicit requirements mandated by Rule 60Q-6.115(2. (3 Furthermore, claimant's counsel has ten (10 days to show good cause via pleading filed with this division as to why his Motion to Compel Updated Carrier File But Not Limited to Indemnity/Medical Payout, Updated Medical Records, and Surveillance should not be found to be a sham pleading. Done and entered in chambers in Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida this 13th day of January, 2010 Gerardo Castiello Judge of Compensation Claims CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been mailed to each of the parties listed below via E/mail this 13th day of January, 2010. Assistant to the Judge of Compensation Claims Richard E. Zaldivar 2600 SW THIRD AVENUE SUITE 300 Miami, Florida 33129 MAXZZ@BELLSOUTH.NET; ZALDIVARPA@GMAIL.COM Zal Linder Hurley, Rogner, Miller, Cox, Waranch & Westcott 1280 SW 36th Avenue, Suite 100 Pompano Beach, Florida 33069 emiller@hrmcwbroward.com