Political Activity and Lobbying Report 2016

Similar documents
Political Activity and Lobbying Report 2017

Political Contributions Report. Introduction POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

If you have questions, please or call

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

2016 us election results

Congressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.

January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

Immigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008

Understanding UCC Article 9 Foreclosures. CEU Information

CenturyLink Political Contributions Report. July 1, 2017 December 31, 2017

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Sunlight State By State After Citizens United

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

Exhibit A. Anti-Advance Waiver Of Lien Rights Statutes in the 50 States and DC

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

/mediation.htm s/adr.html rograms/adr/

Economic Nexus Standards in State Taxation. CEU Information

Gun Laws Matter. A Comparison of State Firearms Laws and Statistics

Instructions for Completing the Trustee Certification/Affidavit for a Securities-Backed Line of Credit

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

Historically, state PM&R societies have operated as independent organizations that advocate on legislative and regulatory proposals.

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

A Nation Divides. TIME: 2-3 hours. This may be an all-day simulation, or broken daily stages for a week.

Election 2014: The Midterm Results, the ACA and You

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

Governing Board Roster

STANDARDIZED PROCEDURES FOR FINGERPRINT CARDS (see attachment 1 for sample card)

RULE 7.5: FIRM NAMES AND LETTERHEADS

Presentation to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers' International Union. Paul Lemmon July 26, 2010

Fundamentals of the U.S. Transportation Construction Market

Research Brief. Resegregation in Southern Politics? Introduction. Research Empowerment Engagement. November 2011

APPENDIX C STATE UNIFORM TRUST CODE STATUTES

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2019

Sample file. 2. Read about the war and do the activities to put into your mini-lapbook.

Lobbying: 10 Answers you need to know Venable LLP

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

Presentation Outline

States Adopt Emancipation Day Deadline for Individual Returns; Some Opt Against Allowing Delay for Corporate Returns in 2012

ANTI-POVERTY DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD STAMP PROGRAM BENEFITS: A PROFILE OF 1975 FEDERAL PROGRAM OUTLAYS* Marilyn G. Kletke

Now is the time to pay attention

APPENDIX D STATE PERPETUITIES STATUTES

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

SMART GROWTH, IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Geek s Guide, Election 2012 by Prof. Sam Wang, Princeton University Princeton Election Consortium

Admitting Foreign Trained Lawyers. National Conference of Bar Examiners Washington, D.C., April 15, 2016

Regional CLE Program:

Briefing ELECTION REFORM. Ready for Reform? After a day of chaos, a month of uncertainty and nearly two years of INSIDE. electionline.

MEMORANDUM. STATE OF ALASKA Department of Law-Criminal Division. Survey of States Sentencing

Incarcerated Women and Girls

State Legislative Competition in 2012: Redistricting and Party Polarization Drive Decrease In Competition

Limited Liability Corporations List of State Offices Contact Information

RULE 1.1: COMPETENCE. As of January 23, American Bar Association CPR Policy Implementation Committee

Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers

RULE 3.8(g) AND (h):

Election Year Corporate Political Activity: Legal Risks and Strategic Opportunities

Mandated Use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PMPs) Map

Uniform Wage Garnishment Act

RULE 1.14: CLIENT WITH DIMINISHED CAPACITY

Graduation and Retention Rates of Nonresidents by State

Dynamic Diversity: Projected Changes in U.S. Race and Ethnic Composition 1995 to December 1999

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2008

COMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION WITH STATE VERSIONS AND AMENDMENTS SINCE AUGUST 2002

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

2018 NATIONAL CONVENTION

Constitution in a Nutshell NAME. Per

The Impact of Wages on Highway Construction Costs

VOL. XV No. 12 Dec. 3, 2018

FSC-BENEFITED EXPORTS AND JOBS IN 1999: Estimates for Every Congressional District

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

State and Local Immigration Laws: Recap of 2013 and Outlook for November 22, 2013

The Progressive Era. 1. reform movement that sought to return control of the government to the people

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

Report of Lobbying and Political Contributions For Fiscal Year 2015

The Great Immigration Turnaround

RULE 3.1: MERITORIOUS CLAIMS AND CONTENTIONS

Update on State Judicial Issues. William E. Raftery KIS Analyst Williamsburg, VA

VOTER WHERE TO MAIL VOTER REGISTRATION FORM. Office of the Secretary of State P.O. Box 5616 Montgomery, AL

Prison Price Tag The High Cost of Wisconsin s Corrections Policies

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015

2010 Immigration-Related Bills and Resolutions in the States

CRAIN S CLEVELAND BUSINESS

Section 4. Table of State Court Authorities Governing Judicial Adjuncts and Comparison Between State Rules and Fed. R. Civ. P. 53

RULE 4.2: COMMUNICATION WITH PERSON REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL

State Reforms Reducing Collateral Consequences for People with Criminal Records

VOCA 101: Allowable/Unallowable Expenses Janelle Melohn, IA Kelly McIntosh, MT

Statutes of Limitations for the 50 States (and the District of Columbia)

Washington, D.C. Update

Transcription:

and Lobbying Transparency is a critical part of the relationships we have with our government partners and the taxpayers we ultimately serve, as well as our shareholders, and we are committed to transparency regarding our government relations and political efforts. In addition to complying with applicable disclosure laws, CoreCivic is going a step further to produce this annual report, which we believe will bring further clarity to our activities. We believe it is the right thing to do for our business, our partners and our shareholders. CoreCivic s political and government relations activities are designed to educate federal, state and local officials on the benefits of partnership corrections, CoreCivic s ability to assist them in meeting their needs and our track record of success. Our company does not, under longstanding policy, lobby for or against policies or legislation that would determine the basis for or duration of an individual s incarceration or detention. Page 1

Overview Corporate funds are used to make political contributions where allowed by law and where management has determined that such contributions will be an effective use of the funds. CoreCivic also sponsors a political action committee (PAC)* that makes contributions to federal candidates and to candidates in certain jurisdictions where contributions with corporate funds are not allowed. CoreCivic s political contributions and lobbying activities are subject to robust oversight, approval and compliance procedures. contributions using corporate funds require approval by our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Development Officer or a Vice President Partnership Relations and, for compliance purposes, the Office of General Counsel. Government relations engagements and expenditures require Vice President-level or above approval. The Office of General Counsel and external compliance experts provide support for the company s reporting and other compliance obligations, as well as periodic compliance training for internal partnership development personnel and contract government relations professionals. The Risk Committee of CoreCivic s Board of Directors provides Board-level oversight of the Company s political and government relations activities and compliance procedures. Compliance policies and procedures are addressed in CoreCivic s Code of Ethics and in greater detail in our Government Relations policy.** Our government relations activities focus on legislative, regulatory and executive actions that may impact the construction, operation and leasing of privately owned or managed prisons, detention facilities, and residential reentry centers. We also advocate for a wide range of innovative, cost-saving governement real estate solutions through our CoreCivic Properties business offering. The disclosures in the lobbying reports filed by the company under the Federal Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended by the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007 ( LDA ), are representative of the types of matters on which the company lobbies. As stated in our most recent LDA report,*** and as a matter of longstanding corporate policy and practice, CoreCivic does not lobby for or against policies or legislation that would determine the basis for an individual s incarceration or detention. This policy is included in our Code of Ethics and our Government Relations Policy. * CoreCivic Action Committee ** http://www.corecivic.com/media/default/documents/misc/policy-3-28.pdf *** Available at https://lobbyingdisclosure.house.gov/ Page 2

Contributions Table A-1 Totals by Source of Funds Combined Corporate and CoreCivic PAC................... $1,005,630.00 Corporate....................................... $846,800.00 CoreCivic PAC.................................... $158,830.00 Totals by Recipient Category (Source in Parenthesis) Federal Candidates, Parties & Committees (CoreCivic PAC)......... $149,000.00 State/Local Candidates, Parties & Committees (Combined)......... $366,630.00 National 527 (Corporate).............................. $490,000.00 Table A-2 (Continued on following page) State Type CoreCivic PAC Corporate AL Candidate $2,500.00 AL Total $2,500.00 AR Candidate $3,000.00 AR Total $3,000.00 AZ Candidate $2,000.00 $13,000.00 Party Committee $13,000.00 AZ Total $2,000.00 $13,000.00 CA Candidate $2,500.00 $85,200.00 Committee $32,200.00 Party $55,000.00 CA Total $2,500.00 $172,400.00 CO Committee $2,000.00 $35,300.00 CO Total $2,000.00 $35,300.00 DC Candidate $1,000.00 DC Total $1,000.00 FL Candidate $5,500.00 $8,500.00 Committee $7,000.00 Party $5,000.00 FL Total $5,500.00 $20,500.00 GA Candidate $5,500.00 $30,750.00 GA Total $5,500.00 $30,750.00 IN Candidate $2,500.00 IN Total $2,500.00 KS Candidate $2,500.00 $2,000.00 KS Total $2,500.00 $2,000.00 KY Committee $2,500.00 Party $5,000.00 KY Total $7,500.00 MO Candidate $2,500.00 MO Total $2,500.00 MS Candidate $2,000.00 MS Total $2,000.00 Page 3

State Type CoreCivic PAC Corporate MT Candidate $4,480.00 Party $2,500.00 MT Total $6,980.00 NC Candidate $2,500.00 NC Total $2,500.00 ND Candidate $3,000.00 ND Total $3,000.00 NH Candidate $2,500.00 $5,000.00 ND Total $2,500.00 $5,000.00 NJ Candidate $5,000.00 $1,000.00 NJ Total $5,000.00 $1,000.00 NM Candidate $5,000.00 NM Total $5,000.00 NV Candidate $2,500.00 $1,000.00 Committee $2,500.00 NV Total $2,500.00 $3,500.00 OH Candidate $1,000.00 OH Total $1,000.00 SC Candidate $1,000.00 Committee $2,500.00 SC Total $3,500.00 TN Candidate $14,000.00 $27,350.00 Committee $5,000.00 $29,000.00 Party $10,000.00 Other $100.00 TN Total $19,100.00 $66,350.00 TX Candidate $25,250.00 Committee $2,500.00 TX Total $27,750.00 UT Candidate $2,500.00 UT Total $2,500.00 VT Candidate $1000.00 VT Total $1000.00 WI Candidate $5,000.00 WI Total $5,000.00 WV Candidate $2,500.00 WV Total $2,500.00 National Parties $30,000.00 National 527's $490,000.00 Federal Committees $5,000.00 GRAND TOTAL $158,830.00 $846,800.00 Page 4

527 Organizations CoreCivic contributed to the following national 527 organizations in : Page 5 Democratic Governors Association Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee National Governors Association Republican Governors Association Republican State Leadership Committee Western Governors Association The aggregate total of contributions to these organizations is included in the summary data listed above. Additional information regarding recipient candidate and political committees, as well as the laws, rules and regulations applicable to political contributions by corporations and corporate affiliated political action committees, is available publicly through Internet sites maintained by the relevant Federal (e.g. the Federal Election Commission and Internal Revenue Service websites, www.fec.gov and www.irs.gov) and state agencies (e.g., www.sos.ca.gov). Lobbying Information CoreCivic retains the services of consultant government relations professionals in jurisdictions where it does or may in the future do business. CoreCivic employees also register as lobbyists in jurisdictions where their activities meet the statutory definition. The list below shows CoreCivic s consultant registered lobbyists in by jurisdiction. Table B-1 Jurisdiction Federal Alabama Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Kentucky Indiana Los Angeles County Minnesota Mississippi Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico Oklahoma South Carolina Tennessee Texas Vermont Washington Firm Name Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Bockorny Group, Inc. Greenberg Traurig, LLP Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC Simmons Russel Group Capitol Resources LLC Policy Development Group Inc. Molera Alvarez LLC Roberts GR Strategies LLC Capitol Advocacy Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP Floridian Partners LLC Smith, Bryan & Myers Piedmont Public Affairs Troutman Sanders Strategies Ashford & Wriston Carlsmith Ball Lobby Idaho, LLC McBrayer McGinnis Leslie & Kirkland Barnes & Thornburg LLP Ek & Ek LLC Hill Capitol Strategies Capitol Resources LLC Ferrari Public Affairs Rath, Young & Pignatelli PC Komjathy & Kean LLC Edwin T. Mahr Fried Kilpatrick Guinn LLC Scott Adkins Consulting, Inc. The Ozmint Firm Johnson Poss Government Relations Greenberg Traurig, LLP McLean, Meehan & Rice LLC Bogard & Johnson LLC CoreCivic s contracts with its outside government relations professionals contain strict conflict of interest clauses that permit CoreCivic to terminate the relationship if the professional or his or her firm engages in activities that conflict with CoreCivic s commitment not to lobby for or against policies or legislation that would determine the basis for or duration of an individual s incarceration or detention.

Lobbying Related Expenses In, CoreCivic expended approximately $1.78 million in fees and other payments relating to lobbying at the Federal, state, and local levels. Of this amount, approximately $830,000 was attributable to Federal lobbying-related activities and the remainder (approximately $958,832) to state and local activities. None of this amount is related to grassroots lobbying communications (communications directed to the general public that refer to specific legislation or regulation, reflects a view on such legislation, or regulation or encourages the recipients to take action with respect to such legislation or regulation). CoreCivic works with a number of consultant lobbyists to ensure that public officials are made aware of the issues impacting our industry. CoreCivic and its consultant lobbyists file disclosure reports at the Federal, state, and local level to comply with the various rules of all jurisdictions in which we have a presence. Trade and Membership Associations, Chambers of Commerce, and Other Groups CoreCivic, its facilities and employees also are members of certain trade and membership associations, chambers of commerce and other groups. Below is a list of such organizations to which CoreCivic paid dues or fees of $25,000 or more in, of which a portion were not tax deductible as a result of being used by the organization for lobbying purposes: Table B-2 Trade Association, Membership Association & Chamber Total Paid % Non-Deductible for Lobbying Non-Deductible Portion Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce $35,900.00 5% $1,975.00 US Chamber of Commerce $25,000.00 40% $10,000.00 National Association of Real $65,852.00 25% $16,463.00 Estate Investment Trusts Combined Other State & Local $16,258.00 10% $1,625.80 Chambers of Commerce TOTAL $166,610.00 $37,063.80 CoreCivic contributes or pays dues to other tax exempt organizations that engage in advocacy or educational efforts on behalf of their constituencies. CoreCivic has not been made aware that any dues paid by CoreCivic are used for lobbying or other political activities. In, CoreCivic was not a member of any partnership corrections-related or similar trade association that engages in political activities on behalf of its members. Many CoreCivic employees are members of the American Correctional Association ( ACA ), which is a 501(c) (3) charitable organization. CoreCivic also pays audit and accreditation related fees to the ACA. 501(c)(3) organizations are subject to strict limitations on political activities, and CoreCivic has not been made aware that any dues or fees paid by CoreCivic or its member employees are used for lobbying. This report is not a supplement to any other report filed or required to be filed by the company with any governmental agency. To the extent the report contains information about PAC, it is not intended as a solicitation for contributions to PAC from any person. The report has not been audited and the company undertakes no obligation to issue any updates or corrections. Page 6