Request for, Objections to and Hearings on

Similar documents
COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS

GUIDELINES FOR COUNSEL REGARDING COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO FLA. R. CIV. P.

[For counsel appearing before the Civil Divisions of the 9th Circuit Court in Orange County]

NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT UNIFORM GUIDELINES REGARDING COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS

GUIDELINES FOR COUNSEL REGARDING COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS

GUIDELINES FOR COUNSEL REGARDING COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO

Judge Declan P. Mansfield Judicial Practice Preferences Section H, J3 & J7

Judge Declan P. Mansfield Judicial Practice Preferences Section H, J3 & J7

Defendant(s). / ORDER REGARDING RULE EXAMINATION 1 Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure ( Examination of Persons ),

Chapter 5 DISCOVERY. 5.1 Vocabulary Introduction and Discovery Deadlines Chart The Deposition 6

R in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

ORDER REGARDING RULE EXAMINATION. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure ( Examination of Persons ),

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations Orange County Circuit Civil Division 40 Judge Bob LeBlanc

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. I

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

STATE OF VERMONT VERMONT SUPREME COURT TERM, Order Promulgating Amendments to Rules 16.2 and 26 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

Guidelines & Procedures Orange Civil- Division 33

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2015

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

Medical Record Discovery Issues in the Motor Vehicle Case

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

SUMMARY JURY TRIAL PART: QUEENS COUNTY SUPREME COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

TITLE 04 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Janet Croom Guidelines and Procedures. Circuit Civil Jury Division (Updated: September, 2017)

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

Wrongful Death Medical Malpractice Lawsuits: Standing, Damages, Doctor vs. Hospital Liability

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Gary L. Sweet Courtroom B Okeechobee County Courthouse

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial)

COURT RULES OF THE HONORABLE RICHARD MOTT, J.S.C. 401 Union Street Columbia County Courthouse (Temporary)

DECISION AND ORDER. This case was referred to the undersigned by the Hon. Richard J. Arcara,

F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. No. CV JH/DJS NOTICE

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between all parties to the within action that disclosure shall proceed and be completed as follows:

STATE OF FLORIDA Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]

IN ORDER TO PROVIDE YOU WITH THE BEST SERVICE POSSIBLE, WE HANDLE ALL COMMUNICATION BY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

LOCAL RULES of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLARION COUNTY

1. Intent. 2. Definitions. OCERS Board Policy Administrative Hearing Procedures

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Civil No. 1:13-CV-1211 vs. GLS/TWD Andrew Cuomo, et al.

Gonzalez v 80 W. 170 Realty LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33414(U) November 20, 2018 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Doris M.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/20/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 35 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/20/2016

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

Trials 101: Civil and Criminal Case Management Essentials, Part 3

ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

CHAPTER 16 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

JUDGE GABRIELLE N. SANDERS Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations For Osceola County Civil Division 60-G, Courtroom 4B

Plaintiffs : : vs. : NO ,389 : SUSQUEHANNA IMAGING : ASSOCIATES, INC.; RICHARD D. : WALTER, M.D.; and PATRICK : J. CAREY, D.O.

N.J.A.C. 5:23A N.J.A.C. 5:23A-1.1. New Jersey Register, Vol. 49 No. 11, June 5, 2017

FBOR DISCIPLINARY APPEAL PROCEDURE City of Seaside

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/03/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/03/2016

WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT RULES AS LAST AMENDED EFFECTIVE 2/7/08

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

State of Florida Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Department 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Elizabeth A. Metzger Courtroom B, Okeechobee County Courthouse

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

The Federal Employee Advocate

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION STANDING ORDER

Chapter IV RULES FOR CIVIL CASES

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

DISCOVERY- LOCAL RULES JUSTICE COURTS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

New Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules (2011)

Transcription:

GUIDELINES FOR COUNSEL REGARDING COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO FLA. R. CIV. P. 1.360(A)(1)(A) & IF ORDERED (B), AS WELL AS 1.360(B) AND 1.390(B) & (C) 1 [For counsel appearing before Division 40, Orange County] In order to assist counsel for all parties seeking to invoke the privileges, and protections, afforded under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.360, the Court herein attempts to address the most frequently disputed matters that are brought before the Court. The examination under the Rule is a Compulsory Examination and not an Independent Examination. The physician or healthcare provider was not chosen by the Court. The examination must not be referred to in front of the jury as an independent medical exam. Request for, Objections to and Hearings on Requests for an examination must set forth the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination as well as the name of and the qualifications of the person conducting the examination with some specificity. If examinations under these rules are requested such written request should be made no later than 70 days before the pretrial date to allow time for objections, hearings on same, and an opportunity to reset the examination. Objections to Examination of Persons under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.360(a)(1)(A) must be filed no later than 30 days from the written request assuming service of process has occurred at least 15 days prior to the request being served. The objections must state the specific reasons for the objections. A hearing must be immediately requested on any objection filed. Failure to set the objection for immediate hearing will be deemed an abandonment of the Request under the rules. Examinations sought under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.360(a)(1)(B) must be obtained with an order from this Court, or with a written agreement of all parties. Please make certain the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination as well as the name of and the qualifications of the person conducting the examination are set forth with some specificity. THE EXAMINATION 1 These Guidelines are published to assist trial counsel with issues that routinely come before this Court involving expert examinations of injured parties and discovery of those expert opinions. Literally, close to 100 hours of hearing time per year are consumed addressing the same objections for the same stated reasons despite the existence of controlling case law. Counsel are not precluded from filing the appropriate motions and obtaining a hearing before the Court on a particular case should the facts of that case, in good faith, suggest that these standard provisions should not control. -1-

The date and time of the examination must be coordinated with opposing counsel. If the attorneys can not agree on a mutually convenient date for the examine to occur within 60 days of the request, the Court, upon written motion, will pick the date without consultation with counsels calendars. Examinations should occur in the county where the case is being tried absent agreement of counsel to the contrary. Out of county examinations must be approved by the Court after an evidentiary hearing and the proper record having been made. While requiring in county exams is not a hard and fast, inflexible rule, it is generally well within the Court s discretion. See McKenney v. Airport Rent-A-Car, 686 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1997). Generally, if out of county examinations are to be conducted the transportation and loss of work expense will have to be born by the party requesting the examination. Persons Who May be Present At The Examination One of Plaintiff s counsel, or a representative thereof, a videographer, a court reporter, an interpreter, if necessary, and/or, if a minor, a parent or guardian may attend the compulsory medical examination. See Broyles v. Reilley, 695 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Audio tape recordings are also permitted. See Palank v. CSX Transp. Inc., 657 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1995). No other persons may attend without specific order of the Court. The plaintiff s counsel will notify, in writing, the names, position relative to the plaintiff, and number of persons who will be present so that an examining room of sufficient size can be reserved. The presence of these third parties is premised upon a requirement that they will not interfere with the doctor s examination. See Bacallao v. Dauphin, 963 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). To that end, no person present may interrupt, enter or leave the examining room during the examination, or vocalize in any matter. No communication vocally, in writing, or in any other manner may occur between or amongst the party being examined and anybody else in the examining room except the examiner or individuals that she/he deems necessary for the examination. Videotape and Stenographic Record of Examination As noted above, a person being examined may be accompanied by a videographer, certified court reporter, and/or interpreter. The recordings are the property of the legal representative of the person being examined and are not discoverable without further order of this Court. Items And Information To Be Brought The person being examined is not required to bring any medical records, diagnostic films or studies or aids or reports with him/her. 2 See Franklin v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 566 2 If the original records, films or other diagnostic aids are in the actual possession of the -2-

So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1990) (requesting party must obtain records through normal discovery process). See also Rojas v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 641 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1994) (appropriate for injured party to sign appropriately limited release for out-of-state medical records where subpoenas have been ignored). The person being examined should have a form of identification to verify their identity if requested. If a patient information sheet was forwarded to counsel for the party to be examined at least 7 business days before the date for the examination, the party to be examined should bring the completed information sheet with them. Written intake forms or histories that are deemed necessary by the examiner must be provided to counsel for the party to be examined no later than 7 days prior to the exam. These forms can be reviewed by counsel and completed by the party to be examined and must be brought to the office of the examiner on the day of the exam. The examining physician may questions the party about entries made on the form regarding medical issues. See Bozman v. Rogers, 640 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1994) (court could require party being examined to provide all appropriate information by filling out forms and answering questions at CME). The party being examined will not be required to provide information as to when or why they retained counsel. Further, while they will be not be required to respond to questions regarding who was a fault in the accident, they will need to respond to inquiry from the healthcare provider regarding the mechanics of the accident and their body movements within the vehicle or at the time of the incident. They will be required to provide their medical history without limitation as to time frame and a work history with regard to the physical attributes and activities of their present and past occupations and hobbies. If the person to be examined is not fluent in English and if the examiner is not fluent in the language of the person being examined a certified interpreter must be utilized to interpret the examination. The expense of the interpreter will be born by the party requesting the examination. Limitations on Examination The examiner will be limited to non-invasive procedures unless a prior order from the court has been obtained, and will further be limited to the extent of the examination that was set forth in the Request for Examination and/or Order allowing the examination. Neither an examination nor subsequent opinions resulting from the examination outside of the examiner s specialty will be permitted. Times for the examination party, or his/her guardian, being examined, those records would have to be produced at the time of the examination upon proper written request. -3-

While an expert s time is valuable, so is the time of the party who is being examined. The party being examined should arrive no later than 15 minutes before the start time of the examination. Examinations which have been scheduled for a specific time should commence within 30 minutes of that time. The party who was to be examined will be free to leave the examiner s office if she/he has not been called in for the examination after having waited for 30 minutes from the published start time of the examination. EXPERT REPORTS AND ANTICIPATED TESTIMONY Subpoenas Retained experts must be produced for discovery deposition without the necessity of a subpoena. All experts should be under subpoena for trial. The Court cannot force a witness to appear who is not under subpoena. Written Reports Pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P.1.360(b) a detailed written report will be issued by the examining physician or healthcare provider and provided to all counsel no later than 14 business days after the day of the examination. As noted in the rule,...if an examiner fails or refuses to make a report, the court may exclude the examiner s testimony if offered at the trial. 1.360(b)(1) The party requesting the examination shall also provide to opposing counsel, at the time the examination is scheduled, no less than three dates when the examiner will be available for oral deposition. Should any of the dates be within 14 days of the examination the above referred to report shall be provided to deposing counsel no later than 5 days before the deposition date. No report under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.360 will be admissible at trial absent a stipulation by the parties. Opinions not contained in written reports Experts rendering opinions under this rule will be prohibited from expressing opinions, diagnostic impressions, causation opinions and other conclusions that are not contained within the written report. Any changes of opinions or conclusions based on new information must be made know to opposing counsel immediately, a revised or supplemental report provided and dates for updated depositions must also be provided. At trial, failure to have taken all immediate, timely and reasonable steps to advise opposing counsel of changes in experts opinions or conclusions will mitigate against allowing such testimony. See Office Depot v. -4-

Miller, 584 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1991). Expert Fees and Charges The Court will not require counsel to tender fees for discovery or trial testimony in advance of or as a condition of the examiner appearing. However, the Court does require full payment to be remitted to the examiner no later than 10 business days from receipt of the invoice from the examiner s office. The retaining party is free to compensate an expert witness any amount they deem appropriate or any amount which they have agreed by contract to pay. The Court will only require opposing counsel to pay a reasonable fee for the time reserved or the time used whichever is less. If counsel and the examiner can agree on such a fee, that fee will apply. If no agreement can be reached, the Court will, upon proper motion and hearing and notice to all parties of interest, including the examiner, establish a reasonable fee for the services. In some cases, this may involve an evidentiary hearing as to the reasonable amount of the fee and the time expended. Be sure to advise the Judicial Assistant as to how much time will be needed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.390(c) Prepared by Judge John Marshall Kest Revised March 2010 Adopted by Judge A. Thomas Mihok, Effective January 3, 2011-5-