, ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PARKERVISION, INC., TO REFORM THE OFFICIAL CAPTION

Similar documents
, ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated

Case 3:11-cv RBD-TEM Document 127 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID 3058

Case 3:11-cv RBD-TEM Document 116 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1549

Nos , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. PARKERVISION, INC., a Florida corporation,

Case 6:14-cv PGB-KRS Document 229 Filed 12/10/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID 8774

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv RBD-TEM Document 99 Filed 04/06/12 Page 1 of 28 PageID 1290

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Case 8:10-cv JDW-EAJ Document 86 Filed 05/25/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID 913

Case 3:15-cv BJD-JRK Document 94 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 4522

Case 3:11-cv RBD-TEM Document 150 Filed 08/23/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID 3418

Case 3:15-cv BJD-JRK Document 107 Filed 08/28/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 4667

Case 3:15-cv BJD-JRK Document 49 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 2283

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IN RE TELES AG,

CASE NOS , -1307, -1309, -1310, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 07/25/ , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

FLORIDA VIRTUAL SCHOOL, et al.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv JLK Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2018 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2015 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Before the Honorable E. James Gildea Administrative Law Judge

Case 1:14-cv ADB Document 527 Filed 09/05/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON DIVISION

Case 5:17-cv JPB Document 29 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 972

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case 5:17-cv JPB Document 29 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 972

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Paper Entered: October 24, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Leave to file reply brief of up to 10,500 words.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. Classroom 329 SYLLABUS

Case 1:10-cv PAB-KLM Document 116 Filed 04/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNOPOSSED PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT S AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT S APPROVAL TO ELECTRONIC FILE CASE DOCUMENTS VIA CM/ECF SYSTEM 1

Case 1:10-cv GBL-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No

Paper Entered: June 3, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Case 1:14-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D01-373

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:13-md In re: North Sea Brent Crude Oil Futures Litigation.

Paper Entered: April 14, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. EDMUND OPTICS, INC., Petitioner, SEMROCK, INC., Patent Owner.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 9:17-cv KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:11-mc RLW Document 1 Filed 05/17/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR VACATUR AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 22

Cooper & Kirk, PLLC 1523 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC Hon. William M. Skretny, Western District of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Civil Action No.: 9= /0 C/\j /-^

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED Nos (L), (con.), (con.), (con.)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SCl3-1934

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Paper Entered: August 13, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Case 1:13-cv WMS Document 54 Filed 05/24/13 Page 1 of 4 NEW YORK STATE RIFLE AND PISTOL

Case 1:18-cv JGK Document 26 Filed 02/21/19 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:14-cv TC-EJF Document 58 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:15-cv LMB-JFA Document 37 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 374

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Paper Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MARY LOU BENNEK, Derivatively on ) Behalf of THE HOME DEPOT, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Paper 17 Tel: Entered: February 6, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv TJC-JBT Document 85 Filed 11/11/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2256

Pakootas, Donald R. Michel, and State of Washington,

Case 2:12-cv JRG Document 403 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 17492

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner,

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. DR. MICHAEL FARMWALD and RPX CORPORATION Petitioners,

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case KG Doc 200 Filed 09/19/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. v. Case Number: 3:16-cr-93-J-32-JRK

Case 6:14-cv PGB-KRS Document 249 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 8876

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 121 Filed: 10/01/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1626. No. - IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Paper Date: June 5, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Case 1:11-cv MAM Document 31 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 915 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 54 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv AJN Document 176 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:15-cv HEH-RCY Document 102 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 1030

Case , Document 912, 03/29/2018, , Page1 of 6

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: 2013-CA-5265-O

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2014 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:13-cv WMS Document 47 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 10. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Buffalo Division

PTAB Trial Proceedings and Parallel Litigation: Impact, Strategy & Consequences

Transcription:

Case: 14-1612 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PARKERVISION, INC., TO REFORM THE OFFICIAL CAPTION Plaintiff - Appellant ParkerVision, Inc. ( ParkerVision ) respectfully moves to reform the Official Caption reflected on the electronic docket. The Official Caption includes the law firm of Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC ( Sterne Kessler ), which was dismissed from this case before final judgment in the district court. In answering ParkerVision s complaint, Qualcomm, Inc. ( Qualcomm ) asserted breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract claims against Sterne Kessler, the firm that prosecuted the patents-in-suit. See Dkt. 197 at 2, citing Dkt. 91, counts 9 and 11. Ruling on Sterne Kessler s motion to dismiss these counterclaims, the district court dismissed them without prejudice and abated them until the primary claims in this case are resolved. Dkt. 197 at 4. Later, Qualcomm voluntarily dismissed these counterclaims. Dkt. 526. As a result, Sterne Kessler is no longer a party to this case.

Case: 14-1612 Document: 41 Page: 2 Filed: 09/25/2014 Accordingly, in accordance with the Practice Notes to Federal Circuit Rule 12, ParkerVision respectfully requests the Official Caption be reformed as follows: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PARKERVISION,INC., a Florida Corporation v. Plaintiff - Appellant, QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant - Cross-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in No. 3:11-cv-00719-RBD-JRK, Judge Roy B. Dalton Counsel for ParkerVision has discussed this motion with counsel for Qualcomm who has indicated that Qualcomm does not oppose the requested reformation. this motion. A proposed order believed appropriate for entry by the Court is attached to Dated: September 25, 2014 /s/ Erik R. Puknys Erik R. Puknys FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant ParkerVision, Inc. 2

Case: 14-1612 Document: 41 Page: 3 Filed: 09/25/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of the Unopposed Motion of ParkerVision, Inc., to Reform the Official Caption, it is ORDERED that: The Motion is GRANTED. FOR THE COURT: Date:

Case: 14-1612 Document: 41 Page: 4 Filed: 09/25/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST Counsel for ParkerVision, Inc., certifies the following: The full name of every party or amicus represented by me is: ParkerVision, Inc. The name of the real party in interest (if the party named in the caption is not the real party in interest) represented by me is: None All parent corporations and any publicly held companies that own 10 percent or more of the stock of the party or amicus curiae represented by me are: None The names of all law firms and the partners or associates that appeared for the party or amicus now represented by me in the trial court or are expected to appear in this court are: Finnegan, Henderson Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. Donald R. Dunner, Erik R. Puknys, Jacob A. Schroeder McKool, Smith, P.C. Douglas A. Cawley, Richard A. Kamprath, Ivan Wang, Kevin L. Burgess, Josh W. Budwin, Leah Buratti, Mario A. Apareotesi, Kevin Kneupper, James Quigley, Travis G. White

Case: 14-1612 Document: 41 Page: 5 Filed: 09/25/2014 Smith Hulsey & Busey Stephen D. Busey, James A. Bolling Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist Ava K. Doppelt, Bran R. Gilchrist, Jeffrey S. Boyles Caldwell, Cassady & Curry, P.C. Jason D. Cassady, John A. Curry Dated: September 25, 2014 /s/ Erik R. Puknys Erik R. Puknys FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant ParkerVision, Inc. 2

Case: 14-1612 Document: 41 Page: 6 Filed: 09/25/2014 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Unopposed Motion of ParkerVision, Inc., to Reform the Official Caption was served upon registered counsel by operation of the Court s CM/ECF system on this 25th day of September, 2014. /s/kay Wylie