Democracy in the Middle East and North Africa:

Similar documents
Women in the Middle East and North Africa:

Civic Engagement in the Middle East and North Africa

Social Justice and the Arab Uprisings

2016 Arab Opinion Index: Executive Summary

Social Justice & Development Policy in the Arab World

The Quandary of Bad Governance in the Arab World. Imad K. Harb

OPEN NEIGHBOURHOOD. Communicating for a stronger partnership: connecting with citizens across the Southern Neighbourhood

The Total Survey Error Paradigm and Challenges to its Application in the Arab World

Arab Opinion Index 2015

Lebanon: Five Years after the Arab Uprisings

U.S. Image Still Poor in the Middle East Pew Global Attitudes surveys of 50 nations in 2002 and 2003 found that the U.S. Favorable Opinion of the U.S.

Refugees in Jordan and Lebanon: Life on the Margins

arabyouthsurvey.com #arabyouthsurvey April 21, 2015

Middle East & North Africa Facebook Demographics

By Encyclopedia Brittanica, adapted by Newsela staff on Word Count 1,286

The Gallup Center for Muslim Studies Mid East Youth: Jobs, Life & Future Outlook

CHAPTER II LABOUR FORCE

AMID Working Paper Series 45/2005

Contribution : The Employment Dimensions of On- going Socio-political events in Arab Region

The three years since 2011 have witnessed

Algeria Five Years after the Arab Uprisings. Findings from the Arab Barometer

The Bayt.com Middle East Job Seeker Confidence Survey. September 2018

REGIONAL PROGRAMME TO COMBAT CRIMINAL & TERRORIST THREATS AND STRENGTHEN CRIMINAL JUSTICE & HEALTH SYSTEMS IN LINE WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON

Draft report submitted by Mr. M. Gyöngyösi (Hungary), co-rapporteur

International Law of Freedom of Association in the Arab World

MIDDLE EAST NORTH AFRICA

Winners and Losers in the Middle East Economy Paul Rivlin

INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE ARAB STATES

The Bayt.com Middle East Jobseeker Confidence Survey. August 2017

THE ARAB SPRING IS A TERM USED TO DESCRIBE THE SERIES OF DEMONSTRATIONS AND REVOLUTIONS THAT ROCKED THE ARAB WORLD BEGINNING IN DECEMBER,

Middle Eastern Americans and Social Welfare

Authoritarianism in the Middle East. Introduction to Middle East Politics: Change, Continuity, Conflict, and Cooperation

On the Surge of Inequality in the Mediterranean Region. Chahir Zaki Cairo University and Economic Research Forum

Bahrain Telecom Pricing International Benchmarking. December 2018

General Idea: The way in which the state is born affects its domestic conditions for a long time The way in which the state is born affects its

Regional Consultation on International Migration in the Arab Region

Remarks of Andrew Kohut to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee Hearing: AMERICAN PUBLIC DIPLOMACY IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD FEBRUARY 27, 2003

ASSESSMENT REPORT. Obama s Visit to Saudi Arabia

Middle East that began in the winter of 2010 and continue today. Disturbances have ranged

Recent developments. Note: This section is prepared by Lei Sandy Ye. Research assistance is provided by Julia Roseman. 1

ARAB BAROMETER SURVEY PROJECT JORDAN REPORT

The Arab Economies in a Changing World

Role of CSOs in Implementing Agenda July 2017 League of Arab States General Headquarters Cairo Final Report and Recommendations

ANNEX 3. MEASUREMENT OF THE ARAB COUNTRIES KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY (BASED ON THE METHODOLOGY OF THE WORLD BANK)*

Views of Non-Formal Education among Syrian Refugees in Lebanon

POLICYBRIEF EUROPEAN. - EUROPEANPOLICYBRIEF - P a g e 1

CHAPTER II LABOUR FORCE

arabyouthsurvey.com #arabyouthsurvey

The Impact of Decline in Oil Prices on the Middle Eastern Countries

Single Windows and Arab Regional Integration

Understanding Youth in Arab Countries:

THE DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE ARAB COUNTRIES

U.S. EXPORTS TO MENA REGION A MIXED BAG IN

UK attitudes toward the Arab world an Arab News/YouGov poll

Revolutions: Causes and Consequences of the Arab Spring

DUE DILIGENCE PRICES & PRODUCTS

Keywords: Arab Spring, conflict, cooperation, authoritarian regimes, transition

Lebanon, Egypt, Palestine, Iraq, Syria, Tunisia, Morocco, Libya, Yemen and Kurdistan Region in Iraq.

The American Public and the Arab Awakening

Women s Economic Empowerment (WEE) in MENA region

Bayt.com Career Aspirations in the Middle East and North Africa. December 2014

The Bayt.com Middle East and North Africa Salary Survey May 2013

Can Obama Restore the US Image in the Middle East?

Democratic Transition and Development in the Arab World. (Stanford University, April, 2012).

AMERICA S GLOBAL IMAGE REMAINS MORE POSITIVE THAN CHINA S BUT MANY SEE CHINA BECOMING WORLD S LEADING POWER

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

Implications of the Arab Uprisings

Program on Arab Reform and Democracy From Political Activism to Democratic Change in the Arab World May 12-13, 2011 ABSTRACTS

FOURTH ANNUAL IDAHO PUBLIC POLICY SURVEY 2019

Policy Frameworks to Accelerate Poverty Reduction Efforts

The authoritarian regimes of the Middle East and the Arab Spring + Student Presentation by Vadym: The recent development in Libya

The Arab Spring: What Consequences on Foreign Investment?

The Bayt.com Middle and North Africa Salary Survey May 2015

E V E N T R E P O R T


Public Affairs and Communications Office

Foundation for the Future. Towards promoting democracy and human rights through strengthening CSOs in the Broader Middle East and North Africa.

Generational divide in Tunisia s 2018 municipal elections: Are youth candidates different? By Alexandra Blackman, Julia Clark, and Aytuğ Şaşmaz

International Poll Finds Large Majorities in All Countries Favor Equal Rights for Women

and the External Actor s Role within the Euro-Mediterranean Region

Notes to Editors. Detailed Findings

Corruption in the MENA Region

Pippanorris.com 1 DPI415: Comparative Politics in Global Perspective

Jamal AlFakhouri, Regional CO Coordinator MENA Region

Tyranny by Stabilizers, 1986

5+5 Dialogue a mechanism of regional integration and cooperation

Costs of war. The Syrian crisis and the economic consequences for Syria and its neighbours. Peter Seeberg

The Levant Security project was launched in 2006 as part of the Stanley

Model Arab League Annotated Bibliography for Algeria ncusar.org/modelarableague

Settling for Stability: America s Middle East Policy after the Arab Spring

The Role of Local Government in Addressing the Impact of Syrian Refugees: Jordan Case Study

Bayt.com Middle East Consumer Confidence Index. September 2015

Bahrain Egypt Iraq Israel Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic United Arab Emirates

The Economic Roadmap to Peace in the Middle East

International Poll Finds Large Majorities in All Countries Favor Equal Rights for Women

The Bayt.com Middle East and North Africa. Salary Survey April 2017

Setting the Scene : Assessing Opportunities and Threats of the European Neighbourhood Joachim Fritz-Vannahme

International Relations CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF THE MIDDLE EAST WAR ON EUROPEAN POPULATION. REFUGEES CRISIS RISK OR OPPORTUNITY?

Algeria s Islamists Crushed in First Arab Spring Elections

The Central Mediterranean route: Deadlier than ever

Transcription:

Democracy in the Middle East and North Africa: Five Years after the Arab Uprisings October 2018 ARABBAROMETER Natalya Rahman, Princeton University @ARABBAROMETER

Democracy in the Middle East and North Africa: Five Years after the Arab Uprisings Natalya Rahman, Princeton University Key Findings Across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), eight-in-ten Arabs believe that democracy is the best system of government, even though it may have problems. This perception seems to have increased in most countries from 2013 to 2016. There also appears to be consensus regarding the economic performance under democratic government: Less than one third across the region believe that economic performance is weak under democratic governance. However, Arab views on the flaws of democracies are mixed: One third believe that democracy is ineffective in maintaining stability; four-in-ten think that democracy is indecisive; almost every other person says that the people of their country are not ready for democracy. With the exception of Palestinians and Algerians, Arab publics predominantly evaluate their countries as more democratic in 2016. They seem to be more skeptical regarding the suitability of democracy to their countries in 2016. www.arabbarometer.org 2

Introduction Uprisings engulfed parts of the Middle East in 2011, starting in Tunisia and then erupting in countries including Egypt, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Bahrain. This Arab Spring brought varying levels of change in these countries. For example, Tunisia has witnessed a more inclusive government while Jordan and Morocco have seen constitutional changes. Meanwhile, Algeria has remained relatively stable. What have been the effects of these regional events on popular support for democracy? Did the Arab uprisings represent a sustained demand or a short burst of desire for democracy? Prior analysis of Arab Barometer results found that the Arab Spring did not significantly shift popular attitudes towards democracy. Rather, demand for democracy was high at the time of the uprisings (Wave II in 2010-2011) and remained high after (Wave III in late 2012 early 2014). Is this still the case in Arab countries or have the events in the five years following the Arab uprisings diminished the public s desire for democracy? The results from Wave IV (2016) of the Arab Barometer, the primary focus of this report, shed some light on attitudes towards democracy in the years after the Arab uprisings. Figure 1: Democracy Better System of Government www.arabbarometer.org 3

Attitudes towards Democracy It is helpful to think about the regimes of the seven countries discussed below using Freedom House s scores based on political rights and civil liberties. According to scores for 2018, Tunisia is the only country classified as free. In contrast, Tunisia s neighbor, Algeria, remains dominated by the country s military and security forces. Lebanon, Morocco, and Jordan are considered party free and the other countries covered in both waves are rated as not free by Freedom House. Democracy is the better system of governance Regardless of regime type or experience with the Arab uprisings, the survey results make clear that Arab citizens still want democracy. Across the region, the vast majority of citizens (ranging from 91 percent to 77 percent) say that democracy is the best system, despite its potential problems. In fact, in most countries surveyed, regardless of regime type, citizens are now more likely to say democracy is the best system compared to 2013. There has been a 16-percentage-point increase in support for democracy in Morocco and a 10-point increase in Jordan between 2013 and 2016. There are smaller increases in Lebanon (1 point) and Tunisia (6 points). Palestine remains unchanged at 79 percent. In contrast, Algeria has decreased by 6 points, but most citizens (77 percent) still favor democracy. Many citizens also say that democracy is always preferable to any other kind of government. This differs from the prior question about support for democracy because instead of affirming that it is the just the best system citizens are in effect asked if it is the only viable system. In Jordan (68 percent), Lebanon (66 percent), Egypt (54 percent), and Morocco (51 percent), more than half say that democracy is always preferable to other types of governance. In Tunisia, roughly half (49 percent) also support this statement. In contrast, in Palestine (41 percent) and Algeria (37 percent), fewer than half of citizens hold this view. Instead, in both societies, many say that under some circumstances alternative system may be preferable or that the form of the country s government does not matter to people like them. Commitment to democracy Although most citizens say democracy is the best system, how strong is this belief? To measure this concept, the Arab Barometer asks people the degree to which democracy is associated with a number of problems that critics often attribute to this type of political system. Specifically, it asks if democracy is indecisive and has too much quibbling. In most countries, fewer than half of citizens associate this problem with democracy, including just 18 percent in Morocco. www.arabbarometer.org 4

Meanwhile, those in Tunisia (73 percent) and Palestine (52 percent) are more likely than citizens elsewhere in the region to harbor this concern. Figure 2: Democracy Indecisive and Full of Problems There have been divergent trends across the region in concern about the degree to which democracy is indecisive. In three cases, concern about democracy being indecisive has increased since 2013 while the percentage has decreased in three other countries. The most dramatic increase (23 points) is in Algeria where citizens are more than twice as likely to say that democracies are indecisive in 2016 than in 2013. There are smaller increases in Tunisia (14 points) and Palestine (9 points). In contrast, Morocco has shown a 14-point decrease while the percentage has fallen by 9 points in Jordan. This indicates that more people have a favorable view of democracy in these two countries. Such views could be the result of both regimes holding competitive elections in 2016. In Lebanon, there has been a 6-point decrease in citizens that say democracy has problems relative to 2013. This is especially surprising since Lebanon had had no president for two years during the Wave IV survey. Economic performance under democracy Another problem sometimes associated with democracy is that it has negative effects on the economy. In fact, this concern is more widespread across the www.arabbarometer.org 5

Middle East and North Africa. Figure 3: Economy Weak in a Democracy About half of Tunisians associate democracy with weak economic performance, while this perception is also relatively common in Palestine (41 percent) and Algeria (39 percent). In Jordan (31 percent) and Morocco (12 percent), fewer hold this view and there has been a downward trend over time. Since 2013, the percentage of citizens who say democracy is bad for the economy has fallen by 17 points in Morocco and 11 points in Jordan. It is important to note that the Jordanian and Moroccan economies were relatively weak during this period, which for Jordan could be attributed to the spillover effects of the Syrian and Iraqi conflicts. Since neither country is generally considered to be a full democracy, perhaps citizens are less likely to link economic problems to a democratic system in both cases. In contrast, the rest of these countries show an increase in those who associate weak economic performance with democracy. There has been a large increase (21 percentage points) in Algerians that believe the country s economic performance is weak under democracy. Part of this is perhaps a demonstration effect from the events in its neighbor Tunisia. There have been increases in Palestine and Lebanon as well. In the relatively more democratic Lebanon, this increase may partly be due to the government s struggle to cope with the effect of the Syrian crisis on economic growth. www.arabbarometer.org 6

Maintaining stability under democratic governance Another potential shortcoming of democracy is a perceived lack of order and stability. Citizens are more likely to perceive this problem to be an issue in Tunisia (56 percent) and Palestine (47 percent) than elsewhere in the region. In the other countries, fewer than 35 percent believe that lack of security is an issue. For example, in Morocco only 9 percent of citizens harbor this concern. Figure 4: Democracy Ineffective in Maintaining Stability The biggest increase in negative perception about the effects of democracy is in Algeria, where citizens are 18 points more likely to say that democratic regimes are not effective at maintaining stability. Perhaps this increase reflects the security issues facing Tunisia, a relatively democratic neighboring country compared to Algeria. Meanwhile, there is also a significant increase in Palestine (8 points). In contrast, large decreases in Morocco (20 points) and Jordan (13 points), indicate that citizens are less likely to associate these problems with democracy in 2016 than in 2013. Again, it is possible that these views are linked with constitutional changes in both countries. Citizens may believe their countries are more democratic, with the Moroccan King Mohammed VI s recent removal of ministers to introduce accountability in the government and the Jordanian Prime Minister Abdullah Ensour s (2014 2016) measures to combat corruption. These reforms did not lead to instability, so it may be that citizens are more www.arabbarometer.org 7

likely to believe that instability is not a problem that comes with democracy. Are the people ready for democratic government? The final question in this battery asks people whether their fellow citizens are prepared for democracy. In Tunisia, three-quarters (76 percent) say that their country s citizens are not prepared for democracy, which likely reflects some of the challenges the country has faced during its democratic experiment following the Jasmine revolution. In Palestine, 57 percent say that citizens are not prepared for democracy. Elsewhere, between 30 percent and 45 percent of citizens hold this view. Figure 5: People Not Ready for Democracy Overall, attitudes on this question follow no regional trend. There has been a decrease in Jordan, Lebanon, and Morocco since 2013, indicating that citizens are now less concerned about the their country s residents not being capable of living in a democracy. For Jordan and Morocco, this could link back to the changes in the each country s constitution. In contrast, there have been increases in the percentage of citizens that believe those living in their country are not prepared for democracy in Algeria (12 points), Palestine (10 points) and Tunisia (5 points). www.arabbarometer.org 8

Democracy Ratings Perceived State of Democracy In terms of democratic development of the regimes themselves, respondents were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10 the extent to which their country is democratic, with 0 being completely authoritarian and 10 being fully democratic. Jordan has a score of almost 7, meaning they believe their regime is closer to a democracy than an authoritarian system. Lebanon, Morocco, and Tunisia are closer to the midpoint at 5. Egypt has an average score of 4.7, and Algeria and Palestine are closer to 4. Overall, there is an increase in the extent to which citizens believe that their country is democratic. Palestine and Algeria remain exceptions here. Despite Algeria s significant decrease, Algeria, Egypt, Palestine and Tunisia have relatively similar ratings. Given that Tunisia is widely considered the most democratic country in the region, it is clear that the political system is still seen as having many shortcomings by its citizens. Country 2013 2016 Egypt 3.1 4.7 +1.6 Morocco 3.98 5.10 +1.12 Lebanon 4.16 5.11 +0.95 Jordan 5.86 6.71 +0.85 Tunisia 4.32 4.97 +0.65 Palestine 4.49 4.05-0.44 Algeria 6.32 4.36-1.96 Figure 6: State of Democracy indicates change from 2013 to 2016. Country 2013 2016 Morocco 5.38 7.15 +1.77 Jordan 6.05 6.52 +0.47 Egypt 4.59 5.02 +0.43 Tunisia 4.85 4.78-0.07 Palestine 5.56 4.85-0.71 Lebanon 5.42 4.57-0.85 Algeria 7.28 5.36-1.92 Figure 7: Suitability of Democracy indicates change from 2013 to 2016. Perception of Suitability of Democracy On this same scale, citizens were asked how appropriate democracy is for their country. Morocco has the highest score here at 7.2, indicating a stronger belief that democracy is appropriate for the country. This is followed by Jordan s rating of 6.5, while the rest of the countries surveyed are close to the midpoint of 5. With regard to trends over time, there has been a decrease in Algeria, Palestine, Tunisia, and Lebanon and a marked increase in Morocco (1.8). Egypt and Jordan have experienced smaller increases of less than a half a point on average. It is worth noting that in Egypt, Wave III took place in the last months of Morsi s government and Wave IV was in the context of Sisi s government, under whom citizens say democracy is slightly more appropriate. www.arabbarometer.org 9

Conclusion Attitudes toward democracy have not changed consistently across the region. The most significant differences are found in Morocco and Jordan, where citizens are now less likely to associate potential problems with democratic government while also exhibiting a greater commitment to this system. This change could be attributed to their respective monarchies holding competitive elections and generally attempting to alter their citizen s perceptions of the regime. Arguably, the reforms did relatively little to open up the system of government despite being promoted as democratic reforms by the regime. As a result, it is possible that citizens in both countries believed that the country was more democratic but also saw that many problems often associated with democracy were not exacerbated by these reforms. In turn, they may have become less concerned about the potential for democracy to be the source of greater challenges. In contrast, Tunisia s government has become more inclusive and the public is witnessing firsthand the challenges of a democratic transition and consolidation. As a result, their survey responses demonstrate that they associate more problems with democracy despite their continued support for this type of governance. Egyptians on the whole perceive their government to be more democratic and for democracy to be more appropriate for their country, whereas Algerians show the opposite effect in addition to associating more problems with democracy. Despite political turmoil in Lebanon, citizens associate fewer problems with democracy and have increased their support for it. As for Palestine, the public associate more problems with democracy but continue in to support the system. Overall, these results suggest that domestic politics are driving results in each country as opposed to updating taking place in the aftermath of the Arab uprisings. The primary exception may be Algeria, where citizens may be updating their beliefs based on the experience in neighboring Tunisia. However, elsewhere domestic changes are more likely to account for shifts in public opinion. As a result, Tunisia s ongoing struggle to consolidate democracy is likely having minimal effects on views elsewhere in the region, implying that there are few if any lasting effects of the Arab uprisings on attitudes toward democracy. Instead, citizens continue to hope for improved governance and believe that democracy is likely to be the best system to achieve this goal, even if many in continue to harbor some concerns about effects of such governance on their country. www.arabbarometer.org 10

About Arab Barometer The Arab Barometer is a nonpartisan research network that provides insights into the social, political, and economic attitudes and values of ordinary citizens across the Arab world. We have been conducting high quality and reliable public opinion surveys of probability samples representative of citizens aged 18 or above in the Middle East and North Africa since 2006. Each country survey included approximately 1,200 respondents. Interviews were conducted face-to-face in the respondent s place of residence. The error margin is ± 3 percent. The Arab Barometer is the largest repository of publicly available data on the views of men and women in the MENA region. Our findings give a voice to the needs and concerns of Arab publics. Until 2017, the Arab Barometer has conducted 36 national surveys over four waves including more than 45,000 interviews in 14 Arab countries.......... ARABBAROMETER.ORG ARABBAROMETER @ARABBAROMETER