^ BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI

Similar documents
ST. PATRICK FIELD, AMITE JUN 0 "

STATE OIL AND GAS BOARP

IN THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI DOCKET NO

IN THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI ORDER. THIS DAY this cause came on to be heard by the State Oil and

^ with the Board and that the Board has full jurisdiction of the

TO AMEND THE SPECIAL FIELD U RULES FOR THE LEAF RIVER FIELD, COVINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI!1 Vv

ihi'gi!ñ,ib,'é'iipffi

STATE Gil A; ID GAS L;OARD Relief! fc VMwh. Avi.r.g S~>-/v*ar

ORDER. THIS DAY this matter came on for hearing before the State. Oil and Gas Board on the Petition of Exchange Oil & Gas Corporation

DOCKET NO ORDER NO. Ill-Io

BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OP MISSISSIPPI

BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI ORDER. This matter came on to be heard on the sworn Petition

RE: PETITION OF GULF SOUTH RESOURCES, JAN

mineral leases have heretofore executed a "Unit Operating

RE: PETITION OF KCS RESOURCES, INC. TO FILED FOR RECORD ESTABLISH SPECIAL FIELD RULES AND AN MER FOR SOUTH WINCHESTER FIELD, OUT - \ 2007

STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD Clyde a Davis. State Oil & Gas Supervisor THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI

Company was represented at the hearing by its attorney James M. Nix.

PRODUCTION COMPANY TO AMEND THE ) STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD. the 19th day of June, 2002, on the Petition of QUESTAR EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION

IN THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI AMENDED ORDER. On June 16,1999, this matter came on for hearing before the State Oil and Gas Board on

State Oil and Gas Board on the Petition of Pachuta Corporation

GAS CORPORATION TO AMEND THE

DOCKET NO ORDER NO/,P, ',?- 6 7

ORDER NO. / C 3 *- (rf

("Petitioner") requesting authority to use the Byrd Salt Dome in Greene County, Mississippi

BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

DOCKET NO RDER N0

AMEND THE SPECIAL FIELD RULES FOR THE TINSLEY FIELD TO PROVIDE FOR THE Mnw TINSLEY FIELD UNIT IN THE TINSLEY FIELD, NUV - j 2007

STORAGE FIELD, SMITH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI. ' buptrviso

RESULTS STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF ALABAMA AUGUST 22 & 24, 2006

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL AND GAS DIVISION FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL OIL AND GAS SECTION

March 8, I. Unit Background

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

DOCKET NO ORDER NO. / f-?7

FINAL ORDER. Findings. Facts. Counties, A list of the wells at ( Wells ) is. ownership of the rights below a horizontal to permit

Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division Revised March 2017 COMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT

COMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA FINDINGS AND ORDER

Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO VERIFIED APPLICATION

BEFORE THE OIL & GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO APPLICATION

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA RIMROCK RESOURCE OPERATING, LLC HORIZONTAL DRILLING AND SPACING UNIT

New Mexico State Land Office Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division Revised Feb. 2013

1 E 2017 BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC. ) CAUSE CD NO.

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO APPLICATION

FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

INTERIM ORDER OF THE COMMISSION MULTIUNIT HORIZONTAL WELL. Findings

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO VERIFIED APPLICATION

APPLICATION. COMES NOW the Applicant, Continental Resources, Inc., and shows the Honorable Corporation Commission the following:

SUGGESTIONS FOR OPERATORS OPTIONAL PROCEDURE FOR SPACING-RELATED APPLICATIONS OCC-OAC 165:

ONLINE VERSION STATE/FEE WATERFLOOD UNIT UNIT AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE

BEFORE THE OIL & GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO APPLICATION

ONLINE VERSION STATE/FEDERAL/FEE EXPLORATORY UNIT UNIT AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE NO.

ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNTY BOARD OF DEKALB COUNTY, ILLINOIS, as follows:

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE O}(LAHO1A

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO APPLICATION

May 16, Michael Mulvey PROPOSAL FOR DECISION

AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS

Township 10 North. Range 57 West. 6th P.M.

******************************************************* * KEY ISSUES:

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION

Township 10 North. Range 56 West. 6th P.M.

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

ALBERTA REGULATION 151/71 Oil and Gas Conservation Act OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION REGULATIONS PART 2 LICENSING OF WELLS

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO : CASE NO. DR

The Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulations, 1969

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION

June 19, 2007 EXAMINER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

BEFORE THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Robert 'l Johnson Thomas R. Byrne Edward L. Henry Leo B. Gambrino Keith H.

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

1914 Mill Creek Decree. Mono County Superior Court

HOME RULE: CAN MUNICIPALITIES BAN NATURAL GAS EXPLORATION IN NEW YORK? To Date: All New York Cases Answer this Question in the Affirmative.

PETITION FOR ANNEXATION

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION

AOGC Fayetteville Shale Activity Report To Be Presented to the Arkansas Legislative Council Reporting Period: July 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO APPLICATION

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF OSHTEMO KALAMAZOO COUNTY, MICHIGAN NOTICE OF ORDINANCE ADOPTION

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA STAFF'S REVISED PROPOSED RULES. March 6,2013 TITLE 165. CORPORATION COMMISSION

APPLICATION FOR PIPELINE PUBLIC ROAD CROSSING PERMIT

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 2, COLORADO

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: OKLAHOMA ENERGY ACQUISITIONS, LP

MINUTES THE STATE BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS December 8, 2011

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY


Online Version STATE/FEDERAL/FEE WATERFLOOD UNIT UNIT AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE NO.

PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

Elena Lewis 457 Raphael Avenue. WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit by virtue of the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and,

BRAMBLEWOOD ACRES I - PROTECTIVE COVENANTS

The Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range Permit Regulations

Transcription:

^ BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI DOCKET NO, 105-64-162 ORDER NO. 142-64 ORDER ON PETITION OF CENTRAL OIL COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO COMPLETE AND PRODUCE ITS #1 LEO PARKER WELL IN EAST FORK FIELD (NORTH), AMITE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE SPACING REQUIREMENTS, AND TO DEFINE THE LOVJER TUSCALOOSA OIL POOL This day this cause came on for hearing before the r *W State Oil and Gas Board of Mississippi on application and petition of Central Oil Company, a Mississippi corporation, for permission to complete and produce its #1 Leo Parker V/ell in East Fork Field (North), Amite County, Mississippi, on a unit described as follows: Northwest Quarter of Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 5 East, East Fork Field (North), Amite County, Mississippi, and as an exception to the spacing requirements, and to define the Lower Tuscaloosa Oil Pool. The State Oil and Gas Board finds that due, proper and legal notice of the hearing of said cause by the Board at this meeting has been given in the manner and form and for the time required by law, and the rules and regulations of this Board, and that due and legal proofs of publication of notice are on file with the Board and that the Board has full juris diction of this cause, and the Beard having heard the evidence of witnesses and the argument of counsel and being of the opinion that it should grant said application and petition and being fully advised in the premises further finds: I Petitioner, Central Oil Company, is the operator of, and either owns or controls, all of the drilling rights for

W oil or gas on the Northwest Quarter of Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 5 East, East Fork Field (North), Amite County, Mississippi. Pursuant to the order of the Board in Docket No. 102-62-162, the petitioner was authorized and did drill a well on said land in search of oil or gas, tested and then produced the then productive zone in said Field, the Upper Tuscaloosa, and by virtue of the order of the Board was permitted to drill said well as an exception to the spacing *\ requirements, and pursuant to the order and permit of the Board, did drill said well at a surface location of 75 feet east of the west line and 64 feet south of the north line of said.northwest Quarter of Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 5 East, Amite County, Mississippi. The Board further finds that said well was drilled to a depth sufficient to penetrate the then productive zone in said Field, the Upper Tuscaloosa, and also to a depth sufficient to penetrate the Lower Tuscaloosa Sand, which said zone or pool has not heretofore been productive in said Field, and (' - which the Board does now find to be a separate and distinct oil-bearing sand, and which is defined as "any oil-bearing sand in the interval between 11,130 feet to 11,300 feet, as shown on the electric log of Central Oil Company1s #1 Leo Parker Well, and all zones correlative with this interval" and that the same was penetrated in the subject well, and that said Lower Tuscaloosa Oil Pool is a separate and distinct pool from any and all other oil-producing sands in the East Fork Field (North). Ill The Board further finds that the Upper Tuscaloosa ^'%r Pool, in the subject well, is now one hundred per cent II -2-

^*" productive of salt water, and that pursuant to the authority of the Board, petitioner has tested the Lower Tuscaloosa Oil Pool, and that a well completion or re-completion report and well log have previously been filed with the Board, and that said tests indicate production of oil in the Lower Tuscaloosa Zone, and the Board does hereby authorize the petitioner to complete and produce said well from the Lower Tuscaloosa Pool as herein defined, as an exception to the spacing requirements under the Statewide Rules. IV The Board further finds that a well drilled at a regular location on said land would not be productive of either oil or gas in commercial quantities, would result in the drilling of an unnecessary well, and that in order to obtain or attempt to obtain commercial production from the Lower Tuscaloosa Oil Pool from a well drilled on said land, that the requested completion at the present location and within the well bore of the subject well must be made. V The Board further finds that the oil, gas and mineral lease involved on the subject unit requires that any drilling operations be at least 200 feet from any residence or other improvements on the land, and that the residence, garage and barns of the surface owner are within 200 feet of any other possible location, and that the said owner will not waive this requirement, and the Board therefore finds that petitioner can only produce the Lower Tuscaloosa Oil Pool within the well bore of the existing v/ell without violating the provisions of the lease. VI The Board further finds that more than five acres of the said Northwest Quarter of Northeast Quarter of Section 15-3-

^ are underlain by oil and other hydrocarbons in the Lower Tuscaloosa Oil Pool, and that petitioner is therefore entitled to a full allowable of production from the proposed well. VII The Board further finds that petitioner has hereto fore run and filed a report of a directional survey in its #1 Leo Parker Well, and the Board therefore finds that the point of completion in the Lower Tuscaloosa Oil Pool, as defined herein, is wholly within the unit lines of the subject unit, and is in all ways approved,, ^^ " IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the State Oil and Gas Board of Mississippi that'the"petitioner, Central Oil Company, be and it is hereby granted permission to complete and produce its #1 Leo Parker Well at the existing location described as being 75 feet east of the west line and 64 feet south of the north line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 5 East, Amite County, Mississippi, as an exception to the spacing requirements of the Statewide Rules and Regulations, and petitioner, Central Oil Company, is further granted a full and ( "^ regular allowable upon production from said well, and the Board does further find that the Lower Tuscaloosa Oil Pool in the East Fork Field (North), Amite County, Mississippi, is a separate and distinct oil"pool within the field, and is further defined as being the interval between 11,130 feet to 11,300 feet as shown on the electric log of Central Oil Company's #1 Leo Parker Well, and all zones correlative with this interval. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the Board that Central Oil Company is hereby reappointed and is redesignated as the operator of said unit and said well, and it -4-

is hereby authorized and allowed to complete and produce the said #1 Leo Parker Well as described. ALL OF THE ABOVE IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED on this the '?' -" day of June, 1964, STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI / BY: Chairman