IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 15-CV-324 DOCKETING STATEMENT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 11-CV-1128

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 3:15-cv jdp Document #: 187 Filed: 05/13/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 15-CV-324

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 3:15-cv jdp Document #: 66 Filed: 12/17/15 Page 1 of 11

Case: 3:15-cv jdp Document #: 255 Filed: 08/11/16 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 15-CV-324 DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

v. Case No. 16CV117 SECRETARY BRANCEL'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR A JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 15-CV-324 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 14-CV-1310

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 11-CV-1128

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Part Description 1 7 pages 2 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiffs' Witness List 3 Exhibit 2 - Defendants' Witness List

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 11-C-1128 DECLARATION OF MICHAEL HAAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

United States Court of Appeals

In the United States Court of Appeals

Supreme Court of the United States

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No [Consolidated with No ] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 11-CV-1128 THIRD DECLARATION OF CLAYTON P.

gerrymander. We also solicited the views of the parties as to the appropriate

Case: 3:18-cv jdp Document #: 41 Filed: 01/16/19 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 3:16-cv wmc Document #: 3 Filed: 07/06/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: Document: 43-1 Filed: 10/26/2016 Pages: 9. Nos , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 11/03/14 Entry Number 27 Page 1 of 13

Case: Document: 50-1 Filed: 10/31/2016 Pages: 25. No , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MILWAUKEE COUNTY BRANCH 41. v. Case No. 17-CV REPLY BRIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

Case: 2:14-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 98 Filed: 11/26/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 6215

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. 19-cv HSG 8

Case 1:11-cv RHS-WDS Document 5 Filed 11/10/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case: 3:15-cv jdp Document #: 304 Filed: 10/21/16 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 2:11-cv LA Filed 11/05/13 Page 1 of 6 Document 164

Case 3:16-cv CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 121 Filed: 10/01/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1626. No. - IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Case 5:12-cv KHV-JWL- Document 53 Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case: 3:15-cv jdp Document #: 239 Filed: 01/14/19 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 5:03-cv JF Document Filed 05/05/2006 Page 1 of 7

2016 WI APP 85 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 560 Filed 02/11/2009 Page 1 of 18

Case 3:12-cv Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 04/07/14 Page 1 of 9

United States Court of Appeals

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Case: Document: 48 Filed: 06/17/2014 Pages: 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT SEALED

2:12-cv DPH-MJH Doc # 63 Filed 05/30/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1692 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:05-cv DDP-RZ Document 132 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:337

Nordyke v. King No (9th Cir. En Banc Review)

***THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE*** ***EXECUTIONS SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 20, 24, and 27, 2017*** No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Leave to file reply brief of up to 10,500 words.

2:09-cv GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

1. SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE. 2. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT. 3. STAPLE ALL ADDITIONAL PAGES 1/30/2014 3:13CV739

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO 3951)* Docket Number: TO1 CONTACT CENTERS, INC. Jeffrey J. Reich, Esquire James W Kutz, Esquire VS.

PlainSite. Legal Document

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

United States Court of Appeals

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Case: Document: 484 Page: 1 08/06/

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 79 Filed: 12/18/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:859

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PETITIONS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2254

Supreme Court of the United States

CASE NO E UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. HON. TOM PARKER, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT WAUKESHA COUNTY

Case 1:08-cv JSR Document 151 Filed 05/23/16 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Submitted:September 23, 2013 Decided: December 8, 2014)

Case 4:15-cv CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

scc Doc 928 Filed 03/12/12 Entered 03/12/12 18:37:05 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 02/14/2017 Page: FILED 1 United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Hannan v. Philadelphia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

unconscionability and the unavailability of the forum, is not frivolous. In Inetianbor

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Paul McArdle v. Verizon Communications Inc

In the Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Case: 3:08-cv bbc Document #: 504 Filed: 11/23/11 Page 1 of 8

Transcription:

Case: 3:15-cv-00324-jdp Document #: 240-3 Filed: 08/03/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ONE WISCONSIN INSTITUTE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 15-CV-324 MARK L. THOMSEN, et al., Defendants. DOCKETING STATEMENT Defendants Mark L. Thomsen, Ann S. Jacobs, Beverly R. Gill, Julie M. Glancey, Steve King, Don M. Millis, Michael Haas, Mark Gottlieb, and Kristina Boardman, by their attorneys, Attorney General Brad D. Schimel and Assistant Attorneys General S. Michael Murphy, Gabe Johnson-Karp, and Jody J. Schmelzer, concurrent with their Notice of Appeal, submit this Docketing Statement. See 7th Cir. R. 3(c)(1). Defendants are sued in their official capacities. The occupants of Defendants positions have changed in some instances since the filing of the second amended complaint in March 2016. (Dkt. 141.) The Wisconsin Government Accountability Board (the GAB ) ceased operations in June 2016 and was replaced by the Wisconsin Elections Commission

Case: 3:15-cv-00324-jdp Document #: 240-3 Filed: 08/03/16 Page 2 of 6 (the Elections Commission ). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), the parties stipulated to the substitution of Defendants sued in their official capacities (Dkt. 230). The GAB Defendants as of June 2016 namely, Gerald C. Nichol, Elsa Lamelas, Thomas Barland, Harold V. Froehlich, Timothy Vocke, and John Franke are succeeded by the Elections Commission Defendants as shown in the following table. GAB Defendant, position (as of June 2016) Gerald C. Nichol, Chair Elsa Lamelas, Vice Chair Thomas Barland, Secretary John Franke, Timothy Vocke, and Harold V. Froehlich, Board Members Elections Commission Defendant, position (as of August 2016) Mark L. Thomsen, Chair Ann S. Jacobs, Vice-Chair Beverly R. Gill, Secretary Julie M. Glancey, Steve King, and Don M. Millis, Commissioners Defendant Kevin J. Kennedy was director and general counsel of the GAB. His position does not exist at the Elections Commission. He is no longer a defendant. Defendant Michael Haas was Administrator of the Elections Division of the GAB in June 2016. He is now Interim Administrator of the Elections Commission. Defendant Mark Gottlieb is Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (the DOT ). Defendant Kristina Boardman is Administrator of the DOT s Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV). 2

Case: 3:15-cv-00324-jdp Document #: 240-3 Filed: 08/03/16 Page 3 of 6 RELATED CASE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SEVENTH CIRCUIT RULE 3(c)(1) This case is related to a case currently pending before this Court, Ruthelle Frank, et al., v. Scott Walker, et al., Nos. 16-3003 and 16-3052. Both cases involve challenges to Wisconsin s voter ID law specifically, to the petition process for obtaining free IDs from the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Division of Motor Vehicles. The district court in this case incorporated the factual findings of the district court in Frank, which in turn based its decision on evidence presented in this case. (See Dkt. 234:8 ( The court also adopts the facts found by Judge Adelman [in Frank] concerning the history and operation of the [ID petition process], which he based substantially on the evidence presented in this case. Frank v. Walker, No. 11-cv-1128, 2016 WL 3948068 (E.D. Wis. July 19, 2016). ). INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SEVENTH CIRCUIT RULE 28(a)(1) The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1343(a)(3), and 1357; and 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 1988, over this action brought for alleged violations of the First, Fourteenth, Fifteenth, and Twenty-Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution, as well as 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202 over the requests for declaratory relief. (Dkt. 141 (Second Amended Complaint).) 3

Case: 3:15-cv-00324-jdp Document #: 240-3 Filed: 08/03/16 Page 4 of 6 INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SEVENTH CIRCUIT RULE 28(a)(2) The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1291 and 1292(a)(1) over this appeal from the district court s July 29, 2016, order granting injunctive relief (Dkt. 234:118 19 (Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law)) and the district court s August 1, 2016, judgment (Dkt. 235.) No party has filed a motion for a new trial or alteration of a judgment, or any other motion claimed to toll the time within which to appeal. See 7th Cir. R. 28(a)(2)(ii), (iii). Defendants filed their Notice of Appeal on August 3, 2016, along with a copy of the district court s July 29, 2016, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Dkt. 234). See 7th Cir. R. 28(a)(2)(iv). The Notice of Appeal was timely filed within 30 days after judgment was entered on August 1, 2016. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). This case is not a direct appeal from the decision of a magistrate judge. See 7th Cir. R. 28(a)(2)(v). INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SEVENTH CIRCUIT RULE 28(a)(3) There are no claims that remain for disposition in the district court. See 7th Cir. R. 28(a)(3)(i). The district court stated that it intends its order to be immediately appealable; for the avoidance of doubt, the court grants permission to any 4

Case: 3:15-cv-00324-jdp Document #: 240-3 Filed: 08/03/16 Page 5 of 6 party to file an interlocutory appeal if this order is not final for appeal purposes. (Dkt. 234:119.) The portion of the district court s order (Dkt. 234) granting a permanent injunction constitutes a final order, appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291. To the extent that any portions of the district court s order granted injunctive relief that was not intended to be permanent, those portions are appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1). The ground for appellate jurisdiction is not the collateral order doctrine. See 7th Cir. R. 28(a)(ii). The order sought to be reviewed does not remand a case to a bankruptcy judge or administrative agency. See 7th Cir. R. 28(a)(3)(iii). Finally, issues remain before the district court; namely, the district court retained jurisdiction to oversee compliance with the injunction. (Dkt. 234:119.) 5

Case: 3:15-cv-00324-jdp Document #: 240-3 Filed: 08/03/16 Page 6 of 6 Dated this 3rd day of August, 2016. Wisconsin Department of Justice Post Office Box 7857 Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7857 (608) 266-5457 (Murphy) (608) 267-8904 (Johnson-Karp) (608) 266-3094 (Schmelzer) (608) 267-2223 (Fax) murphysm@doj.state.wi.us johnsonkarpg@doj.state.wi.us schmelzerjj@doj.state.wi.us Respectfully submitted, BRAD D. SCHIMEL Wisconsin Attorney General /s/s. Michael Murphy S. MICHAEL MURPHY Assistant Attorney General State Bar #1078149 GABE JOHNSON-KARP Assistant Attorney General State Bar #1084731 JODY J. SCHMELZER Assistant Attorney General State Bar #1027796 Attorneys for Defendants 6