MOTION INFORMATION STATEMENT. Shew v. Malloy. opposing PARTY: June Shew, et al. [name of attorney, with firm, address, phone number and ]

Similar documents
Leave to file reply brief of up to 10,500 words.

Cooper & Kirk, PLLC 1523 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC Hon. William M. Skretny, Western District of New York

Case: Document: 484 Page: 1 08/06/

Case , Document 912, 03/29/2018, , Page1 of 6

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY Telephone:

Case , Document 34-1, 03/18/2016, , Page1 of 1

Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

1. SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE. 2. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT. 3. STAPLE ALL ADDITIONAL PAGES 1/30/2014 3:13CV739

Case 3:13-cv AVC Document 78 Filed 10/11/13 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

MOTION INFORMATION STATEMENT. Date: July 13, 2009 _

VERIFIED COMPLAINT Introduction

Case 1:13-cv WMS Document 25 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 4

Case , Document 219-1, 01/26/2017, , Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY Telephone:

Case , Document 48-1, 07/16/2015, , Page1 of 1

LAW OFFICES 100 GARDEN CITY PLAZA, GARDEN CITY, NY TELEPHONE: (516) FACSIMILE: (516)

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Case 1:13-cv WMS Document 109 Filed 08/05/13 Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-cv WMS Document 138 Filed 11/26/13 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case , Document 122-1, 04/10/2017, , Page1 of 4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IN RE TELES AG,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-cv WMS Document 54 Filed 05/24/13 Page 1 of 4 NEW YORK STATE RIFLE AND PISTOL

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Lower Tribunal Case No.: 08-1 THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Appellant/Petitioner,

Case , Document 57-1, 03/29/2016, , Page1 of 3 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SCl3-1934

Case , Document 1-1, 04/21/2017, , Page1 of 2

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 121 Filed: 10/01/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1626. No. - IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 1100 East Main Street, Suite 501, Richmond, Virginia September 24, 2014

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-cv WMS Document 47 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 10. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Buffalo Division

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cv PAE

A (800) (800)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Case 2:16-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1

Case , Document 133-1, 04/09/2018, , Page1 of 3 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

FLORIDA VIRTUAL SCHOOL, et al.,

Arneson and the Senate Majority Caucus s Application for Summary Relief.

NOS , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNDER SEAL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Harrisburg Division --ELECTRONICALLY FILED--

Bhanusali. AAPS and AAPI ORMC, et al.

UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

v. Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-861

Case: Document: 40 Page: 1 04/15/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/19/2012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT United States Courthouse 219 S Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois DOCKETING STATEMENT

Case: Document: 80 Page: 1 05/27/ No In The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Case 9:03-cv KAM Document 2795 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/17/2014 Page 1 of 8

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 543 Filed 01/15/2009 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 3:06-cr LAB Document 378 Filed 09/01/07 Page 1 of 3

CASE NOS , -1307, -1309, -1310, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 9:17-cv KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT

Case 1:15-cv LM Document 8 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (L) (5:15-cv D)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room St. Louis, Missouri 63102

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

Southside Hospital v. New York State Nurses Association UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

15-20-CV FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ALLCO FINANCE LIMITED Plaintiff-Appellant

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 133 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A (Revised)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs - Appellants, Defendants - Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12-cv AJN

Motions 1:18-cv CRK-JCG-GSK American Institute for International Steel, Inc. et al v. United States et al

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED Nos (L), (con.), (con.), (con.)

Case: Document: 95-1 Page: 1 02/04/ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

Case 3:16-cv CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9

January 17, 2017 letter brief and January 26,

U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv JDB

JOINT MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.5, the parties jointly

MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITIONS AND DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS' MATERIAL S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

Case: Document: 17 Page: 1 05/13/ Eastern District of New York, Korman, J.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT No JIM BEICKER, et al.,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS:

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK B

1a APPENDIX A John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

Transcription:

Case: 14-319 Document: 97 Page: 1 07/18/2014 1274516 5 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-857-8500 MOTION INFORMATION STATEMENT Docket Number(s): 14-319-CV ---------------------------------- Caption [use short title] Motion for: Leave to File Overlength Brief Shew v. Malloy Set forth below precise, complete statement of relief sought: The Appellees ask the Court for leave to file an overlength brief of up to 22,000 words. MOVINP- RTY: Dannel P. Malloy, et al. UPiai ntiff 0Appellant/Petitioner I Defendant I Appellee/Respondent opposing PARTY: June Shew, et al. MovrNG ATTORNEY: Maura Murphy Osborne opposing ATTORNEY: Brian T. Stapleton [name of attorney, with firm, address, phone number and e-mail] Office of the Attorney General Goldberg Segalla LLP 55 Elm Street, Hartford, CT 06141-0120 11 Martine Avenue, Suite 705, White Plains, NY 10606 tel: 860-808-5218; e-mail: Maura.MurphyOsborne@ct.gov tel: 914-798-5400; e-mail: bstapelton@goldbergsegalla.com Court-Judge/Agency appealed from: The Honorable Alfred v. Covello Please check appropriate boxes: Has movant notified opposing counsel (required by Local Rule 27.I): [{] YesO No (explain): Opposin~unsel's position on motion: l.{j Unopposed Oopposed Qon 't Know Does opposing counsel intend to file a response: DYes [{]No Doon't Know B B FOR EMERGENCY MOTIONS, MOTIONS FOR STAYS AND INJUNCTIONS PENDING APPEAL: Has request for relief been made below? Yes No Has this relief been previously sought in this Court? Yes No Requested return date and explanation of emergency: Is oral argument on motion requested? DYes [{]No (requests for oral argument will not necessarily be granted) Has argument date of appeal been set? D Yes [{]No If yes, enter date: s ~i t~ i'" ;e,j! of~~~ in t~. y::h:'/f 'JAVJII J'' 'f:t::ld~ Date: July 18, 2014 ~~==~~~~~=-~==~-- --171- Service by: Li..JcM/ECF D Other (Attach proof of service] Form T-1080 (rev. 12-13)

Case: 14-319 Document: 97 Page: 2 07/18/2014 1274516 5 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ------------------------------------------------------------------- X JUNE SHEW, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Docket No. 14-319-cv - V.- DANNEL P. MALLOY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. DECLARATION OF MAURA MURPHY OSBORNE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF -------------------------------------------------------------------- X MAURA MURPHY OSBORNE declares as follows: 1. I am an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Connecticut and represent the Defendants-Appellees on this appeal: Connecticut Governor Dannel P. Malloy, Chief State's Attorney Kevin Kane, Commissioner of Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection Reuben Bradford I, and State's Attorneys David Cohen, John Smriga, Stephen Sedensky III, Maureen Platt, Kevin Lawlor, Michael Dearington, Peter McShane, Michael Regan, Patricia Froehlich, Gail Hardy, Brian Preleski, David Shepack, and Matthew Gedansky and ("Defendants-Appellees"). I respectfully submit this Declaration in support of the motion of the Defendants-Appellees for leave to file an overlength principal brief, not to exceed 22,000 words, in opposition to Plaintiffs' opening brief. Defendants brief is due on August 14, 2014. This matter has not been scheduled for oral argument. I On February 1, 2014, Dora B. Schriro replaced Reuben Bradford as the Commissioner of DESPP.

Case: 14-319 Document: 97 Page: 3 07/18/2014 1274516 5 2. This appeal involves the constitutionality of certain provisions of "An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children's Safety" ("the Act") enacted by the Connecticut Legislature in April 2013, in the wake of the killing of twenty children and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012. 3. The claims at issue in this appeal were filed by June Shew, Mitchell Rocklin, Stephanie Cypher, Peter Owens, Brian McClain, Stephen Holly, Hiller Sports, LLC, MD Shooting Sports, LLC, the Connecticut Citizens" Defense League, and the Coalition of Connecticut Sportsmen alleging, inter alia, the Act violated their rights protected by the Second and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. 4. The record and briefing in this matter, both below and before this Court, are extensive and support the Defendants' request for additional words for their brief. Specifically, the record on appeal consists of a ten-volume, 2856-page Joint Appendix, and several non-party organizations, entities, and individuals, including twenty-three states, have filed six amicus briefs in support of Plaintiffs. 5. While this is a request for an approximate fifty percent increase in the 14,000 word-count limit ordinarily applicable under Rule 32, Defendants believe that the expanded word limit is justified by the public safety interests implicated by Plaintiffs' constitutional challenges, the volume of record below, and the number of amici briefs filed to which Defendants may respond. Defendants are unable to adequately present the relevant and necessary facts and legal argument within the standard 14,000 word limit but will be able to do so within a 22,000 word limit. 6. Plaintiffs consent to the granting of this motion on the condition that Defendants consent to their requesting up to 10,500 words for their reply brief, to which Defendants have agreed. 2

Case: 14-319 Document: 97 Page: 4 07/18/2014 1274516 5 7. For the foregoing reasons, I believe that there is good cause to grant leave for permission to file an overlength brief in this matter. I declare under penalty of petjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 18 111 day of July, 2014, in Hartford, Connecticut. 3

Case: 14-319 Document: 97 Page: 5 07/18/2014 1274516 5 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that on July 18, 2014, a copy of the foregoing Defendants'/Appellees' Motion For Leave to File Overlength Brief was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent by e-mail to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. filing through the Court's system. Parties may access this BY: Is/ Maura Murphy Osborne Maura Murphy Osborne