Case 3:17-cv BEN-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/19/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 3

Similar documents
Case 2:13-cv JPS Filed 01/18/13 Page 1 of 12 Document 1

Case 2:18-cv JPB Document 1-1 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 31

Case 6:17-cv JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 0:09-cv DWF-SRN Document 1 Filed 10/28/09 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/14/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8 CIVIL COVER SHEET

allege ("Plaintiffs"), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, hereby 216(b) ("FLSA"). Accordingly, this Court has subject-matter

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

CASE 0:17-cv WMW-LIB Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case: 1:17-cv SA-DAS Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/19/17 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:17-cv RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 3:17-cv G Document 1 Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

Case 2:18-cv HCM-RJK Document 1 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 1

MASTER SHORT-FORM COMPLAINT FOR INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION. NEXUS SERVICES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No:

Case 1:16-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 8:17-cv CEH-TBM Document 1 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/08/2018 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:17-cv DLH-CSM Document 1 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

(collectively "Defendants") unpaid overtime wages, Plaintiff, CASE NO.:

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 3:17-cv K Document 1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 3:16-cv YY Document 1 Filed 07/10/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:18-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

vehicle. The Plaintiff, Oscar Willhelm Nilsson, by undersigned counsel, states as

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION. v. Civil Action No.

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2017 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 8:17-cv RAL-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 5:16-cv BKS-DEP Document 1 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:18-cv TBR Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 3:16-cv L Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 1:17-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2017 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 4:15-cv A Document 1 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 1:15-cv GLR Document 1 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 26

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 05/29/17 Page 1 of 9. Exhibit 3

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No

Case 4:18-cv O Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/16 Page 1 of 9

Plaintiff, similarly situated, files this Complaint against Defendant, KLOPP INVESTMENT. attorneys' fees and costs.

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:16-cv RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed03/12/15 Page1 of 7

Case 2:18-cv SJF-SIL Document 1 Filed 03/29/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Billings, Montana Telephone: (406) individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Attorneys

Case: 4:16-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/25/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 5:18-cv HE Document 1 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 2:13-cv WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 08/01/13 Page 1 of 24 PageID: 1

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Charlottesville Division CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Preliminary Statement

Case 2:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 1 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ROSWELL DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

EXPRESS, INC., A GEORGIA CORPORATION, D/B/A R&L GLOBAL LOGISTICS,

Case 2:18-cv KM-CLW Document 1 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1

Case 1:18-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:16-cv RC Document 1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1

Case 1:17-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2017 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case 2:17-cv CCC-MF Document 1 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : :

For its Complaint against Defendant Adlife Marketing & Communications, Co.,

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 9:12-cv RC Document 1 Filed 08/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

CASE 0:16-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 09/01/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Kurtis Skaar

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case 1:18-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

41-Te6 FILED. PlaintiffCASE NO.: (0' Individually, situated, 216(b) ("FLSA").

Case 0:18-cv DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2018 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. ORLANDODIVISION. u vad. CASE NO.: Ut... COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 8:18-cv SCB-MAP Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1

U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

PILED. tjjlf1jsjtct1jf FLO.: Plaintiff, BRANDY SHAFFER ("Plaintiff"), on behalf of herself and others similarly

employed Plaintiff within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. approximately three (3) years, for which he was not compensated by Defendant at a rate of time

Case 1:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2017 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2018 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Transcription:

Case :-cv-044-ben-bgs Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 4 5 MICHAEL A. CONGER (State Bar #488 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A. CONGER San Dieguito Road, Suite 4-4 P.O. Box 94 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 90 Telephone: (858 59-000 Facsimile: (858 59-0 Attorney for Plaintiffs David K. Kries, Gary Mondesir and those similarly situated 8 9 0 4 0 8 DAVID K. KRIES, and GARY MONDESIR, on behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, CITY OF SAN DIEGO; and DOES through 0, inclusive, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COMPLAINT FOR OVERTIME WAGES (9 U.S.C. 0. Plaintiffs DAVID K. KRIES, and GARY MONDESIR, on behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated, bring this action on behalf of themselves and other employees and former employees of the City of San Diego to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, interest, attorney s fees and costs under the provisions of Fair Labor Standards Act of 8, as amended (9 U.S.C. 0, et seq.. I. PARTIES 'CV44 BEN BGS 4. The Plaintiffs are employees of the City of San Diego. The plaintiffs bring this action on their own behalf and, pursuant to 9 U.S.C. (b, on behalf of all other employees and former employees similarly situated. The plaintiffs have consented in writing to becoming

Case :-cv-044-ben-bgs Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 4 5 8 9 0 4 0 8 such a party and have filed such written consents pursuant to 9 U.S.C. (b. 5. Defendant City of San Diego ( City is the employer of the plaintiffs and those similarly situated.. The true names or capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of defendants DOES to 0, inclusive, are unknown to plaintiffs, who therefore sue said defendants by such fictitious names.. The plaintiffs are informed and believe and thereon allege that each of the defendants designated herein as a DOE is responsible in some manner for the events and happenings herein referred to, and caused injury and damages proximately thereby to plaintiff as herein alleged. Plaintiffs will seek leave of court to amend this complaint to set forth the true names and capacities of such named defendants when their identities become known. 8. The plaintiffs are informed and believe and thereon allege that each defendant named in this action, including DOE defendants, at all relevant times, was the agent, ostensible agent, servant, employee, representative, assistant, joint venturer, and/or co-conspirator of each of the other defendants, and was at all times acting within the course and scope of his, her, or its authority as agent, ostensible agent, servant, employee, representative, joint venturer, and/or co-conspirator, and with the same authorization, consent, permission or ratification of each of the other defendants. 9. Jurisdiction is proper because this case presents a federal question. 0. Venue is proper because the City of San Diego is in this federal district. II COUNT ONE (Against the City of San Diego Under 9 U.S.C. (b. During the period relevant to this Complaint, Defendant City has failed to correctly calculate the regular rate of pay (9 U.S.C. 0(e of the plaintiffs and others similarly situated.. The City s failure to correctly calculate the regular rate was caused by, among other things, failing to include cash paid to the plaintiffs, and other similarly situated, in lieu of

Case :-cv-044-ben-bgs Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 4 5 8 9 0 4 0 providing or paying medical and related insurance premiums under the City s flexible benefits plan. See Flores v. City of San Gabriel (9th Cir. 0 8 F.d 890 (requiring such payments to be included in the regular rate.. The plaintiffs, and others similarly situated, worked overtime for the City in the three-year period before the filing of this complaint. 4. The amount paid by the City for this overtime was too low because the City had failed to properly calculate the regular rate of pay on which the overtime rate was calculated.. The City s violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act set forth herein was willful because, based on information and belief, the City took no affirmative action to assure compliance with the FLSA requirements. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for the following:. That Notice be given to present and former employees of the City informing them of their right to join -- without retaliation -- in that portion of this action brought pursuant to 9 U.S.C. (a( and (b;. That judgment be entered against the City in the amounts respectively due the plaintiffs and other employees and former employees of the City similarly situated for unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and interest as the Court may determine pursuant to 9 U.S.C. (b;. That pursuant to 9 U.S.C. a permanent injunction be entered against the City restraining further violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, among others; 4. Attorney s fees, costs and prejudgment interest pursuant to 9 U.S.C. (b; 5. For such additional and further relief as this Court may deem just. Dated: July, 0 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED s/michael A. Conger Attorney for Plaintiffs E-Mail: congermike@aol.com 8

Case :-cv-044-ben-bgs Document - Filed 0// PageID.4 Page of JS 44 (Rev. 0/ CIVIL COVER SHEET The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 4, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM. I. (a PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS DAVID K. KRIES, and GARY MONDESIR, on behalf of themselves and CITY OF SAN DIEGO; and DOES THROUGH 0, Inclusive all other employees similarly situated (b County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff San Diego County of Residence of First Listed Defendant San Diego (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES NOTE: (c Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number Attorneys (If Known Michael A. Conger Law Office of Michael A. Conger P.O. Box 94, Rancho Santa Fe, CA 90; (858 59-000 II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED. III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff (For Diversity Cases Only and One Box for Defendant U.S. Government Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party Citizen of This State Incorporated or Principal Place 4 4 of Business In This State U.S. Government 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State Incorporated and Principal Place 5 5 Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III of Business In Another State Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Nation Foreign Country IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in One Box Only Click here for: Nature of Suit Code Descriptions. CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES 0 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY Drug Related Seizure 4 Appeal 8 USC 8 5 False Claims Act 0 Marine 0 Airplane 5 Personal Injury - of Property USC 88 4 Withdrawal Qui Tam ( USC 0 Miller Act Airplane Product Product Liability 90 Other 8 USC 9(a 40 Negotiable Instrument Liability Health Care/ 400 State Reapportionment 0 Recovery of Overpayment 0 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS 40 Antitrust & Enforcement of Judgment Slander Personal Injury 80 Copyrights 40 Banks and Banking Medicare Act 0 Federal Employers Product Liability 80 Patent 450 Commerce Recovery of Defaulted Liability 8 Asbestos Personal 85 Patent - Abbreviated 40 Deportation Student Loans 40 Marine Injury Product New Drug Application 40 Racketeer Influenced and (Excludes Veterans 45 Marine Product Liability 840 Trademark Corrupt Organizations Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY 480 Consumer Credit of Veteran s Benefits 50 Motor Vehicle 0 Other Fraud 0 Fair Labor Standards 8 HIA (95ff 490 Cable/Sat TV 0 Stockholders Suits 55 Motor Vehicle Truth in Lending Act 8 Black Lung (9 850 Securities/Commodities/ 0 Other Contract Product Liability 80 Other Personal 0 Labor/Management 8 DIWC/DIWW (405(g Exchange 5 Contract Product Liability 0 Other Personal Property Damage Relations 84 SSID Title XVI 890 Other Statutory Actions Franchise Injury 85 Property Damage 40 Railway Labor Act 85 RSI (405(g 89 Agricultural Acts Personal Injury - Product Liability 5 Family and Medical 89 Environmental Matters Medical Malpractice Leave Act 895 Freedom of Information REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS 90 Other Labor Litigation FEDERAL TAX SUITS Act 0 Land Condemnation 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: 9 Employee Retirement 80 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff 89 Arbitration 0 Foreclosure 44 Voting 4 Alien Detainee Income Security Act or Defendant 899 Administrative Procedure 0 Rent Lease & Ejectment 44 Employment 50 Motions to Vacate 8 IRS Third Party Act/Review or Appeal of 0 Torts to Land 44 Housing/ Sentence USC 09 Agency Decision 5 Tort Product Liability Accommodations 50 General 950 Constitutionality of 90 All Other Real Property 445 Amer. w/disabilities - 55 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION State Statutes Employment Other: 4 Naturalization Application 44 Amer. w/disabilities - 540 Mandamus & Other 45 Other Immigration Other 550 Civil Rights Actions 448 Education 555 Prison Condition 50 Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement V. ORIGIN (Place an X in One Box Only Original Removed from Proceeding State Court VI. CAUSE OF ACTION VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: VIII. RELATED CASE(S IF ANY DATE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Remanded from 4 Reinstated or 5 Transferred from Appellate Court Reopened Another District (specify Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity: 9 U.S.C. Section 0 Brief description of cause: Complaint for Overtime Wages CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION UNDER RULE, F.R.Cv.P. (See instructions: DEMAND $ JUDGE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD 0/0/0 s/michael A. Conger 'CV44 BEN BGS Multidistrict Litigation - Transfer 8 Multidistrict Litigation - Direct File CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: JURY DEMAND: Yes No DOCKET NUMBER RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE

JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 0/ Case :-cv-044-ben-bgs Document - Filed 0// PageID.5 Page of INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44 Authority For Civil Cover Sheet The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 4, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows: I.(a (b (c II. III. IV. Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and then the official, giving both name and title. County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved. Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting in this section "(see attachment". Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a, F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X" in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below. United States plaintiff. ( Jurisdiction based on 8 U.S.C. 45 and 48. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here. United States defendant. ( When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box. Federal question. ( This refers to suits under 8 U.S.C., where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes precedence, and box or should be marked. Diversity of citizenship. (4 This refers to suits under 8 U.S.C., where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity cases. Residence (citizenship of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this section for each principal party. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If there are multiple nature of suit codes associated with the case, pick the nature of suit code that is most applicable. Click here for: Nature of Suit Code Descriptions. V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the seven boxes. Original Proceedings. ( Cases which originate in the United States district courts. Removed from State Court. ( Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 8 U.S.C., Section 44. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box. Remanded from Appellate Court. ( Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing date. Reinstated or Reopened. (4 Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date. Transferred from Another District. (5 For cases transferred under Title 8 U.S.C. Section 404(a. Do not use this for within district transfers or multidistrict litigation transfers. Multidistrict Litigation Transfer. ( Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 8 U.S.C. Section 40. Multidistrict Litigation Direct File. (8 Check this box when a multidistrict case is filed in the same district as the Master MDL docket. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NOT AN ORIGIN CODE. Origin Code was used for historical records and is no longer relevant due to changes in statue. VI. VII. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 4 USC 55 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule, F.R.Cv.P. Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction. Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded. VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases. Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.

Case 4-cv-044-BEN-BGS Document - Filed 0// PagelD. Page of I MICHAEL A. CONGER (State Bar #488 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A. CONGER San Dieguito Road, Suite 4-4 P.O. Box 94 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 90 Telephone: (858 59-000 4 Facsimile: (858 59-0 5 Attorney for Plaintiffs David K. Kries, Gary Mondesir and those similarly situated 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 DAVID K. KRIES, and GARY MONDESIR, on CASE NO: CV44 BEN BGS behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated, CONSENT TO JOIN UNDER FAIR Plaintiffs, LABOR STANDARDS ACT (9 U.S.C. (b vs. 4 CITY OF SAN DIEGO; and DOES through 0, inclusive, Defendants. 0, Jim Mackay, hereby authorize and consent to become a party plaintiff to this action pursuant to 9 U.S.C. (b. Dated: July, 0 ckay 8

ClassAction.org This complaint is part of ClassAction.org's searchable class action lawsuit database and can be found in this post: Employees File Suit Against City of San Diego Over Allegedly Improper OT Wages