Texas. SUPER DISTRICT A - FIVE SEATS % 2000 Presidential Vote

Similar documents
Issue Overview: How the U.S. elects its presidents

Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 5

10/23/2012. Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 5

Ch. 5 Test Legislative Branch Government

2014 ELECTIONS IN TEXAS

Congressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond

2. Identify the factors of political socialization. Rank them from #1 (most important) to #5 (least important). Then, explain your ranking.

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN ARIZONA. March 4, 2014

Gerrymandering: t he serpentine art VCW State & Local

The Electoral College

US History, October 8

Union Voters and Democrats

Moral Values Take Back Seat to Partisanship and the Economy In 2004 Presidential Election

Redistricting Reform in the South

TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2016 ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES: 11

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN COLORADO. June 25, 2014

Latinos and the Mid- term Election

PARTISANSHIP AND WINNER-TAKE-ALL ELECTIONS

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

Growth Leads to Transformation

TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

Electing a President. The Electoral College

In The Supreme Court of the United States

What Happened on Election Day

ELECTING CANDIDATES WITH FAIR REPRESENTATION VOTING: RANKED CHOICE VOTING AND OTHER METHODS

Applying Ranked Choice Voting to Congressional Elections. The Case for RCV with the Top Four Primary and Multi-Member Districts. Rob Richie, FairVote

Campaigns & Elections. US Government POS 2041

that changes needed to be made when electing their Presidential nominee. Iowa, at the time had a

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1

Politicians who needs them? 1 of 5 10/23/2014 8:30 AM. October , 5.34am EDT. Glenn Altschuler

Testimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government. October 16, 2006

Winning Florida The Importance of Central Florida and the Puerto Rican Vote

In the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

Presidential Race Nip and Tuck in Michigan

Electoral College Reform: Evaluation and Policy Recommendations

AP Govt. Day 53. Objectives: The Learner will examine and understand the institutions of national government: Congress

The 2010 Election and Its Aftermath John Coleman and Charles Franklin Department of Political Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Patrick J. Lingane February 7, 2008 A Letter to the Author Improvements to Spitzer s Chapter on Elections

Edexcel GCE Government and Politics: Topic C Politics of the USA Jonathan Vickery

New Jersey s Redistricting Reform Legislation (S.C.R. 43/A.C.R. 205): Republican Gerrymanders, Democratic Gerrymanders, and Possible Fixes

Purposes of Elections

RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

9. Some industries like oil and gas companies largely support candidates. A) Democrats B) Republicans C) Libertarians D) Independent candidates

Elections and Voting Behavior

Fuzzy Math: Wrong Way Reforms for Allocating Electoral College Votes

Student Performance Q&A:

The Center for Voting and Democracy

Reading Between the Lines Congressional and State Legislative Redistricting

Hispanics and the Changing Racial Demographics of the Intermountain West

The Effect of Electoral Geography on Competitive Elections and Partisan Gerrymandering

Elections. How we choose the people who govern us

GOVERNMENT REFORM: Independent and Third-Party Candidates Access To Congressional Elections and Presidential Debates

STATEMENT OF WADE HENDERSON, PRESIDENT & CEO THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS

American Dental Association

MN LET THE PEOPLE VOTE COALITION INFORMATION SHEETS ON SOME PROPOSED CAUCUS RESOLUTIONS FOR FEBRUARY 6, 2018 CAUCUSES JANUARY 22, 2018

Texas Elections Part I

Please note: additional data sources are referenced throughout this presentation, including national exit polls and NBC/WSJ national survey data.

HPISD CURRICULUM (SOCIAL STUDIES, GOVERNMENT) EST. NUMBER OF DAYS:25 DAYS

Chapter 5: Political Parties Ms. Nguyen American Government Bell Ringer: 1. What is this chapter s EQ? 2. Interpret the quote below: No America

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Youth Voting in the 2004 Battleground States

US Government Module 3 Study Guide

Watch the video and take the pre-test for Be sure you are working on getting your collaboration and service learning project completed.

Texas Elections Part II

Supreme Court of the United States

Indicate the answer choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

The 2020 Census, Gerrymandering, and Voter Suppression

EXTENDING THE SPHERE OF REPRESENTATION:

Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Erica Seifert and Scott Tiell, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

Fair Representation and the Voting Rights Act. Remedies for Racial Minority Vote Dilution Claims

Mindy Romero, Ph.D. Director

Texas Redistricting : A few lessons learned

The Battleground: Democratic Perspective September 7 th, 2016

Political Attitudes &Participation: Campaigns & Elections. State & Local Government POS 2112 Ch 5

Nevada Poll Results Tarkanian 39%, Heller 31% (31% undecided) 31% would renominate Heller (51% want someone else, 18% undecided)

To understand the U.S. electoral college and, more generally, American democracy, it is critical to understand that when voters go to the polls on

Introduction What are political parties, and how do they function in our two-party system? Encourage good behavior among members

Mindy Romero, Ph.D. Director

The Executive Branch

Chapter 6: Voters and Voter Behavior Section 4

POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND THE LATINO VOTE By NALEO Educational Fund

NEWS RELEASE. Poll Shows Tight Races Obama Leads Clinton. Democratic Primary Election Vote Intention for Obama & Clinton

Chapter 5 - The Organization of Congress

CSE 308, Section 2. Semester Project Discussion. Session Objectives

Political Parties. Chapter 9

Assessing California s Redistricting Commission

The Next Swing Region: Reapportionment and Redistricting in the Intermountain West

The second step of my proposed plan involves breaking states up into multi-seat districts.

U.S Presidential Election

2014 ELECTIONS IN CALIFORNIA

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

Redrawing the Map: Redistricting Issues in Michigan. Jordon Newton Research Associate Citizens Research Council of Michigan

How the Rising Share of Latino Voters Will Impact the 2016 Elections. By Anna Chu and Charles Posner December

1996 NEW JERSEY ELECTIONS CLINTON LEADS DOLE; LOW AWARENESS OF SENATE CANDIDATES

Fixing the U.S. Congress by Embracing Earmarks

What do you know about how our president is elected?

Chapter 10: Congress Section 2

How Women Changed the Outcome of the Election

An open primary 2. A semi-open primary

Subject: Florida U.S. Congressional District 16 General Election Survey conducted for FloridaPolitics.com

Transcription:

Texas Racial Representation Of the voting population of 6,232,350, 28.7 are Latino and 11.0 are black. Under the current 32-district system, black voters do not make up the majority in any district and Latino voters make up the majority in seven districts. There are currently two black and six Latino representatives from Texas. Under the proposed super districting plan, Latino voters are well-positioned to elect four candidates of choice. Latino voters supporting a candidate with crossover appeal could, in coalition with other minority and white voters, elect seven candidates of choice. voters are well-positioned to elect one candidate of choice. voters supporting a candidate with crossover appeal could, in coalition with other minority and white voters, elect three candidates of choice. Political Analysis In the 2000 Presidential election, George W. Bush won Texas with 59 of the vote over Al Gore's 38. The state's Democratic partisanship is 40.6. Under the current 32-district system, 21 districts can be considered Republican, ten can be considered Democratic, and one can be considered competitive. Under the proposed super districting plan, voters would likely elect a total of 16 Republicans, 12 Democrats, and four candidates who could come from either party. SUPER DISTRICT A - FIVE Texas 14 136460 (65.6) 71434 (34.4) - - 207894 7.7 32.0 Texas 15 63495 (45.5) 76161 (54.5) - - 139656 1.3 78.3 Texas 20 64659 (42.9) 86133 (57.1) - - 150792 5.3 68.2 Texas 27 75600 (48.7) 79716 (51.3) - - 155316 2.1 71.6

Texas 28 62275 (40.8) 90202 (59.2) - - 152477 7.5 69.6 Total 402489 (49.9) 403646 (50.1) - - 806135 5.0 61.5 16.7 Latino voters are well-positioned to elect two candidates of choice. Latino voters supporting a candidate with crossover appeal could elect a third candidate of choice in coalition with other minority and white voters. 51.7 This super district would likely elect two Democrats and two Republicans with one swing seat. SUPER DISTRICT B - FIVE Texas 7 130053 (67.9) 61498 (32.1) - - 191551 11.3 25.9 Texas 9 124578 (55.3) 100778 (44.7) - - 225356 21.1 14.4 Texas 18 47335 (25.5) 138059 (74.5) - - 185394 42.2 32.6 Texas 22 156219 (68.2) 72806 (31.8) - - 229025 10.1 19.7 Texas 25 81359 (48.4) 86764 (51.6) - - 168123 22.7 34.3 Total 539544 (54.0) 86764 (46.0) - - 999449 20.9 24.5 16.7 Latino voters are well-positioned to elect one candidate of choice. voters are well-positioned to elect one candidate of choice. 47.6 This super district would likely elect two Democrats and two Republicans with one swing seat. SUPER DISTRICT C - FIVE Texas 1 142544 (64.1) 79801 (35.9) - - 222345 16.2 7.4 Texas 2 133641 (63.0) 78493 (37.0) - - 212134 13.8 8.8 Texas 5 118703 (62.1) 72507 (37.9) - - 191210 15.8 17.7 Texas 8 187243 (77.7) 53843 (22.3) - - 241086 5.2 13.0 Texas 29 42770 (39.4) 65863 (60.6) - - 108633 14.7 62.2 Total 624901 (64.1) 350507 (35.9) - - 975408 12.7 17.2 16.7 Both black and Latino voters supporting a candidate with crossover appeal could elect a candidate of choice in coalition with white and other minority voters. 37.5 This super district would likely elect two Democrats and two

Republicans with one swing seat. SUPER DISTRICT D - FIVE Texas 3 154525 (72.2) 59357 (27.8) - - 213882 6.6 14.4 Texas 4 157678 (70.2) 66995 (29.8) - - 224673 11.7 9.4 Texas 24 70665 (45.7) 83806 (54.3) - - 154471 21.7 38.0 Texas 26 166762 (73.3) 60771 (26.7) - - 227533 5.0 11.0 Texas 32 129527 (64.9) 70029 (35.1) - - 199556 9.1 27.4 Total 679157 (66.6) 340958 (33.4) - - 1020115 10.1 18.7 16.7 Even though Latinos are above the victory threshold they would likely need crossover support to elect a candidate of choice. voters supporting a candidate with crossover appeal could elect a candidate of choice in coalition with white voters. 35.0 This super district would likely elect three Republicans and two Democrats. SUPER DISTRICT E - THREE Texas 12 141032 (66.6) 70751 (59.3) - - 211783 4.5 19.9 Texas 13 156330 (74.6) 53146 (25.4) - - 209476 5.6 21.6 Texas 17 161877 (72.2) 62241 (27.8) - - 224118 3.8 19.6 Total 459239 (71.2) 186138 (28.8) - - 645377 4.6 20.3 25 Latino voters supporting a candidate with crossover appeal could elect a candidate of choice in coalition with other minority and white voters. 30.4 This super district would likely elect two Republicans and one SUPER DISTRICT F - THREE Texas 16 56276 (40.7) 81860 (59.3) - - 138136 2.9 77.7

Texas 19 149350 (75.5) 48400 (24.5) - - 197750 5.6 34.1 Texas 23 105789 (58.6) 74727 (41.4) - - 180516 1.4 66.8 Total 311415 (60.3) 204987 (39.7) - - 516402 3.4 57.2 25 Latino voters are well-positioned to elect one candidate of choice. Latino voters supporting a candidate with crossover appeal could elect a second candidate of choice in coalition with other minority and white voters. 41.3 This super district would likely elect two Republicans and one SUPER DISTRICT G - THREE Texas 10 89738 (46.9) 101534 (53.1) - - 191272 10.9 33.0 Texas 21 206157 (72.8) 77056 (27.2) - - 283213 2.1 17.2 Texas 31 160802 (71.6) 63903 (28.4) - - 224705 9.0 16.9 Total 456697 (65.3) 242493 (34.7) - - 699190 6.7 21.4 25 Latino voters supporting a candidate with crossover appeal could elect a candidate of choice in coalition with other minority and white voters. 36.3 This super district would likely elect two Republicans and one SUPER DISTRICT H - THREE Texas 6 146931 (66.9) 72754 (33.1) - - 219685 10.2 13.5 Texas 11 129701 (67.5) 62465 (32.5) - - 192166 15.4 16.4 Texas 30 48916 (30.9) 109507 (69.1) - - 158423 40.5 31.1 Total 325548 (57.1) 244726 (42.9) - - 570274 20.4 19.4 25 Both black and Latino voters supporting a candidate with crossover appeal could elect a candidate of choice in coalition with white and other minority voters. 44.5 This super district would likely elect one Democrat and one Republican with one swing seat.

This proposal is based on the current congressional districts of Texas. Because current congressional districts are often the results of gerrymandering, the proposed super district boundaries are not as smooth and nice-looking as they could be in a similar proposal that made use of sub-congressional district data.