Communities of Color Coalition on City Council Redistricting

Similar documents
Overview of Boston s Population. Boston Redevelopment Authority Research Division Alvaro Lima, Director of Research September

ARTICLE 3 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS

Boston s Emerging Ethnic Quilt: A Geographic Perspective. James P. Allen and Eugene Turner. California State University, Northridge.

Community Meetings 2005

The Impact of Drug and Marijuana Arrests Within the Largest Cities of Massachusetts

BOSTON REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JULY 20, 2010 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR 5:30 P.M. MINUTES/SCHEDULING

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION OF BOSTON MARCH 15, 2018 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR 3:30 P.M.

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Districts

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION OF BOSTON JUNE 15, 2017 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR 3:30 P.M.

Overview. League of Women Voters: The Ins and Outs of Redistricting 4/21/2015

Case 1:11-cv DLI-RR-GEL Document 182 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2214

Ms. Coll. 57 Bill Owens Papers, : Guide

BOSTON MAYORAL ELECTION POLL

City of Placentia By-District Elections Briefing. February 6, 2018

City of Rancho Cucamonga Presentation of Draft Maps

Sweetwater Union High School District Demographic and Districting Introduction

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1517 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 214 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BOSTON WATER AND SEWER COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, March 22, 2017 I. CALL TO ORDER

IOLTA Grants

City of LEMOORE CALIFORNIA. Staff Report

City of Oakland 2013 Redistricting Town Hall forum

December 12, City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections

Sully District Fairfax County. Prepared by Ralph Hubbard Sully Supervisor Representative Fairfax County Redistricting Committee 3/23/2011

Local Opportunities for Redistricting Reform

October 17, Lompoc 2017 Districting Initial Hearings

December 12, City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections

Reading Between the Lines Congressional and State Legislative Redistricting

Putting an end to Gerrymandering in Ohio: A new citizens initiative

May 9, City of South San Francisco 2018 Districting Initial Hearings

Redrawing the Map: Redistricting Issues in Michigan. Jordon Newton Research Associate Citizens Research Council of Michigan

On a motion duly made and seconded, it was, by a 4-1 majority. Messrs. Palmieri and Golden attended the meeting.

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. May 8, 2018

October 30, City of Menlo Park Introduction to Election Systems

NEW YORK STATE SENATE PUBLIC MEETING ON REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 14, 2010

October 16, Whittier Union High School District Introduction to Districting

REDISTRICTING FUN U DA D M A EN E TA T L A S L

Boston s Emerging Ethnic Quilt: A Geographic Perspective. James P. Allen and Eugene Turner. Department of Geography

Messrs. Meade and Golden attended the Meeting. The Chairman opened the meeting of the Boston Redevelopment Authority.

Chinese. imagine all the people. Chinese in Boston Photos by Renato Castello & Jeremiah Robinson

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

Brazilians. in Boston

Ballot Measures-V Section

Charter Review Commission

APPORTIONMENT Statement of Position As announced by the State Board, 1966

REDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?

Sequoia Union High School District Districting Public Forums

Redistricting Overview San Mateo County Harbor District

Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Legal Overview. July 8, 2011 By: Joseph Kanefield and Mary O Grady

ST. TAMMANY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD 2010 CENSUS/2014 ELECTION REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 1, Presentation by REDISTRICTING L.L.C.

H 7749 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:12-cv JLH Document 18-7 Filed 02/22/12 Page 1 of 20

Congressional and Legislative Appointments

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

The Very Picture of What s Wrong in D.C. : Daniel Webster and the American Community Survey

AN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 649 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 9

Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Baton Rouge December 15, 2009

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

CSE 308, Section 2. Semester Project Discussion. Session Objectives

Assessing California s Redistricting Commission

Redistricting & the Quantitative Anatomy of a Section 2 Voting Rights Case

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL MASTER S DRAFT PLAN AND ORDER

City of Mesquite Districting City Council Districts. Presented By: Gunnar Seaquist Partner, Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

New Developments in the Meaning of the Voting Rights Act. Nate Persily Beekman Professor of Law and Political Science Columbia Law School

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA THIRD EXTRA SESSION 2016 HOUSE BILL DRH30015-LU-3 (12/13)

Illinois Redistricting Collaborative 2018 Gubernatorial Gerrymandering Survey

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

Chinatown People Progressive Association Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. v. Civil Case No. 1:17-CV TCB

Redistricting Virginia

Testimony of Natasha M. Korgaonkar Assistant Counsel, Political Participation Group NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. TOM SCHEDLER, in his official capacity as The Secretary of State of Louisiana, COMPLAINT

The California Voting Rights Act: Recent Legislation & Litigation Outcomes

Can Mathematics Help End the Scourge of Political Gerrymandering?

AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF PHILIP P. KALODNER IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY

Case 2:12-cv TOR Document Filed 10/03/14 EXHIBIT A

4/23/2018. CCAC Annual Conference April 19, a.m. 12 p.m. Break w/ Exhibitors 10 a.m. 10:30 a.m.

TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

COMPACTNESS IN THE REDISTRICTING PROCESS

United States House of Representatives Plan - Special Masters - October 14, 2011 Population Report

City of Redlands Introduction to 2016 Districting

activists handbook to

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the congressional district lines you have proposed in your capacity as Special Master.

Place Matters for Health in Boston:

Reapportionment. In 1991, reapportionment and redistricting were the most open, democratic, and racially

Note: Wards 1, 3 and 5 will hold elections on November 3, 2020; and Wards 2, 4 and 6 will hold

ILLINOIS (status quo)

Illinois Redistricting Collaborative Talking Points Feb. Update

Testimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government. October 16, 2006

Irish. imagine all the people. Irish in Boston

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

REDISTRICTING commissions

Boston Police Aim To Increase Diversity On Force, But Challenges Persist In Hiring W...

Political changes in San Francisco during the past twenty years David Latterman February, 2017

July 19, Washington Unified 2018 Districting

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT 1

In the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

Transcription:

Communities of Color Coalition on City Council Redistricting Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center, Castle Square Tenants Organization, Chinatown Resident Association, Chinese Progressive Association & Chinese Progressive Political Action, Inquilinos Boricuas en Acción, MassVote, NAACP Boston Branch, Oíste?, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Economic Justice, South Boston en Acción, The Urban League of Eastern Massachusetts, and Project HIP-HOP Stop The Cracking and Packing in Boston The Coalition proposes two maps for serious consideration by the Mayor and City Council. These maps meet all the requirements for city redistricting, while also adhering to the 1965 Voting Rights Act and maximize opportunities for communities of color. At the same time the map takes into account the desire for neighborhoods to remain as whole as possible, natural alliances and avoids forcing incumbents into the same district. Both maps are based on the 2010 census determination of 617,598 as the population of Boston, requiring 68,622 for each of the nine districts. It addresses that population grew in districts 1, 2, 7, 8 and 9 and population declined in districts 3, 4, 5 and 6. Both maps follow the rule that the population deviation can be no greater than 5% or +/- 3.421 residents. Map 1 Raw Population District Raw Population Color Population Deviation White Black Latino Asian *POC 1 (East Boston and Charlestown) 68,110-0.74% 54.7 3.6 34.6 4.5 42.7 2 (South Boston, Chinatown, Waterfront) 70,502 2.74% 64.5 7.6 10.5 15.3 33.4 3 (North Dorchester) 67,356-1.84% 18.1 40.7 20.0 10.1 70.8 4 (Mattapan & Dorchester) 66,007-3.81% 22.1 53.7 13.1 6.4 73.2 5 (Hyde Park and Roslindale) 66,074-3.71% 32.7 40.1 22.1 2.0 64.2 6 (Jamaica Plain and West Roxbury) 67,931-1.01% 64.1 10.5 16.6 6.0 33.1 7 (Roxbury, Fenway, South End) 71,406 4.06% 29.4 37.0 22.2 6.1 65.3 8 (Beacon Hill, Back Bay, Mission Hill) 68,692 0.10% 68.9 5.8 8.7 13.8 28.3 9 (Allston and Brighton) 71,516 4.22% 66.1 4.6 10.0 15.3 29.9 The Coalition map proposal maintains its intent when voting age population (VAP) is applied. Any map that seeks to enhance the voice of communities of color must be based on voting age population. Map 1 Voting Age Population Voting Age Population Color Population White Black Latin Asian *POC 1 (East Boston and Charlestown) 55,903 59.8 3.2 30.1 4.4 37.7 2 (South Boston, Chinatown, Waterfront) 62,313 67.8 6.8 8.7 15.0 30.5 3 (East Dorchester) 50,118 21.7 39.3 17.8 10.6 67.7 4 (Mattapan & Dorchester) 49,590 25.1 53.2 11.2 6.3 70.7 5 (Hyde Park and Roslindale) 50,492 37.0 38.9 19.6 2.0 60.5 6 (Jamaica Plain and West Roxbury) 56,040 67.3 10.0 14.7 6.0 30.7 7 (Roxbury, Fenway, South End) 58,359 34.9 34.4 18.7 7.1 60.2 8 (Beacon Hill, Back Bay, Mission Hill) 64,980 70.2 5.3 7.9 14.0 27.2 9 (Allston and Brighton) 66,089 68.2 4.2 8.8 15.1 28.1

Coalition of Color Map 1 Coalition Map 1 does not deviate far from several of the proposals currently before the council. But it does differ specifically in two areas, notably District 2 and District 4. District 2 had to lose population due to increases in the district population. Our proposal is that the Polish Triangle shift from District 2 to District 3. The Polish Triangle is part of Dorchester, and moving to District 3 follows natural boundaries. The Coalition map also includes in District 2 the maximum South End precincts possible to keep this neighborhood whole, while adhering to geographic compactness and maintaining the political link between the South End and Chinatown. The residents of Chinatown and the South End share a 30 year history of struggle to have fair representation as they share District 2 with the historically politically dominant South Boston. District 4, which lost population, represents an excessive case of packing of people of color (POC). District 4 has historically been 90% people of color with Blacks accounting for 68% of the district. Boston is 53% people of color yet the nine districts do not reflect this reality. Only two of the nine

district councilors are of color with both being African-American. There are no Asian or Latino district councilors. This can be directly attributed to the packing of District 4. The Linehan map packs District 4 even further to the detriment of communities of color in Districts 3 and 5. The Coalition map seeks to intelligently unpack District 4. District 3 and 4 would now share an East-West border near Park Street. District 3 would be in effect North Dorchester linking Grove Hall with Upham s Corner and uniting Fields Corner East and West. The new District 4 would contain Mattapan and South Dorchester, unifying Lower Mills. District 4 would be 73.2% POC and still be 53.7% Black maintaining its protected class status. However District 3 would benefit and increase from 54% to 70.8% POC, creating a real opportunity for communities of color to have a strong voice as the Voting Rights Act intended. The Coalition map proposal maintains four strong majority-minority districts based on VAP numbers and maintains the link between Chinatown and the South End. MAP 1 PRECINCT LIST D1: 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 1-6, 1-7, 1-8, 1-9, 1-10, 1-11, 1-12, 1-13, 1-14, 2-1, 2-2, 2-3, 2-4, 2-5, 2-6, 2-7, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 3-4. D2: 3-7, 3-8, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-1, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 6-5, 6-6, 6-7, 6-8, 6-9, 7-1, 7-2, 7-3, 7-4, 7-5, 7-6, 7-7, 8-1, 8-2, 9-1. D3: 7-8, 7-9, 7-10, 13-1, 13-3, 13-4, 13-5, 13-6, 13-7, 13-8, 13-9, 13-10, 14-1, 14-2, 14-3, 14-4, 14-6, 14-7, 15-1, 15-2, 15-3, 15-4, 15-5, 15-6, 15-7, 15-8, 15-9, 16-1, 16-2, 17-1, 17-2. D4: 14-5, 14-8, 14-9, 14-10, 14-11, 14-12, 14-13, 14-14, 16-3, 16-4, 16-5, 16-6, 16-7, 16-8, 16-9, 16-10, 16-11, 16-12, 17-3, 17-4, 17-5, 17-6, 17-7, 17-8, 17-9, 17-10, 17-11, 17-12, 17-13, 17-14, 18-1, 18-2, 18-4. D5: 18-3, 18-5, 18-6, 18-7, 18-8, 18-9, 18-10, 18-11, 18-12, 18-13, 18-14, 18-15, 18-16, 18-17, 18-18, 18-19, 18-20, 18-21, 18-22, 18-23, 19-10, 19-11, 19-13, 20-1, 20-2, 20-4, 20-8, 20-9. D6: 10-6, 10-7, 10-8, 10-9, 11-4, 11-5, 11-6, 11-7, 11-8, 11-9, 11-10, 19-1, 19-2, 19-3, 19-4, 19-5, 19-6, 19-7, 19-8, 19-9, 19-12, 20-3, 20-5, 20-6 20-7, 20-10, 20-11, 20-12, 20-13, 20-14, 20-15, 20-16, 20-17, 20-18, 20-19, 20-20. D7: 4-5, 4-6, 4-7, 4-8, 4-9, 8-3, 8-4, 8-5, 8-6, 8-7, 9-2, 9-3, 9-4, 9-5, 11-1, 11-2, 11-3, 11-5, 12-1, 12-2, 12-3, 12-4, 12-5, 12-6, 12-7, 12-8, 12-9, 13-2. D8: 3-5, 3-6, 4-10, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 5-8, 5-9, 5-10, 5-11, 10-1, 10-2, 10-3, 10-4, 10-5, 21-1, 21-2. D9: 21-3, 21-4, 21-5, 21-6, 21-7, 21-8, 21-9, 21-10, 21-11, 21-12, 21-13, 21-14, 21-15, 21-16, 22-1, 22-2, 22-3, 22-4, 22-5, 22-6, 22-7, 22-8, 22-9, 22-10, 22-11, 22-12, 22-13.

Map 2 Raw Population District Raw Population Color Population Deviation White Black Latino Asian *POC 1 (East Boston and Charlestown) 67,575-1.52% 54.9 3.3 34.7 4.5 42.5 2 (South Boston, Chinatown, Waterfront) 70,502 2.74% 64.5 7.6 10.5 15.3 33.4 3 (East Dorchester) 67,324-1.89% 35.4 26.8 12.9 14.6 54.3 4 (Dorchester & Roslindale) 66,751-2.73% 13.2 55.1 24.3 2.1 81.5 5 (Hyde Park and Mattapan) 68,514-0.16% 24.9 51.9 18.1 1.8 71.8 6 (Jamaica Plain and West Roxbury) 65,314-4.82% 65.0 9.7 16.6 6.0 32.3 7 (Roxbury, Fenway, South End) 68,858 0.35% 28.3 38.1 22.6 5.7 66.4 8 (Beacon Hill, Back Bay, Mission Hill) 71,240 3.82% 68.6 6.0 8.8 13.9 28.7 9 (Allston and Brighton) 71,516 4.22% 66.1 4.6 10.0 15.3 29.9 Map 2 Voting Age Population Voting Age Population Color Population White Black Latin Asian *POC 1 (East Boston and Charlestown) 55,373 60.1 2.9 30.2 4.5 37.6 2 (South Boston, Chinatown, Waterfront) 62,313 67.8 6.8 8.7 15.0 30.5 3 (East Dorchester) 52,560 39.5 25.2 11.4 14.4 51.0 4 (Dorchester & Roslindale) 48,078 15.8 55.4 21.8 2.2 79.4 5 (Hyde Park and Mattapan) 52,018 28.4 51.0 15.9 1.9 68.8 6 (Jamaica Plain and West Roxbury) 54,114 67.9 9.4 14.7 6.0 30.1 7 (Roxbury, Fenway, South End) 55,861 33.7 35.6 19.0 6.6 61.2 8 (Beacon Hill, Back Bay, Mission Hill) 67,478 69.8 5.4 8.0 14.1 27.5 9 (Allston and Brighton) 66,089 68.2 4.2 8.8 15.1 28.1 Coalition Map 2 also does not deviate far from several of the proposals currently before the council and adheres closely to Map 1 in the boundaries of District 2 and the location of the Polish Triangle. It differs however from Map 1 by keeping District 3 virtually untouched while changing the boundaries of Districts 4 and 5. Map 2 also addresses the legally unacceptable packing in District 4 by shifting its orientation so that District 4 and 5 share a long East-West border. District 4 now connects Dorchester to Roslindale via Franklin Field and American Legion Highway. Therefore District 5 now has Mattapan linked to Hyde Park, which are natural neighbors. Map 2 allows Mattapan to be whole and meets an even higher legal standard. In Map 2, District 5 is 51% Black and 69% people of color. This is important as a demonstrated second single-race majority district in Boston compels the council to make every attempt to accomplish this goal. While no map is perfect, the Coalition seeks to intelligently unpack District 4 as required. Both maps accomplish this goal while maintaining neighborhood integrity and protects incumbents. In addition, both maps maintain District 4 s protected class status keeping it 53% or 55% Black. The Coalition of Color strongly encourages the City to adopt one of these maps with no more than minor change that

creates real opportunities for communities of color to have a strong voice as the Voting Rights Act intended. Coalition of Color Map 2 MAP 2 PRECINCT LIST D1:1-1,1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 1-6, 1-7, 1-8, 1-9, 1-10, 1-11,1-12,1-13, 1-14, 2-1, 2-2, 2-3, 2-4, 2-5, 2-6, 2-7, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 3-4.

D2:3-7,3-8, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-1, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 6-5, 6-6, 6-7, 6-8, 6-9, 7-1, 7-2, 7-3, 7-4, 7-5, 7-6, 7-7, 8-1, 8-2, 9-1. D3: 7-8, 7-9, 7-10, 13-3, 13-5, 13-6, 13-7, 13-8, 13-9, 13-10, 15-1,15-2, 15-3, 15-4, 15-6, 15-7, 15-8, 15-9, 16-1, 16-2, 16-3, 16-4,16-5, 16-6, 16-7, 16-8, 16-9, 16-10, 16-11, 16-12, 17-4, 17-13 D4:13-1, 13-4, 14-1, 14-2, 14-3, 14-4, 14-5,14-6,14-7, 14-8,14-9, 14-10, 14-11, 14-12, 14-13, 14-14, 15-5,17-1, 17-2., 17-3,17-5, 17-6, 17-8, 17-9, 17-11, 18-7,19-10, 19-11, 19-13, 20-1, 20-2, 20-4 D5: 17-7, 17-10, 17-12, 17-14, 18-1, 18-2, 18-4, 18-3, 18-5, 18-6 18-8,18-9, 18-10, 18-11, 18-12, 18-13, 18-14, 18-15, 18-16, 18-17, 18-18,18-19, 18-20, 18-21, 18-22, 18-23, 20-3, 20-8, 20-9. D6:10-6, 10-7, 10-8, 10-9, 11-4,11-6,11-7, 11-8, 11-9, 11-10,19-1,19-2, 19-3, 19-4, 19-5, 19-6, 19-7, 19-8, 19-9, 19-12,20-5,20-620-7,20-10,20-11,20-12,20-13, 20-14, 20-15, 20-16, 20-17, 20-18, 20-19,20-20. D7: 4-5,4-7, 4-8, 4-9, 8-3, 8-4, 8-5, 8-6, 8-7, 9-2, 9-3, 9-4, 9-5, 11-1,11-2, 11-3, 11-5, 12-1, 12-2, 12-3, 12-4, 12-5, 12-6, 12-7, 12-8,12-9, 13-2. D8:3-5, 3-6,4-6, 4-10, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 5-8, 5-9, 5-10, 5-11, 10-1,10-2, 10-3, 10-4, 10-5, 21-1, 21-2. D9:21-3, 21-4, 21-5, 21-6, 21-7, 21-8, 21-9, 21-10, 21-11, 21-12, 21-13,21-14, 21-15, 21-16, 22-1, 22-2, 22-3, 22-4,22-5, 22-6, 22-7, 22-8, 22-9, 22-10, 22-11, 22-12, 22-13.