Options in Brief. International Trade in a Globalized World Options 25

Similar documents
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton To Gender Equality and Women s Empowerment Policy Dialogue

Political Resolution IndustriALL Global Union s 2 nd Congress Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 5-7 October 2016

October 2006 APB Globalization: Benefits and Costs

GLOBALIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Putting development back in the WTO

GED Social Studies Focus Sheet: Lesson 16

Trump and Globalization. Joseph E. Stiglitz AEA Meetings Philadelphia January 2018

The Doha Round in Broader Context. Thomas Oatley World View November 15, 2006

Economic Globalization and Its Consequences

Trade Basics. January 2019 Why Trade? Globalization and the benefits of trade By Dr. Robert L. Thompson

The Importance and Promise of American Manufacturing

"WTO DOHA ROUND: A CONTRIBUTION TO A FREER, FAIRER AND

Options in Brief. Confronting Genocide: Never Again? 31

International Economics Day 2. Douglas J Young Professor Emeritus MSU

Social Studies Part 3 - Implications and Consequences of Globalization. Chapter 11 - Economic Globalization

The Economics of Globalization: A Labor View. Thomas Palley, Assistant Director of Public Policy, AFL-CIO

CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS FOR THE NEXT PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS COMPETING TO TRADE

Chapter 9: Fundamentals of International Political Economy

Globalization 10/5/2011. International Economics. Five Themes of Geography

CHAPTER 10: Fundamentals of International Political Economy

Globalisation and Open Markets

Trading Game. The. Materials Needed. » three paper grocery bags, each marked with one of the following labels: Group 1, Group 2, or Group 3

Are we truly globalizing the world marketplace? A critical view. Jonika Kromidha Faculty of Economy, University of Tirana, Albania,

Free Trade and Sweatshops

Political Resolution IndustriALL Global Union s 2 nd Congress Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 5-7 October 2016

As Prepared for Delivery. Partners in Progress: Expanding Economic Opportunity Across the Americas. AmCham Panama

High Level Forum Globalization and Global Crisis: The Role of Official Statistics Monday, 23 February 2009 ECOSOC Chamber 3:00-6:00 pm

Preferential market access in recent years has been linked to such goals as limiting civil conflict, arms sales, job losses and worker exploitation

Benefits and costs of free trade for less developed countries

Summary of Democratic Commissioners Views

BBB3633 Malaysian Economics

Oxfam Education

ASEAN Economic Community (AEC): Can ASEAN learn from the EU?

Committee: G13 Summit. Issue title: Reducing trade inequality. Submitted by: Tamás Kocsis, President of G13 Summit

POS 335 Andreas Syz February 17, 2004

The End of the Multi-fiber Arrangement on January 1, 2005

Session 10: Neoliberalism as Globalization, Part II. (Anti) Free Trade and (De)Globalization

The future of EU trade policy

GLOBALIZATION S CHALLENGES FOR THE DEVELOPED COUNTRIES

AQA Economics A-level

Options Role Play Instructions

Module 5 Review Guide

Has Globalization Helped or Hindered Economic Development? (EA)

IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Modernizing Canada s Trade Remedy System:

International Solidarity

Prepared by Iordanis Petsas To Accompany. by Paul R. Krugman and Maurice Obstfeld

Opportunities from Globalization for European Companies

Area of study 2: Dynamic Places

China: The Dragon's Effect on Southeast Asia

Business Globalization

CPI TALKS. With Frederic Jenny

Bringing EU Trade Policy Up to Date 23 June 2015

NAFTA: Capitalizing on Natural Advantages

Ambassador Kirk Announces New Initiatives for Trade Enforcement

CAPTURING THE GAINS. Governance in a value chain world. Frederick Mayer and Anne Posthuma. e c o n o m i c a n d s o c i a l u p g r a d i n g

U.S. FOREIGN ECONOMIC POLICY: TRADE, INVESTMENT, AND AID ISSUES AND POLICIES

EL FINAL DE LA CONVERTIBILIDAD DEL DOLAR

First draft Is globalization sustainable?

Wanted: Jubilee 2010 Against Protectionism

AMERICANS ON GLOBALIZATION: A Study of US Public Attitudes March 28, 2000

epp european people s party

Spurring Growth in the Global Economy A U.S. Perspective World Strategic Forum: Pioneering for Growth and Prosperity

The New Geography of Jobs. Enrico Moretti University of California at Berkeley

SPEECH OF AMBASSADOR MONDALE TO THE JAPAN CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH (TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995)

Session 12. International Political Economy

OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP TESTIMONY OF DAN DIMICCO CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CEO NUCOR CORPORATION

US Trade Policy under Trump: NAFTA, Steel, and Beyond

International Political Economy

Ch. 6 Free Trade. Organizing the Marketplace Introduction to International Relations

Hungry for change- Frequently Asked Questions

SOME FACTS ABOUT MEXICO'S TRADE

European competition policy facing a renaissance of protectionism - which strategy for the future?

Chair of the Africa Progress Panel, former Secretary-General of the United Nations and Nobel Laureate

Adam Smith and Government Intervention in the Economy Sima Siami-Namini Graduate Research Assistant and Ph.D. Student Texas Tech University

Andhra Pradesh: Vision 2020

Challenges and Opportunities for Colombia s Social Justice and Economy. Joseph E. Stiglitz Bogota February 16, 2017

TRADE IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY

UNDERSTANDING TRADE, DEVELOPMENT, AND POVERTY REDUCTION

Taking advantage of globalisation: the role of education and reform in Europe

Globalization - theory and practices

Anthony Saich The US Administration's Asia Policy

ECON MACROECONOMIC PRINCIPLES Instructor: Dr. Juergen Jung Towson University. J.Jung Chapter 18 - Trade Towson University 1 / 42

In this unit we are going to speak about globalization.

Exploitation: An Act of Cruelty or Opportunity. Today, the world produces millions of goods in order to satisfy the needs of the

International Trade Union Confederation Statement to UNCTAD XIII

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL. --- COMMENCMENT ADDRESS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME South Bend, Indiana, 21 May 2000

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Business Trend: Global Trade A House of Mirrors or Horrors

GLOBAL DEBATES. The U.S. and international trade: Why did things go sour? Understanding shortcomings in making the case for international trade

Testimony to the United States Senate Budget Committee Hearing on Opportunity, Mobility, and Inequality in Today's Economy April 1, 2014

PART 3: Implications and Consequences of Globalization Chapter 11 - Foundations of Economic Globalization #1 (Pages )

Survey of US Voters Caddell & Associates March 10, 2016

Perception of the Business Climate in Vietnam May 2015

The Americans (Survey)

International Trade Revised: November 8, 2012 Latest version available at

Modernizing Canada s Trade Remedy System:

Political Aspects of International Electricity Grid Interconnections

The International Law Annual Senior Lecturer, Kent Law School, Eliot College, University of Kent.

5.1 Prosperity in the 1920 s

Transcription:

International Trade in a Globalized World Options 25 Options in Brief Option 1: Keep the U.S. Economy on Top Since the end of World War II, the United States and many of its chief trading partners have en joyed unprecedented prosperity and economic growth. Free trade gives all countries a stake in protecting international peace and prosperity, because the economic health of one country depends on so many others. Although many barriers to trade remain, progress in lowering tariffs has produced positive results. World trade has soared, living standards have risen, and poverty has been reduced. To back away now from the top position in the global economy would leave the playing field open to U.S. rivals and remove a key pillar of international stability. Now more than ever, the United States is in a position to reap the benefits of international trade. Option 2: Protect U.S. Workers For too long, U.S. trade policy has served the interests of a small, selfish elite while the rest of the country has watched from the sidelines. The United States has produced multi-millionaires at a record rate while millions of hard-working people struggle to support their families on shrinking paychecks. U.S. trade policy must put the needs of U.S. workers above the heartless laws of free trade. The U.S. economy cannot be strong if it is constantly shedding jobs. U.S. trade policy must focus on stemming the flow of jobs overseas and protecting U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition. The forces of economic globalization must not be allowed to trample the lives of the men and women who built the country s economy. Option 3: Put Values First The United States should put its values before its wallet. There are issues that are more important to society than the benefits of free trade or the protection of U.S. workers. In today s world, trade policy is one of the most effective tools for addressing a range of global concerns such as human rights violations, environmental degradation, and the exploitation of child labor. The strong desire of other countries to have a trading relationship with the United States means that the United States has the opportunity to help promote broadlyaccepted international values. The United States should be prepared to lead the way by imposing sanctions or trade embargoes on countries that do not agree about the importance of these issues. U.S. trade policy should reflect U.S. values. Option 4: Work for Free and Fair Trade The current system of trade has not produced greater wealth for all, but clear winners and losers. So-called free trade is highly unfair. The current trade system serves the interests of large companies from the United States and elsewhere. Current U.S. trade policies give these businesses a competitive edge while doing nothing to help those hurt the most by free trade. The United States must take a leadership role in making the WTO more fair and effective in serving all countries rich or poor. Fair trade means providing fair prices for goods and fair wages for workers around the world. In the long run fair trade will promote greater productivity and more high-skilled jobs in the United States. In the short term it will improve the international opinion of the United States. WWW.CHOICES.EDU WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, BROWN UNIVERSITY THE CHOICES PROGRAM

26 International Trade in a Globalized World Options Option 1: Keep the U.S. Economy on Top After World War II, the United States took the lead in creating an interna tional economic system that recognized the critical importance of free trade and the free market. Since then, the United States and many of its chief trading partners have en joyed unprecedented prosperity and economic growth. The United States helped the countries of Western Europe and Japan get back on their feet because it understood that the economic health of U.S. trading partners was vital to U.S. well-being. Although many barriers to trade remain, progress in lowering tariffs has produced positive results. World trade has soared, living standards have risen, and poverty has been reduced. More open trade has provided U.S. consumers with better products at lower prices. The growth of trade has cemented U.S. alliances with Western Europe and Japan and built bridges across the lines of politics and culture. Free trade gives all countries a stake in protecting international peace and prosperity because the economic health of one country depends on so many others. Now more than ever, the United States is in a position to reap the benefits of international trade. U.S. technological expertise has given the United States the lead in many promising industries, including biotechnology and computer software. U.S. in genuity continues to produce cutting-edge tech nology. To back away now from the top position in the global economy would leave the playing field open to U.S. rivals and remove a key pillar of international stability. The economic success of the United States must be our top priority. To tie a list of international issues like human rights and other concerns to trade discussions would take away from expanding U.S. markets and undermine the overall efficiency of the U.S. economy. With its cultural diversity, outstanding universities, and forward-looking industries, the United States can compete successfully with any country in the world. THE CHOICES PROGRAM WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, BROWN UNIVERSITY WWW.CHOICES.EDU

International Trade in a Globalized World Options 27 Option 1 is based on the following beliefs U.S. leaders must base the country s trade policy on promoting the overall health of the U.S. economy. As participants in the world s most productive, innovative economy, the great majority of people in the United States benefit from the expansion of free trade. U.S. leadership in promoting free trade is essential to maintaining the United States position as an economic superpower. What policies should we pursue? The United States should reject foreign policy measures that interfere with U.S. trade interests, especially with respect to China and other key trading partners. The United States should press for the expansion of NAFTA and the WTO, and promote the creation of a Pacific Rim trade agreement. Arguments for Increased trade will spur greater economic growth, improve the overall standard of living, and provide U.S. consumers with better products. Free trade will give rise to an international system in which all countries have an interest in maintaining peace, stability, and worldwide economic growth. Promoting more open trade with Mexico and other U.S. neighbors to the south will reduce poverty in Latin America, ease the flow of immigrants into the United States, and expand the market for U.S. goods. The free, open competition of the marketplace will sharpen the efficiency of U.S. industry and encourage innovation. The United States should use foreign aid and trade benefits to reward poorer countries that follow free-trade policies. Arguments against Free trade policies will result in the transfer of millions of U.S. jobs abroad. Free trade will lead to a weakening of worker safety and environmental standards. The blind pursuit of free trade will leave U.S. industries and workers at a disadvantage in competing against companies overseas that use child labor or that have low safety and environmental standards. Free trade without fairness protects big businesses in the United States at the expense of workers in the United States. WWW.CHOICES.EDU WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, BROWN UNIVERSITY THE CHOICES PROGRAM

28 International Trade in a Globalized World Options Option 2: Protect U.S. Workers For too long, U.S. trade policy has served the interests of a small, selfish elite while the rest of the country has faced rising inequality. Corporate presidents claim that free trade is the road to economic prosperity for all. Top policy makers have tried to convince the U.S. public that the WTO, NAFTA, and other trade pacts are the glue holding together the international system. But people in the United States are finally waking up to the truth. NAFTA and the WTO have hurt U.S. workers. In reality, U.S. trade policy has been crafted for the benefit of the few at the expense of the many. The United States has produced multi-millionaires at a record rate while millions of hard-working people struggle to support their families on shrinking paychecks. U.S. trade negotiators have opened the doors to imported goods, and other countries protect their industries with high tariffs and subsidies. The result is that the United States has lost millions of jobs since the 1980s. These were jobs that allowed U.S. workers to provide their families with a decent standard of living and to buy cars, clothes, and computers made by people in the United States. U.S. trade policy must put the needs of U.S. workers above the heartless laws of free trade. The U.S. economy cannot be strong if it is constantly shedding jobs. More than any other group, workers have suffered from misguided U.S. trade policy. U.S. trade policy must focus on reducing the flow of jobs over seas and protecting U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition. At home, the United States must help workers adjust to the changing economic environment through expanded government retraining programs. The forces of economic globalization must not be allowed to trample the lives of the men and women who built the country s economy. THE CHOICES PROGRAM WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, BROWN UNIVERSITY WWW.CHOICES.EDU

International Trade in a Globalized World Options 29 Option 2 is based on the following beliefs Most of the benefits of free trade are reaped by wealthy investors, while the majority of U.S. workers suffer from lower wages and greater job insecurity. Protecting good paying jobs for U.S. workers should be the top priority of U.S. trade policy. Environmental concerns and labor rights in other countries are less important. Many successful economies have largely ignored the principles of free trade in order to protect their local businesses. The United States should too. What policies should we pursue? The United States should renegotiate more favorable terms under the WTO and NAFTA so that it can protect U.S. businesses and workers. The United States should substantially expand programs designed to retrain U.S. workers hurt by trade. Arguments for Raising some barriers to trade will boost U.S. businesses and keep them from transferring jobs overseas. By taking control of the pace of economic change, the United States will ease the disruptive effects of change on workers and slow the widening gap between rich and poor. By investing in the retraining of U.S. workers, the United States will strengthen the overall competitiveness of the U.S. economy. Ensuring that good jobs stay in the United States will protect U.S. workers and contribute to the overall strength of the economy. The United States should use tax policy to discourage U.S. companies from transferring manufacturing jobs abroad and to encourage foreign companies to base their factories in the United States. Arguments against Raising U.S. trade barriers will push other countries to raise their own trade barriers, which could reduce exports worldwide and tip the global economy into a depression. Creating barriers against outside competition will deprive U.S. consumers of a wide selection of affordable goods and drive up prices. There is no need to raise barriers to protect jobs when so many new jobs can be created through free trade. Imposing restrictions on U.S. businesses will lead to lower corporate profits and falling returns for tens of millions of ordinary U.S. investors. WWW.CHOICES.EDU WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, BROWN UNIVERSITY THE CHOICES PROGRAM

30 International Trade in a Globalized World Options Option 3: Put Values First The United States should put its values before its wallet. The United States must recognize that there are issues that are more important to society than the benefits of free trade. A trade policy without values will increase poverty and inequality around the world and in the United States. In today s world, trade policy is one of the most effective tools for addressing a range of global concerns such as human rights violations, environmental degradation, and the exploitation of child labor. Addressing these international concerns is not just idealistic; it makes good economic and political sense. Societies that are torn apart by economic strife and the lack of respect for human rights are unstable. Instability can increase the number of immigrants and refugees, pushing people across borders to escape suffering, poverty, and injustice. Instability can also weaken governments so that they are unable to monitor the business practices of the companies in their countries. Businesses that use child labor or exploit their workers have an unfair advantage over businesses that follow fair regulations. Environmental pollution spills over borders and affects vulnerable populations around the world. U.S. trade policy should promote the democratic values that are important to people in the United States. The strong desire of other countries to have a trading relationship with the United States means that the United States has the opportunity to help promote its values. With its economic strength, the United States can promote human rights, safe working conditions, and a clean environment as conditions of trade. The United States should be prepared to lead the way by imposing sanctions or trade embargoes on countries that do not agree about the importance of these issues. U.S. trade policy should reflect U.S. values. THE CHOICES PROGRAM WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, BROWN UNIVERSITY WWW.CHOICES.EDU

International Trade in a Globalized World Options 31 Option 3 is based on the following beliefs While economic interests are important, the United States cannot separate those interests from its concerns for justice, human rights, and democracy. Government policy on trade should reflect a commitment to protecting the environment. The world s long-term economic health and the stability of the international system are linked to the growth of human rights and the rule of law worldwide. What policies should we pursue? The United States should not have normal trading relations with countries that do not share the same concerns for human rights and labor standards. The United States should lead the way in imposing trade embargoes and economic sanctions on countries that violate human rights. The United States should insist that all trade agreements, including NAFTA and the WTO, provide safeguards that further the Arguments for Promoting human rights helps promote international stability and is vital to global security. Linking trade policy with other issues gives the United States greater leverage in dealing with concerns that will ultimately affect the world community. The U.S. public will support trade policies overseas that reflect the values it supports at home. As economic conditions in poor countries improve, business there will be forced to compete fairly with businesses in the United States and elsewhere. values of human rights, poverty reduction, and environmental safety. The United States should press its lower income trading partners to raise wages and worker safety standards as their economies grow. U.S. companies operating in these countries around world should be prodded to lead the way. Arguments against Tying trade policy to a list of other international issues will hurt U.S. efforts to expand trade and will weaken the U.S. economy. By concentrating on the issues of other countries, the United States could overlook the economic hardships faced by U.S. workers. By promoting strict regulations, the United States would put additional burdens on countries working to grow their economies and possibly foster resentment towards the United States among people in those countries. By forcing industries in lower income countries to adopt costly labor, safety, and environmental standards, the United States may contribute to companies cutting costs by laying off workers. Trade embargoes and sanctions often harm the very people the policies intend to help. WWW.CHOICES.EDU WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, BROWN UNIVERSITY THE CHOICES PROGRAM

32 International Trade in a Globalized World Options Option 4: Work For Free and Fair Trade Many U.S. leaders mindlessly repeat the idea that all gain from free trade. In reality, the current system of trade has not produced greater wealth for all, but clear winners and losers. So-called free trade is highly unfair. If the United States is to promote free trade around the world, it must practice what it preaches. A free and fair trading system can help improve the lives of people everywhere. The current trade system serves the interests of large companies from the United States and elsewhere. Large businesses have an edge over small producers around the world because of their size and ability to set up shop anywhere. Many people in the United States and around the world have been put out of work because of competition from these businesses. Many of these businesses, particularly in agriculture, receive large subsidies from their governments. This allows them to sell their products at artificially low prices. Current U.S. trade policies give these businesses a competitive edge while doing nothing to help those hurt the most by free trade. Our trade policies should offer help to workers, not just large businesses. The United States plays a leading role in the WTO, which promotes freer trade. But the United States does not fully follow the WTO s principles. The United States should eliminate its subsidies and tariff barriers. In addition, the United States should lead discussions about an international minimum wage to ensure that workers around the world earn enough money to afford food, clothing, and shelter. Fair trade means providing fair prices for goods and fair wages for workers around the world. These are basic human rights that all people deserve. The United States must take a leadership role in making the WTO more fair and effective in serving all countries rich or poor. In the long run, fair trade will promote greater productivity and more high-skilled jobs in the United States. In the short term, it will improve the international reputation of the United States and set higher global standards. THE CHOICES PROGRAM WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, BROWN UNIVERSITY WWW.CHOICES.EDU

International Trade in a Globalized World Options 33 Option 4 is based on the following beliefs People in the United States and around the world deserve the opportunity to earn a living on which they can survive. Creating a system of fair and just trade is more important than continuing a system that only profits wealthy businesses in the United States and elsewhere. As one of the most economically powerful countries in the world, the United States has a responsibility to improve economic, social, and political conditions wherever it can. Free and fair trade is one way to achieve these goals. What policies should we pursue? The United States should reduce or eliminate subsidies to agricultural producers and reduce tariffs on imported goods. The United States should push for the further reduction of trade barriers and take a leading role in making the WTO more fair. Arguments for Taking a lead in fair trade will improve international opinion of the United States. Reducing trade barriers will promote greater competition and therefore greater productivity and growth in the U.S. economy in the long run. The United States will be poised to take a lead in new industries, particularly in hightech sectors. This will replace many lower skilled jobs in manufacturing, for example, with higher skilled and higher paying jobs. Fair trade will most benefit poor people in poorer countries around world, which may greatly reduce the amount of money the United States devotes to foreign aid. The United States should encourage U.S. corporations to provide livable wages to their workers overseas. The United States should provide job training for U.S. workers who lose their jobs due to trade, automation of manufacturing, and technological advances. Arguments against U.S. jobs will be lost. Once protective trade policies such as subsidies are ended, more businesses will move overseas. The United States will be forced to import more and more agricultural and manufactured goods while its exports from those sectors decline. U.S. companies will face steeper competition around the world without protective trade policies. Cutting into corporate profits would open the playing field for another great economic power to emerge and challenge the U.S. global position. WWW.CHOICES.EDU WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, BROWN UNIVERSITY THE CHOICES PROGRAM

34 International Trade in a Globalized World Supplementary Resources Books Bhagwati, Jagdish N. In Defense of Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Chang, Ha-Joon. Economics: The User s Guide. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2014. Friedman, Thomas L. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. 1st updated and expanded ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006. Milanovic, Branko. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016. Stiglitz, Joseph E. The Price of Inequality: How Today s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2012. Online Resources World Trade Organization <http://www.wto. org/> Provides information on current and past disputes, statistics, and goals of the organization. U.S. Trade Representative <http://www.ustr. gov/> Outlines U.S. interests in global trade and provides statistics and general information. Equitablog <http://equitablegrowth.org/ equitablog/> Policy and data oriented blog that focuses on economic growth and equity. Center for Global Development <http://www. cgdev.org/> Provides information about development and how it connects to global trade and economics. THE CHOICES PROGRAM WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, BROWN UNIVERSITY WWW.CHOICES.EDU