Internet Policy and Governance Europe's Role in Shaping the Future of the Internet

Similar documents
Evolving the Ecosystem: Institutional Innovation in Global Internet Governance

Internet Governance and G20

on the Commission Communication on Internet Policy and Governance - Europe`s role in shaping the future of Internet Governance

The State of Multi-stakeholderism in International Internet Governance Internet Governance Task Force September 11, 2014 Chicago

BASIS. Business Action to Support the Information Society

Internet Governance An Internet Society Public Policy Briefing

Towards a Collaborative, Decentralized Internet Governance Ecosystem

The political economy of the Internet Governance: why is Africa absent

Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation Indicative Terms of Reference Focal point for trade unions at the country level

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Reflections from the Association for Progressive Communications on the IGF 2013 and recommendations for the IGF 2014.

EURO LATIN-AMERICAN DIALOGUE ON SOCIAL COHESION AND LOCAL PUBLIC POLICY BOGOTA AGENDA 2012

Political Party Strengthening Toolkit Political Participation and Representation Programme

Introduction to Global Internet Governance. Internet Week Guyana 9/13 October 2017

The IGF - An Overview -

Open Ended Working Group (OEWG) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Information Note CFS OEWG-SDGs/2016/01/21/03

Strategy Approved by the Board of Directors 6th June 2016

What if we all governed the Internet?

Industry Agenda. PACI Principles for Countering Corruption

Presented at the Closing Plenary Session on 11 September 2006

Issued by the PECC Standing Committee at the close of. The 13th General Meeting of the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council

Role of Governments in Internet Governance. MEAC-SIG Cairo 2018

GUIDANCE NOTE OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL. United Nations Assistance to Constitution-making Processes

Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada

KEYNOTE ADDRESS: GFMD Thematic Workshop Implementation of the Global Compact for Migration at the National Level 21 March 2019, Geneva

The 18th Asia-Europe Think Tank Dialogue THE AGE OF CONNECTIVITY: ASEM AND BEYOND

STATEMENT BY MR. OBIORA C. OKAFOR INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Finland's response

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS FORUM

ENERGY INDUSTRY INITIATIVE:

I would like to ask all of you to take your seats, and I apologize for this delay but that's part of the process.

Democratic Governance in Your Backyard Japan and the European Union. A Point of View from the European Commission

IT for Change's Contribution to the Consultations on Enhanced Cooperation being held at the United Nations Headquarters in New York in December 2010

AFRICAN DECLARATION. on Internet Rights and Freedoms. africaninternetrights.org

OPENING REMARKS. William Lacy Swing, Director General International Organization for Migration

Climate and Conservation With Justice: People, Planet, Power

City of Johannesburg: 12 June 2012 GFMD Preparatory Workshop, Mauritius

Recent trends in Pacific regionalism: PIDF s innovative leadership for inclusive sustainable development

A Modern European Data Protection Framework. Bruno Gencarelli DG JUSTICE and CONSUMERS

16827/14 YML/ik 1 DG C 1


CIVIL SOCIETY IN DEVELOPMENT POLICY 2017

Concluding Remarks of Co- Chairs 6 th Session of Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals Friday, 13 December 2013

RULES OF PROCEDURE. The Scientific Committees on. Consumer Safety (SCCS) Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER)

Dialogue #2: Partnerships and innovative initiatives for the way forward Intergovernmental Conference, 11 December 2018 Marrakech, Morocco

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS FORUM

BLUE BOOK ON BUILDING INCLUSIVE FINANCIAL SECTORS FOR DEVELOPMENT A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIVE PROCESS. Overview

Discussion paper: Multi-stakeholders in Refugee Response: a Whole-of- Society Approach?

Meeting of APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade Sapporo, Japan 5-6 June Statement of the Chair

Elections. New Brunswick. Strategic Plan

2. Good governance the concept

Peer Review The Belgian Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion EU2020 (Belgium, 2014)

A4AI-Ghana Multi-stakeholder Coalition Objectives and Plans. Sonia Jorge, Executive Director Alliance for Affordable Internet

CONCORD Response to the Communication on the proposed Joint Declaration on the EU Development Policy CONCORD Policy Working Group September 2005

PROVISIONAL VERSION. REGULATION (EU) No.../2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Ideas of Order: Charting a Course for the Financial Stability Board. Remarks by. Randal K. Quarles. Vice Chairman for Supervision

Welsh Language Impact Assessment

THE FREE FLOW OF KNOWLEDGE AND A SPACE FOR A PARTNERSHIP IN MONGOLIA

MITIGATING RISKS OF ABUSE OF POWER IN CASH ASSISTANCE

Contribution of the International College of AFNIC to the WSIS July 2003

Country programme for Thailand ( )

FAST FORWARD HERITAGE

INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE NEW DEAL FOR ENGAGEMENT IN FRAGILE STATES

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

ID4D IDENTIFICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT

A Modern European Data Protection Framework Safeguarding Privacy in a Connected World

A Role for the Private Sector in 21 st Century Global Migration Policy

Internet Governance 5+ years after Tunis. Yrjö Länsipuro

EPP Policy Paper 2 A Europe for All: Prosperous and Fair

ADVOCATING FOR PEOPLE CENTERED DEVELOPMENT IN THE POST-2015 AGENDA: ENGAGING IN THE PROCESS NATIONALLY, REGIONALLY AND GLOBALLY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO FRAMEWORK PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH HUMANITARIAN ORGANISATIONS

Coordination of Humanitarian and Development Assistance in Jordan

Reflection paper on the interoperability of information systems in the area of Freedom, Security and Justice

A Response to the Consultation on the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Bill

Low Carbon Development, 100% Renewable Energy and Poverty Reduction in Tanzania. Workshop, 25 th Feb. in Dar es Salaam

ECA. Towards an Effective Africa Regional Forum on Sustainable Development. Geneva. Africa 21winter seminar. Nassim Oulmane. 15 Feb.

The International Platform on Health Worker Mobility

Bern, 19 September 2017

Speech delivered by IHRB Executive Director John Morrison. Bogota, Colombia, 16 October 2011

DÓCHAS STRATEGY

Co-facilitators draft resolution of May 6th

Enhancing ICANN. Text. Accountability

THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-GENERAL -- REMARKS TO FIFTH ROUND OF NEGOTIATIONS TOWARDS A GLOBAL COMPACT FOR MIGRATION. New York, 7 July 2018

DECLARATION OF THE 1 st PAN-AFRICAN CONFERENCE ON COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE JUDICIARY AND INDIGENOUS/HOME-GROWN COMMUNITY JUSTICE INSTITUTIONS

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Enhancing the Effective Engagement of Indigenous Peoples and Non-Party Stakeholders

Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. Strategy

STAMENT BY WORLD VISION International Dialogue on Migration Session 3: Rethinking partnership frameworks for achieving the migrationrelated

INTERNET SOCIETY -ISOC COMMENTS ON THE REPORT OF THE WGIG

POLICY MAKING PROCESS

Framework for Action. One World, One Future. Ireland s Policy for International Development. for

Dialogue of Civilizations: Finding Common Approaches to Promoting Peace and Human Development

Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION

SECTION THREE BENEFITS OF THE JSEPA

Department for Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) Division for Social Policy and Development

Liberia Monrovia L Electoral Reform & Inter-Party Dialogue Consultant. Eight (8) Months

2013/AMM/001 Agenda Item: 2. Draft Agenda. Purpose: Consideration Submitted by: AMM Chairs

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 21 September /09 ASIM 93 RELEX 808

Transcription:

Internet Policy and Governance Europe's Role in Shaping the Future of the Internet Communication COM(2014)72/4 of 12.2.2014 from the European Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions http://eur-lex.europa.eu/lexuriserv/lexuriserv.do?uri=celex%3a52014dc0072%3aen%3anot

Introduction Sustainable governance which involves all stakeholders is essential in order to preserve the benefits of the Internet. Internet governance involves a wide variety of organisations, and is broadly understood to refer to the "development and application by Governments, the private sector and civil society, in their respective roles, of shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programmes that shape the evolution and use of the Internet"

Introduction The Commission is committed to working with partners to rebuild trust in the Internet, including through the strengthening of its global governance, which is an essential prerequisite for a sustainable future for an open Internet.

Objectives A common European vision for Internet governance to defend and promote fundamental rights and democratic values, and multi-stakeholder governance structures that are based on clear rules that respect those rights and values as a single, un-fragmented network, subject to the same laws and norms that apply in other areas of our day-to-day lives; and where individuals can benefit from their rights and from judicial remedies when those rights are infringed;

Objectives A common European vision for Internet governance governed by a genuine multistakeholder model where the necessary inter-governmental discussions are anchored in a multistakeholder context in the full understanding that the Internet is built and maintained by a variety of stakeholders, as well as governments; where decisions are taken on the basis of principles of good governance, including transparency, accountability, and inclusiveness of all relevant stakeholders

Objectives A common European vision for Internet governance with a strengthened and reformed Internet Governance Forum with a globalised Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).

The Commission supports establishing a coherent set of global Internet governance principles, consistent with fundamental rights and democratic values, with all stakeholders. The Commission will facilitate discussions among stakeholders, including via multistakeholder platforms and the High Level Group on Internet Governance. The Commission invites the Council and the European Parliament to contribute to a common European position in all appropriate venues.

The Commission supports establishing a coherent set of global Internet governance principles, consistent with fundamental rights and democratic values, with all stakeholders. For over two years, the Commission has advocated an approach summarised by the COMPACT acronym: the Internet as a space of Civic responsibilities, One unfragmented resource governed via a Multistakeholder approach to Promote democracy and Human Rights, based on a sound technological Architecture that engenders Confidence and facilitates a Transparent governance both of the underlying Internet infrastructure and of the services which run on top of it.

The Commission will engage with stakeholders to: strengthen the Internet Governance Forum, taking account of the Recommendations of the Working Group on Improvements to the IGF; clearly define the role of public authorities in the multistakeholder context, consistent with an open and free Internet; facilitate issues-based multistakeholder dialogue and decision-making across organisational boundaries.

The Commission will work with all stakeholders to identify how to globalise the IANA functions, whilst safeguarding the continued stability and security of the domainname system; establish a clear timeline for the globalisation of ICANN, including its Affirmation of Commitments.

The European Commission is firmly committed to the multistakeholder model of Internet governance. The Commission calls upon stakeholders to further strengthen the sustainability of the model by making actors and processes more inclusive, transparent and accountable. The Commission will work with stakeholders on the exchange of best practices.

The Commission proposes to launch the technical development of the Global Internet Policy Observatory (GIPO) in 2014 as a resource for the global community. The Commission calls on stakeholders to engage in capacity building in order to establish and promote multistakeholder processes in countries and regions where such processes are not or less developed. The Commission, together with recipients, will continue in 2014 to strengthen its development assistance programmes in support of media development and freedom of expression, as well as technological, policy and regulatory capacity-building related to the Internet.

The Commission will launch a broad consultation, of civil society, the technical and academic communities and European industry, as well as the European Parliament and Member States, on how to ensure adequate and transparent multi-stakeholder involvement in the formulation of future European Internet governance policies.

The Commission, together with interested parties, including the European Internet industry, proposes to convene a series of workshops with international experts in law, ethics, social sciences, economics, international relations and technology. This expected output will be concrete and actionable recommendations to ensure coherence between existing normative frameworks and new forms of Internet-enabled norm-setting.

The Commission encourages all stakeholders to strengthen (and where appropriate create) structured mechanisms to allow regular, early and truly inclusive upstream participation, review and comment in technical decisions. These structured mechanisms should also strive towards consistency of technical decisions with human rights

The Commission will work with the Council and Parliament to achieve rapid adoption and implementation of key legislation, including the reform of the data protection framework and the proposed Directive on network and information security, in order to strengthen trust online. The Commission is committed to working with partners to rebuild trust in the Internet, including through the strengthening of its global governance, which is an essential prerequisite for a sustainable future for an open Internet.

The European Commission will launch an in-depth review of the risks, at international level, of conflicts of laws and jurisdictions arising on the Internet and assess all mechanisms, processes and tools available and necessary to solve such conflicts. All options for action at the Union or international level will subsequently be carefully considered, including possible legislative initiatives or additional guidelines as needed, subject to appropriate impact assessments. This work will build on existing policies.

Conclusions The Internet should remain a single, open, free, unfragmented network of networks, subject to the same laws and norms that apply in other areas of our day-to-day lives.

Conclusions The Internet should remain a single, open, free, unfragmented network of networks, subject to the same laws and norms that apply in other areas of our day-to-day lives. Its governance should be based on an inclusive, transparent and accountable multistakeholder model of governance, without prejudice to any regulatory intervention that may be taken in view of identified public interest objectives such as to ensure the respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic values as well as linguistic and cultural diversity and care for vulnerable persons.

Conclusions The Internet should remain a single, open, free, unfragmented network of networks, subject to the same laws and norms that apply in other areas of our day-to-day lives. Its governance should be based on an inclusive, transparent and accountable multistakeholder model of governance, without prejudice to any regulatory intervention that may be taken in view of identified public interest objectives such as to ensure the respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic values as well as linguistic and cultural diversity and care for vulnerable persons. A safe, secure, sound and resilient architecture is the basis for trust and confidence of Internet users. At the same time, the innovation power of the Internet must be maintained with the full participation of the European Internet economy, building on a strengthened digital single market interconnected to the world.

Conclusions This requires careful yet robust stewardship