P1 Basic UK Patent Law and Procedure. Friday 3 October p.m p.m. Time allowed THREE hours

Similar documents
THE JOINT EXAMINATION BOARD. PAPER P1 Basic United Kingdom Patent Law and Procedure a.m p.m.

Foundation Certificate

The following fees must be paid in connection with the filing of a PCT application:

INVENTION DISCLOSURE FORM

Third Party Observations, Oppositions & Invalidation Trials of Patents in Japan

CIPA Introductory Certificate in Patent Administration Syllabus

AUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges

NEW ZEALAND Patent Regulations SR 1954/211 as at 3 September 2007 as amended by Supreme Court Act (2003 No. 53) ENTRY INTO FORCE: January 1, 2004

No. 30 of Patents and Industrial Designs Act Certified on: 19/1/2001.

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FD1 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 66%

UNITED KINGDOM Patent Rules 2007 as amended up to and including October 1, 2014

1. Information to be inserted into EPO Forms 1001 and 1002: 6. Applicant s/representative s ref. Z9876EP

Newly Signed U.S. Patent Law Will Overhaul Patent Procurement, Enforcement and Defense

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

SUDAN Patents Act Act No. 58 of 1971 ENTRY INTO FORCE: October 15, 1971

PART I IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO PART I OF THE CONVENTION

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report

THE ACTS ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT ACT */**/***/****/*****/******/*******

Final Diploma Syllabus

LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF INVENTIONS. No. 50-XVI of March 7, Monitorul Oficial nr /455 din * * * TABLE OF CONTENTS.

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FD1 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 56%

BRUNEI Patent Order 2011

PSMP. In contrast to a patent the duration of protection of a utility model is limited to ten years from the date of application.

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

NEW ZEALAND - Patents - Schedule of Charges

HONG KONG Patents (General) Rules as amended by L.N. 40 of 2004 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 7, 2004 Chapter: 514C

FINLAND Patents Act No. 550 of December 15, 1967 as last amended by Act No. 101/2013 of January 31, 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

Threats & Opportunities in Proceedings before the EPO with a brief update on the Unitary Patent

Practice for Patent Application

Invention Disclosures and the Role of Inventors

Examiners Report on Paper DII Examiners Report - Paper D Part II

The Patents Act 1977 (as amended)

Order on Patents and Supplementary Protection Certificates

IRELAND Patents Rules 1992 as amended by S.I. No. 334 of September 7, 2012, as amended up to and including the September 3, 2012

THE PATENTS ACT 1970

Can I Challenge My Competitor s Patent?

pct2ep.com Guide to claim amendment after EPO regional phase entry

AZERBAIJAN Law on Patent Date of Text (Enacted): July 25, 1997 ENTRY INTO FORCE: August 2, 1997

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 51%

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ENVELOPE MAKERS/FLAT FILES & FILING PADS ANNEXURE- A 2

HUNGARY Patent Act Act XXXIII of 1995 as consolidated on March 01, 2015

patents grant only the right to stop others from making, using and selling the invention

Frequently Asked Questions. Trade/service marks: What is a trade/service mark?

POTENTIAL PATENT APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Part Two Conditions and Provisions for Filing an Application Article 8

License Agreement. 1.4 Named User License A Named User License is a license for one (1) Named User to access the Software.

Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents

Update on the CRISPR IP Saga and lessons to be learnt. Claire Irvine and Cath Coombes #healthcare #intellectualproperty

PATENT ACT, B.E (1979) 1. BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX; Given on the 11 th Day of March B.E. 2522; Being the 34 th Year of the Present Reign

Section 5 Exceptions to Lack of Novelty of Invention (Patent Act Article 30)

THE PATENT LAW 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Article 1. This Law shall regulate the legal protection of inventions by means of patents.

Accelerated Examination. Presented by Hans Troesch, Principal Fish & Richardson P.C. March 2, 2010

Your Guide to Patents

INFORMATION FOR INVENTORS SEEKING PATENT PROTECTION

AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 Compilation date: 24 February 2017 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, 2016 Registered: 27 February 2017

Singapore Patents Rules as amended by S 739 of 2014 ENTRY INTO FORCE: Nov 13th, 2014

Kingdom of Bhutan The Industrial Property Act enacted on July 13, 2001 entry into force: 2001 (Part III, Sections 17 to 23: May 1, 2009)

PATENTS TRADEMARKS COPYRIGHTS TRADE SECRETS ZIOLKOWSKI PATENT SOLUTIONS GROUP, SC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYS. Patent Process FAQs

DENMARK Patents Regulations Order No. 25 of 18 January, 2013 ENTRY INTO FORCE: 1 February, 2013

Should you elect non publication?

Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art

PATENT ATTORNEYS EXAMINATION

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

FICPI 12 th Open Forum

of Laws for Electronic Access SLOVAKIA Law on Inventions, Industrial Designs and Rationalization Proposals (No. 527 of November 27, 1990)*

PATENT ACT (UNOFFICIAL CLEAR TEXT) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY

General Information Concerning. of IndusTRIal designs

Patent Basics for Emerging Companies. Maria Laccotripe Zacharakis, Ph.D. Thomas Hoover Daniel J. Kelly McCarter & English, LLP

Candidate's Answer - DI

TRADE MARKS RULES, 1996 (as amended)

Compilation date: 24 February Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, Registered: 27 February 2017

PATENT PROSECUTION STRATEGIES IN AN AIA WORLD: SUCCEEDING WITH THE CHANGES

Exclusions from patentability 15 Inventions contrary to public order or morality not patentable

FINAL REPORT THE PATENTS AND DESIGNS ACT, INTRODUCTION PATENTS

America Invents Act Implementing Rules. September 2012

America Invents Act of 2011 Part 1: Impact on Litigation Strategy Part 2: Strategic Considerations of the FTF Transition

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA PATENT LAW TREATY (PLT) ASSEMBLY. Fifth (3 rd Extraordinary) Session Geneva, September 22 to 30, 2008

Managing costs and timeliness at EPO & UKIPO. Mike Jennings A.A.Thornton & Co October 2017

Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharma Co

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY. as in force from July 1, 2017

Germany. Henrik Holzapfel and Martin Königs. McDermott Will & Emery

People's Republic of Bangladesh THE PATENTS AND DESIGNS ACT ACT NO. II OF 1911 as amended by Act No. XV of 2003 Entry into force: May 13, 2003

Regulations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. (as in force from July 1, 2018)

TREATY SERIES 2008 Nº 4. Act revising the Convention on the Grant of European Patents

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY. Date of mailing. (day/month/year) PAYMENT DUE. (day/month/year)

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY. Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability

New Zealand Nouvelle-Zélande Neuseeland. Report Q193. in the name of the New Zealand Group by Tim JACKSON

Introduction. 1 These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?

GENERAL INFORMATION ON PATENT APPLICATIONS IN JAPAN

History of the PCT Regulations

Second medical use or indication claims

FINLAND Patents Decree No. 669 of September 26, 1980 as last amended by Decree No. 580 of 18 July 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

A Guide To Filing A Design Patent Application. Prepared by I.N. Tansel from pac/design/toc.

PRE-GRANT OPPOSITION POST-GRANT OPPOSITION

Dehns Guide to the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

Patents Ownership. Inventor default owner of patent right

Patent Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan

GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK

Transcription:

INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES Basic UK Patent Law and Procedure Friday 3 October 2014 2.00 p.m. 5.00 p.m. Time allowed THREE hours 1. You should attempt four of questions 1 to 5 in Part A and three of questions 6 to 9 in Part B. There are nine questions altogether, five in Part A and four in Part B. 2. Each question in Part A carries 10 marks and each question in Part B carries 20 marks. 3. If more than four questions are answered in Part A, or more than three questions are answered in part B, only the first four or three presented in each respective part will be marked. 4. Start each question (but not each part of each question) on a fresh sheet of paper. 5. Enter the question paper reference number (), the question number, and your candidate number in the appropriate boxes at the top of each sheet of paper. 6. The scripts are photocopied for marking purposes. a. Use black ink. b. Write on one side of the paper only. c. Write within the printed margins. d. Do not use highlighter pens on your answer script. 7. Do not state your name anywhere in the answers. 8. Write clearly: examiners cannot award marks to scripts that cannot be read. 9. Reasoning should always be given where appropriate. INFORMATION FOR CANDIDATES 1. The total number of marks for this paper is 100. 2. At the end of the examination the invigilator will instruct you to: 3. a. count the number of pages you have used; b. use the boxes on each page of the answer script to number pages in the format 1 of 25, 2 of 25 etc ; c. place your answer sheets in order in the white envelope, seal the envelope and leave the envelope on the desk. a. Do not staple the pages, or use sellotape or treasury tags. b. You may take the examination paper with you. 4. This question paper consists of 5 pages in total, including this page. Page 1 of 5

Part A Question 1 In this question assume that the only relevant prior art is the prior art referred to in the question. a) Client A demonstrated their invention at an exhibition. The invention is a black box having input and output ports. Whilst the public could see what the box does, it was not possible to determine how this was achieved. Can the client still obtain a GB patent for the invention? b) Client B writes we recently showed our invention to a customer. The customer is now making and selling the invention. Can we still obtain a GB patent for the invention? Advise Client B. c) Client C writes We recently filed a GB patent application for two embodiments of our invention. The day after filing, a GB application in the name of our competitor was published. This discloses the first of our embodiments but not the second. Can we still obtain a GB patent? Advise Client C. Question 2 a) Methods of treatment or diagnosis are not patentable. Summarise the provisions of the UK Patents Act 1977 relating to such methods. b) Your client has invented a method of immunisation (i.e. one which prevents rather than cures a disease). Is the method excluded from patentability? c) Your client has invented a method of diagnosis of a human disease in which a patient s blood is tested in a test tube. Is the method excluded from patentability? d) Your client claims to have invented a perpetual motion machine. List two grounds on which UKIPO is likely to object to an application for the invention. Page 2 of 5

Question 3 a) A first GB patent application is filed on 1 October 2013. A second GB application is filed on 1 October 2014 without claiming priority from the first. Is it still possible to add a priority claim to the second application to claim priority from the first? If so, what is the time limit for doing so and what extensions of time are available? Outline the procedure. b) A first GB application is filed on 1 October 2013. A second GB application is filed on 5 October 2014. Is it still possible to add a priority claim to the second application to claim priority from the first? If so what is the time limit for doing so and what extensions of time are available? Outline the procedure. Question 4 Under the UK Patents Act 1977, what acts constitute infringement of a patent for a process? 10 marks Question 5 a) What is the time limit for filing a statement of inventorship in respect of a GB patent application? What extensions of time are available? b) What is the time limit for filing a statement of inventorship in respect of a GB divisional patent application? c) An inventor informs you that he does not wish to have his name and address (or at the very least his address) published. How would you proceed and by what time limit? d) What is the consequence of failure to file a statement of inventorship in respect of a GB patent application? Page 3 of 5

Part B Question 6 Provide notes on opinions by UKIPO. Your notes should cover the following. a) On what issues UKIPO will issue an opinion. b) On what grounds UKIPO may refuse to issue an opinion. c) Who may file the request for an opinion. d) The procedure followed through to issue of the opinion (including actions that can be taken by third parties). 7 marks e) Review and appeal. Question 7 Your client has recently acquired a portfolio of GB patents and applications from a third party. None of the patents or applications has a priority date. Write notes on the actions that need to be taken for each of these. a) Patent D1 was filed on 31 January 2010 and granted on 30 September 2014. Inspection of the register shows that no renewal fees have been paid. b) Application D2 was published on 28 March 2014. Inspection of the register shows that no request for examination was filed. 5 marks c) For application D3 an examination report was issued on 30 May 2014 setting a four month time limit for response. No response was filed. d) Application D4 was filed on 1 January 2008. An examination report was issued on 17 February 2014 raising a non-unity of invention objection and setting a three month time limit for filing a response. A response was filed on time restricting the claim set to one of the two inventions only. No reply has been received from UKIPO to date. e) Application D5 was filed on 1 September 2013. A request for search has been filed and the filing and search fees paid. This application is of particular interest to the client as they are aware that many of their competitors are starting to develop products in this field in the UK. There are a further available for general points. Page 4 of 5

Question 8 a) Your client writes We hold a licence to a GB patent but never recorded it. As we understand it we are the only company that holds a licence to the patent. Can we sue a third party for patent infringement and to what extent does the patent proprietor need to be involved? Advise your client. 10 marks b) Your client writes We have been selling our patented product for many years. The patent has however come to the end of its 20 year life. We have asked our suppliers to make sure that any new product they supply to us is no longer marked as patented but we are still running down our old stock fulfilling pre-existing orders placed when the patent was still in force. One of our competitors has now requested that we cease providing product marked as patented. This would mean we have to scrap all our existing stock. This would significantly damage our business. What should we do? Advise your client. c) What are the remedies for a groundless threat of infringement and what acts are specifically identified as not being threats? Question 9 Provide notes on two leading cases of the British Courts. For each case your notes should cover the parties to the case, a summary of the facts of the case, a summary of the decision and a brief discussion of what precedent is set by the case. One case should have claim construction as a main issue. The other should have novelty or inventiveness as a main issue. Page 5 of 5