International Labour Conference, 95th Session, 2006 Report IV(2A) Promotional framework for occupational safety and health Fourth item on the agenda

International Labour Conference, 95th Session, 2006 Report IV(2A) Promotional framework for occupational safety and health Fourth item on the agenda International Labour Office Geneva ISBN 92-2-116609-0 ISSN 0074-6681 First edition 2006 The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the International Labour Office, and any failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval. ILO publications can be obtained through major booksellers or ILO local offices in many countries, or direct from ILO Publications, International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. Catalogues or lists of new publications are available free of charge from the above address, or by email: pubvente@ilo.org. Visit our web site: www.ilo.org/publns. Formatted by TTE: reference Confrep/ILC95(2006)/IV(2A)-2006-03-0080-1 Printed in Sw itzerland iii CONTENTS Page LIST OF RECURRING ABBREVIATIONS... v INTRODUCTION... 1 REPLIES RECEIV ED AND COMMENTA RIES... 3 1. General observations... 3 2. Responses to specific questions... 13 3. Observations on the proposed Convention on the promotional framework for occupational safety and health... 31 4. Observations on the proposed Recommendation on the promotional framework for occupational safety and health... 46 v LIST OF RECURRING ABBREVIATIONS Employers and workers organizations Argentina CGT RA General Confederation of Labour of the Republic of Argentina Australia ACTU Australian Council of Trade Unions Austria IV Federation of Austrian Industry WKÖ Chamber of Commerce of Austria ÖGB Austrian Confederation of Trade Unions

Barbados BWU Barbados Workers. Union Belarus FPB Federation of Trade Unions of Belarus Belgium CNT National Labour Council FGTB General Federation of Labour of Belgium Brazil CNC National Confederation of Commerce CNI National Confederation of Industry CGTB General Confederation of Workers of Brazil Canada CEC Canadian Employers. Council CLC Canadian Labour Congress China CEC China Enterprise Confederation ACFTU All-China Federation of Trade Unions Costa Rica CCTD-RN Costa Rica Confederation of Democratic Rerum Novarum Workers Cyprus CEIF Cyprus Employers. and Industrialists. Federation Czech Republic ČMKOS Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions Denmark DA Danish Employers. Confederation FTF Salaried Employees. and Civil Servants. Confederation LO Danish Confederation of Trade Unions Egypt ETUF Egyptian Trade Union Federation Finland EK Confederation of Finnish Industries vi SY Federation of Finnish Enterprises (Suomen Yrittäjät) VTML State Employer.s Office SAK Central Organization of Finnish Trade Unions STTK Finnish Confederation of Salaried Employees AKAVA Confederation of Unions for Academic Professionals France MEDEF Movement of French Enterprises CGT-FO General Confederation of Labour. Force Ouvrière Germany BDA Confederation of German Employers. Associations Greece SEV Federation of Greek Industries ESEE National Confederation of Greek Trade Iceland ASI Icelandic Federation of Labour Italy Confindustria General Confederation of Italian Industry CGIL Italian General Confederation of Labour CISL Italian Confederation of Workers. Unions Confartigianato General Confederation of the Craft Sector UIL Italian Labour Union Japan JBF Japan Business Federation (Nippon Keidanren) JTUC-RENGO Japanese Trade Union Confederation Lebanon ALI Association of Lebanese Industrialists Malaysia MEF Malaysian Employers. Federation Mexico CONCAMIN Mexican Confederation of Chambers of Industry Mongolia MONEF Mongolian Employers. Federation Netherlands VNO-NCW Confederation of Netherlands Industry and Employers FNV Netherlands Confederation of Trade Unions CNV National Federation of Christian Trade Unions MHP Central Union for Intermediate and High Level Employees

New Zealand BNZ Business New Zealand NZCTU New Zealand Council of Trade Unions Norway NHO Confederation of Norwegian Business and Industry LO Confederation of Trade Unions in Norway List of recurring abbreviations vii Poland Solidarność Independent and Self-Governing Trade Union Portugal CCP Confederation of Trade and Services of Portugal CIP Confederation of Portuguese Industry CGTP General Confederation of Portuguese Workers Senegal CNTS National Confederation of Workers of Senegal South Africa BUSA Business Unity South Africa Spain CC.OO. Trade Union Confederation of Workers. Committees Sweden LO Swedish Trade Union Confederation Switzerland UPS Confederation of Swiss Employers Turkey TISK Turkish Confederation of Employers. Associations United Kingdom CBI Confederation of British Industry TUC Trades Union Congress United States AFL-CIO American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations Other abbreviations used in the report ILO International Labour Organization EU European Union OSH Occupational Safety and Health SMEs Small and medium-sized enterprises WHO World Health Organization 1 INTRODUCTION The first discussion on the question of occupational safety and health with a view to developing a new instrument which would establish a promotional framework for occupational safety and health took place at the 93rd Session (2005) of the International Labour Conference. Following that discussion, and in accordance with article 39 of the Standing Orders of the Conference, the International Labour Office prepared and communicated a report 1 containing a proposed Convention and a proposed Recommendation based on the Conclusions adopted by the Conference at its 93rd Session. Governments were invited to send their comments on three specific questions and any amendments or comments they might wish to make so as to reach the Office by 15 November 2005 at the latest, or to inform it, by the same date, whether they considered that the proposed texts constituted a satisfactory basis for discussion by the Conference at its 95th Session (2006). At the time the present report was prepared, the Office had received replies from the governments of the following 63 member States: Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Iceland, India, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Republic of Korea, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malawi, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, South

Africa, Spain, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, Uruguay. In accordance with article 39, paragraph 6, of the Standing Orders of the Conference, as amended at its 73rd Session (1987), governments were requested to consult the most representative organizations of employers and workers before finalizing their replies and to indicate which organizations they had consulted. The governments of 34 member States (Australia, Austria, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, China, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Denmark, Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia, Finland, France, Guatemala, Iceland, Italy, Jordan, Malawi, Mauritius, Republic of Moldova, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey, Uruguay) indicated that their replies had been drawn up after consultation with organizations of employers and workers. Some of the governments incorporated in their replies the opinions expressed by these organizations on certain points, while others transmitted the observations of 1 ILO:, Report IV(1), International Labour Conference, 95th Session, Geneva, 2006. 2 employers. and workers. organizations separately. In some cases, replies were received directly from employers. and workers. organizations. To ensure that the English and French texts of the proposed Convention and proposed Recommendation on the promotional framework for occupational safety and health are in the hands of the governments within the time limit laid down in article 39, paragraph 7, of the Standing Orders of the Conference, these texts have been published in a separate volume, Report IV(2B), that has been sent to them. The present volume, Report IV(2A), which has been drawn up on the basis of the replies from governments and from employers. and workers. organizations, contains the essential points of their observations. This report is divided into four sections: the first comprises their general observations on the proposed texts, the second summarizes their replies to the three specific questions asked in Report IV(1), while the third and fourth sections contain their observations on the proposed Convention and the proposed Recommendation respectively. Office commentaries on the observations and replies are provided under each section. 3 REPLIES RECEIVED AND COMMENTARIES In their replies, most governments and employers. and workers. organizations commented in some detail on the proposed Convention and Recommendation and answered the questions raised in Report IV(1). This report contains the substance of those replies with Office commentaries where appropriate. However, the governments of the following 12 member States said that they had no observations to make and that they considered the proposed texts a satisfactory basis for discussion at the International Labour Conference in June 2006. These were Armenia, Belarus, Czech Republic, Egypt, Estonia, Jordan, Kuwait, Republic of Moldova, Morocco, Poland, Suriname and United Arab Emirates. 1. General observations This first section includes general observations that relate to the proposed instruments as a whole, that do not relate specifically to any particular provision, and that refer to general provisions. ARGENTINA

The only practical way to promote occupational safety and health (OSH) and to ensure that the international and national bodies concerned have the necessary human and financial resources is to incorporate the rights to OSH. which are rights to life. into the fundamental Conventions and rights of the ILO. CGT RA: The subject matter of OSH is very important and must involve all players, especially the State. The responsibility of the State should be extended to ensure that there is effective monitoring of compliance and imposing of sanctions in cases of non-compliance. Sufficient human, financial and technical resources for monitoring and enforcement must be assured. While the texts of the proposed instruments are adequate, it will be necessary to include more detailed reference to the responsibilities of the State and employers and to the rights of workers. AUSTRALIA The draft instruments are broadly consistent with the need for labour sta ndards that are principles-based, flexible and non-prescriptive. The final instruments should make an important contribution to securing better OSH outcomes throughout the world. ACTU: The proposals reflect Australia.s own national OSH policy, system and programme, and its National Occupational Health and Safety Strategy 2002-12 provides a good example of a national policy and programme. With regard to the proposed texts, the Convention should promote the elimination of hazards in the workplace rather than minimizing hazards and risks, and the Recommendation should spell out the hierarchy of 4 controls (elimination, substitution, engineering controls, administration and personal protective equipment). AUSTRIA Austria welcomes the proposal to have a Convention supplemented by a Recommendation. Since the Convention is supposed to lay down the fundamental principles, which should be specified in further detail by the Recommendation, it is important to draft the Convention as concisely as possible and incorporate detailed provisions in the Recommendation. In particular, Austria favours deleting any reference to the national OSH programme from the proposed Convention and including it only in the Recommendation, where it would be more detailed. This should ensure wider ratification of the Convention. IV: Given the very high level of OSH protection already in Austria, a new international instrument would not contribute to further improvements at the national level. At the international level, it is feared that a Convention would be too inflexible and that only a few member States would ratify it, so a Recommendation is preferred. WKÖ: Agrees with the above views of the IV. European Union legislation contains obligations for employees to make appropriate use of equipment and protective systems and to carry out checks for defects, etc., and the proposed ILO instruments should also include a general statement to this effect. ÖGB: Supports all the contents of the instruments and welcomes the fact that they are in the form of a Convention supplemented by a Recommendation. However, more attention needs to be paid to implementation strategies and the integration of existing OSH instruments. The ÖGB is also in favour of launching a ratification campaign on existing OSH Conventions and the ILO should offer technical assistance to member States concerning such Conventions. BARBADOS The BWU welcomes the instruments, noting the need for high-level political

commitment to OSH and national recognition of its importance. Effective implementation of existing ILO instruments is also needed, as is greater emphasis on reporting achievements and progress. There must be a targeted approach to OSH, setting priorities and dealing with high-risk sectors including SMEs, and for this the inspectorates must be strengthened. A national high-level tripartite body should be responsible for the national programme, the continuous improvement in OSH promotion, advocacy, legislation, knowledge and support services. BELGIUM CNT: The objective of a national policy and a national system for OSH must be to promote and implement several principles, including access of workers and their representatives to information on risks and preventive measures, risk analysis, training in prevention, an independent preventive service and the implementation of measures to reduce risks to the greatest extent possible. The European Union Framework Directive on Occupational Safety and Health (Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989) sets out such principles and is the basis for Belgian law on OSH. The ILO promotional framework should, however, contain a wider variety of instruments than just a Convention and a Recommendation. Replies received and commentaries 5 FGTB: It is hoped that the national system for OSH will serve to ensure that enough resources are available for inspection services, in order to help implement Convention No. 81. BRAZIL Several issues need to be further examined, namely the possibility for OSH to be considered a fundamental right, the implementation of national policy and its contents (finance, management, monitoring and control mechanisms), the need for inter -sectoral and cross-cutting approaches in implementing national policy, and for national programmes to be put into practice using multi-professional, interdisciplinary and intersectoral approaches. CNC: A declaration would be the most appropriate form of instrument to make a real contribution to OSH, ensuring it a high political priority and promoting national OSH strategies based on a culture of prevention and the greater implementation of standards. CANADA The objective of the Convention and Recommendation should be to raise global awareness, to foster high-level political commitment and to promote the right of workers to a safe and healthy working environment. These instruments should be strictly promotional in nature and not include overly prescriptive language that would create barriers to widespread ratification and implementation. Overall, the draft texts meet these objectives. CLC: The most important omission of the texts is that they fail to clearly promote the ratification and implementation of some key OSH Conventions, notably Convention No. 155, and the Convention should call for ratification of Convention No. 155 on a priority basis. The tripartite development of national policy should be extended to tripartism in framing all national OSH laws and institutions. CHINA ACFTU: A framework Convention on OSH will help to raise levels of OSH in every country and play a positive role in controlling and minimizing work-related

injuries. The Convention and Recommendation should be promotional and not regulatory, as this will be conducive to better ratification and adoption by member States, thus placing OSH high on the national agenda. As the proposed texts emphasize, governments must consult with representative organizations of workers and employers on OSH as well as gaining the active participation of enterprises and workers. This is important in settling OSH matters effectively and providing better protection of workers. legal rights to safety and health at work. COSTA RICA The proposed texts should include a reference to the Members recognizing occupational diseases on the basis of ILO Recommendations or similar international standards. CYPRUS CEIF: No additional principles or specific issues should be incorporated into the instruments, since the key point about a promotional framework is that it should enable 6 each country to determine the appropriate level of specificity in its own national policy, system or programme. CZECH REPUBLIC The ČMKOS fully supports the adoption of an ILO Convention and a Recommendation on a promotional framework for OSH. However, the purpose of the new Convention should not only be prevention of work-related injuries and occupational diseases but also maximum preservation of workers. physical, mental and social capacities. As a very important topic, OSH deserves special attention, but people need to be reminded of this and public awareness must be improved. While much progress has been made in the Czech Republic recently through the ratification of ILO Conventions on OSH, more needs to be done. DENMARK The new instruments are welcomed. They should not contain specific rules on OSH such as are found in other ILO Conventions, but establish a promotional framework on OSH in order to help the largest number of member States to ratify the Convention. DA: A declaration would be the most suitable instrument to promote the launch of a national plan quickly in many countries, although it is accepted that the majority favour a Convention. As was made clear at the International Labour Conference in 2005, the content of the Convention should be broad and without too many specific obligations, so that it can be widely ratified by many countries. LO and FTF hope that the new instruments will emphasize the necessary interaction between workplaces and companies more than the present texts do, and that they will define workers. rights and duties and employers. and governments. responsibilities to a greater extent. The present drafts do not sufficiently emphasize the need for governments to ratify and implement the ILO.s.core. Conventions on OSH. EGYPT ETUF: The Convention is a very important one and member States should be urged to ratify it, as well as make efforts to establish cooperation at local, national and international levels. It should not be prescriptive, but rather raise awareness of prevention through education, training and promotional activities. Political commitment to the implementation of a national OSH policy and national programmes should come from the highest level of leadership, to give effect to international Conventions and reduce occupational risks. The implementation of programmes and compliance with

OSH legislation should be encouraged through good quality systems including tripartite consultation, using incentives such as exoneration of taxes and through coordination with insurance schemes. The instruments should also address the need for national monitoring of latent chronic diseases and a culture of prevention should be promoted. Lastly, they should encourage and provide incentives for the exchange of information and data on OSH. EL SALVADOR The proposed instruments constitute a satisfactory basis for further discussion. They encourage vitally important matters that are already being promoted in El Salvador through its national OSH policy, its Strategic Plan and new OSH legislation. However, it is important to integrate the gender perspective into the instruments, to ensure that men and women are treated equally as regards the protection of their health at work. Replies received and commentaries 7 ESTONIA The proposed texts for a Convention and a Recommendation are fully supported. The flexibility and articulation of the proposed instruments will certainly increase the possibility of implementing the relevant basic principles of OSH. FINLAND The proposed policies are appropriate as such. However, a more precise definition of the aims of the instruments would be helpful at the outset, for example stating the right of every employee to work in conditions that are as safe and healthy as possible. VTML: The proposed instruments are ideal to fill the gap between relevant existing instruments, as they discuss the development of OSH as a whole and emphasize the significance of national policies in the systematic promotion of OSH in a wider context. EK: The document should be a communication rather than a Convention. SY: The proposals should be formulated as a proclamation. SAK, STTK, AKAVA: The instruments have great significance for the promotion of OSH. They should specify the basic principles of national OSH practices so as to ensure adequate OSH measures, including those for mental occupational health, the significance of which should be highlighted in the instruments. The instruments should also state various rights and duties so that they can be properly enforced. These include employee participation in decision-making, rights to adequate OSH training and information, and access to occupational health services. They also include employers. overall responsibilities for OSH, assessment of hazards and risks, including those for mental occupational health, and providing training and information. Government obligations to develop legislation in order to improve levels of OSH should also be included. FRANCE MEDEF: It is important for the instruments to fit into the.integrated approach. framework and to bring about political commitment by member States to establish national action to prevent occupational hazards. The new instruments should not be prescriptive and should not repeat the detail of existing OSH instruments, nor be substitutes for them. It is therefore not necessary to repeat all or parts of Convention No. 155. The instruments should set objectives and determine the general principles for setting national policies but be flexible enough to allow member States to adapt to their own national situations. CGT-FO: It is necessary to strengthen OSH standards generally, given the

growing economic pressures on labour costs in the context of globalization and trade liberalization. Discussions on the proposed instruments must therefore lead to an effective normative Convention based on existing instruments, so as to affirm their relevance, promote their effective implementation and ensure their full respect. GERMANY The proposed texts are to be welcomed as they set out sensible structural and policy foundations for a national OSH system and link together existing OSH instruments. By providing the possibility of regular review of national structures and measures, the proposed instruments should also be able to keep pace with future developments in the world of work. However, the German translation of the term 8.working environment., as it appears in several parts of the proposed instruments, should be reconsidered. GREECE The proposed instruments cover the specific issues sufficiently and the texts form an adequate basis for constructive discussion. However, it would be useful for the Convention to include an article on its scope of application. GUATEMALA The proposed instruments are comprehensive in forming a thorough basis for occupational risk management. They will be of considerable legislative importance in Guatemala, therefore, and will be used as a basis for developing a national OSH policy and system, and a national programme for the promotion of a national preventative OSH culture. HUNGARY The proposed instrument(s) should be as focused as possible. The main goal is to seek political commitment and to help place the issue of worker protection high on th e political agenda in Member countries. The employer side of the National Reconciliation Council states that the content of both the proposed Convention and Recommendation is acceptable. The employee side of the National Reconciliation Council considers that the new instruments do not meet expectations regarding the mechanism for supporting OSH objectives. The links between these and existing OSH instruments should also be less ambiguous. ITALY Confindustria: Both texts substantially reflect the provisions and levels of protection already implemented through European Union legislation. on the general principles of occupational risk prevention, consultation and participation, and training for workers and their representatives. Confartigianato also welcomes and generally approves the documents. JAPAN JBF: The draft instruments are considered to be appropriate and it is believed that most member States will be able to ratify the Convention without too much difficulty. It is hoped that the proposed Convention and Recommendation will be adopted without substantial amendment or addition. REPUBLIC OF KOREA Given the differences between country environments, recognition of these instruments would be better promoted if they took the form of a declaration rather than a Convention and a Recommendation. Convention No. 155 has been ratified by only a

small number of countries, and adopting a similar Convention will be unproductive. Replies received and commentaries 9 LITHUANIA Lithuania considers the proposed texts to be a satisfactory basis for further discussion. LUXEMBOURG Luxembourg is content with the present draft, but in the forthcoming discussions will put effort into increasing the substance of the Convention by transferring elements originating from the Recommendation. MALAWI The proposed texts are a satisfactory basis for further discussion. MEXICO CONCAMIN: The promotional aspect of the instrument must be at its heart, and duplication of existing instruments on this issue should be avoided. The instruments should therefore take the form of a declaration rather than a Convention, which would involve additional regulations, reducing flexibility and preventing ratification. A promotional declaration, supported by technical assistance, could result in effective measures to improve OSH. NETHERLANDS There is a need for a promotional framework for OSH, but it should give maximum flexibility to member States and not take the form of a Convention. The Netherlands therefore reserves its position with regard to the proposed Convention. VNO-NCW supports the above view. NEW ZEALAND The development of the proposed framework is supported. As a complement to existing OSH instruments, the proposed framework should help developing countries in particular to promote OSH, should encourage member States to adopt policies, systems and infrastructural changes, and should raise awareness and the national profile of OSH. The promotional framework should be comprehensive and outcome-focused, embodying a participative approach, and should help identify priorities without prescribing the balance of interventions to be taken. It may be appropriate for key principles to be specifically reflected in the Convention with further guidance in the Recommendation. BNZ shares the above view and accepts that the proposed texts are an appropriate basis for discussion. NORWAY The Norwegian Working Life Authorities find the present proposed texts an excellent and relevant basis for further discussion. This view is shared by the NHO, and to some extent by the LO, which has some specific suggestions for consideration. PANAMA The Government considers that the proposed documents cover key issues well and that they provide a good basis for further discussion. The texts constitute a series of active steps towards progressively achieving a safer and healthier working environment, 10 and also contain positive commitments in that they oblige the State to establish policies, national OSH systems and programmes based on the principles of relevant ILO instruments. However, a key concern is the capacity of member States to implement the national programmes effectively or to administer national OSH systems that fulfil all the

requirements of the Convention. for example, providing adequate mechanisms for data collection and analysis. PAPUA NEW GUINEA The Government pledges its full support to the proposed texts, as they complement its own cause of modernizing labour legislation and promoting greater awar eness of OSH among workers and the general population. At present, the Government does not have any recognized national policy, structured system or national programmes for OSH, but the proposed instruments will be welcomed by all social partners as consistent with calls by everyone for relevant national OSH legislation. PERU The Government is generally in agreement with the content of the proposed texts. However, a change to the Spanish version of the proposed Preamble to the Convention is needed, which is noted later. PHILIPPINES The Government is pleased to note that the proposed instruments will be discussed at the International Labour Conference in 2006, and believes that, if adopted, they will go a long way to reducing the incidence of work-related sickness, injuries and deaths. PORTUGAL The Office texts constitute a good basis for discussion. The CIP agrees with this view, but considers that it should be for member States to choose the most effective means of achieving the goals of the instruments. The CCP believes that OSH is a key concern in promoting both good working conditions and enterprise competitiveness, as the economic consequences of accidents and diseases at work are becoming increasingly marked. However, a legislative pause is called for to allow time for the correct application and evaluation of existing OSH laws, especially in the European Union context. It also highlights the importance of promoting compliance with relevant national legislation, for which sufficient human and material resources must be provided to enable the development of high-quality preventive services, especially for SMEs. The CGTP considers that the draft texts fall short in terms of conferring responsibilities for compliance with preventive and promotional OSH policies. Two aspects that should be addressed more specifically are: the intrinsic link between the national OSH system and enterprises, with employers being given responsibility for establishing and maintaining a safe and healthy working environment, and the involvement of other bodies such as universities, technological/scientific research centres and laboratories in defining national policy, systems and programmes for OSH. Replies received and commentaries 11 SLOVAKIA The social partners all agree that the proposed texts are a satisfactory basis for further discussion. The proposed instruments should express the basic principles of OSH transparently, to help to create and implement policies at national and enterprise levels. SOUTH AFRICA BUSA: The proposed texts are supported and they are an appropriate basis for discussion by the Conference in 2006. The texts are deserving of support not only because of the process underlying their formulation, but also because they represent a sensible approach. The promotional framework for OSH aligns with the aspirations expressed in the Preamble of the ILO Constitution, namely.the protection of the worker against sickness, disease and injury., and in the Declaration of Philadelphia.adequate

protection for the life and health of workers in all occupations., and its development is supported. The International Labour Conference concluded in 2003 that the purpose of a new instrument should be to ensure that priority is given to OSH in national agendas and to foster political commitment to developing national strategies for the improvement of OSH. The new instrument should have a promotional rather than prescriptive content. Consequently, BUSA believes that a declaration would be best suited to make these aspirations reality in the workplace, through strategies based on a preventative safety and health culture and the management systems approach. There is a limit as to what can be achieved through the adoption of a Convention that is in essence a legislative action, as one cannot, for example, legislate political commitment. A declaration, far from being a weak instrument, could have a strong impact on member States; it requires no ratification and member States would be bound to it by reason of their membership of the ILO. SWEDEN The social partners agree that the proposed Convention and Recommendation could become important instruments in achieving a more systematic promotion of OSH in member States, and find the Office texts to be a satisfactory basis for further discussion. SWITZERLA ND Switzerland supports the integrated approach so far as it consolidates existing instruments and facilitates the adoption of operational measures aimed at strengthening the implementation of such standards. However, it does not believe the inten tion of the integrated approach was to initiate the drafting of a new Convention and Recommendation, as is being proposed, and it reaffirms its support for a declaration as this is likely to have much more symbolic weight and therefore to be followed by concrete action in the field. The UPS supports this view, adding that a simple code of practice or promotional declaration would be the most pragmatic way of improving OSH at the international level. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC Syrian Arab Republic considers the texts to be a satisfactory basis for discussion. 12 TURKEY TISK: The proposed instruments mainly address action at the national level, and in that respect Turkey will be able to meet those objectives, considering the recent tremendous progress made through various national projects. However, the instruments must take into account the fact that many national economies are made up mainly of SMEs; for example, 98 per cent of the Turkish economy comprises such enterprises. UKRAINE The Government has no fundamental objections to the content of these instruments. UNITED KINGDOM The Government is content with the texts of the proposed Convention and Recommendation as currently drafted in the report. The CBI agrees with the above views. URUGUAY The concept of occupational diseases should be broadened to.work-related diseases. so as to give the instruments coherence by virtue of the preventive character of the concept. Strong impetus should also be given to the national authorities, to ensure

that they have the necessary human and budgetary resources, which could be achieved by incorporating rights to OSH, which are rights to life, into the ILO.s fundamental principles and rights at work. Office commentary The general observations on the proposed texts clearly echo the consensus underlying the adoption of the Global Strategy on Occupational Safety and Health at the 91st Session (2003) of the International Labour Conference. Governments and employers. and workers. organizations appear to be in full agreement that OSH must be given a higher priority at international, national and enterprise levels. In this respect, the proposed Convention and Recommendation on the promotional framework for occupational safety and health underline the importance of fostering a political commitment towards achieving a safe and healthy working environment. The responses examined in the present report reflect broad support for the adoption of a Convention and a Recommendation. A few governments and employers. organizations advocate the adoption of a declaration. With reference to the decision taken on this issue during the first discussion at the 93rd Session (2005) of the International Labour Conference, the Office has proposed no changes in this regard. In terms of content, several governments highlight the need for flexibility. They consider that non-prescriptive provisions would better contribute to the objective of a widely ratified Convention. Most of the workers. organizations believe that the content needs to be reinforced. They refer in particular to the importance of contributing to the promotion of the existing instruments, the principles of national policy on OSH and preventive measures at the workplace level. In addition to inviting comments on the proposed texts, the Office also invited comments on three specific questions and, where relevant, concrete suggestions for possible modifications to the proposed texts. The Office notes that while a large number of comments were received in response to these three questions, very few responses included any specific suggestions for modifications to the proposed texts. Replies received and commentaries 13 The Office draws attention to the importance of obtaining strong support for the instruments in order to achieve the objective of wide-scale ratification. It would therefore urge governments and employers. and workers. organizations to consider how best this can be achieved during the second discussion. 2. Responses to specific questions The Office invited comments on the following questions: 1. The articulation of the link between the proposed instruments and relevant existing instruments in the area of occupational safety and health: How can this be best achieved with a view to the promotion of relevant existing instruments? Please comment. 2. Should the basic principles governing a national policy on occupational safety and health be included? If so, please specify. 3. Concerning workplace measures, should any specific issues of prevention, such as indication of rights, duties and responsibilities, information and training, and workplace safety and health committees, be included? If so, please specify. * * * Qu. 1 The articulation of the link between the proposed instruments and relevant existing instruments in the area of occupational safety and health: How can this be best achieved with a view to the promotion of relevant existing instruments?

Please comment. Total number of replies from governments: 32. Argentina. All related instruments that refer to the protection of workers. health and safety should be specifically included in the proposed texts. Australia. Clear cross-referencing between the proposed instruments and existing ones would be helpful. Where possible each section in the proposed Convention and Recommendation should be cross-referenced to corresponding provisions of relevant instruments. Austria. Listing relevant existing instruments in the annex and including references to them in the main texts would suffice. The ILO fundamental Conventions could also be included in the annex. Barbados. It would be advantageous to annex the relevant existing instruments. It would also be useful to have a manual or guidance document on how the proposed instruments can be applied in practice. Brazil. The proposed promotional framework should consider the fundamental elements of existing instruments, which should be done through the Recommendation. Such topics as inspection systems and the tripartite model, referred to in Convention No. 155, should be included. CNI: Existing OSH instruments should be kept up to date so as to be flexible and practical, and their ratification and implementation should be promoted. 14 CGTB: Such links should commit ratifying members to comply with the provisions of existing instruments, and for this the support of the WHO should also be sought. Canada. The current draft instruments include sufficient linkages between the promotional framework and relevant existing OSH instruments, and further duplication of texts would not promote further ratification. An extra clause could be added to the Preamble:.Noting the importance of relevant ILO instruments in the area of occupational safety and health.. CEC: The links that need to be made have already been included. All instruments relating to OSH share a common goal and are therefore intrinsically linked, besides which the proposed Convention and Recommendation already contain several references to existing instruments. CLC: The proposed instruments should clearly promote the ratification of relevant existing instruments, of which Convention No. 155 is the most important. Therefore, the annex of existing instruments attached to the proposed Recommendation should also be attached to the proposed Convention. China. The references to relevant ILO instruments on OSH in Articles 2 and 4(3)(e) of the proposed Convention are considered to be the best way of promoting the application of such instruments, and these texts are supported. CEC: As far as possible, the new Convention should highlight the basic framework for OSH in order to achieve high ratification. When developing their own legislation on OSH, each country should refer to specific ILO Conventions as appropriate. Costa Rica. The linkages between proposed and existing instruments, as in the present text, are sufficient. Cyprus. The proposed Convention should, if adopted, become one of the ILO fundamental Conventions, and each member State should be encouraged to ratify it.

CEIF: The linkages proposed in the current drafts are satisfactory. Czech Republic. ČMKOS: Conventions Nos. 155, 161, 81, 167, 170, 176 and 184 should be considered as the main instruments for OSH, and the proposed Convention should appeal for the ratification of Convention No. 155 specifically. Denmark. The instruments should promote the ratification and effective implementation of relevant existing instruments, especially Conventions Nos. 155, 161, 81, 167, 170, 176 and 184. The annex attached to the proposed Recommendation should also be attached to the Convention. The LO and FTF share the Government.s view, adding that if interaction between the new and existing instruments is not formulated directly, there is a risk of undermining existing instruments on OSH. Ratification of Convention No. 155 should be given priority, and ratification of other Conventions listed in the annex should be similarly considered. France. The maximum number of member States should join in the promotional process, therefore the proposed Convention should focus on the essential elements of Convention No. 155 and Recommendation No. 164. However, sufficient flexibility is vital so as to permit national freedom in the choice of methods and articulations to achieve this objective. Replies received and commentaries 15 CGT-FO: The main objective of the proposed Convention should be the ratification of existing relevant instruments, starting with Conventions Nos. 155, 161, 81, 167, 170, 176 and 184. Therefore, the annex to the proposed Recommendation should be attached to the proposed Convention. The main definition missing from the instrument is that of.occupational health., which includes workers. mental health as well as their physical health. Germany. The proposed Convention should provide a framework, the provisions of which are given specific form through other OSH Conventions, so it is not necessary to create further links with them. Existing OSH instruments should be reviewed and adapted where necessary, and particular attention should be paid to Convention No. 161 and its accompanying Recommendation No. 171, where there are substantive links with the proposed instruments. BDA: The present version of the existing text adequately articulates the link. Greece. SEV, ESEE: The existing texts are sufficient to attain the objective of promoting existing relevant instruments. Guatemala. Guatemala is currently reviewing and updating its own OSH legislation and Conventions Nos. 121 and 155 are both very important. Hungary. Existing Conventions and Recommendations should not be promoted in themselves but as instruments to be used to achieve the goal of worker protection. In the promotional framework, the formulation of national OSH policy, reflecting high -level commitment, should come first as a basis for the ratification and implementation of specific workplace measures. The proposed instruments should refer to existing ones only where it is absolutely necessary to do so, such as the case of Convention No. 155 regarding national policy. Iceland. Member States should be invited to ratify existing instruments, which could be done by a text in the proposed Recommendation. However, it is important that as many member States as possible ratify the new Convention and considerations concerning the ratification of other instruments should be avoided. ASI: The promotional framework instruments should help promote the ratification

and effective implementation of relevant existing instruments. Such an approach would be consistent with the integrated approach and the ILO Global Strategy on OSH adopted at the International Labour Conference in 2003. The Convention should call for the ratification of Conventions Nos. 155, 161, 81, 167, 170, 176 and 184, on a priority basis, and the ratification of other Conventions listed in the annex should also be considered. To this end, the annex to the Recommendation should also appear as an annex to the Convention. India. Relevant existing instruments and statutes should be taken into account when formulating national OSH policy, systems and programmes. A link between the proposed instrument and relevant existing instruments could be considered, but the ultimate act of linking should be left with the countries concerned. Italy. There should be a close link between the proposed and existing instruments on OSH, as this solution would be in keeping with the promotion of the integrated approach and the conclusions of the International Labour Conference in 2003. CGIL, CISL, UIL: The promotional framework instruments should help promote the ratification and effective implementation of relevant existing instruments. Such an approach would be consistent with the integrated approach and the ILO Global Strategy on OSH adopted at the International Labour Conference in 2003. The Convention should 16 call for the ratification of Conventions Nos. 155, 161, 81, 167, 170, 176 and 184, on a priority basis, and ratification of other Conventions listed in the annex should also be considered. To this end, the annex to the Recommendation should also appear as an annex to the Convention. Japan. Relevant existing instruments are appropriately referred to in the draft Convention (Article 2) and in the Recommendation (Paragraph 7). Kenya. Relevant existing instruments contain standards but there has been a lack of zeal in implementing them. The promotional framework for OSH provides the impetus needed. Republic of Korea. Not many countries have ratified relevant existing instruments since they specify duties that are substantially concrete and comprehensive. Moreover, given different OSH standards in different countries, linking the proposed instruments to existing ones may make it harder for countries to ratify the new Convention. Lithuania. Listing relevant existing instruments, as has been done in the annex to the proposed Recommendation, is sufficient. Malawi. The ratification of relevant existing instruments can only be achieved if the proposed instruments provide for financial mechanisms for their implementation. There is also a need to provide incentives to influence ratification or to prescribe periods within which member States should ratify Conventions. Malaysia. The proposed Convention should be as simple as possible to ratify, so its contents should be as general and non-prescriptive as possible when referring to existing instruments. This approach would indirectly promote the use of the existing instruments by member States and over the years lead to their ratification. Mexico. Links between the proposed instrument and existing ones can be achieved through national policies that are consistent with Article 4 of Convention No. 155, and that have been formulated and implemented through the participation of employers and workers. To ensure such participation, Mexico has established workplace safety and health committees that monitor the implementation of relevant legislation and promote better working conditions.

Mongolia. Mongolia has implemented a national programme on OSH with some success, but there is a need to further strengthen the national inspection system and to foster a preventative OSH culture. The proposed instruments will greatly help with this and are supported. Netherlands. FNV, CNV, MHP: The promotional framework instruments should help promote the ratification and effective implementation of relevant existing instruments. Such an approach would be consistent with the integrated approach and the ILO Global Strategy on OSH adopted at the International Labour Conference in 2003. The Convention should call for the ratification of Conventions Nos. 155, 161, 81, 167, 170, 176 and 184, on a priority basis, and the ratification of other Conventions listed in the annex should also be considered. To this end, the annex to the Recommendation should also appear as an annex to the Convention. New Zealand. The original intention behind the integrated approach was to facilitate the rationalization and updating of existing OSH instruments. The link betwe en the proposed instrument and relevant existing instruments is implied by the very notion of a.framework.. Replies received and commentaries 17 Norway. The references to Convention No. 155 and Recommendation No. 164 in the Preamble of the proposed Convention are sufficient, but a more general reference to the ILO fundamental Conventions and to the Decent Work Agenda is recommended. The annex to the proposed Recommendation could also be an annex to the Convention and be referred to in a footnote. The NHO and the LO support the Government.s position, but the LO wishes to see a mention of Convention No. 119, although it is recognized that this Convention needs updating. Peru. Articulation of the link between the proposed instruments and relevant existing instruments is necessary in order to give legal backing and effective promotion to the proposed instruments. Poland. Solidarność: The promotional framework instruments should help promote the ratification and effective implementation of relevant existing instr uments. Such an approach would be consistent with the integrated approach and the ILO Global Strategy on OSH adopted at the International Labour Conference in 2003. The Convention should call for the ratification of Conventions Nos. 155, 161, 81, 167, 170, 176 and 184, on a priority basis, and the ratification of other Conventions listed in the annex should also be considered. To this end, the annex to the Recommendation should also appear as an annex to the Convention. Portugal. CIP: The links between the proposed texts and existing instruments are satisfactorily articulated. CGTP: Such links should be made very clear and to this end it should be stated that the application of existing instruments will not be adversely affected by the approval of the new, more generic and more broadly applicable instruments. The articulation of the link between instruments should be set out in the Preamble. Senegal. CNTS: Ratification of the proposed Convention should automatically entail that of other relevant ILO instruments dealing with OSH. New wording is proposed for Article 2. South Africa. The proposed instruments need to promote core OSH instruments, such as Convention No. 155 and fundamental principles such as those for workers. rights. The promotional framework should also promote awareness-raising and OSH