IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/24/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. 1. This is an action for direct patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos.

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IQ BIOMETRIX S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 2:17-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

Courthouse News Service

Case5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed10/10/14 Page1 of 10. Attorneys for Plaintiff ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/03/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case 1:18-cv RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Judge:

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 3:17-cv M Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

Case 1:10-cv LJM-DML Document 186 Filed 11/09/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 2242

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/29/16 Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PETER SAVENOK, PAUL SAVENOK AND ) SERGEY SAVENOK, ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PLAINTIFFS, ) PATENT INFRINGMENT ) VS. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) CLASSIC HERITAGE CORP., ) ) JURY DEMANDED DEFENDANT. ) COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Peter Savenok, Paul Savenok and Sergey Savenok complain of defendant Classic Heritage Corp. ( Classic Heritage ) and as claim for relief show as follows: NATURE OF LAWSUIT 1. This is a claim for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1338(a). PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Peter Savenok is an individual who lives at 1877 South Orchard Rd., Wheaton, IL 60189. 3. Plaintiff Paul Savenok is an individual who lives at 102 East Farnham, Wheaton, IL 60189. 1

4. Plaintiff Sergey Savenok is an individual who lives at 441 N Park Boulevard #3B, Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 and works at 288 Commonwealth Drive, Carol Stream, IL, 60188. 5. Plaintiffs Peter Savenok and Paul Savenok are the joint owners of the entire ownership interest of Royal Corinthian Inc. Plaintiffs Peter Savenok and Sergey Savenok are the joint owners of the entire ownership interest of Architectural Mall, Inc. 6. Defendant Classic Heritage is an Illinois corporation having a principal place of business at 128 Industrial Road, Addison, Illinois 60101. THE SAVENOK PATENTS 7. Plaintiff Peter Savenok is the assignee of, and owns all rights, title and interest in and to, and has standing to sue for past, present and future infringement of: United States Patent No. 6,491,287, entitled Method for Manufacture of a Balustrade of Synthetic Material and Apparatus Thereof, issued on Dec. 10, 2002 ( the 287 patent ) (Exhibit A); and United States Patent No. 6,841,108, entitled Method of Manufacturing a Balustrade of Synthetic Material, issued on Jan. 11, 2005 ( the 108 patent ) (Exhibit B) (collectively the Savenok Patents ). THE INFRINGEMENT 8. Defendant Classic Heritage has infringed claims of the Savenok patents through, among activities, the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or distribution of products and services utilizing balustrade products that fall within the scope of claims of the Savenok patents. Accordingly, Classic Heritage has committed direct and/or contributory infringement, and/or has induced infringement, of the Savenok Patents pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a)-(c). 2

VENUE 9. Venue is, therefore, proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)-(d) and/or 1400(b). RELIEF REQUESTED 10. Infringement by the defendant has injured the Plaintiffs and they are entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate them for infringement of the Savenok Patents, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, 285. Specifically, Plaintiffs seek lost profit damages as a result of injuries to Royal Corinthian, Inc. and Architectural Mall, Inc. If the infringement is found to be intentional and willful, then Plaintiffs will seek treble damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284. 11. Infringement by the defendant will continue to injure Plaintiffs until this Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement, and specifically enjoins further manufacture, sale, use and/or offer for sale of the infringing apparatus, equipment, and method of using same, as recited in Paragraphs 8, above, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283. 3

PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs ask this Court to enter judgment against the defendant, and its subsidiaries, agents, servants, employees, attorneys and all persons in active concert or participation with the defendants, granting Plaintiffs the following relief: A. a judgment that defendant has directly and/or contributorily infringed and/or induced the infringement of the Savenok Patents; B. an award to Plaintiffs of such damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 that are adequate to compensate it for the defendant s infringement, the damages to be no less than a reasonable royalty; C. an award to Plaintiffs for lost profits due to injuries to the business interests of Royal Corinthian, Inc. and Architectural Mall, Inc.; D. a permanent injunction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283 prohibiting further infringement of the Savenok Patents; an award of treble damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 to the extent that the defendant s infringement, or any thereof, is ultimately found to be willful; E. an award to Plaintiffs of its reasonable attorney fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285 upon a determination that this is an exceptional case justifying such fees; F. that the Court award prejudgment and postjudgment interest on all damages; G. that Plaintiffs recover all its costs of action; and H. for such other and further relief as this Court and/or a jury may deem proper and just. 4

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiffs hereby demand that all issues herein be determined by a jury. DATED: September 8, 2009 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael P. Mazza Michael P. Mazza Illinois Bar No. 6201609 Dana L. Drexler Illinois Bar No. 6291515 Michael P. Mazza, LLC 686 Crescent Blvd. Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137-4281 Phone: (630) 858-5071 Fax: (630) 282-7123 Email: mazza@mazzallc.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS 5