UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Similar documents
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) )

November 29, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC Dear Ms.

June 2, The documents submitted with this filing consist of this letter of transmittal, and all attachments thereto.

March 22, The documents submitted with this filing consist of this letter of transmittal, and all attachments thereto.

Governors of the States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming, Docket No.

October 4, 2005 RE: APPLICATION /INVESTIGATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) )

April 3, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC Dear Ms.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Berry Petroleum Company ) Docket No. ER _

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) )

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) MOTION FOR PARTY STATUS

REPLY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) TO PROTEST OF DIVISION OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

166 FERC 61,098 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC February 8, In Reply Refer To:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No.

January 25, 2002 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

October 21, 2005 RE: APPLICATION /INVESTIGATION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) )

124 FERC 61,004 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION OF AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S (U 338-E) REPLY TO PROTESTS

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 1 of Constitution Avenue,

Arizona Public Service Company, Docket No. ER , Agency Agreement

July 22, 1999 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

December 28, Via Electronic Filing

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IS0 CALIFORNIA. February 2,2004

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESPONSE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) TO PROTESTS

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

September 8, 2004 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION. Format for Customer Generation Quarterly Report

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory Operations Southern California Edison Company P O Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BEIJING BOSTON BRUSSELS CENTURY CITY CHICAGO DALLAS GENEVA FOUNDED May 1, 2017

October 10, FERC Electric Tariff No. 7, Transmission Control Agreement

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

F I L E D :45 PM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

152 FERC 61,060 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ON TECHNICAL CONFERENCE. (Issued July 20, 2015)

April 16, Docket No. ER

July 13, 2005 ADVICE 1902-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

June 15, SoCalGas Advice No (U 904 G) Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. Subject: Additional Hazardous Substance Site

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy ) Docket No. EL Corporation )

September 3, 2003 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

December 13, 2004 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

May 16, 2006 ADVICE 2002-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

December 22, 2005 ADVICE 1947-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

May 6, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC Dear Ms.

BEFORE THE UNITED STATATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

November 12, 2004 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ALLCO FINANCE LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant,

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) RESPONSE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

September 28, 2000 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

160 FERC 61,058 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

AMENDED AND RESTATED TRANSMISSION CONTROL AGREEMENT. Among The California Independent System Operator Corporation and Transmission Owners

June 9, Tariff Amendment to Modify Definition of Pre-RA Import Commitment

TEL (503) FAX (503) Suite S.W. Taylor Portland, OR November 8, 2007

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

129 FERC 61,075 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

March 22, Advice No U-904-G. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. Subject: Submission of Long-Term Storage Contract

In the Supreme Court of the United States

15-20-CV FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ALLCO FINANCE LIMITED Plaintiff-Appellant

February 12, Notice of Certificate of Concurrence Regarding Agua Caliente Solar LGIA

A. Zonal Agreements and Termination of the GFA

Washington, DC Tel Fax steptoe.com. August 26, 2011

ALJ/SPT/ek4 Date of Issuance 4/3/2015

August 13,2009 UM INVESTIGATION INTO INTERCONNECTION OF PURPA QF LARGER THAN 10MW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

ALSTON&BIRD LLP The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC

Case , Document 1-1, 04/21/2017, , Page1 of 2

March 1, Notice of Proposed Construction Project Pursuant to General Order 131-D, DowneyMed 66/12 kv Substation

September 6, CPUC Energy Division Attn: Tariff Unit 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE S MOTION TO INTERVENE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APP: AJllS--~---- PETITION FOR REVIEW. and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15( a), the Mozilla Corporation

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Transcription:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, and Riverside, California No. 11-1442 Petitioners, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent. MOTION TO INTERVENE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15(d), Southern California Edison Company (SCE) respectfully moves to intervene in the above-captioned docket in support of Respondent. This motion is made on the grounds that: 1. SCE is a transmission-owning public utility that serves more than 13 million people in a 50,000 square mile area of central, coastal, and Southern California. SCE s service territory includes more than 180 cities. As a investorowned utility, SCE has a public service obligation conferred by state laws to deliver electricity to its customers. Furthermore, SCE is a Participating Transmission Owner and market participant in the California Independent System Operator (CAISO).

2. SCE desires to intervene in this appeal to protect its interest and those of its customers. In the appeal, the petitioners challenge two orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that dealt with the Must-Offer Obligation and the categorization of the South of Lugo Transmission Path as a zonal rather than local constraint under the rules of the CAISO market. Under the FERC Order categorizing the South of Lugo Transmission Path as a zonal constraint, the cost responsibility of the Must-Offer Obligation will now be allocated to a number of load-serving entities, including Petitioners, rather than just to the load that SCE serves. Any modification of the categorization of the South of Lugo Transmission Path will impact SCE ratepayers. Further, because SCE is a Participating Transmission Owner and market participant in the CAISO, any further modification of how the Must-Offer Obligation is calculated will necessarily have an impact on SCE and its ratepayers. Thus, SCE s interests in these proceedings meet the standard for intervention under Fed. R. App. P. 15(d). 1 1 See Yakima Valley Cablevision, Inc. v. FCC, 794 F.2d 737, 744-45 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (Rule 15(d) intervention granted to one directly affected by agency policy); New Mexico Dep't of Human Servs. v. Department of Health & Human Servs. Health Care Fin. Admin., 4 F.3d 882, 884 n.2 (10th Cir. 1993) (Rule 15(d) motion granted to intervenors with a substantial and unique interest in the outcome ); Bales v. NLRB, 914 F.2d 92, 94 (6th Cir. 1990) (Rule 15(d) motion granted to one with substantial interest in the outcome ); In re Grand Jury Investigation of Cuisinarts, Inc., 665 F.2d 24, 28 n.2 (2d Cir. 1981) (Rule 15(d) motion granted to one with significant interests in proceedings). 2

CONCLUSION SCE is entitled to intervene in these proceedings and respectfully requests that it be afforded all rights as a respondent. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Rebecca Austin Furman Jennifer R. Hasbrouck Southern California Edison 2244 Walnut Grove Ave. P.O. Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770 (626) 302-3475 Attorneys for Southern California Edison Company Dated: December 13, 2011 3

RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Circuit Rule 26.1 of this Court, Southern California Company (SCE) hereby discloses the following: SCE is an investor-owned public utility primarily engaged in the business of purchasing, generating, transmitting, distributing, and selling electric energy at wholesale and retail in the State of California. SCE is a subsidiary of its parent, Edison International, both of which have issued equity and debt securities to the public. SCE has common and preferred stocks outstanding. The common stock is held 100% by Edison International; the preferred stocks are publicly-held. There is no publicly-held company that has a 10% or greater equity interest in SCE, other than Edison International. Respectfully submitted, Dated: December 13, 2011 /s/ Rebecca Austin Furman Jennifer R. Hasbrouck Southern California Edison 2244 Walnut Grove Ave. P.O. Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770 (626) 302-3475 Counsel for Southern California Edison Company

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Michal Odorczuk, hereby certify that on December 13, 2011, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing motion to be served, by delivery in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, on counsel for petitioners and respondent: SERVICE LISTS FOR ER04-835 AND ER04-103 Office of the Solicitor Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Avenue NE Washington, D.C. 20585 /s/ Michal Odorczuk Case Analyst Southern California Edison 2244 Walnut Grove Ave. P.O. Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770 (626) 302-6699

FERC Service List EL04-103 Non-Email Chrystina L Steffy FERC 888 1st St NE Washington, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 20426 District of Columbia Roger Van Hoy Modesto Irrigation District PO Box 4060 Modesto,CALIFORNIA 95352-4060 Stanislaus James C Feider Northern California Power Agency 180 Cirby Way Roseville, CALIFORNIA 956786420 Placer MAURY A KRUTH Transmission Agency of Northern California PO Box 15129 Sacramento,DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 95851-0129 Sacramento

FERC Sevice List ER04-835 Non-Email Kerry Hattevik CPUC 505 Van Ness Ave San Francisco, CALIFORNIA 941023214 Chrystina L Steffy FERC 888 1st St NE Washington, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 20426 District of Columbia Roger Van Hoy Modesto Irrigation District PO Box 4060 Modesto,CALIFORNIA 95352-4060 Stanislaus James C Feider Northern California Power Agency 180 Cirby Way Roseville, CALIFORNIA 956786420 Placer

abb@eslawfirm.com aclair@stinson.com Anna.Valdberg@sce.com aorchard@smud.org bblair@thompsoncoburn.com braun@braunlegal.com broadwnm@sce.com cdl@cpuc.ca.gov cstrother@mshpc.com Cynthia.A.Fonner@Constellation.com Deborah.Barnes@doj.ca.gov debra.raggio@mirant.com dmahmud@mwdh2o.com docallaghan@ci.vernon.ca.us ehahn@mwdh2o.com ejgrammer@gkrse-law.com ErikSaltmarsh-Service@eob.ca.gov FERCCASEADMIN@SCE.COM gdo@duncanallen.com Gopal.Swaminathan@ferc.gov gortman@stinson.com grehal@water.ca.gov jeff.lam@powerex.com jkey@steptoe.com julia.moore@alston.com kaplan@iepa.com kmorton@sempra.com kms@cpuc.ca.gov krk2@pge.com lau@cpuc.ca.gov lehfeldtr@dicksteinshapiro.com Lisa.Dowden@spiegelmcd.com lsg@dwgp.com marcia.hooks@ferc.gov marcia.kamine@ladwp.com mary.lynch@constellation.com mdp5@pge.com michelle.d.grant@dynegy.com mrp@dwgp.com myuffee@mwe.com nsaracin@water.ca.gov nsaracino@caiso.com paul.fox@bracewellgiuliani.com pfg@vnf.com rjda@pge.com sherifl@calpine.com shg@cpuc.ca.gov smn@dwgp.com tim.muller@williams.com tracy.davis@bgllp.com tsolomon@winston.com warren@wrightlaw.com wld@dwgp.com FERC Combined Email Service List for EL04-103 and ER04-835