THIS CAUSE came on before the undersigned Superior Court Judge on the Attorney

Similar documents
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard before the undersigned judge on the plaintiff^ State of

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION. vs. DIVISION: A

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY NO. 09 CV

12 CVS. Scenic NC, Inc., ) Plaintiff ) ) ) North Carolina Department of MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. ) Transportation, ) Defendant )

SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 13 CVS 7849

r-q r.:: n u li n-:f THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE

Case 3:13-cv CAB-WMC Document 10 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DISTRICT COURT DIVISION

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO Bannock Street Denver, CO GERALD ROME, Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 7 April 2015

CONSENT JUDGMENT. THIS CAUSE came on before the undersigned Judge for entry of a Consent Judgment

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Leave to Conduct Expedited Discovery (the Motion for Expedited Discovery ) in the abovecaptioned

Case 1:10-cv FJS Document 24 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

14 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT DIVISION GENERAL CIVIL RULES

FILED SAN MAteO COUNTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

PROTECTION FROM ABUSE (PFA) Instructions PRO SE FAYETTE COUNTY

PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

Courthouse News Service

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

3:18-cv JMC Date Filed 05/22/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv RWZ Document 53-1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Plaintiffs, Upon reading and filing of the Affidavit in Support of Order to Show Cause with

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 4 January 2011

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Anderson v. Coastal Communities at Ocean Ridge Plantation, Inc., 2011 NCBC 14.

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 February 2013

PROPERTY BOND PACKET

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 22, 2012 Session

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Case No. 3:17-CV-292

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOW COMES Plaintiff LegalZoom.Com, Inc., pursuant to Rule 3.3 of the

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Case 1:14-at Document 6 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 27 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:752

Original - Court 1st copy - Defendant CASE NO. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Directions for Claim and Delivery

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff

REPLEVIN PACKET. Information or forms provided by the Clerk of Court should be considered as basic

United States Bankruptcy Court. Northern District of California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PETITION TO MODIFY PROTECTION FROM ABUSE ORDER INSTRUCTION SHEET

March 15, 2013 David Johnson, Deputy Counsel The North Carolina State Bar


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

Kin Lung Cheung v Nicosia 2014 NY Slip Op 32176(U) July 30, 2014 Sup Ct, Kings County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Mark I. Partnow Cases posted

Filing # E-Filed 05/08/ :47:12 PM

Case 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

MOTION FOR TELEPHONE TESTIMONY OF W. SCOTT ROCKEFELLER WITH REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED RULING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF YOLO. Plaintiff, Defendant. JEFF W. REISIG, District Attorney of Yolo County, by LARRY BARLLY, Supervising

When should this form be used? IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING E-FILING. What should I do next?

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Vacating a Judgment and Staying Enforcement of a Writ of Restitution

Case 1:14-cv CMH-TRJ Document 14 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 83

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 2:13-cv DAK Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 5:13-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 132 Filed: 05/24/13 Page: 1 of 27 - Page ID#: 5323

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI

Upon reading and filing the affirmation of Lawrence E. Tofel, sworn to on the 5th

Case 2:14-cv MMM-AGR Document 17 Filed 08/04/14 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:467 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) {1} Before the Court is the Motion of non-party National Western Life Insurance Company

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Adams, in her Official capacity as Chairman of the Moore BOE, Carolyn M. McDermott, in her Official capacity as Secretary of the Moore BOE; William R.

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 5

Correction to Correct Way to Correct Incorrect Documents The Scrivener s Error Revisited By W. Paul Lewis, Title Counsel, Pinehurst & Wilmington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

Transcription:

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WAKE COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION NO. 05CV002761 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ex rel. ROY COOPER, Attorney General, Plaintiff, TEMPORARY vs. RESTRAINING ORDER D. SCOTT HEINEMAN and KURT F. JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY and D/B/A THE DOREAN GROUP, and JOYCE EARL DELANCY LAMBETH, A/K/A J.E.D. LAMBETH, Defendants. THIS CAUSE came on before the undersigned Superior Court Judge on the Attorney General s motion for a temporary restraining order pursuant to N.C.G.S. 75-14, Rule 65 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, and Chapter 114 of the North Carolina General Statutes. It appears to the Court from the verified complaint and the motion and affidavits filed herein that there is good and sufficient cause to believe that the defendants D. Scott Heineman, Kurt Johnson, and Joyce Earl Delancy Lambeth are engaged in unfair and deceptive commercial practices in violation of N.C.G.S. 75-1.1. It further appears to the Court that immediate and continuing harm to the consuming public and to the integrity of the North Carolina public records will occur unless defendants are temporarily enjoined from violations of the law, and the Court therefore finds the plaintiff State of North Carolina is entitled to a temporary restraining order.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants, their agents, employees, and persons acting in concert with them are temporarily restrained from: (a advertising mortgage elimination services to residents of North Carolina; 2

(b soliciting or receiving money from any residents of North Carolina for mortgage elimination services; (c filing any documents on the public records in any county in North Carolina, including documents entitled Notice of Intent to Correct Title, Substitution of Trustee, Specific Power of Attorney, Full Reconveyance or any other document being used in a scheme to have a deed of trust satisfied with less than full payment; (d filing any documents on the public records in any county in North Carolina where defendants, their agents, employees, and persons acting in concert with them purport to sign the documents as attorney-in-fact or agent for any lending institution unless defendants, their agents, employees, and persons acting in concert with them can produce an affidavit signed by an authorized agent employed by the lending institution giving permission for defendants, their agents, employees, and persons acting in concert with them to make a filing on behalf of the lending institution; and (e filing any document on the public records in any county in North Carolina which creates a negative option through which a lender purports to lose rights and/or appoint defendants, their agents, employees, and persons acting in concert with them as attorney-in-fact for the lender. (f disposing of any funds defendants have collected from North Carolina consumers in connection with their operation of a mortgage elimination business; and 3

(g destroying, removing, transferring, erasing, or otherwise disposing of any business or financial records, relating to defendants' mortgage elimination operations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that at least three (3 days prior to the preliminary injunction hearing in this matter, and in no event later than two (2 weeks after entry of this Order, defendants shall provide plaintiff with a list identifying every North Carolina consumer who has paid any defendant for mortgage elimination services, including the consumer s name, address, and telephone number, along with the amount of money each customer paid to one or more defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be heard before the Superior Court Judge presiding at the Wake County Courthouse, Courtroom on, 2005, at. M., or as soon thereafter as this matter can be heard, on the State s motion for a preliminary injunction. This the day of March, 2005 at. M. Superior Court Judge 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby certify that I have this day served upon defendants the foregoing TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER in the following manner: Service by the Guilford County Sheriff s Department to: J.E.D. Lambeth 3914 Old Berkshire Drive, Browns Summit, NC 27214 Service by independent process server to: D. Scott Heineman, d/b/a The Dorean Group 2447 Corum Court or 29460 Union City Blvd. Kurt F. Johnson, d/b/a/ The Dorean Group 125 East SunnyOak Avenue/Apt.103 Campbell, CA (Zip 95008, 95009 or 95011 or 29460 Union City Blvd. This the 3rd day of March, 2005. ROY COOPER Attorney General Division Harriet F. Worley Assistant Attorney General Consumer Protection N.C. Department of Justice 5