Case 1:12-cv GBL-IDD Document 201 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4071

Similar documents
Case 1:14-cv CMH-TRJ Document 14 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 83

Case 1:08-cv GBL-TCB Document 21 Filed 06/27/08 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 652

Case 1:11-cv GBL -TRJ Document 4 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 349

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-SEITZ/MCALILEY

Case 1:12-cv GBL-JFA Document 67 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 748

: : : : MOTION OF K&L GATES LLP TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL AND TO FILE SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT UNDER SEAL

) Case Number: ^.'l^fcv^l

Case 1:08-cv GBL-JFA Document 197 Filed 02/08/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 2343

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

Case 1:12-cv GBL-JFA Document 17 Filed 09/10/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 185

Case 1:10-cv GBL -TRJ Document 74 Filed 03/23/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 661

Case 1:13-cv GBL-IDD Document 50 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 637 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Defendants hereby move for a stay of all case deadlines in the abovecaptioned. 1. At the end of the day on December 21, 2018, the appropriations act

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA (Alexandria Division) Plaintiff, 1:07cv846 JCC/TRJ Judge Cacheris

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 304 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 6635

Case 2:12-cv MSD-TEM Document 4 Filed 12/26/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 25

Case 2:12-md Document 174 Filed 06/14/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1222

Case 1:13-cv GBL-TCB Document 33 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID# 2015

herein, counsel will move this Court before the Honorable Denny Chin, United States District

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

Case 1:08-cv JHR-AMD Document 36 Filed 04/07/2009 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 5:13-cv MFU Document 13 Filed 04/19/13 Page 1 of 5 Pageid#: 53

Committee Opinion October 31, 2005 PROVISION ALLOWING FOR ALTERNATIVE FEE ARRANGEMENTS SHOULD CLIENT TERMINATE REPRESENTATION MID-CASE WITHOUT CAUSE.

Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 11 Filed 01/22/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 108

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNOPPOSED MOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES TO PERMIT APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Case 1:09-cv ABJ Document 24-1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ) Civil Action No.

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv GBL -TRJ Document 54 Filed 11/02/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 476

Case 1:16-cv CMA Document 126 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)

GLOBAL HUB LOGISTICS, et al., ) VS. ) February 2, ) ) Defendants. ) ) TAMERLANE GLOBAL SERVICES, et al.,) MOTIONS HEARING

Case 1:07-cv JPJ -PMS Document 305 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 6 Pageid#: 2830

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM

Case 2:07-cv JBF-TEM Document 45 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 3:14-cv REP-AWA-BMK Document 170 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 6325

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-cv HEH Document 64 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 445

Case: 4:11-cv CDP Doc. #: 51 Filed: 06/06/11 Page: 1 of 11 PageID #: 790

Case 1:12-cv GBL-JFA Document 61 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 640

Case 1:14-cv PAC Document 95 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:08-cv WMS-LGF Document 379 Filed 10/19/12 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:17-cv ABJ Document 12 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv BAH Document 47 Filed 04/06/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:15-cr AWA-RJK Document 39 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 220

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:15-cv LMB-JFA Document 37 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 374

Case 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document 29 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:08-mc PLF Document 300 Filed 08/17/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case KRH Doc 924 Filed 11/16/15 Entered 11/16/15 14:00:42 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 216 Filed 08/09/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4171

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division -

Supreme Court of Virginia

Case 1:14-cv JCC-IDD Document 7 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 39

Case 1:16-cv CMA Document 319 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2017 Page 1 of 6

registrations of six of PFI's trademarks on the grounds that they consisted of matter that "may

Case 3:15-cv HEH-RCY Document 102 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 1030

v. Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-560

Case 3:12-cv REP Document 191 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID# 3471

Case 1:16-cv TSC Document 9 Filed 09/20/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv JFA Document 13 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 90

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2018 Page 1 of 4

Case 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 22 Filed: 09/10/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:140

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s), vs. Case No: 6:07-CV-6149-HO. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

* IN THE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AFFIDAVIT OF N. TUCKER MENEELY

Case 3:15-cv MHL Document 69 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 1055

Case 9:03-cv KAM Document 2795 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/17/2014 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 223 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4200

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 9:18-cv DMM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2018 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:06-cv VLB Document Filed 02/22/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IN RE TELES AG,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA. STATE OF ALABAMA, ) ) ) ) v. ) CASE NO. CC ) ) ) MICHAEL GREGORY HUBBARD, ) ) Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv CMH-TCB Document 25 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 159

Information or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel PREVIEW

Case 1:10-cr LMB Document 322 Filed 10/07/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 2438 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

Case 9:17-cv KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:14-cv REP-AWA-BMK Document 146 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 5723

Case 3:15-cv HEH-RCY Document 161 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 2253

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 1:06-cv SL Doc #: 266 Filed: 08/23/10 1 of 5. PageID #: 8484

STATE OF FLORIDA Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida

MOTION TO WITHDRAW. Margaret L. Fleming, Winfield J. Sinclair, and Misty S. Fairbanks, Assistant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT United States Courthouse 219 S Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois DOCKETING STATEMENT

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-mc CKK Document 188 Filed 09/21/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Transcription:

Case 1:12-cv-01350-GBL-IDD Document 201 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4071 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION GLOBAL HUB LOGISTICS, et al., Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. Civ. A. No. 1:12-cv-1350-GBL-IDD TAMERLANE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW Troutman Sanders LLP hereby files this Memorandum in Support of its motion, pursuant to Local Rules 7 and 83.1(G and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7, for leave to withdraw as counsel to Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Tamerlane Global Services, Inc. ( Tamerlane and James O Brien ( O Brien in this matter. In accordance with Virginia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.16(b, Troutman Sanders LLP submits that the continued representation of Tamerlane has been rendered unreasonably difficult by Tamerlane and O Brien; the representation has become an unreasonable financial burden to Troutman Sanders LLP; and reasonable warning has been provided to Tamerlane and O Brien. Tamerlane and O Brien have substantial outstanding bills to Troutman Sanders LLP, 1 no payment toward the outstanding bills has been made in several months, and the lines of communications between Troutman Sanders LLP and Tamerlane and O Brien have become significantly strained. Considering the sizeable outstanding fees and 1 Troutman Sanders LLP is not submitting its bills or fully disclosing the amount of Tamerlane s and O Brien s outstanding and unpaid fees. If the Court requires additional information or documents, Troutman Sanders LLP can make the information available for the Court s in camera review. 1

Case 1:12-cv-01350-GBL-IDD Document 201 Filed 04/04/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID# 4072 the breakdown of the relationship, the engagement has become a considerable and unfair burden upon Troutman Sanders LLP. Undersigned counsel has consulted with counsel for Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Global Hub Logistics, and Global Hub Logistics does not oppose this motion. Accordingly, pursuant to Virginia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.16(b and Local Rule 83.1, the Court should permit Troutman Sanders LLP to withdraw as Tamerlane s and O Brien s counsel in this matter. Troutman Sanders LLP was retained by Tamerlane and O Brien to serve as litigation counsel in this case, Civ. A. No. 1:12-cv-1350-GBL-IDD. 2 Troutman Sanders LLP fully represented Tamerlane and O Brien throughout the pretrial motions, discovery, and trial phases of this case. As the Court well knows, the matter proceeded to trial on October 15, 2013 and continued for six days of testimony and several additional days of deliberation by the jury. The trial phase was completed when the jury returned its verdict on October 28, 2013, judgment was entered on that same day, and this Court ruled on and denied Tamerlane s post-trial motions on March 26, 2014. At no point was the scope of Troutman Sanders LLP s representation extended to appellate or other post-judgment representation. In determining whether to grant a motion to withdraw as counsel, courts in this district apply the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct. See Portsmouth Redevelopment and Housing Authority v. BMI Apartments Assocs., 851 F. Supp. 775, 782 (E.D. Va. 1994; Local Rule 83.1(I. In addition to governing circumstances requiring an attorney s withdrawal, Virginia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.16(b also permits withdrawal in certain other situations: [A] lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the client, or if:... 2 Tamerlane and O Brien were represented by other counsel in a previous related litigation in this Court. 2

Case 1:12-cv-01350-GBL-IDD Document 201 Filed 04/04/14 Page 3 of 5 PageID# 4073 (4 the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer s services and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled; (5 the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer or has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client; or (6 other good cause for withdrawal exists. Virginia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.16(b (emphases added. Withdrawal is appropriate here because there will be no material adverse impact on Tamerlane s and O Brien s interests if this motion is granted. The trial has concluded and a judgment has been entered. Troutman Sanders LLP has informed Tamerlane and O Brien of the deadline to appeal and of their option to request the return or provision of any relevant documents, pursuant to Rule 1.16(e. Troutman Sanders LLP has satisfied the conditions of its representation by performing all services for which the firm was retained. Troutman Sanders LLP appropriately advocated on Tamerlane and O Brien s behalf during the pretrial, discovery, trial and post-trial phases of this case. Moreover, Troutman Sanders LLP submits that Rule 1.16(b(4, (5 and (6 are satisfied as well, further supporting its request to withdraw. Tamerlane and O Brien s bills have been outstanding since October 2013, and continued representation would result in a further unreasonable financial burden on Troutman Sanders LLP. Absent overreaching on the part of an attorney, contracts for legal services are valid and, when those services have been performed as contemplated in the contract, the attorney is entitled to the fee fixed in the contract. Portsmouth Redevelopment, 851 F. Supp. at 783 (quoting Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & Fine, 234 S.E.2d 282, 285 (Va. 1977. Nonetheless, Tamerlane and O Brien have refused to satisfy their financial obligations to Troutman Sanders LLP. In similar circumstances, this Court has permitted counsel to withdraw from a representation when a client has failed to pay or that client cut off communications regarding unresolved fee issues. See id. (finding outstanding fees of $220,000 constituted an undue burden on counsel; see also Calkins v. Pacel Corp., 602 F. 3

Case 1:12-cv-01350-GBL-IDD Document 201 Filed 04/04/14 Page 4 of 5 PageID# 4074 Supp. 2d 730, 732-33 (W. D. Va. 2009 (permitting counsel to withdraw due to client s repeated failures to live up to its financial obligations. Troutman Sanders LLP has not been able to obtain the position or consent of Tamerlane or O Brien regarding this motion, despite repeated warnings on March 24, March 31, and April 2 by Troutman Sanders LLP that it intended to seek to withdraw and after several communications during the same time period advising Tamerlane and O Brien of their rights and Troutman Sanders LLP s obligations. Accordingly, Troutman Sanders LLP respectfully submits that it has shown the significant financial burden that continued representation would cause, its reasonable warnings to the client, and the unreasonably difficult position in which Tamerlane and O Brien have placed Troutman Sanders LLP. The Court therefore should permit Troutman Sanders LLP leave to withdraw from this matter. Dated: April 4, 2014 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Lesley Whitcomb Fierst Ryan C. Berry (VSB No. 67956 Lesley Whitcomb Fierst (VSB No. 79337 K. Nicola Harrison (VSB No. 82194 TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 1850 Towers Crescent Plaza, Suite 500 Tysons Corner, VA 22182 Telephone: 703-734-4334 Fax: 703-734-4340 Email: ryan.berry@troutmansanders.com Email: Lesley.fierst@troutmansanders.com Email: nicola.harrison@troutmansanders.com Counsel for Tamerlane Global Services, Inc. and James O Brien 4

Case 1:12-cv-01350-GBL-IDD Document 201 Filed 04/04/14 Page 5 of 5 PageID# 4075 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 4, 2014, I filed a copy of the foregoing Memorandum in Support of Unopposed Motion to Withdraw with the Court via the CM/ECF system, which will notify the following counsel of record: Craig J. Franco, Esq., VSB No. 41449 Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C. 1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 400 Reston, VA 20190 Tel: (703 218-2302 Fax: (703 218-2160 Craig.franco@ofplaw.com Counsel for Global Hub Logistics and Masud Roshan /s/ Lesley Whitcomb Fierst Lesley Whitcomb Fierst (VSB No. 79337 TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 1850 Towers Crescent Plaza, Suite 500 Tysons Corner, VA 22182 Telephone: 703-734-4334 Fax: 703-734-4340 Email: lesley.fierst@troutmansanders.com Counsel for Tamerlane Global Services, Inc. and James O Brien 5