* * * TONY L. SCHAFFER, * Respondent *

Similar documents
BEFORE THE DISTRICT 6 GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE EVIDENTIARY PANEL 6-1 STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF FULLY PROBATED SUSPENSION. Parties and Appearance

On this day came to be heard the above styled and numbered cause. Petitioner

BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 8-6 STATE BAR OF TEXAS AGREED JUDGMENT OF PROBATED SUSPENSION. Parties and Appearance


CAUSE NO. DC JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT CHRISTOPHER L. GRAHAM COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE

ofthe State Bar of Texas appeared by attorney and announced ready. Respondent, Bryan P. Cartall,

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS AGREED INTERLOCUTORY ORDER OF SUSPENSION

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF PROBATION

THE NEW GRIEVANCE SYSTEM AND HOW TO AVOID IT. BETTY BLACKWELL Chair, Commission for Lawyer Discipline Standing Committee of The State Bar

On Feb. 5, 2007, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals dismissed for want of prosecution the appeal of Gordon M. White [# ], 47, of Richmond,

December, Tex. B.J. 1040

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF PROBATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. (Before a Referee) Case No.: SC v. TFB File No.: ,037(07A)(OSC)

March, Tex. B.J Disciplinary Actions

208.4 Inquiry Panel Review. applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary to practice law in

REINSTATEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE. To facilitate the processing of Petitions for Reinstatement to practice law the

DISBARMENTS On Sept. 27, Robert Joseph Smith [# ], 45, of Beaumont, was disbarred. An evidentiary panel of the District

STATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY

OCCUPATIONAL DRIVERS LICENSE INFORMATION PACKET

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

Committee issued a public reprimand in Case No. S on June 13, BODA cause number

NO. C A AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BOARD OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS AND MAINTENANCE & ALTERATION CONTRACTORS

APPENDIX A Affidavit in Support of Application to Resign While Proceeding or Investigation is Pending INSTRUCTIONS An application pursuant to section

Bomba [# ], 62, of San Antonio,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE ACCEPTING CONSENT JUDGMENT

disciplinary action was ca lled for hearing before the Board of Discipl inary Appeals. Petitioner

LAWYERING FOR A LAWYER WITH A DISABILITY BEFORE THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO CRIMINAL/TRAFFIC DIVISION PLEA IN ABSENTIA

The Anatomy of a Complaint

COLORADO COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE

People v. Michael Scott Collins. 14PDJ042. December 2, 2014.

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU

On Sept. 19, 2006, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals dismissed for want of prosecution the appeal of the complainant

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

Information & Instructions: Motion to dissolve writ of garnishment. 1. A Motion to dissolve a Writ of Garnishment should set forth the following:

LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

IBADCC Ethics Disciplinary Procedures

BYLAWS Washington State Bar Association

STATE OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY

THE GRIEVANCE PROCESS

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR. VSB Docket No , , , ORDER OF REVOCATION

People v. Richard O. Schroeder. 17PDJ046. January 9, 2018.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE (As to Font Type Only)

OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION COUNTY INDIGENT DEFENSE PROCEDURES REPORT COVER SHEET

BYLAWS Washington State Bar Association

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

Purpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration

ALABAMA PRIVATE INVESTIGATION BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 741-X-6 DISCIPLINARY ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Legal Referral Service Rules for Panel Membership

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

APPLICATION CHECKLIST IMPORTANT Submit all items on the checklist below with your application to ensure faster processing. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

STATUTE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

Tuesday 28th November, 2006.

OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS. Sanction Imposed: Two Year and Three Month Suspension

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. Nos ,011(17B) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,361. In the Matter of LAWRENCE E. SCHNEIDER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

on a probated suspension from the practice of law in Texas beginning November 17, 2017, and ending November 16, BODA Cause No

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

MISSOURI HOCKEY, INC.

ex parte application of the Committee, the Board may order the remedy specified in paragraph 7

Disciplinary Procedure 2.25, Bragg has. of 30 days from the date of the judgment

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD FOR THE STATE OF VERMONT

ending November 16, BODA Cause number

Unless otherwise expressly provided, in Part V of these Rules of Civil Procedure:

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

~/

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. The following attorneys appeared as counsel for the parties:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,378. In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

CHAPTER Law Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights

SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM. (Vehicle Code 23152)

***FOR BACKGROUND CHECK ONLY***

1 of 9. APPLICATION CHECKLIST - IMPORTANT - Submit all items on the checklist below with your application to ensure faster processing.

CHAPTER 16. FOREIGN LEGAL CONSULTANCY RULE RULE PURPOSE RULE GENERAL CERTIFICATION REGULATIONS

BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF VSB DOCKET: ELLIOT M. SCHLOSSER ORDER

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO PRACTICE AS AN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR-AT-LAW IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK SUPREME COURT APPELLATE DIVISION

CITY OF AUSTIN Chauffeur s Permit Application New / Renewal / Amendment. 1. Applicant s Name 2. Social Security No. - -

SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS PETITION FOR COMPULSORY DISCIPLINE

) No. SB D RICHARD E. CLARK, ) ) No Respondent. ) ) O P I N I O N REVIEW FROM DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION

HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS AND SUITES. 500 South Washington, Fredericksburg, TX

RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1-1. NAME. The name of the body regulated by these rules shall be THE FLORIDA BAR.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No ,577(17J) REPORT OF REFEREE

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE. vs. Case No.: License No.: PTA FINAL ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

[Cite as Richland Cty. Bar Assn. v. Akers, 106 Ohio St.3d 337, 2005-Ohio-5144.]

APPENDIX RULE MEMBERSHIP CLASSIFICATIONS

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,097. In the Matter of TIMOTHY CLARK MEYER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER. 2015, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR Case No. SC [TFB No ,112(18B)(CRE)]

Transcription:

BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 09-2 STATE BAR OF TEXAS COMMISSION FOR LAWYER * DISCIPLINE, * Petitioner * v. * 201606357 * * TONY L. SCHAFFER, * Respondent * AGREED JUDGMENT OF PROBATED SUSPENSION Parties and Appearance On this day came to be heard the above styled and numbered cause. Petitioner and Respondent, Tony L. Schaffer, Texas Bar Number 17720880, announce that an agreement has been reached on all matters including the imposition of a Probated Suspension. Jurisdiction and Venue The Evidentiary Panel 9-2, having been duly appointed to hear this complaint by the chair of the Grievance Committee for State Bar of Texas District 9, finds that it has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action, and that venue is proper. Professional Misconduct The Evidentiary Panel, having considered the pleadings, admissions, stipulations and agreements of the parties, finds Respondent has committed Professional Misconduct as defined by Rule 1.06(W) of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. Findings of Fact Petitioner and Respondent agree to the following findings of fact. Accordingly, the Evidentiary Panel finds: Page1of5

1. Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in Texas and is a member of the State Bar of Texas. 2. Respondent resides in and maintains his principal place of practice in Travis County, Texas. 3. On March 27, 2015, Complainant, JoAn Dreyer, hired Respondent, Tony L. Schaffer, to represent her in a contested probate matter. As Dependent Administrator of their mother's estate, Complainant's sister filed a lawsuit against Complainant and a notice of lis pendens against Complainant's homestead. Complainant's sister agreed to release the lis pendens on condition that Complainant place $15,000 in escrow from the sale proceeds of Complainant's homestead until the probate dispute was resolved. On or about May 28, 2015, Corridor Title Company wired $15,000 to Respondent's IOLTA account on behalf of Complainant from the proceeds of the sale of Complainant's homestead. By September 26, 2016, both parties had signed a settlement agreement authorizing Respondent to release the escrowed $15,000 to Complainant. On October 4, 2016, Respondent wired $3,965 to Complainant's bank account. Complainant made numerous requests for Respondent to deliver the remaining escrow funds to her. Respondent failed to respond to requests and has not delivered the remainder of the escrowed funds, in the amount of $11,035, to Complainant. From June 15, 2016, through September 18, 2016, Complainant made numerous attempts to contact Respondent by text, email and telephone, to no avail. 4. The Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the State Bar of Texas has incurred reasonable attorneys' fees and direct expenses associated with this Disciplinary Proceeding in the amount of $4,795.20. 5. Respondent owes restitution in the amount of $11,000.00 payable to JoAn Marie Dreyer. Conclusions of Law Petitioner and Respondent agree that, based on the foregoing findings of fact, the following Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct have been violated. Accordingly, the Evidentiary Panel concludes that the following Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct have been violated: 1.03(a) and 1.14(b). Sanction It is AGREED and ORDERED that the sanction of a Probated Suspension shall be imposed against Respondent in accordance with the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. Agreed Judgment of Fully Probated suspension Page 2 of 5

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months with the suspension being fully probated pursuant to the terms stated below. The period of probated suspension shall begin on May 1, 2018, and shall end on July 31, 2018. Terms of Probation It is further ORDERED that during all periods of suspension, Respondent shall be under the following terms and conditions: 1. Respondent shall not violate any term of this judgment. 2. Respondent shall not engage in professional misconduct as defined by Rule 1.06(W) of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure during the period of suspension beginning with the execution of this agreement. 3. Respondent shall not violate any state or federal criminal statutes (Class C misdemeanor traffic violations will not be grounds for revocation). 4. Respondent shall keep State Bar of Texas membership department notified of current mailing, residence and business addresses and telephone numbers. 5. Respondent shall comply with Minimum Continuing Legal Education requirements. 6. Respondent shall comply with Interest on Lawyers Trust Account (IOL TA) requirements.. 7. Respondent shall promptly respond to any request for information from the Chief Disciplinary Counsel in connection with any investigation of any allegations of professional misconduct. Probation Revocation Upon information that Respondent has violated a term of this judgment, the Chief Disciplinary Counsel may, in addition to all other remedies available, file a motion to revoke probation pursuant to Rule 2.23 of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure with the Board of Disciplinary Appeals ("BODA") and serve a copy of the motion on Respondent pursuant to Tex.R.Civ.P. 21a. BODA shall conduct an evidentiary hearing. At the hearing, BODA shall determine by a preponderance of the evidence whether Respondent has violated any term of this CFS..15A Page 3 of 5

Judgment. If BODA finds grounds for revocation, BODA shall enter an order revoking probation and placing Respondent on active suspension from the date of such revocation order. Respondent shall not be given credit for any term of probation served prior to revocation. It is further ORDERED that any conduct on the part of Respondent which serves as the basis for a motion to revoke probation may also be brought as independent grounds for discipline as allowed under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. Restitution, Attorney's Fees and Expenses It is further ORDERED Respondent shall pay restitution on or before this judgment is presented to the Evidentiary Panel for execution to JoAn Marie Dreyer in amount of $11,000.00. Respondent shall pay the restitution by certified or cashier's check or money order made payable to JoAn Marie Dreyer and delivered to the State Bar of Texas, Chief Disciplinary Counsel's Office, P.O. Box 12487, Austin, TX 78711-2487 (1414 Colorado St., Austin, TX 78701 ). It is further ORDERED Respondent shall pay all reasonable and necessary attorney's fees and direct expenses to the State Bar of Texas in the amount of $4, 795.20. The payment of attorney's fees and direct expenses shall be paid in three (3) monthly installments with the first installment being $1,598.40 due on or before April 25, 2018, with two additional installment payments of $1,598.40 due on the 25th day of May 2018, and on the 25 1 h day of June 2018. Payments shall be made by certified or cashier's check or money order. Respondent shall forward the funds, made payable to the State Bar of Texas, Chief Disciplinary Counsel's Office, P.O. Box 12487, Austin, TX 78711-2487 (1414 Page4 of5

Colorado St., Austin, TX 78701). It is further ORDERED that all amounts ordered herein are due to the misconduct of Respondent, are assessed as a part of the sanction in accordance with Rule 1.06(Z) of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. Any amount not paid shall accrue interest at the maximum legal rate per annum until paid and the State Bar of Texas shall have all writs and other post-judgment remedies against Respondent in order to collect all unpaid amounts. Publication This suspension shall be made a matter of record and appropriately published in accordance with the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. Other Relief All requested relief not expressly granted herein is expressly DENIED. SIGNED this 30th day of April, 2018. EVIDENTIARY PANEL 9-2 DISTRICT NO. 9 STATE BAR OF TEXAS Ryan Andrew Botkin District 9-2 Presiding Member AGREED AS TO BOTH FORM AND SUBSTANC~ \\ \\_ d~d~,~-~ ~ Am~ KateS Tony L. Schaffer State Bar No. 17720880 " State Bar No. 24075987 Respondent Counsel for Petitioner Pages of5