Rio. Koniki Village, Pedapadu Mandal,

Similar documents
, W.P. No of2016

I, Smt.P.Padmavathi, Wo. S.Raghu Ram, aged 37 years,

W.P.NOS. 5380, 5385, 5359, 5360,5383 AND 5384 OF 2017

Bar&Bench (

Bar & Bench ( SYNOPSIS

l. I am the 4fr respondent herein and as such, I am well acquainted 2. Before going into the merits ofthe case, the brief history ofthe case

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NOS /2014 C/W 85491/2013 (KLR-RES)

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

Bar&Bench (

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO OF 2010.

A.F.R. Judgment delivered on

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF Gaddam Ramulu & Anr..Appellant(s) VERSUS

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE. W.P.NOs.35-37/2013 (GM-RES)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam,Nagaland,Meghalaya,Manipur, Tripura,Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) MIZORAM BENCH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH

Dt : Dr. Subbaramaiah, MOTHER INDIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (MICDA) PUTTUR Chittoor Dist.,A.P.

Special Appeal No. 390 of 2018

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) 5777 OF 2017.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO OF 2012 [S-R]

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN. W.P.No.35881/2016 & WMP.No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS

2 4. RahulRaj Mall Notice to be served upon its Authorized Representative Notice to be served its Authorized Representative Dumas Road, Magdalla, Sura

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND SIX

(BY SRI GANGADHAR SANGOLLI, ADVOCATE)

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::HYDERABAD ABSTRACT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ) AND -VERSUS AND. Bhaban (3 rd Floor), 56, Agrabad C/A,

PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ORISSA NOTIFICATION The 20 th April 2010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

DATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012

Bar & Bench (

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 946 OF 2009

THE MADHYA PRADESH ACT NO. 37 of 1981

Karnataka High Court Sri John Adil Kamath Pinto vs Shri Umesh Chandra on 26 July, 2013

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 21/2007

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7470/2015

LAW AREA NAME : WOMAN SECTION NAME : SPECIAL LAWS SUB SECTION NAME : DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT LAW IN BRIEF

I therefore request the Standing Counsel for Andhra Municipalities,

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (ELECTIONS) DEPARTMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No

CORAM : HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Appellant

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 520 of 2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015

Case No. 17 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd., Santacruz (E).

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, Date of decision: 8th February, 2012

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L.NARAYANA SWAMY WRIT PETITION NOS /2013(KLR-RR-SRU)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL. WRIT PETITION Nos /2010 (GM-RES),

, 19, 20, , 13, 14, 15) (1978) 4 SCC

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 9 th February, J U D G M E N T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF J HARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(C) No of Rajendra Tudu 2. Ramesh Turi 3. Prafulla Chandra Das...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS. W.P. No. of 2007

Bar and Bench (

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No.

Bar & Bench (

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI NOTIFICATION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SURI APPA RAO

W.P.No.32054/2014 (GM-RES) ORDER. In Prakash Singh Vs. Union of India, (2006) 8 SCC 1, Apex Court issued several directions in the matter of police

under the Right to Information Act about action taken if any on the complaint/representations made by him to the Governor of Goa against Advocate

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

Sub: In the matter of representation in compliance to the directions of Hon ble High Court, Jabalpur in Writ Petition no.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No of Bokaro Steel Workers Union 2. N.M.D.C. Mines Workers' Union Petitioners

GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA ABSTRACT

Order in D.Dis.R.P.301/2016 D2 dated:

CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2016) MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS.Appellants VERSUS J U D G M E N T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Writ Petition (Civil) No of Judgment reserved on : November 05, 2008

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 63 OF Sandeep Parekh and ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY. WRIT PETITION No OF 2016 (KLR CON)

Tamil Nadu Association For The... vs The Principal Secretary on 9 January, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA RSA NO.5663 OF 2010(PAR)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND,RANCHI.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL. W.P.Nos.50029/2013 & 51586/2013 (CS-RES)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus

GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA ABSTRACT

THE RENEWAL OF ARMS LICENCE INDEX

ARRANGEMENT FOR THE SITTING OF HON BLE JUDGES FROM THURSDAY, 23 RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2018 UNTIL FURTHER ORDERS. Public Interest Litigations

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus

PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY KARACHI GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY (INSTRUCTION SLIP)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CHANGE OF LAND USE MATTER Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 5180/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NOS OF 2014 (LA-RES)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR

Contempt of Courts (CAT) Rules, Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1576 of 2013

Transcription:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANAGANA AND FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Contempt Case No.1003 of 2017 IN WP.No.41794 of 2016 Between: l.yelamanchili Sri Chaitanya Dev, S/o. Late Mahesh Chandra Chowdary, aged about 50 years, Occ: Cultivation Rio. Koniki Village, Pedapadu Mandal, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh and other. And... Petitioner. l.m.a. Yakub Basha, Deputy Director of Fish eries, Eluru, West Godavari District. 2.GJ.S.Kumar, West Godavari District. Tahasildar, Peddapadu Mandal,... Respondents COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT No.1 I, M.A.Yakub Basha, S/o M.A. Khuddus, aged 56 years, Occ: Joint Director of fisheries,, temporarily come down to Hyderabad, do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state on oath as follows. 1. 1submit that, I am respondent No.1 herein and I know the facts of the case. At the time of filing of Writ petition 1 worked as Deputy Director of Fisheries, Eluru, West Godavari District. Now I was promoted as Joint Director of Fisheries, Machilipatnam,. ~ ATTESTOR Fisnerles De Jr.pmt~'ItGjtlcf!r /Technlcoi ASJistaMJ ')/0 )., Director o{ Fishene«. ~Ilir' DEPO ~

11211 2. In reply to Para No.2 of the petitioners affidavit, it is submitted that the allegations of the petitioners are not true and correct except spherically admitted hearin. It is submitted that objections received from the petitioners herein, the Meeseva Application of 5th respondent was rejected and permission was not granted to the s" respondent to dig the fish tank according to the G.O.Ms.No.7 A.H,DD and Fisheries Department dated 16.03.2013. 3. In reply to Para NoA of the petitioners affidavit, it is submitted that the respondent No.5 in W.P.NoA1794 of 2016 has submitted an application I'OJ" according permission to dig fish tank in RS.No,292/1C in an extent of3.50 acres 01' Koniki Village of Peddapadu Manda, West Godavari District. The application was enquired by the Mandal level Committee consisting or Tahasildar, Agriculture Officer, Assistant Engineer of Irrigation Department, Officers of Pollution control Board, Ground water and Fisheries Department and on the recommendation of the Mandal Level committee the provisional registration was not given by the District Level Committee to dig the fish tank. As the matter stood thus, the petit ioncr herein has filed W.P.NoA1794 of 2016 the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Hydcrabad requesting to give directions to the respondents not accord permission to respondent No.5 for digging fish tank in RS.No.29211 of Koniki Village, Peddapadu MandaI of West Godavari District. The Hon 'ble High Court at Hyderabad issued the following order dated 01.12.2016. ~. ATTESTOR Fisitmes D~ Jij:Mt.~.'1iejllcer f'fechflkllf Assisttu.tl.u«)'1. Direcwr of l'lshef'te,~,~iur'.joint Director Krishna of Fisheries, Distr ict

11311 " respondents No.3 & 4 are directed to ensure that the land in RS.No. 292/1 of. Koniki Village, Peddapadu Mandal, West Godavari District is not used for fish tank except in accordance with Law and with orders for construction of fish tanks from the competent authority". It is to submit that in view of the interim orders of the Hori'ble High Court notice has been issued to Sri. G.V Krishna Rao, Respondent No.5 vide notice No. FISH-CCOHC/I/2017/FM/A8/2017 dated 04.05.2017 that he has started digging of fish tank violating the interim orders of the Hon'ble High Court and instructed him not to take up digging of fish tank without obtaining permission and to stop construction immediately without valid permission if he is doing so. Any action 1'01' digging of fish tank necessary action to demolish the tank would be taken as per Law and notices were served to the respondent No.5 as well as to the petitioners. It is further submitted that necessary field enquiry was made and found that the respondent No.5 in writ petition stopped the laying of bund on western side or his land. 4. In reply to Para No.5 of the petitioner affidavit, it is submitted that both the 1st and 2nd respondents had issued notices to the 5th respondent to stop the illegal digging of the fish tank in the said land with proclainer, and also informed to the petitioner that s" respondent application rejected as per the G.O.Ms.No.7 of the AB,DD & Fisheries Department dated 16.()3.2013. '}IO A~ F'isitmd Dt. JiiM~T(;jficl'T ftech'lkaf Assistat.t) ;h Direcior ot f1.' heftej, bur Joint Director of Fisheries,

.'.. "......r '.....,.,' ""1'_... 11411 5. In reply to Para No.6 of the petitioner affidavit,it is submitted that the s" respondent is laying bund on western side of his land to prevent the seepage water, from the Kovva Murgu Drain. As per the orders of the Hon 'ble High court laying of bund on western side of the land also stopped forthwith. Hence this Hon 'ble I--:IighCourt orders implemented. There is no violation or this Hon'ble High Court. Orders. 6. In reply to Para Nos.7 & 8 of the petitioner affidavit, it is submitted that the s" respondent stopped the laying of bund on western side of his land on receipt of notices from respondent Nos. 1 & 2. There is no Collusion th In between 5 respondent and respondent No.1 7. In reply to Para No.9 of the petitioner affidavit " it is submitted that the respondents have obeyed the interim order dated 01.12.2016 in W.P.No.41794 or 2016. Therefore under sections 10 to 12 of the contempt of the Court Act not applicable to the respondents as the 5th respondent not dug the fish tank in his land in RS.No.2921l of Koniki Village of Peddapadu MandaI and not violated the interim order of the Hon 'ble High Court in W.P.No.4 1794 of 2016 dated 01.] 2.20] 6. The petitioners are intentionally blaming the respondents and also misleading the Hon 'ble High Court. ATTESTbR Fisitl"ries De»,:,mt.;'1tGjncer ftech"knfassisttll,ij.j/{) )'1 Direcinr or hs/terrej, Iuur- OEPO E~, t

,.. f- //5/ / In Koniki Village Peddapadu Mandal most of the lands converted in to fish tanks. I 'J filed copy of sketch for this Hon'ble Court kind consideration and perusal.l submit that the petitioner herein also having fish tanks in the same area.,{ 1: i' I respectfully submitted that I am law abiding citizen. r have great respect, towards Hori'blc Courts and its orders. 1 never violated the orders of Hon'ble 1'. Courts. If inconvenience his caused to this Hon'ble Court, I tender my unconditional apology to this Hon 'ble Court. For the reasons stated above it is therefore prayed that this Hon 'ble Court may be pleased to close the contempt case No.1 003 or 2017 in W.P.No.41794 of 2016 and pass such other order or orders in the interest ()f' Justice. Solemnly affirmed and signed On this day of June 2017 and signed in my presence. -,V A ESTOR ~ ~~.:...Fish"'~ De ~mc."7ffcjf1dn \ \ ~'" rrec/l'1/(af Assistat.u " b",~~ ~'f,~~~~0" Dtrecior or f (Sh{!"i~'1 f tur <,~).0(.. \..,-v~ ~. ';,~~v ",!;~"'\':~ c.:;.1~\''';'. ~.~~:<b,~~.0"'~~~ VERIFICATION 00 ~o ~., (f..", I, ~~~~ Basha, S/o M.A. Khuddus, aged 56 years, Occ:.loini "\0 '\V:J~.,... Director of fisheries,, temporarily come down to Hyderabad, do,.joint Director Krishna of Fisheries, District hereby verify that the contents of the above Paras from I to '7 are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and verified on this day of' June, 2017 Govt. pleader for Fisheries (AP) DEP~