IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Similar documents
I. Background and History of Proceedings

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Houston Area Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship Committee, Defendant.

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

US v Matagorda County Decree UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, Defendant. CONSENT DECREE

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

~ Civil Action No. A-04-C~-o03370lI

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

Case 2:99-cv JPM Document 14 Filed 11/24/1999 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ~ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE LmGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CONSENT DECREE. I. Background

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

CONSENT DECREE;~:~~~~~ s; ~~~: c:? The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("Commission" or "EEi:;~ins0\Ited

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Civil Action No.: [PROPOSED] CONSENT DECREE. Press Release.

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STA1ES DISTRICT COURT EAS1ERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 06 CV 2697 (ARR)(RER) CONSENT DECREE

Case 3:05-cv HTW-LRA Document 82 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:06-cv JMM Document 140 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

EEOC v. Altec Industries

Anita Robinson, et al., v. Boeing Company, d/b/a Boeing Defense & Space Group

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

I' " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ~ICHIGAN SOUTHERN,,{ON J;:: Zi.. Plaintiff, Defendant ~I

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

Case 1:18-cv JLK Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2018 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU~ NOV - FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS~i.~ SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

Case 2:11-cv LRH-GWF Document 177 Filed 06/03/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA INTRODUCTION

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity ) Commission, ) Case No.: CV PHX-DAE

)

Transcription:

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION ENTERED [.,.;y 07 2003 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Defendant. MII.illl,\,<. ;Mby, Clerk at GIll CIVIL ACTION NO. H-03-0619 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CONSENT DECREE Plaintiff, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("Commission" or "EEOC") and Defendant, Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. {"Defendant"or II Jacobs"}, agree to entry of this Consent Decree. I. Background and History of Proceedings A. Charging Party Kimberly Mitchell filed a charge of discrimination with the Commission alleging Defendant violated the Equal Pay Act of 1963 ("EPA") and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. ("Title VII"). B. On February 20, 2003, after investigating the Charge and finding discrimination, the Commission commenced this action alleging that Defendant's conduct toward Kimberly Mitchell ("Charging Party") during the course of her employment constituted wage discrimination on the basis of sex in violation of Sections 206 and 215 of the EPA and Section 703 (a) of Title VII. C. Defendant denied the allegations of wage discrimination on the basis of sex.

D. The parties wish to avoid the risks, uncertainties and expenses of continued litigation. Accordingly, the parties have agreed to settle this lawsuit. Neither Defendant's consent to the entry of this decree nor any of the terms set forth in it shall constitute or be construed as an admission of any EPA or Title VII violation. Both parties agree that this Consent Decree is being entered into for the sole purpose of compromising disputed claims without the necessity for protracted litigation. E. The Commission and Defendant stipulate to the jurisdiction of the Court and the satisfaction of a" administrative prerequisites. The parties further waive hearing and entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues. IT IS ORDERED that: 1. This Consent Decree is entered in full and complete settlement of any and all claims arising out of or asserted in Civil Action No. H-03-0619 and the above-referenced Charge on behalf of Charging Party. 2. Defendant and all of its employees and affiliated companies agree they will not engage in any employment practices which discriminate against any individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment because of such individual's sex and will not retaliate against any individual who has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice under Title VII or who has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing under the EPA or Title VII. -2-

3. Defendant and all of its employees and affiliated companies agree that they will not engage in any employment practice which discriminates against female employees because of their sex in violation of the EPA or Title VII. 4. Annually, for three years from the entry of this Decree, Jacobs will provide, using either an attorney or an independent experienced training person or group, a program on the illegality of employment discrimination regarding recruitment, hiring, wage decisions and promotion, and such training shall include a discussion of the law relating to the EPA and Title VII and the illegality of gender based wage discrimination to all human resources professionals and management level and above employees in the Central Region. The first training shall be completed not later than October 31, 2003, or within six (6) months from the date the Consent Decree is entered, whichever date is later. Defendant shall submit to the EEOC, each year at least thirty days in advance of the program, the name of the program provider and a curriculum outline indicating the information to be addressed during the program and copies of all agendas and materials to be distributed at the training seminar. The person who shall administer the training will be either attorney(s) or person(s) possessing at least five years of experience in labor and employment law. Written acknowledgment of receipt of the training shall be obtained by Defendant from all individuals attending the training and retained among the employment records -3-

of Jacobs and also copies shall be forwarded to the EEOC within thirty days after the completion of the training. 5. Annually, for three years from the entry of this Decree, Jacobs will provide to the EEOC a copy of all charges of sex discrimination and all internal complaints of sex discrimination in the Central Region made to Human Resources and a summary of the resolution of the complaint. 6. Defendant agrees that within ten days after entry of this Decree it will conspicuously post the attached notice (Exhibit 1/ A ") in an area accessible to all employees at each of Jacobs' locations in Houston for a period of three years from the date the Decree is signed. 7. Defendant agrees that when recruiting for the position of estimator at schools, colleges or with any other entity, it shall state that it is an equal employment opportunity employer and that it is seeking qualified female and male applicants for the job. 8. Defendant agrees that when placing job advertisements for the position of estimator 1 it shall state that it is an equal employment opportunity employer and that it is seeking qualified female and male applicants for the job. Pictorial ads should feature a female. 9. Defendant agrees to provide the Commission with bi-annual reports containing the name, gender and salary of those persons in the estimator position in Houston during the term of the Decree. -4-

10. Defendant agrees to pay the total sum of TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND AND NO/1 00 DOLLARS ($200,000.00) on the terms further set out in the settlement agreement with Kimberly Mitchell in full and final settlement of the EEOC's lawsuit to provide monetary relief to her. Said sum shall be paid by April 30, 2003. A copy of the checks disbursed to Kimberly Mitchell shall be mailed to the EEOC's undersigned counsel of record. 11. Each party to this action shall bear their own costs and attorney's fees. 12. This Consent Decree shall be binding on Defendant and all of Defendant's successors-in-interest, and Defendant will notify all such successors-in-interest of the existence and terms of this Consent Decree. 13. This Decree shall remain in effect for three years from the date of signing. During the period that this Decree shall remain in effect, the Court shall retain jurisdiction to assure compliance with this Decree and to permit entry of such further orders or modifications as may be appropriate. The EEOC is specifically authorized to seek Court-ordered enforcement of this Decree in the event of a breach of any of the provisions herein. 14. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to preclude the Commission from filing a separate action under Title VII or any other statute which the Commission enforces in the future for any alleged violations by Defendant not resolved by this Decree. -5-

- Signed this ft:, day of ~,2003 at Houston, Texas. Melinda Harmon United State District Judge AGREED AND CONSENTED TO: Houston District Office 1 91 9 Smith Street, 7th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 209-3399 Fax: (713) 209-3402 By: Ethel. TBN: 050 SON: 14155 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 500 Dallas Street, Suite 3000 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 655-5751 Fax: (713) 655-0020 -6-

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Houston District Office NOTICE TO THE EMPLOYEES OF JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Mickey Leland Federal Building 1919 Smith Street, 7 th Floor Houston, TX 77002-8049 (713) 209-3320 TTY (713) 209-3439 FAX (713) 209-3381 THIS NOTICE IS POSTED PURSUANT TO THE CONSENT DECREE ENTERED IN RESOLUTION OF A LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY THE EEOC AGAINST JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. REGARDING WAGE BASED SEX DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORK PLACE PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL PAY ACT OF 1963 AND TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964, AS AMENDED. 1. Federal law requires that there be no discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of the employee I s sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age or disability with respect to compensation, hiring or other terms, conditions or privileges of employment. 2. JACOBS ENGINEERING supports and will comply with such Federal law in all respects and will not take any action against employees because they have exercised their rights under the law by filing charges with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), providing information to the EEOC, and/or receiving compensation for the settlement of any sex or wage discrimination claim. 3. JACOBS ENGINEERING prohibits wage and sex discrimination and will not engage in the practice of altering the terms and conditions of employment on the basis of sex. 4. Wage and sex discrimination is expressly prohibited and constitutes an unlawful discriminatory employment practice. Such discriminatory employment practices will not be tolerated at JACOBS ENGINEERING. 5. Any employee who feels they have been the target of such discrimination is advised to report this action promptly to Barry Rogers, Director of Human Resources, 5995 Rogerdale Rd., Houston, Texas 77072, (832) 351-7105. SIGNED this ~ tr' day of ---"~~""""""-"'.L...-_' 2003. BaITYRoge; Director of Human Resources Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.... ---- This OFFICIAL NOTICE shall remain posted for three full years from date of signing. "EXHIBIT A"