IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IQ BIOMETRIX S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/24/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:17-cv M Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/15/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 7:15-cv DAE Document 68 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION

COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION TRANSDATA, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 6:11-cv-113 DENTON COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., d/b/a COSERV ELECTRIC Defendant. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF TRANSDATA, INC. S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT TRANSDATA, INC. S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT PAGE 1

Plaintiff TransData, Inc., for its complaint against Defendant Denton County Electric Cooperative, Inc., d/b/a CoServ Electric, hereby demands a jury trial and alleges as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff TransData, Inc. ( TransData ) is a Texas corporation having a place of business at 2560 Tarpley Road, Carrollton, Texas 75006. 2. TransData was founded in 1969, and has been involved in the design and manufacture of power and energy metering products for over 40 years. Specifically, TransData has been active in the design and manufacture of digital solid-state electric meters since approximately 1979 and has brought six generations of solid-state electric meters to market. TransData had its headquarters in Tyler, Texas from 1987 to 1990, and has occupied its current suburban-dallas location since 1990. 3. TransData has provided electric meters and related products and services to over 500 electric utilities and power producers in more than 25 countries worldwide, including all of the 50 largest electric utility companies in the United States. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant Denton County Electric Cooperative, Inc., d/b/a CoServ Electric ( CoServ ), is a Texas Corporation having a place of business at 7701 S. Stemmons Parkway, Corinth, TX 76210. CoServ has appointed Donnie Clary, located at 7701 S. Stemmons Parkway, Corinth, TX 76210, as its agent for service of process in Texas. JURISDICTION 5. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq. This Court has original and exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over the patent infringement claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338. TRANSDATA, INC. S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT PAGE 2

6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over CoServ because CoServ has established contacts with the forum including by voluntarily conducting business and soliciting customers in the State of Texas and the exercise of jurisdiction over CoServ would not offend the traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. CoServ is a Texas corporation and has extensive business operations in Texas. VENUE 7. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1391 and/or 1400 because each of the defendants is subject to personal jurisdiction in the Eastern District of Texas. 8. Venue is proper in this judicial district as to CoServ because CoServ is doing business in the Eastern District of Texas, and also because it is currently using infringing electric meters (including but not limited to the Landis+Gyr Focus AX electric meter) within the Eastern District of Texas. COUNT 1 INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,181,294 9. TransData realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 8 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 10. United States Patent No. 6,181,294 ( the 294 Patent ), entitled Antenna for Electric Meter and Method of Manufacture Thereof, was duly and legally issued on January 30, 2001. The 294 Patent was duly and legally assigned to TransData, and TransData owns and has full rights to sue and recover damages for infringement of the 294 Patent. A copy of the 294 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 11. The 294 Patent is valid and enforceable. TRANSDATA, INC. S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT PAGE 3

12. On information and belief, CoServ has infringed, and is still infringing, one or more claims of the 294 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing certain electric meters, including but not limited to the Landis+Gyr Focus AX electric meter. 13. On information and belief, CoServ has actively induced, and continues to actively induce, the infringement of one or more claims of the 294 Patent by actively inducing the making, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or import of certain electric meters, including but not limited to the Landis+Gyr Focus AX electric meter. 14. CoServ s infringement of the 294 Patent has injured TransData, and TransData is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate it for CoServ s infringement, which in no event can be less than a reasonable royalty. 15. CoServ has caused TransData substantial damage and irreparable injury by its infringement of the 294 Patent, and TransData will continue to suffer damage and irreparable injury unless and until the infringement by CoServ is enjoined by this Court. COUNT 2 INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,462,713 16. TransData realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 15 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 17. United States Patent No. 6,462,713 ( the 713 Patent ), entitled Antenna for Electric Meter and Method of Manufacture Thereof, was duly and legally issued on October 8, 2002. The 713 Patent was duly and legally assigned to TransData, and TransData owns and has full rights to sue and recover damages for infringement of the 713 Patent. A copy of the 713 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 18. The 713 Patent is valid and enforceable. TRANSDATA, INC. S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT PAGE 4

19. CoServ has infringed, and is still infringing, one or more claims of the 713 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing certain electric meters, including but not limited to the Landis+Gyr Focus AX electric meter. 20. On information and belief, CoServ has actively induced, and continues to actively induce, the infringement of one or more claims of the 713 Patent by actively inducing the making, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or import of certain electric meters, including but not limited to the Landis+Gyr Focus AX electric meter. 21. CoServ s infringement of the 713 Patent has injured TransData, and TransData is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate it for CoServ s infringement, which in no event can be less than a reasonable royalty. 22. CoServ has caused TransData substantial damage and irreparable injury by its infringement of the 713 Patent, and TransData will continue to suffer damage and irreparable injury unless and until the infringement by CoServ is enjoined by this Court. COUNT 3 INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,903,699 23. TransData realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 22 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 24. United States Patent No. 6,903,699 ( the 699 Patent ), entitled Wireless Communication Device for Electric Meter and Method of Manufacture Thereof, was duly and legally issued on June 7, 2005. The 699 Patent was duly and legally assigned to TransData, and TransData owns and has full rights to sue and recover damages for infringement of the 699 Patent. A copy of the 699 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 25. The 699 Patent is valid and enforceable. TRANSDATA, INC. S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT PAGE 5

26. CoServ has infringed, and is still infringing, one or more claims of the 699 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing certain electric meters, including but not limited to the Landis+Gyr Focus AX electric meter. 27. On information and belief, CoServ has actively induced, and continues to actively induce, the infringement of one or more claims of the 699 Patent by actively inducing the making, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or import of certain electric meters, including but not limited to the Landis+Gyr Focus AX electric meter. 28. CoServ s infringement of the 699 Patent has injured TransData, and TransData is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate it for CoServ s infringement, which in no event can be less than a reasonable royalty. 29. CoServ has caused TransData substantial damage and irreparable injury by its infringement of the 699 Patent, and TransData will continue to suffer damage and irreparable injury unless and until the infringement by CoServ is enjoined by this Court. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff TransData respectfully requests that judgment be entered in favor of TransData and against Defendant CoServ and further prays that the Court grant the following relief to TransData: A. A judgment that CoServ has infringed, and/or induced the infringement of, the 294 Patent, the 713 Patent, and the 699 Patent, and continues to infringe and/or induce the infringement of the 294 Patent, the 713 Patent, and the 699 Patent; B. Entry of a permanent injunction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283 enjoining CoServ, as well as its officers, directors, servants, consultants, managers, TRANSDATA, INC. S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT PAGE 6

employees, agents, attorneys, successors, assigns, affiliates, subsidiaries, and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them, from infringement and inducing infringement of the 294 Patent, the 713 Patent, and the 699 Patent, including but not limited to making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing any products that infringe or products that perform the patented processes set forth in the 294 Patent, the 713 Patent, and the 699 Patent; C. An award of all damages adequate to compensate TransData for CoServ s infringement and/or inducement of infringement, such damages to be determined by a jury and, if necessary, an accounting of all damages; D. An award of prejudgment and post-judgment interest to TransData pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284; E. A declaration that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 285 and an award of the reasonable attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by TransData in this action; and F. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. JURY DEMAND TransData hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues and claims so triable. Dated: March 14, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Eric H. Findlay Eric H. Findlay Paul R. Steadman, P.C. Eric H. Findlay Matthew J. Hertko Texas State Bar No. 00789886 Bradley W. Micsky Brian Craft KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Texas State Bar No. 04972020 300 N. LaSalle Street Joseph O. Seeber, IV TRANSDATA, INC. S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT PAGE 7

Chicago, Illinois 60654 Texas State Bar No. 17979250 (312) 862-2000 Phone FINDLAY CRAFT, LLP (312) 862-2200 Fax 6760 Old Jacksonville Hwy. paul.steadman@kirkland.com Suite 101 matthew.hertko@kirkland.com Tyler, TX 75703 bradley.micsky@kirkland.com (903) 534-1100 Phone (903) 534-1137 Fax Robert G. Krupka, P.C. efindlay@findlaycraft.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP bcraft@findlaycraft.com 333 South Hope Street jseeber@findlaycraft.com Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 680-8400 Phone (213) 680-8500 Fax bob.krupka@kirkland.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF TRANSDATA, INC. TRANSDATA, INC. S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT PAGE 8