Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

Similar documents
Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

1:1_ (I f 0 HiIiB} ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RM-KMT Document 239 Filed 03/06/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:09-cv PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

JUDGMENT APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION AGAINST BERNARD EBBERS. On this day of, 2005, a hearing having been held before this Court to

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: //y/20/0

the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Certain Defendant s

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 825 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:14-cv TJC-JBT Document 173 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6189

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:15-cv NRB Document 243 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 14. Case 1:15-cv NRB Document Filed 09/19/17 Page 1of14

mg Doc 4808 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 08:51:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

#0 I. ! l>a TE FILE ~ V 1 Q r USDC ~DNY, DOCU'.\'IENT I FLF.CTRO:\ICALLY FILED I I DOC#:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 1:11-cv CM Document Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

prejudice on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:09-md BSJ Document Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 150 EXHIBIT A

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case 4:02-cv SPF-FHM Document 1550 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK..

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 844 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Transcription:

---~------------------ Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SILVERCORP METALS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 12-cv-9456 (JSR) CLASS ACTION D ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT WHEREAS, (A) This Action 1 was originally commenced on or about December 28, 2012. Lead plaintiffs Charles A. Burnes, Jr. and Dale Hachiya were appointed Lead Plaintiffs on April 15, 2013, and the Court approved their choice of counsel, Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP, n/k/a Pomerantz, LLP ("Pomerantz"). An Amended Complaint was filed June 11, 2013, asserting claims under Sections lo(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78j(b), and 78t(a)) and Rule lob-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission (17 C.F.R. 240.l Ob-5) against Silvercorp, Feng, and Tang. (B) By order entered August 8, 2013, which the Court reaffirmed in a memorandum entered July 1, 2014, the motion to dismiss Feng and Tang was granted, and Lead Plaintiffs' GAAP claim against Silvercorp was dismissed, but Silvercorp's motion to dismiss was otherwise denied. 1 Capitalized terms herein shall have the same definitions as set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the "Stipulation").

Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 2 of 13 (C) On August 29, 2014, Lead Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint, which, inter alia, renamed Feng as a Defendant along with Silvercorp. (D) On October 10, 2014, Lead Plaintiffs, acting on behalf of themselves and a proposed Settlement Class, entered into a Stipulation with the Settling Defendants to settle this Action on the terms provided therein. (E) Lead Plaintiffs have applied to the Court pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order approving the Settlement in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation and for complete dismissal of this Action with prejudice. (F) The Court having reviewed and considered Lead Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and Notice to the Settlement Class (the "Motion"), as well as all papers submitted in support thereof; the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement as set forth in the Stipulation, a copy of which has been submitted with the Motion and the terms of which are incorporated herewith; and all other prior proceedings in this Action, and good cause for this Order having been shown: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The provisions of the Stipulation, including definitions of the terms used therein, are hereby incorporated by reference as through fully set forth herein. All capitalized terms used herein have the meanings set forth and defined in the Stipulation. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Action and over all parties to this Action, including Settlement Class Members. 3. The Court preliminarily approves the Settlement and the proposed Plan of Allocation described in the Notice as fair, reasonable and adequate, pending a final settlement and fairness hearing (the "Settlement Hearing"). The Court preliminarily finds that the proposed 2

------------------------------~ Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 3 of 13 Settlement should be approved as: (i) the result of serious, extensive arm's-length and noncollusive negotiations; (ii) falling within a range of reasonableness warranting final approval; (iii) having no obvious deficiencies; (iv) not improperly granting preferential treatment to the Lead Plaintiffs or segments of the Settlement Class; and (v) warranting notice of the proposed Settlement at the Settlement Hearing described below. Conditional Certification of the Class 4. For purposes of settlement only, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3), this Action is conditionally certified as a class action on behalf of the following persons (the "Settlement Class" or the "Class"): All persons or entities that purchased Silvercorp common stock on the NYSE market between May 20, 2009 and September 13, 2011 (both dates inclusive). Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants, the current officers and directors of Silvercorp, the former officers and directors of Silvercorp, and members of any of their immediate families and their legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns and any entity in which Defendants have or had a controlling interest. Also excluded from the Settlement Class are any persons or entities who exclude themselves by filing a request for exclusion in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Notice. 5. The Court preliminarily finds that the prerequisites for a class action under Rule 23 (a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been satisfied, and certifies a class solely for purposes of this Settlement, finding that: (a) the number of Settlement Class Members is so numerous that j oinder of all members thereof is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class; ( c) the claims of the Lead Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class; ( d) Lead Plaintiffs have fairly and adequately represented the interests of the Settlement Class; ( e) the questions of law and fact common to the members of the Settlement Class predominate over any questions affecting only individual members of the Settlement Class; and (f) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and 3

----------------------- Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 4 of 13 efficient adjudication of the controversy. 6. Based on the finding that Lead Plaintiffs have fairly and adequately represented the interests of the Settlement Class, the Court conditionally appoints Lead Plaintiffs as the class representatives for the Settlement Class. The Court finds that Lead Counsel has fairly and adequately represented the interests of the Settlement Class, and conditionally appoints Lead Counsel as class counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These conditional appointments are solely for purposes of effectuating the Settlement. 7. If the Stipulation is terminated or is not consummated for any reason, the foregoing conditional certification of the Class and appointment of the Class Plaintiffs shall be void and of no further effect and the parties to the Stipulation shall be returned to the status each occupied before entry of this Order without prejudice to any legal argument that any of the parties to the Stipulation might have asserted in the Action. 8. The Court approves the appointment of Huntington National Bank as the Escrow Agent to manage the Settlement Fund for the benefit of the Settlement Class. 9. The Court approves the appointment of Berdan LLP as the Settlement Administrator to supervise and administer the notice procedure and the processing of claims. Stay Order 10. The Court orders the stay of any pending litigation and enjoins the initiation of any new litigation by any Settlement Class Member in any court, arbitration, or other tribunal that includes any Settlement Class Claims against the Released Parties generally and the abovenamed Defendants specifically. Form and Timing of Notice 11. The Court hereby approves, as to form and content, the proposed Notice, 4

Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 5 of 13 substantially in the form of Exhibit B to the Stipulation, and directs that as soon as practicable after entry of this Order, but no later than twenty-one (21) days after entry of this Order granting preliminary approval, the Settlement Administrator shall provide the Notice to each known Settlement Class Member via U.S. mail, postage pre-paid. Silvercorp shall cooperate in the identification of Settlement Class Members by producing reasonably available information from its shareholder transfer records or transfer agent. Lead Counsel shall, at or before the Settlement Hearing, file with the Court proof of mailing of the Notice. 12. Banks, brokerage firms, institutions, and other persons who are nominees who purchased or otherwise acquired Silvercorp common stock for the beneficial interest of other persons during the Settlement Class Period are directed to, within ten (10) days after receipt of the Notice: either (a) send the Notice and the Proof of Claim form to all beneficial owners of Silvercorp common stock purchased or otherwise acquired during the Settlement Class Period; or (b) send a list of the names and addresses of such beneficial owners to the Settlement Administrator. The Settlement Administrator shall provide the Notice to each Settlement Class Member identified through point (b) of this Paragraph via U.S. mail, postage pre-paid, no later than sixty ( 60) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 13. The cost of providing the Notice to the Settlement Class as specified in this Order shall be paid as set forth in the Stipulation. 14. The Court hereby approves, as to form and content, the proposed form Publication Notice, substantially in the form of Exhibit C to the Stipulation, and directs that no more than twenty-one days after entry of this Order granting preliminary approval Lead Counsel shall cause such Publication Notice to be published on a national business Internet newswire. Lead Counsel shall, at or before the Settlement Hearing, file with the Court proof of publication of the 5

Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 6 of 13 Publication Notice. 15. The Court approves the proposed Proof of Claim substantially in the form of Exhibit D to the Stipulation. 16. This Court preliminarily finds that the distribution of the Notice and the publication of the Publication Notice, and the notice methodology, contemplated by the Stipulation and this Order: (a) Constitute the best practicable notice to Settlement Class Members under the circumstances of this Action; (b) Are reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Settlement Class Members of: (i) the proposed Settlement of this Action; (ii) their right to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class; (iii) their right to object to any aspect of the proposed Settlement; (iv) their right to appear at the Settlement Hearing, either on their own or through counsel hired at their own expense, if they did not excluded themselves from the Settlement Class; and (v) the binding effect of the proceedings, rulings, orders, and judgments in this Action, whether favorable or unfavorable, on all persons not excluded from the Settlement Class; ( c) Is reasonable and constitutes due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to be provided with notice; and ( d) Fully satisfies all applicable requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (including Rules 23(c) and (d)), the United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(7), the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Rules of Court, and any other applicable law. 6

Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 7 of 13 Participation and Opt Out 17. Class Members who wish to participate in the Settlement shall complete and submit the Proof of Claim and Release form in accordance with the instructions contained in the Notice. Unless the Court orders otherwise, all Proofs of Claim and Release must be submitted no later than February 4, 2015. Any Class Member who does not submit a Proof of Claim and Release within the time provided shall be barred from sharing in the distribution of the proceeds of the Net Settlement Fund, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, but shall nevertheless be bound by any final judgment entered by the Court. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lead Counsel shall have the discretion to accept late-submitted claims for processing by the Settlement Administrator so long as distribution of the Net Settlement Fund is not materially delayed thereby. 18. Any person falling within the definition of the Settlement Class may seek to be excluded from the Settlement Class by submitting to the Settlement Administrator a request for exclusion ("Request for Exclusion"), which complies with the requirements set forth in the Notice and is postmarked no later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the date of the Settlement Hearing. All persons who submit valid and timely Requests for Exclusion shall have no rights under the Stipulation, shall not share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the Settlement Stipulation or the Judgment. However, a Settlement Class Member may submit a written revocation of a Request for Exclusion up until five ( 5) days prior to the date of the Settlement Hearing and still be eligible to receive payments pursuant to the Stipulation provided the Settlement Class Member also submits a valid Proof of Claim prior to the Settlement Hearing (the "Bar Date"). 7

Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 8 of 13 Settlement Hearing; Right to Appear and Object 19. The Settlement Hearing shall take place before the undersigned, United States District Judge Jed S. Rakoff, in Courtroom 14B, Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl St. New York, New York 10007-1312, on February 9, 2014, at 4:00 p.m., to determine: (a) Whether the Court should certify the Settlement Class and whether the Class Plaintiffs and t?eir counsel have adequately represented the Settlement Class; (b) I Whether the Settlement, on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation, should be finally approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate; ( c) Whether the Action should be dismissed on the merits and with prejudice as to the Settling Defendants; ( d) Whether the Court should permanently enjoin the assertion of any claims that arise from or relate to the subject matter of the Action; (e) Whether the application for attorneys' fees and expenses to be submitted by Lead Counsel should be approved; (f) Whether the Plan of Allocation is fair and reasonable to the Settlement Class; (g) Whether the application for an incentive award to be submitted by Lead Plaintiffs should be approved; and (h) Such other matters as the Court may deem necessary or appropriate. 20. The Court may finally approve the Stipulation at or after the Settlement Hearing with any modifications agreed to by the parties and without further notice to the Settlement Class Members. 8

Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 9 of 13 21. Any Settlement Class Member and any other interested person may appear at the Settlement Hearing in person or by counsel and be heard, to the extent allowed by the Court, either in support of or in opposition to the matters to be considered at the hearing, provided, however, that no person shall be heard, and no papers, briefs, or other submissions shall be considered by the Court in connection to such matters, unless no later than twenty one (21) days before the Settlement Hearing, such person files with the Court a statement of objection setting forth: (i) whether the person is a Settlement Class Member; (ii) to which part of the Stipulation the Settlement Class Member objects; (iii) the specific reason(s), if any, for such objection including any legal support the Settlement Class Member wishes to bring to the Court's attention and any evidence the Settlement Class Member wishes to introduce in support of such objection. Such Settlement Class Member shall also provide documentation sufficient to establish the amount of publicly traded Silvercorp common stock purchased and sold during the Class Period on the NYSE, or by other means involving transactions in the United States, and the prices and dates of such transactions. Objection materials must be sent to the following: for Lead Counsel: Matthew L. Tuccillo Pomerantz LLP 600 Third A venue New York, NY 10016 for Defendants' Counsel: Jeff Hammel Latham & Watkins, LLP 885 Third A venue New York, NY, 10022 Court: Clerk of the Court United States District Court Southern District of New York Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, New York 10007-1312 22. Lead Counsel shall file all papers, including memoranda or briefs in support of the Stipulation, no later than twenty-eight (28) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 9

Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 10 of 13 23. Lead Counsel shall file any motion for an award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses no later than twenty-eight (28) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 24. The Court may adjourn the Settlement Hearing, including the consideration of the motion for attorneys' fees and expenses, without further notice of any kind other than an announcement of such adjournment in open court at the Settlement Hearing or any adjournment thereof. 25. If the Settlement is approved, all Settlement Class Members will be bound by the terms of the Settlement as set forth in the Stipulation, and by any judgment or determination of the Court affecting the Settlement Class, regardless of whether or not a Class Member submits a Proof of Claim. Any member of the Settlement Class who fails to opt out of the Settlement Class or who fails to object in the manner prescribed therein shall be deemed to have waived, and shall be foreclosed forever from raising objections or asserting any claims arising out of, related to, or based in whole or in part on any of the facts or matters alleged, or which could have been alleged, or which otherwise were at issue in the Action. Other Provisions 26. Upon payment of the Settlement Consideration to the Escrow Account by Defendants, the Settlement Fund shall be deemed to be in the custody of the Court and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court until such time as the Settlement Fund is distributed or returned to the Defendants pursuant to the Stipulation and/or further order of this Court. There shall be no distribution of any part of the Net Settlement Fund to the Settlement Class until the Plan of Allocation is finally approved and the Court issues the Settlement Fund Distribution Order. 10

Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 11 of 13 27. Except for the obligation to cooperate in the production of reasonably available information with respect to the identification of Settlement Class Members from Silvercorp's shareholder transfer records, in no event shall the Settling Defendants or any of the Released Parties have any responsibility for the administration of the Settlement, and neither the Settling Defendant nor any of the Released Parties shall have any obligation or liability to the Lead Plaintiffs, Lead Counsel, or the Settlement Class in connection with such administration. 28. No Person shall have any claim against Lead Plaintiffs, Lead Counsel, the Settlement Class Members, the Settlement Administrator, the Escrow Agent or any other agent designated by Lead Counsel based on distribution determinations or claim rejections made substantially in accordance with this Stipulation and the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or further orders of the Court, except in the case of fraud or willful misconduct. No person shall have any claim under any circumstances against the Released Parties, based on any distributions, determinations, claim rejections or the design, terms, or implementation of the Plan of Allocation. 29. The Settling Defendants and all former defendants have denied, and continue to deny, any and all allegations and claims asserted in the Action, and the Settling Defendant has represented that it entered into the Settlement solely in order to eliminate the burden, expense, and uncertainties of further litigation. This Order and the Stipulation, whether the Settlement contemplated by the Stipulation is consummated or not, and any statements made or proceedings taken pursuant to them are not, shall not be deemed to be, and may not be argued to be or offered or received: (a) Against any of the Released Parties as evidence of, or construed as evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Released Parties 11

Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 12 of 13 with respect to the truth of any fact alleged by the Lead Plaintiffs in this Action or the validity of any claim that has been or could have been asserted against any of the Released Parties in this Action or in any litigation, or the deficiency of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in this Action or in any litigation, or of any liability, negligence, fault, or other wrongdoing of any kind by any of the Released Parties. (b) Against any of the Released Parties as evidence of, or construed as evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission of any fault, misrepresentation, or omission with respect to any statement or written document approved or made by any of the Released Parties, or against the Lead Plaintiffs or any Settlement Class Member as evidence of, or construed as evidence of any infirmity of the claims alleged by the Lead Plaintiffs. ( c) Against any of the Released Parties, the Lead Plaintiffs, or any Settlement Class Member as evidence of, or construed as evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Released Parties, the Lead Plaintiffs, or any Settlement Class Member with respect to any liability, negligence, fault, or wrongdoing as against any of the Released Parties, the Lead Plaintiffs, or any Settlement Class Member in any other civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of the Stipulation, provided, however, that, the Released Parties, the Lead Plaintiffs, and any Settlement Class Member may use it to effectuate the liability protection granted them by the Stipulation; ( d) Against any of the Released Parties as evidence of, or construed as evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Released Parties 12

Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 13 of 13 that the Settlement Consideration represents the amount which could or would have been received after trial; ( e) Against Lead Plaintiffs or any Settlement Class Member as evidence of, or construed as evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Lead Plaintiffs or any Settlement Class Member that any of their claims are without merit, or that any defenses asserted by Settling Defendants or any former defendants in this Action have any merit, or that damages recoverable in this Action would not have exceeded the Settlement Fund; and (f) As evidence of, or construed as evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission that class certification is appropriate in this Action, except for purposes of this Settlement. 30. In the event that the Settlement does not become effective in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation, this Order shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation and shall be vacated, and in such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection therewith shall be null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Settlement, and without prejudice to the rights of the parties to the Stipulation before it was executed. SO ORDERED in the Southern District ofnew York on &'~I\) 2014. UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT JUDGE 13