PROXY VOTING POLICY (SUMMARY)

Similar documents
Arrowstreet believes that engaging a proxy voting service provider is in the best interest of its clients because such service:

ALLIANZ GLOBAL INVESTORS SPONSORED CLOSED-END FUNDS (each a TRUST ) PROXY VOTING POLICY

JANUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC JANUS CAPITAL SINGAPORE PTE. LIMITED PERKINS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC. Proxy Voting Procedures February 2016

Hartford Investment Management Company ( HIMCO ) Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures. June 30, 2016

Reaves Utility Income Fund. Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures

Proxy Voting Procedures

PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Sands Capital Management, LLC. Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures

PPM HOLDINGS, INC. PPM AMERICA, INC. PPM FINANCE, INC. PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

MPM HOLDINGS INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER. Effective March 1, 2018

PROXY VOTING Who Has the Power/Duty to Vote Proxies?

CONESTOGA CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC Proxy Voting

KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC. CHARTER OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Amended November 19, 2015

ITRON, INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER Revised December 14, 2017

Rule Ref: Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-6

VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE CHARTER. (As amended, effective August 25, 2017)

ADVANCED DISPOSAL SERVICES, INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF PBF ENERGY INC.

CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (As Amended and Revised, October 15, 2015)

FAR POINT ACQUISITION CORPORATION COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

DANA INCORPORATED COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

CHARTER OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES, COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. CHARTER FOR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE. As of October 4, 2016

NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

The Procter & Gamble Company Board of Directors Compensation & Leadership Development Committee Charter

HALLIBURTON COMPANY BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

MARSICO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES

BROADRIDGE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

MYRIAD GENETICS, INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

TELLURIAN INC. CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. As Adopted by the Board of Directors on April 13, 2017

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER (as amended as of June 5, 2018)

First Data Corporation Charter of the Governance, Compensation and Nominations Committee of the Board of Directors

Non-Discretionary IA Services Client Services Agreement

I-7 Review of Regents Proxy Voting Guidelines for University of California Investment Portfolios

VALVOLINE INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER. Effective January 31, 2018

MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION. Compensation Committee Charter. (Amended and Restated Effective April 16, 2018) Statement of Purpose.

GOVERNANCE OVERSIGHT OF INVESTEE COMPANIES AND PROXY VOTING

NORTHERN TRUST PROXY VOTING POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES. Revised 11/03/14 NTAC:3NS-20

ESG Investment Philosophy

PATHEON N.V. Charter of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee

BAR HARBOR BANKSHARES COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE CHARTER

AMENDED AND RESTATED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (AS OF MAY 12, 2016)

CLIENT UPDATE SEC ISSUES GUIDANCE WITH RESPECT TO PROXY ADVISORY FIRMS AND PROXY VOTING BY INVESTMENT ADVISERS

ALLERGAN PLC COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER

HARSCO CORPORATION (the Corporation ) MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY COMPENSATION AND LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Compensation Committee Charter. I. Purpose

PROXY STATEMENT DISCLOSURE CONTROLS 1

JOINT CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE AND THE PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (As Amended through May 26, 2016)

TherapeuticsMD, Inc. (the Company ) COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. Compensation Committee Charter

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. Compensation Committee Charter

HP INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS HR AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

PROXY VOTING POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES 11/30/2017

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Investment Consulting Agreement

COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE CHARTER (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2019) stock option or other equity participation plans;

FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Compensation and Development Committee Charter of the Board of Directors of Thor Industries, Inc.

Charter of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Trinseo S.A.

FRP HOLDINGS, INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

WINTON GROUP Stewardship Code Disclosure 2017

Sempra Energy Compensation Committee Charter

As used in this Compensation Committee Charter (this Charter ) the following capitalized terms have the following meanings:

AMENDED AND RESTATED CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION AND LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ASPEN AEROGELS, INC.

CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ENDO INTERNATIONAL plc ADOPTED AS OF AUGUST 1, 2017

AGROFRESH SOLUTIONS, INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

SANDRIDGE ENERGY, INC. CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. (As adopted on October 5, 2016)

AMENDED AND RESTATED CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.

ADOBE INC. Charter of the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TINTRI, INC. (Adopted on May 26, 2017; Effective as of March 26, 2017)

DEL TACO RESTAURANTS, INC. CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER CAPRICOR THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Neptune s Compliance with the UK Stewardship Code

GUIDESTONE FUNDS PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

HORIZON PHARMA PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Brown & Brown, Inc. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY. Compensation and Management Development Committee Charter

CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ORACLE CORPORATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (As last amended by the Board of Directors on May 3, 2017)

King III Chapter 2 Remuneration Committee Terms of Reference. September 2009

EXHIBIT A NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER

INDEPENDENCE HOLDING COMPANY CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PRIORITY TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. Adopted as of July 25, 2018

Fred Alger Management, Inc. Weatherbie Capital, LLC Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures Effective as of 07/07/17

PARK HOTELS & RESORTS INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

TIMKENSTEEL CORPORATION COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. Compensation Committee Charter

Stratus Properties Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines

TRANSUNION COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER. Effective June 25, 2015

CHARTER OF THE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ARMSTRONG FLOORING, INC. ADOPTED AS OF MARCH 30, 2016

COTT CORPORATION (the Corporation ) HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE (the Committee ) CHARTER

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED. Charter of the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

SEMGROUP CORPORATION (the Company ) Compensation Committee Charter

Monro, Inc. Compensation Committee Charter

CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NLIGHT, INC.

C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. CHARTER OF THE NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (Amended and Adopted as of December 14, 2017)

CLEARSIDE BIOMEDICAL, INC.

Transcription:

PROXY VOTING POLICY (SUMMARY) MARCH 2018 COLUMBIA MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT ADVISERS, LLC For Institutional use only. Not for distribution to the general public. This material has been prepared for XXXXXXXXX.It has not been filed with FINRA and may not be reproduced, shown or quoted to, or used with, members of the general public. Information as of XXXXXXXXX unless otherwise noted. 2015 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. All rights reserved. 1

POLICY SUMMARY Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC (CMIA) has adopted and implemented the Proxy Voting Policy (the Policy ), which it believes is reasonably designed to: Ensure that proxies are voted in the best economic interest of clients; Address material conflicts of interest that may arise; and Comply with disclosure and other requirements in connection with its proxy voting responsibilities. 2018 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. All rights reserved. 1

POLICY As a fiduciary, CMIA owes its clients the duties of care and loyalty with respect to all services undertaken on the client's behalf. This Policy memorializes how CMIA meets these requirements in voting its clients proxies. Vested Discretionary Voting Authority. Proxies regarding client securities for which CMIA has authority to vote will, unless CMIA determines in accordance with policies stated below to refrain from voting, be voted in a manner considered by CMIA to be in the best economic interests of its clients without regard to any resulting benefit or detriment to CMIA, its employees or its affiliates. In addition, with respect to ERISA accounts, CMIA has an affirmative obligation to vote proxies for an ERISA account, unless the client expressly retains proxy voting authority. The best economic interests of clients is defined for this purpose as the interest of enhancing or protecting the value of client accounts, considered as a group rather than individually, as CMIA determines in its sole and absolute discretion. In the event a client believes that its interests require a different vote, CMIA will vote as the client clearly instructs, provided CMIA receives such instructions in time to act accordingly. CMIA endeavors to vote all proxies of which it becomes aware prior to the vote deadline; however, in certain limited circumstances, CMIA may determine to refrain from voting (see Foreign Securities and Securities on Loan below). No Discretionary Voting Authority. In certain limited circumstances when CMIA is not vested with discretionary authority to vote a client s proxies (i.e., when the client retains voting discretion), CMIA will administer proxy voting on behalf of the client in accordance with the client s voting guidelines, or the client will vote its own proxies, or the client s agent will vote its proxies on behalf of the client. Corporate Governance and Proxy Voting Principles ( Principles ) and Proxy Voting Application Guide ( Application Guide ). CMIA has adopted the Principles, which outline key corporate governance issues and describe the broad principles that CMIA considers and general approach in voting client proxies. The Principles address matters relating to shareholder rights, boards of directors, corporate governance, compensation, capital management, environmental, social and governance practices, and certain other matters. The Application Guide describes how the Principles will be interpreted with respect to certain common voting proposals and what factors are important in the context of voting decisions. CMIA may also consider the voting recommendations of analysts, portfolio managers and information obtained from outside resources, including from one and/or more third-party research providers; however, CMIA reserves the right to consider each proxy vote based on the facts and circumstances of the proposal presented, and submit a vote that it believes is in the best economic interests of clients. CMIA may from time to time vote a proposal in a manner contrary to one or more other affiliates. CMIA regularly reviews and may amend the Principles and Application Guide based on, among other things, industry trends and proposal frequency. 2018 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. All rights reserved. # 2081681 2

Portfolio Managers, Research Analysts, and Responsible Investment Analysts (collectively, Investment Professionals ). In circumstances where proxy issues are not covered by the Principles or a voting determination must be made on a case-by-case basis ( Proxy Referrals ) an Investment Professional will make the voting determination. Investment Professionals may include portfolio managers, research analysts or responsible investment analysts as well as personnel employed by other investment advisers that provide sub-advisory services to one or more CMIA advisory client(s). CMIA follows a hierarchy in terms of the Investment Professional sources it leverages for proxy voting discretion. In each of these circumstances, the Investment Professional must vote in the clients best economic interest and must comply with the conflict of interest practices (described below). Proxy Referrals for Certain Accounts. Proxy Referrals for a security that is held only within a passive index account managed by CMIA s Quantitative Strategies Group, securities held only in equity exchange traded funds managed by CMIA s Strategic Beta group, or securities held only in separately managed accounts managed by CMIA s Structured Equity Group, and not in any other account within CMIA, will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of a third party research provider selected by CMIA or as specified by the client. Conflicts of Interest. For purposes of this Policy, a conflict of interest is a relationship or activity engaged in by CMIA or a CMIA employee that creates an incentive (or appearance thereof) to favor the interests of CMIA, or the employee, rather than the clients interests. For example, CMIA may have a conflict of interest if either CMIA has a significant business relationship with a company that is soliciting a proxy, or if a CMIA employee who is involved in the proxy voting decision-making process has a significant personal or family relationship with the particular company. A conflict of interest is considered to be material to the extent that a reasonable person could expect the conflict to influence CMIA s decision on the particular vote at issue. CMIA seeks to avoid the occurrence of actual or apparent material conflicts of interest in the proxy voting process by voting in accordance with the Principles and the Application Guide, and by observing procedures that are intended to prevent when practicable and manage material conflicts of interest. In all cases in which there is deemed to be a material conflict of interest, CMIA will seek to resolve the conflict in the clients best interests. CMIA considers: (1) proxies solicited by open-end and closed-end investment companies for which CMIA serves as an investment adviser or principal underwriter; and (2) proxies solicited by Ameriprise Financial, Inc. to present a material conflict of interest for CMIA. Consequently, these proxies will be voted following one of the conflict of interest management practices discussed below. In the case of Proxy Referrals, or when an Investment Professional believes that voting contrary to the Principles and the Application Guide may be in the best economic interest of CMIA s clients, CMIA may use its discretion to vote the proxy, provided that: (1) the proxy does not involve companies with which CMIA has a significant business relationship; and (2) the relevant investment personnel (i.e. Investment Professionals or Members of the CMIA Proxy Voting Sub-Committee) who have disclosed any personal conflict of interest circumstances to CMIA s Conflicts Officer do not vote on the matter. If an Investment Professional or Member of the Proxy Voting Sub-Committee has a personal conflict of interest, he will be recused from participating in the proxy vote at issue. 2018 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. All rights reserved. # 2081681 3

If the Conflicts Officer, Proxy Voting Sub-Committee, or the Chairperson of the Proxy Voting Sub- Committee determines that a proxy matter presents a material conflict of interest, or a material conflict of interest is otherwise determined to exist through the application of this Policy, CMIA will invoke one or more of the following conflict management practices: Causing the proxies to be voted in accordance with the recommendations of an independent third party (which generally will be CMIA s proxy voting agent); Causing the proxies to be delegated to an independent third party, which may include CMIA s proxy voting agent; or In unusual cases, with the client s consent and upon ample notice, forwarding the proxies to CMIA s clients so that they may vote the proxies directly. Proxy Voting Agent. In providing proxy voting administration services to clients, CMIA relies on the services of a designated third-party service provider. Disclosures. CMIA's Proxy Voting Policy and procedures are summarized in its Form ADV, which is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) and furnished to clients. In addition, CMIA will provide clients with a copy of its policies upon request. Advisory clients may obtain information on how their proxies were voted by CMIA. However, CMIA will not selectively disclose its investment company clients' proxy voting records to third parties. CMIA will provide proxy voting records of its registered investment company clients to such clients as their agents for disclosure on Form N-PX. Foreign Securities. While CMIA will make reasonable efforts to vote foreign securities on behalf of clients, voting proxies of companies not domiciled in the United States may involve greater effort and cost due to the variety of regulatory schemes and corporate practices. Certain non-u.s. countries require securities to be blocked prior to a vote. CMIA typically will not vote securities in shareblocking countries as the need for liquidity outweighs the benefit of voting. There may also be additional costs associated with voting in non-u.s. countries such that CMIA may determine that the cost of voting outweighs the potential benefit. Securities on Loan. Some of CMIA s clients may participate in securities lending programs. In these situations, in which CMIA is responsible for voting a client s proxies, CMIA will work with the client to determine whether there will be situations in which securities loaned out under these lending arrangements will be recalled for the purpose of exercising voting rights. In certain circumstances securities on loan may not be recalled due to clients preferences or due to circumstances beyond the control of CMIA. 2018 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. All rights reserved. # 2081681 4