UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Similar documents
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Interval Licensing LLC v. ebay, Inc. et al Doc. 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Case 1:12-cv GMS Document 60 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1904

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 160 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv WHA Document 193 Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 6

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv LHK Document 3322 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 7

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No TODD S. GLASSEY AND MICHAEL E. MCNEIL,

Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv RS Document 30 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 6

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E-FILED on 10/15/10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv ODW-RZ Document 66 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:791

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv SVW-PLA Document 21 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:204

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 486 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Civil Action No. 6:09-CV LED

Case MBK Doc 153 Filed 03/28/14 Entered 03/28/14 16:32:07 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the motion.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:10-cv EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv BJD-JRK Document 49 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 2283

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/28/ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Smith v. RJM Acquisitions Funding, LLC Doc. 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 90 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:12-cv VC Document46 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 5

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv Document 430 Filed in TXSD on 11/18/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:17-cv JG Doc #: 87 Filed: 01/11/19 1 of 5. PageID #: 1056 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 798 Filed 09/26/18 Page 1 of 7

Case5:10-cv JW Document72 Filed03/11/11 Page1 of 5

Case Doc 434 Filed 09/08/14 Entered 09/08/14 15:29:08 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:16-md VC Document 419 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 39 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

Case 3:12-cv VC Document 119 Filed 05/09/17 Page 1 of 13 (Counsel listed on signature page)

Terry Guerrero. PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY THE CASE (Doc. 23)

Case 6:14-cv PGB-KRS Document 229 Filed 12/10/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID 8774

Paper 24 Tel: Entered: October 9, 2018 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

1900 M Street, NW, Ste. 250, Washington, D.C

Case5:08-cv PSG Document519 Filed08/22/13 Page1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Inter Partes Review vs. District Court Litigation

Case 2:15-cv WCB Document 510 Filed 10/10/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 25541

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Ellen Matheson. PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY THE CASE (Doc. 100)

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Case abl Doc 164 Entered 05/02/14 12:43:53 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-4 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

American Navigation Systems, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD. et al Doc. 1 1 KALPANA SRINIVASAN (S.B. #0) 01 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 0 Los Angeles, California 00-0 Telephone: --0 Facsimile: --0 ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com BARRY BARNETT (Pro Hac Vice) 01 Main Street, Suite 0 Dallas, Texas Telephone: --00 Facsimile: -- bbarnett@susmangodfrey.com Attorneys for Plaintiff AMERICAN NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, INC. [Additional Counsel list on Signature Page] MAX L. TRIBBLE, JR. (Pro Hac Vice) JOSEPH S. GRINSTEIN (Pro Hac Vice) 00 Louisiana, Suite 0 Houston, Texas 00 Telephone: -1- Facsimile: -- mtribble@susmangodfrey.com jgrinstein@susmangodfrey.com PATRICK C. BAGEANT (Pro Hac Vice) Third Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, WA 1-000 Telephone: --0 Facsimile: -- pbageant@susmangodfrey.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION AMERICAN NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, INC., v. Plaintiff, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, Defendants. Case No. :-cv-0-jst STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW PROCEEDINGS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW PROCEEDINGS NO. :-CV-0-JST Dockets.Justia.com

1 Plaintiff American Navigation Systems, Inc. ( AmNav ) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively Samsung ) 1 hereby submit this stipulation and proposed order. WHEREAS, on March,, Samsung, Apple Inc. ( Apple ), and non-party Google Inc. filed two petitions with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ( PTO ) for administrative inter partes review of asserted U.S. Patent No.,0, ( Patent ), numbered IPR-00 and IPR-001. WHEREAS, Courts have inherent power to manage their dockets and stay proceedings, including the authority to order a stay pending conclusion of a PTO reexamination. Ethicon, Inc. v. Quigg, F.d, - (Fed. Cir. ) (internal citations omitted); Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc., No. cv 01 SI, WL, at * (N.D. Cal. Feb., ). WHEREAS, Samsung urges that it is in the interests of the Parties and the Court to stay the above-captioned case pending final resolution of the inter partes review petitions and associated proceedings pertaining to the Patent. WHEREAS, AmNav does not oppose a stay that would last until the PTO decides whether to institute inter partes review (Dkt. No. ). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between AmNav and Samsung, and subject to the approval of the Court, that: 1. The entirety of this case shall be stayed pending the decision by the PTO whether to institute inter partes review in response to the two petitions. If the PTO institutes inter partes review, the stay will continue through final resolution; in the event that the PTO has not instituted inter partes review within the timeframe set forth by U.S.C. (b), the stay will expire without further action by the Court. All remaining hearings and deadlines 1 Samsung Telecommunications America LLC merged into Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. as of January 1,, and no longer exists as a separate entity. Dkt. No.. Apple and AmNav are filing a substantively identical stipulation and proposed order in their case. - 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW PROCEEDINGS NO. :-CV-0-JST

set forth in the Initial Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. ) are therefore hereby vacated.. In the event the PTO (i) denies inter partes review on all petitioned grounds for any claim of the Patent, or (ii) dismisses an inter partes review proceeding in whole or in part following institution, AmNav intends to file a motion requesting that the Court lift this stay. All briefing and argument pertaining to such a motion shall be conducted according to the Federal Rules, Local Rules, and Standing Orders of this Court. 1

1 Dated: March, By: /s/ Barry Barnett KALPANA SRINIVASAN (S.B. #0) 01 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 0 Los Angeles, California 00-0 Telephone: --0 Facsimile: --0 ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com BARRY BARNETT (Pro Hac Vice) 01 Main Street, Suite 0 Dallas, Texas Telephone: --00 Facsimile: -- bbarnett@susmangodfrey.com MAX L. TRIBBLE, JR. (Pro Hac Vice) JOSEPH S. GRINSTEIN (Pro Hac Vice) 00 Louisiana, Suite 0 Houston, Texas 00 Telephone: -1- Facsimile: -- mtribble@susmangodfrey.com jgrinstein@susmangodfrey.com PATRICK C. BAGEANT (Pro Hac Vice) Third Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, WA 1-000 Telephone: --0 Facsimile: -- pbageant@susmangodfrey.com Attorneys for Plaintiff AMERICAN NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, INC. Dated: March, By: /s/ David S. Almeling MICHAEL K. PLIMACK (S.B. #) mplimack@cov.com CHRISTINE S. HASKETT (S.B. #0) chaskett@cov.com COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 1 Ph: () 1-000 Fax: () 1-01 DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #00) dsnyder@omm.com DAVID S. ALMELING (S.B. #) dalmeling@omm.com MARK LIANG (S.B. #) mliang@omm.com O MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, th Floor San Francisco, California 1- Tel: () -00 Fax: () -01 MISHIMA ALAM (S.B. #) malam@omm.com O MELVENY & MYERS LLP Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 00 Tel: () -00 Fax: () - Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil L.R. -1(i)(), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of its signatories. 1 Dated: March, By: /s/ David Almeling David Almeling

The above STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW PROCEEDINGS is Approved and all parties shall comply with its Provisions. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March, OMM_US:. IT IS SO ORDERED Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Judge Jon S. Tigar