BY:[) i~t:yt~y~j=r:if~~- - -

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv DN Document 47 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 13

Defendants Vance Norton, Anthoney Byron, Bevan Watkins, Troy Slaugh,

Case 2:75-cv BSJ Document 321 Filed 10/22/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Attorneys for Vernal City and Uintah County, Defendants

Case 2:15-cv DB Document 33 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 26

COMES NOW San Juan County and moves the Court to defer consideration

Case 2:12-cv RJS-EJF Document 137 Filed 05/05/17 Page 1 of 15

Case 2:17-cv DN Document 16 Filed 05/19/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv DB Document 2 Filed 12/03/13 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:12-cv RJS Document 75 Filed 12/28/12 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:16-cv DB Document 13 Filed 10/06/16 Page 1 of 8

. No i FILED. VANOE NORTON, GARY JENSEN, KEITH OAMPBELL, ANTHONEY BYRON, BEVAN WATKINS, and TROY SLAUGH,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. ) No. 1:02 CV 2156 (RWR) DEFENDANTS REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 2:16-cv CW Document 85 Filed 02/17/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv BSJ Document 56 Filed 09/05/18 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. ) No. 1:02 CV 2156 (RWR)

No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit RICHARD DOUGLAS HACKFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Case 2:12-cv RJS-EJF Document 139 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv LRH-WGC Document 92 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILLING OUT & SIGNING PETITION. These instructions are very simple, but please follow accordingly.

) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:12-cv- ) ) ) COME NOW Plaintiff the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes ("Tribes") by and

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA P.O. Box 1160 P.O. Box 702 Durant, OK Talihina, OK (580) (918)

Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO REFER TRIBAL MEMBERS CHARGED WITH MISDEMEANOR OFFENSES TO TRIBAL COURT FOR PROSECUTION

EXPUNGEMENT INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS COMPLETION OF THE PETITION

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UTE INDIAN TRIBE, MYTON,

Case 2:08-cv CW-DBP Document 7 Filed 11/11/08 Page 1 of 14

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT

MARTHA L. KING 1900 Plaza Drive Louisville, CO Telephone: (303) Direct: (303) Fax: (303)

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 2:15-cv DN-BCW Document 111 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 6:06-cv RAW Document 73 Filed in USDC ED/OK on 11/03/2009 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs-Appellees,

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION Case No. 1:17-cv MR-DLH

Case 2:07-cv GEB-DAD Document 1 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 11

Enrolled Copy H.B. 33

Case 5:17-cv JPB Document 29 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 972

Case 2:12-cv RJS-DBP Document 99 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 26

Case 2:10-cv CW -BCW Document 43 Filed 05/09/11 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 444 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 10

This opinion is subject to revision before publication in the Pacific Reporter. IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS. ----ooooo----

Case No ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:16-cv JEB Document 64 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:17-cv JPB Document 29 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 972

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:02-cv RWR Document 41 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:75-cv BSJ Document 470 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 53

Case 1:17-cv CSM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 09/03/2014 Page: 1 CASE NOS &

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 460 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:15-cr DN-DBP Document 1 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 7

Law & Order Code of the Fort McDermitt Tribe of Oregon & Nevada

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. RICHARD DEWRAY HACKFORD, et al. Plaintiff/Petitioner - Appellant, v. Case No.

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

Case 2:75-cv BSJ Document 294 Filed 08/25/13 Page 1 of 29

Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT MARK MARTIN, SECRETARY OF STATE INTERVENORS FIRST AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM

Case 3:16-cv LRH-WGC Document 119 Filed 06/01/17 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:14-cv EJL-CWD Document 12 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 235 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendants-Appellants.

Setting Aside Record of Arrest Oregon Revised Statute

THE PYRAMID LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE IS CONSIDERING TO AMEND ITS TRIBAL CONSTITUTION

Case 5:15-cv JLV Document 12 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 127 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 445 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 6

PRO SE GUIDE CHILD WELFARE APPEAL PROCEDURES

Case 4:18-cv HSG Document 73 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 11

Introduction. 1. In an effort to give native Americans greater control over their own affairs,

NATURE OF THE ACTION. enforcement of the Arbitration Award entered November 24, 2015 styled In the

Case 3:16-cv LRH-WGC Document 105 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING OIL AND GAS FACILITIES BUILT AND OPERATED ON NON INDIAN FEE LAND WITHIN THE SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN RESERVATION

Case 1:96-cv TFH-GMH Document 4234 Filed 11/08/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CASE 0:17-cv SRN-LIB Document 1 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 4:14-cv DLH-CSM Document 1 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 10

H. R. 356 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. MAY 16, 2013 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources AN ACT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 179 Filed 03/05/19 Page 1 of 8

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. District: 3 Appeal No. 2010AP v. Circuit Court Case No. 2008CV002234

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Filing a Civil Complaint

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AN AUTHORITIES

Case 5:07-cv C Document 27 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Typed or printed name ORDER Scheduling hearing to Identify Judgment Debtor s Property

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. HO-CHUNK, INC. et al., Appellant,

Case 2:12-cv DN-EJF Document 22 Filed 04/24/14 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

INFORMATION FOR FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1983 AND 1985

OBJECTION TO REFEREE S RECOMMENDED ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Cause No ; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al.

Transcription:

Case 2:17-cv-00321-DN Document 45 Filed 10/10/17 Page 1 of 5 Richita Hackford Pro se 820 East 300 North 113-10 Roosevelt, Utah 84066 Cell Phone (435) 724-1236 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION ZJll GCT I 0 t.:> 3: 3 (1 BY:[) i~t:yt~y~j=r:if~~- - - GRANT CHARLES, in his official capacity as Attorney for Roosevelt City, Utah, v. Plaintiff, UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINT AH and OURAY RESERVATION, BUSINESS COMMITTEE FOR THE UTE TRIBE OF THE UINTAH and OURAY RESERVATION; TRIBAL COURT FOR THE UTE TRIBE OF THE UINTAH and OURAY RESERVATION; WILLIAM L. REYNOLDS in his official capacity as Chief Judge of the Ute Tribal Court; and RICHITA HACKFORD, OPPOSITION TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS Case No. 2:17-cv-00321-DN Judge David Nuffer Defendants. Defendant "Hackford" is in "Opposition" to the Ute Tribal attorney's "Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss" as being used only as an attempt to unlawfully and illegally "escape" their part and knowing participation as legal representatives' involved in the State of Utah's 'fraud' surrounding the "Ute tribe" of unincorporated State Ute citizens. Any attempt for the Ute tribe attorneys to file a "Motion to Dismiss as Moot" in the near future, again is viewed by the defendant "Hackford" as an attempted act of continued fraud before the court. Defendant "Hackford" is legally protected under Executive Order 1861 and Congressional Act May 5, 1864 for the Uinta Valley Shoshone Tribe, Shoshone Uinta Valley Reservation (not a state Ute reservation) by federal Indian law and Congressional Acts. Any attempts to "Dismiss" 1

Case 2:17-cv-00321-DN Document 45 Filed 10/10/17 Page 2 of 5 before the court now is a federal violation of the defendant "Hack:fords" tribal/federal/ congressional/constitutional and civil rights legally protected under the 1934 IRA-Indian Reorganization Act as a member of the Uinta Valley Shoshone Tribe of Affiliated Ute Citizens, Shoshone Uinta Valley and Ouray Reservation. The "the tribe" of state Ute citizens legal representatives and or attorneys' are before the court under the defendant "Hackford's" filing in "the tribe/state Ute citizens/ tribal court" and by Plaintiff Grant Charles filing in this court against "the tribe" defendants and "Hackford" a named defendant the root and sole cause for said filing in this court by Plaintiff Grant Charles. That is now before the court under defendant "Hackford' s" verifiable claims of a long outstanding fraud by the State of Utah, state licensed attorneys' involving the states usage of the 'state Ute citizens' of which "the tribe" is a primary and legally "pertinent" state actor now involved before the court under acts of continued fraud, for the court to even remotely entertain a dismissal of the case before the court under continued acts being fraudulent presented before a federal court by both parties involved herein (Plaintiff Grant Charles and the "Ute tribe, the tribe") would be a legal injustice to the federal Indian defendant "Hackford" causing a continuation of the 'long suffering' and 'harm' by the continuance of the 'state actors' herein violating "Hackford's" tribal/federal/congressional/constitutional and civil rights. This case must continue forward defendant "Hackford" ask the United States to 'legally enjoin' in this case as the United States uninformed absence risk duplicative litigation as a direct result of the United States "uninformed absence". The "United States is an Indispensable Party to be Enjoined" before the court. This case is an issue of 'fraud' wherein the United States definitely retains the primary legal interest in responding to both state parties herein, as to the fraudulent allegations being presented before the court by Plaintiff Grant Charles, and the 2

Case 2:17-cv-00321-DN Document 45 Filed 10/10/17 Page 3 of 5 collective Utah state citizens as "the tribe" both parties claims before the court are so 'outlandish' as being unlawfully promoted within the federally recognized Shoshone Uinta Valley and Ouray Reservation boundaries a federally recognized Shoshone Indian Reservation under the State ofutah's allegations that most definitely has involved the BIA-Bureau oflndian Affairs a U.S. government agency by supporting and promoting the State of Utah's state Ute citizens "Ute tribe" as a "federal tribe". The United States most assuredly must enjoin to protect the United States "interest" as the United States has the primary interest, in defeating none Indian 'state actors' under the BIA- Bureau of Indians as a 'federally recognized Ute tribe" before the court. Therefore "Hackford" request the United States to be enjoin in this case. Dated this day October 6, 2017 JiJJz~,.ti~ cl Richita Hackford 820 E 300 N 113-10 Roosevelt, UT 84066 Cell# (435) 724-1236 3

Case 2:17-cv-00321-DN Document 45 Filed 10/10/17 Page 4 of 5 Certificate of Service I, Richita Hacl("ford hereby certify that on October 6, 2017, I did by U.S. Postal Service, Mail a copy of my "Opposition to Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss" to the following: Judge David Nuffer United States District Court District ofutah, Central Division Office of the Clerk United States Courthouse 351 South West Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 1 original with signature and 1 copy page 1 to be stamped filed & returned in pre~ paid self-addressed envelope. J. Preston Stieff ( 4 7 64) J. Preston Stieff Law Offices 11 0 South Regent Street, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 and to JeffreyS. Rasmussen (Pro Hac Vice) Alvina L. Earnhart (Pro Hac Vice) FREDERICKS PEEBLES & MORGAN, LLP 1900 Plaza Drive Loiosville, CO 80027 Ute Indian Tribe Business Committee Chairman Luke Duncan PO Box 190 Fort Duchesne, Utah 84026 Ute Indian Tribal Court Chief Judge William Reynolds PO Box 190 Fort Duchesne, Utah 84026 Terry L. Pechota Federal Circuit Judge Pechota Law Office 1617 Sheridan Lake Rd Rapid City, South Dakota 57702 Continues next page 4

Case 2:17-cv-00321-DN Document 45 Filed 10/10/17 Page 5 of 5 Jesse C. Trentadue (#4961) Britton R. Butterfield ( # 1315 8) Suitter Axland, PLLC 8 East Broadway, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Grant Charles c/o Suitter Axland, PLLC Roosevelt City Attorney 255 South State Street Roosevelt, Utah 84066 United States Department of Justice Tracy Toulou, Director Office of Tribal Justice Room 2318, RFK Main Justice Building 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-001 United States Department of Justice US Attorney General, Jeff Sessions 950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-001 5