ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS ADJUNCT PROFESSOR PAUL BARTLETT, JR LA TROBE UNIVERSITY, Melbourne, Australia

Similar documents
UNITED STATES ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS

Antitrust Syllabus (construction in progress)

ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY AND PROCEDURE

ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY, AND PROCEDURE. Cases, Materials, Problems. Seventh Edition

Copyright 2014 Carolina Academic Press, LLC. All rights reserved. ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY, AND PROCEDURE: CASES, MATERIALS, PROBLEMS SEVENTH EDITION

Syllabus -- Franchise and Distribution Law/Professor Devlin/Fall 2008

Lecture Notes: Industrial Organization in Context (to be distributed).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement

The typical lawyer in Colorado does not make his or her living

Anglo-American Law. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. V. Psks, Inc., Dba Kay s Kloset, Kay s Shoes. Aykut ÖZDEMİR* * Attorney at law.

Graduate Industrial Organization Some Notes on Antitrust.

National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma and University of Georgia Athletic Association

Antitrust Law and Economic Theory: Finding a Balance

SOME PREDICTIONS ABOUT FUTURE ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT

United States ELEANOR M. FOX AND ROBERT PITOFSKY. Goals of US Competition Policy. Economic and Noneconomic Goals

"JUSTICE" AND OTHER NON-ECONOMIC GOALS OF ANTITRUST Louis B. ScHwA-rz [

10 TH ANNUAL HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER S ROUNDTABLE VBA HEALTH LAW SECTION

The Scope of the Insurance Industry's Sherman Act Exemption: New Considerations

A RELUCTANT STANDARD-BEARER FOR CHICAGO SCHOOL ANTITRUST

The Fractured Unity of Antitrust Law and the Antitrust Jurisprudence of Justice

Legal Aspects of Competitive Construction Market Behavior-An Assessment in Support of VDOT's Antitrust Monitoring and Detection Effort

The Abiding Influence of The Antitrust Paradox: An Essay in Honor of Robert H. Bork

ANTITRUST LAW: POLICY AND PRACTICE Fourth Edition

Legal Methodology in Antitrust Law

Refusals to Deal: The Aftermath of Parke, Davis and the Vitality of the Colgate Doctrine

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States

What Should Be Next at the Supreme Court?

A Different Approach to Antimonopolization Enforcement for the Obama Admininstration

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

COMMENTS OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTIONS OF ANTITRUST LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES LAW

Congressional Digital Collection Supporting Research and Education. Area of Practice: Antitrust Law

THE COMMON LAW OF SECTION 2: IS IT STILL ALIVE AND WELL?

Facts That Shed Light on Intent of Single-Firm Refusals to Deal: Comparative Review of the United States and the Republic of Korea Jurisprudence

The Grinnell Test of Monopolization Sounds a False Alarm: Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.

Does Antitrust Have a Comparative Advantage?

certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit

Anti-Trust Law - Applicability of Section 7 of the Clayton Act to Bank Mergers - United States v. Philadelphia National Bank, 374 U.S.

PARALEGAL INSTITUTE, INC., Plaintiff, against AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, Defendant. No. 77 C 1478

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

AN T I T R U S T C H A L L E N G E S T O

Handbook Of The Law Of Antitrust. By Lawrence A. Sullivan, St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Company

Why Do Bad Antitrust Decisions Sometimes Make Good Law? The Alcoa and Brown Shoe Examples

STATEMENT OF CHARLES P. BAKER CHAIR ABA SECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW. on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. before the SUBCOMMITTEE

1 Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer 2 Distributor Distributor Distributor Distributor Distributor Distributor 3 Consumers

Antitrust, Regulatory Harm, and Economic Liberty

The Rule of Reason After Leegin: Reconsidering the Use of Economic Analysis in the Antitrust Arena

Antitrust Regulation And Problems Of Oligopoly Structure: Helix Milling Co. V. Terminal Flour Mills Co., 523 F.2D 1317 (9Th Cir. 1975).

INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS: CURRENT TRENDS & ISSUES. By David B. Eberhardt and John E. McCann, Jr.

Cleveland State University. Matthew T. Polito

State Regulation of Resale Price Maintenance on the Internet: The Constitutional Problems with the 2009 Amendment to the Maryland Antitrust Act

Protest Boycotts as Restraints of Trade under the Sherman Act: A Proposed Standard

LEGAL UPDATE MICROSOFT: EXCLUSIVE DEALING UNDER SECTION 1 OF THE SHERMAN ACT: A NEW STANDARD? Shannon A. Keyes

Determination of the Relevant Product Market

The Expansion of Horizontal Merger Defenses After General Dynamics: A Suggested Reconsideration of Sherman Act Principles

A New Chapter in Antitrust Law: The Second Circuit's Decision in United States v. Apple Determines Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy Per Se Illegal

UNITED STATES v. SEALY, INC.

NCAA v. Board of Regents: Supreme Court Intercepts Per Se Rule and Rule of Reason

Horizontal Territorial Restraints And The Per Se Rule

The Antitrust Implications of Airline Deregulation

Introduction into US business law VIII FS 2017

Antitrust and Intellectual Property

ANTITRUST DECISIONS OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, 1967 TO 2007

The Facial Unreasonableness Theory: Filling the Void Between Per Se and Rule of Reason

Government & Global Trade Post-Inauguration Webinar Series

Antitrust--Clayton Act--Section 7 Restrictions Held Applicable to Joint Ventures (United States v. Penn-Olin Chem. Co., 378 U.S.

Cleveland State University. Anthony J. Lazzaro

Lessons ofauo: Application of the Per Se Rule Precluded Evaluation of the Reasons for, and Impact of Competitor Meetings

Ridding the Law of Outdated Statutory Exemptions to Antitrust Law: A Proposal for Reform

Case 4:14-cr PJH Document 212 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 22

ANTI-TRUST: COURT OF APPEALS APPLIES BROWN SHOE INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT TO PROHIBIT VERTICAL MERGER

What, Never? Well, Hardly Ever : Strict Antitrust Scrutiny as an Alternative to Per Se Antitrust Illegality, 38 Hastings L.J.

Reasoning Per Se and Horizontal Price Fixing: An Emerging Trend in Antitrust Litigation?

3.2 Antitrust Sherman Act (Section 1, Per Se Violation) Tying Agreement Defense Of Justification

Constitutional Law -- Sherman Act -- Cross- Elasticity in Determining Percentage of Market Control

Motion Picture Split Agreements: An Antitrust Analysis

Antitrust Law - The Per Se Rule - Naked Horizontal Territorial Restraints Held to Be Illegal Per Se

CRS Report for Congress

MOVING BEYOND CARICATURE AND CHARACTERIZATION: THE MODERN RULE OF REASON IN PRACTICE

United States Court of Appeals

American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League: Justice Stevens Last Twinkling of an Eye

CANADIAN OIL AND GAS COMPANIES WHAT CANADIAN OIL AND GAS COMPANIES NEED TO KNOW ABOUT U.S. ANTITRUST LAWS THERESA J. ARNOLD.

NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma: Has the Supreme Court Abrogated the Per Se Rule of Antitrust Analysis

12/6/ :35:59 AM

Whither Price Squeeze Antitrust?

Antitrust - Repudiation of the Intraenterprise Conspiracy Doctrine - Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.

If Per Se Is Dying, Why Not in TV Tying? A Case for Adopting the Rule of Reason Standard in Television Block- Booking Arrangements

Patents, Tying and Market Power: The Implications of ITW v. Independent Ink for Antitrust Claims Against IP Owners

OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 57 WINTER 2004 NUMBER 4 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN OKLAHOMA ANTITRUST LAW

The Interface between Intellectual Property Law and Competition Law in the North American Context

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

Marquette Law Review. James H. Gormley Jr. Volume 62 Issue 2 Winter Article 5

Developments in Section Two of the Sherman Act

Antitrust More than a Century After Sherman: Why Protecting Competitors Promotes Competition More than Economically Efficient Mergers

JUDGE NEIL GORSUCH'S POTENTIAL IMPACT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANTITRUST LAW

Methodist Health Services Corporation v. OSF Healthcare System d/b/a Saint Francis Medical Center Doc. 131

A Survey of the Antitrust Law of Exclusive Agreements

CPI Antitrust Chronicle December 2013 (1)

WikiLeaks Document Release

Transcription:

To: Students, Antitrust Law And Economics Greetings and welcome to the class. Regarding the class syllabus, the cases which are in bold print are for student class recitation. In view of time constraints, and to facilitate efficiency, you may agree in advance among yourselves as to who will recite each case assigned (perhaps in an alphabetical fashion). As to recitation, I recommend the following format: Statement of the facts; who are the parties; what is/are the issue(s) to be decided; the contentions/arguments of the parties; the holding of the Court; the reasoning of the Court; and the lesson of law derived from the case. Best regards, Professor Paul Bartlett, Jr. UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER June, 2013 REQUIRED TEXT: ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS ADJUNCT PROFESSOR PAUL BARTLETT, JR LA TROBE UNIVERSITY, Melbourne, Australia Page 1 of 6

Pitofsky, Goldschmid and Wood, Trade Regulation, 6 th edition, 2010, with the 2011 Supplement (University Casebook Series, Foundation Press) Assigned Readings from Pitofsky et. al.: Chapter 1. (Lecture) The Objectives and Origins of Antitrust Law (pp. 1-53) Section 1. The Goals of Antitrust Policy 1. The Role of Competition and Alternatives to Competitive Markets 2. The Sherman Act and Comparative Legislation 2. The Historical Sources of Antitrust, Legislative History, and Early Developments 1. The Early Law on Monopoly and Contracts in Restraint of Trade 2. The Sherman Act - Some Legislative History 3. Early Development of Legal Doctrine Chapter II. (Lecture) Institutional Framework of Antitrust Policy (pp. 54-111) 1. The Three Level Antitrust Enforcement Pattern 1. Sources of Antitrust Litigation 2. Special Issues Related to Enforcement by the Federal Agencies 3. Special Issue Related to Private Enforcement Reiter v. Sonotone Blue Shield v. McCready Hawaii v. Standard Oil Associated General Contractors v. California State Council Illinois Brick v. Illinois California v. Arc America 4. Special Issues Related to the Big Case 2. The Limits of Antitrust 1. Government Ownership of the Means of Production 2. Regulated Industries 3. Interstate and Foreign Commerce 4. Additional Exemptions, Exclusions, and other Aspects of Economic Control Page 2 of 6

Chapter III Market Structure and a First Look at the Problem of Monopoly Power (pp. 112-176) 1. Monopolization and the Problem of Market Definition U.S. v. Alcoa U.S. v. Du Pont (Cellophane) U.S. v. Grinnell Note on Market Power and Consumer Loss (Lecture) Chapter IV Competitor Collaboration on Price Fixing and Division of Markets (pp. 177-246; 271-306) 1. Conspiracy in Theory and Action 2. Development of the Per Se Rule on Price Fixing U.S. v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. Chicago Board of Trade v. U.S. Appalachian Coals, Inc. v. U.S. U.S. v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., Inc. 3. Characterization Questions and Other Issues Broadcast Music Inc, v. Columbia Broadcasting Systems, Inc. NCAA v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma Texaco Inc. v. Dagher 4. Division of Territories and Some Other Horizontal Restraints Timken, General Motors, and Sealy (Lecture) U.S. v. Topco Associates, Inc. Palmer v. Barbri Chapter V Group Refusals to Deal and Joint Ventures (pp. 307-385) 1. Refusals to Deal F.O.G.A. v. FTC Klor s Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Rambus v. FTC Northwest Wholesale Stationers v. Pacific Stationary Page 3 of 6

FTC v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association 2. Joint Ventures Revisited: Issues of Membership and Access Associated Press v. U.S. 3. Efforts to Influence Government Action (Lecture) Columbia v. Onmi Outdoor Advertising (Lecture) Chapter VI Market Concentration, Conspiracy and the Antitrust Laws (pp. 469-506; 588-604) 1. Note on Oligopoly (469) 2. Inference of Agreement as a Legal Building Block(471) Theatre Enterprises v. Paramount Film (479) Toys R Us, Inc. v. FTC (484) Todd v. Exxon Corporation (525) In re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation (558) U.S. v. Container Corp. (p. 588) U.S. v. Gypsum (Lecture) 3. Intra-Enterprise Conspiracy (p. 613) Copperweld v. Independence Tube Corp. (Lecture) American Needle v. NFL (Supplement, p. 1) Chapter VII Vertical Restraints on Competition (pp. 606-719)) 1. The Economics of Vertical Restraints 2. The Interplay of Common Law and Antitrust Laws 1. Vertical Price Fixing Dr. Miles v. John D. Park & Sons Co. (Lecture) State Oil v. Khan Leegin v. PSKS Note on Resale Price Maintenance and the Fair Trade Laws 2. Customer and Territorial Restraints Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania 3. Vertical Restraints and Refusal to Deal U.S. v. Colgate Co. U.S. v. Parke, Davis & Co.(Lecture) Page 4 of 6

Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp. Chapter VIII Additional Limitations on a Single Firm Exercising Market Power (pp. 721-919) 1. Monopoly Conduct Revisited Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko United States v. Microsoft (767) 2. Attempt to Monopolize (Lecture) Lorain Journal v. United States Spectrum Sports v. McQuillan 3. Predatory Price Cutting (Lecture) Brooke Group v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco United States v. AMR Corp., American Airlines, Inc. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber 4. Tying Arrangements Clayton Act, Section 3 International Salt Co. v. United States Jefferson Parish Hospital v. Hyde Eastman Kodak v. Image Technical Services (Lecture) Chapter IX Mergers (pp. 965-1168) 1. Background on Early Merger Law and the Amendment of Section 7 of the Clayton Act in 1950 Clayton Act, Section 7 2. Proscribed Effect in Horizontal Mergers U.S. v. Philadelphia National Bank U.S. v. Alcoa; U.S. v. Pabst Brewing; U.S. v. Von s Grocery Hospital Corporation of America v. FTC Page 5 of 6

U.S. Department of Justice and FTC Joint Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 2010 (Supplement, p. 3) FTC v. Whole Foods 3. Joint Ventures, Potential Competition, and Conglomerate Mergers U.S. v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co. Texaco v. Dagher FTC v. Procter & Gamble Co. FTC v. Consolidated Foods 4. Integration Through Vertical Merger U.S. v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. Brown Shoe Co. v. U.S. Page 6 of 6