VOLUNTARY REPATRIATION UPDATE 13,274 AFGHAN REFUGEES RETURNED SINCE JANUARY 2018

Similar documents
AFGHANISTAN VOLUNTARY REPATRIATION UPDATE JANUARY ,699 AFGHAN REFUGEES RETURNED IN 2018

AFGHANISTAN VOLUNTARY REPATRIATION UPDATE NOVEMBER ,592 AFGHAN REFUGEES RETURNED SINCE JANUARY 2017

UNHCR Afghanistan Voluntary Repatriation

VOLUNTARY RETURN TO AFGHANISTAN

UNHCR THEMATIC UPDATE

UNHCR THEMATIC UPDATE

UNHCR THEMATIC UPDATE

UNHCR AFGHANISTAN UPDATE ON VOLREP AND BORDER MONITORING VOLUNTARY RETURN TO AFGHANISTAN. December 2012

UNHCR THEMATIC UPDATE

VOLUNTARY RETURN TO AFGHANISTAN

RETURN OF UNDOCUMENTED AFGHANS

RETURN OF UNDOCUMENTED AFGHANS

UNHCR Afghanistan. Voluntary Repatriation to Afghanistan Key Findings of UNHCR Return Monitoring, 01 January 31 December 2015

Afghanistan As at 31 July 2018*

Afghanistan. UNHCR Global Report

2018 Planning summary

Undocumented Afghan Returns from Iran & Pakistan January to December 2015

RETURN OF UNDOCUMENTED AFGHANS

RETURN OF UNDOCUMENTED AFGHANS

Afghanistan. Working environment. Total requirements: USD 54,347,491. The context

RETURN OF UNDOCUMENTED AFGHANS

RETURN OF UNDOCUMENTED AFGHANS

RETURN OF UNDOCUMENTED AFGHANS

Afghanistan. Operational highlights. Persons of concern

2016 Planning summary

RETURN OF UNDOCUMENTED AFGHANS

RETURN OF UNDOCUMENTED AFGHANS

RETURN OF UNDOCUMENTED AFGHANS

Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. Ministry of Refugees and Repatriation. Return and Reintegration Response Plan

PROJECTED POPULATION OF CONCERN IN 2017 FUNDING (AS OF 5 DECEMBER 2017) USD M 450,000. Refugees and asylumseekers 350 Unfunded 64% 87.

BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT

Returnees and Refugees Afghanistan and Neighbouring Countries

2018 Planning summary

AFGHANISTAN. Overview. Operational highlights

UNHCR Pakistan Refugee Operation 2014

Afghanistan. Working environment. Main objectives. Recent developments. Planning figures. Total requirements: USD 76,209,468

Afghanistan. Main Objectives

2016 Planning summary

Islamic Republic of Pakistan 31 March 2018

BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT

Islamic Republic of Pakistan *31 May 2018

Islamic Republic of Pakistan *31 July 2018

BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT

Joint Programme on Voluntary Repatriation of Afghan Refugees. Free of Charge June 2011 RETURN. Information Update Mass Information Committee

BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT

Planning figures. Afghanistan 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 Asylum-seekers Somalia Various

AFGHANISTAN. Overview Working environment

PAGE 1 OF 4 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE EMERGENCY OPERATION , AFGHANISTAN- HUMANITARIAN SUPPORT TO AFGHANS RETURNEES FROM PAKISTAN

U HCR-WFP Joint Funding Proposal to the Government of Italy, General Directorate for Development Cooperation

The Government of the Netherlands, the Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan and UNHCR hereinafter referred to as the Parties,

Joint Programme on Voluntary Repatriation of Afghan Refugeesand Displaced Persons. Free of Charge December 2010 RETURN

Sri Lanka. Persons of concern

Historical unit prices - Super - Australian Shares

AFGHANISTAN - COMPLEX EMERGENCY

Pakistan. Main objectives. Total requirements: USD 23,327,170

Afghanistan. Main objectives. Total requirements: USD 60,978,721

HIGHLIGHTS. Population of concern. Somali returnees. Yemeni prima facie refugees. Third Country Nationals Population of concern

CONFLICT-INDUCED INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT MONTHLY UPDATE

Afghanistan. Working environment. The context. The needs

2/15/2019 1/25/2019 2/1/2019 2/8/2019 2/15/2019 1/25/2019

PAKISTAN - COMPLEX EMERGENCY

Pakistan. Operational highlights. Persons of concern

Overview of UNHCR s operations in Asia and the Pacific

Bruxelles, le 14 November 2001

July 25, The Honorable John F. Kerry Secretary of State. The Honorable Gayle E. Smith Administrator, U.S. Agency for International Development

Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. Policy Framework for Returnees and IDPs

AFGHANISTAN PROTECTION CLUSTER HOUSING, LAND and PROPERTY TASK FORCE. Forced Eviction Roundtable 12 October 2012 Final Report

Enhanced Voluntary Return and Reintegration Package for Afghan Refugees (EVRRP)

DRC Afghanistan. Accountability Framework (AF)

Sri Lanka. Operational highlights. Working environment. Persons of concern

RESEARCH STUDY ON INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS IN URBAN SETTINGS

DROUGHT RESPONSE HIGHLIGHTS HERAT SITUATION REPORT WEEKLY TRENDS HERAT + BADGHIS 1. FEBRUARY. 2019

2015 Humanitarian Response Plan 1 AFGHANISTAN 2015 HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

HIGHLIGHTS. Population of concern. Somali returnees. Yemeni prima facie refugees. Third Country Nationals Population of concern

HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME UPDATE

Pakistan. Operational highlights. Working environment. Achievement and impact. Main objectives

2/1/2019 1/18/2019 2/8/2019 1/25/2019 2/1/2019 2/8/2019 1/18/2019 1/25/2019

29 March - 11 April 2016 HIGHLIGHTS. Population of concern. Somali returnees. Yemeni prima facie refugees. Third Country Nationals

IOM Afghanistan North Waziristan Displacement Response

PAKISTAN - COMPLEX EMERGENCY

PAKISTAN I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Tariff 9900: OHD Percentage Based Fuel Cost Adjustment Historical Schedule ( )

Sri Lanka. Pakistan Myanmar Various Refugees

Voluntary Repatriation to Afghanistan. UNHCR Pakistan

Update on UNHCR s operations in Asia and the Pacific

Afghanistan: Amnesty International s recommendations regarding refugee returns

Northern Afghanistan Humanitarian Regional Team Meeting. UNICEF Mazar-e-Sharif on 25 January Draft Minutes

Islamic Republic of Iran

WORKING ENVIRONMENT. A convoy of trucks carrying cement and sand arrives at the Government Agent s office, Oddusudan, Mullaitivu district, northeast

150,000,000 9,300,000 6,500,000 4,100,000 4,300, ,000, Appeal Summary. Syria $68,137,610. Regional $81,828,836

Major trends in By the end of 2014, the IDP Task Forces in Afghanistan had profiled some 190,000 individuals.

Voluntary Repatriation to Afghanistan 2004

WORKING ENVIRONMENT UNHCR / S. SAMBUTUAN

DRC Afghanistan. Accountability Framework (AF) April 2016

HOPE on the HORIZON! Media Guide to Afghanistan s National Policy on Internal Displacement

The Afghanistan SSAR Country Portfolio

PAKISTAN. Overview. Working environment GLOBAL APPEAL 2015 UPDATE

Foreword from the Chief of Mission

Unaccompanied minors in Denmark - definition by authorities

Sri Lanka. Operational highlights. Working environment. Persons of concern

Transcription:

SEPTEMBER 2018 AFGHANISTAN VOLUNTARY REPATRIATION UPDATE 13,274 AFGHAN REFUGEES RETURNED SINCE JANUARY 2018 In September 2018, UNHCR facilitated the return to Afghanistan of a total of 1,675 Afghan refugees, including 1,434 from Pakistan and 241 from Iran. This figure is 2 higher than 1,374 refugees who returned in August. So far, the return figure from Pakistan is substantially (77%) low compared to the 50,641 refugees who returned during the same period in 2017. There are no major changes in the return trends from Iran and other countries. With improved protection and socio-economic conditions in Pakistan, including extension of PoR cards until 30 June Returnee verification before cash grant distribution Kabul Encashment Center Jul 2018 - UNHCR/ M. Haroon 2019, and ongoing security concerns in Afghanistan, returns for the year are likely to remain lower than initially expected. UNHCR / 10 October 2018 1

Process of return UNHCR s Voluntary Repatriation Centres (VRCs) in the countries of asylum are processing refugees wanting to return to Afghanistan and issue a Voluntary Repatriation Form (VRF) for each family. Two VRCs are located in Pakistan: Azakhel in Peshawar (KPK) and Baleli in Quetta (Baluchistan). Repatriation from Iran is facilitated through all UNHCR Offices, including the VRC in Soleimankhani. Upon return to Afghanistan, returnees are assisted at four Encashment Centers (ECs) located in Kabul, Samarkhel (Nangarhar), Jamal Mayna (Kandahar) and Herat. easy contact with returning refugees in return areas when UNHCR and partners conduct return monitoring through phone survey. At the ECs, UNHCR and Ministry/Directorate of Refugees and Repatriation (MoRR/DoRRs) also conduct returnee monitoring (household level) and identify persons with specific needs to refer to service providers for assessment and potential assistance. Mine risk education is important as a protection intervention for awareness of the threats associated with mines, improvised explosive devices (IED) and unexploded ordnance to prevent injury and loss of life, particularly for those returning to rural areas. At the ECs all Afghan returnees with a valid VRF receive a grant of approximately USD 200 per person based on their area of origin to support returnees immediate humanitarian needs. Besides cash grants, a range of inter-agency services including basic health care and vaccinations (Ministry of Public Health supported by WHO and UNICEF), mine risk awareness (Danish Demining Group supported by UNMAS), back to school campaign (UNICEF/Ministry of Education), and a transit facility for overnight accommodation (UNHCR/MoRR) are also provided for returning refugees. Returnees are also provided with a valid sim card (by Afghan Wireless Communication Company) provided free of charge. UNHCR also provide air time USD 2 per month for 3 months. This is aimed to ensure returnees access to communication services. Sim card distribution will also facilitate All returnees are provided with multi-purpose cash grant (an average of USD 200 per person) at 4 Encashment centers. UNHCR s repatriation cash grants to refugee returnees are intended to prevent, reduce, and respond to immediate protection risks and vulnerabilities upon return to Afghanistan. The cash grant is a key protection tool that provides returnees with the means to meet their immediate humanitarian needs, as well as transportation costs. Between January and September 2018, a total of 13,274 Afghan refugees returned to Afghanistan under UNHCR s facilitated repatriation program, with the majority from Pakistan (11,735) followed by a smaller number from Iran (1,428), Tajikistan (59) and India (52). This is 74% lower than 51,801 Afghans who returned during the same period in 2017. This is largely due to improvements in the protection situation in Pakistan including extension of PoR cards until 30 June 2019. Depending on overall situation in Pakistan the return trend is likely to remain low. UNHCR / 10 October 2018 2

Returnee Monitoring Exit interviews EC monitoring Phone surveys Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) in communities Returnee children receiving mine awareness Kabul EC. UNHCR/ M. Haroon, July 2018 asylum, continuing with the Encashment Centre Monitoring, conducted upon arrival to Afghanistan which is followed up 1-6 months later with a phone survey. Additionally, UNHCR includes refugee returnees as a population group into its protection monitoring at the community level. Returnee monitoring is an inherent part of the protection monitoring carried out by UNHCR in Afghanistan. UNHCR monitors refugee returnees through the entire process of voluntary repatriation: beginning with an interview at the Voluntary Repatriation Centre in the country of Interviewee age/sex 9 87% Female Male 0% 0% 7% 1 0-4 12-17 18-59 60+ ENCASHMENT CENTRE (EC) MONITORING Encashment Centre monitoring is conducted with refugee returnees upon their arrival to Afghanistan. It aims at identifying return trends; an assessment of the voluntariness of return, reasons for the decision to return (in Pakistan/Iran to Afghanistan), the level of information that returnees received in countries of asylum to make a well-informed choice to return home, and conditions and respect for the basic rights in the country of asylum. It also assists to detect harassment and violations that should be brought to the attention of responsible authorities. Between 1 January and 30 September 2018, a total of 1,216 households were interviewed including 611 male and 605 female respondents. Interviewees were selected randomly from the returning families at the ECs, being the first point of contact in Afghanistan. Post-return monitoring UNHCR uses mobile phone surveys to collect real-time data from returnee population one to six months after the returnees have settled in communities. It is supplemented with interviews with Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and general Afghan population for comparison purposes. This provides UNHCR an unparalleled perspective on current population mobility trend and actionable data regarding assistance needs, protection risks and vulnerability, as well as comparative information from a broader crosssection of the population. In July 2017, UNHCR contracted Orange Door Research and Viamo (former VOTO mobile) to conduct phone surveys with returnees, IDPs and the general population. Between August 2017 and January, 2018, a total of 14,095 household level interviews were carried out including 4,003 returnee surveys, 6,097 IDPs and 3,995 general population surveys. The findings are presented in a final report (https://data2.unhcr.org/en/country/afg) UNHCR / 10 October 2018 3

Return Trends 60% (7,988) returned to Kabul, Nangarhar, Sar-e-Pul, Kunduz and Logar provinces. Kabul and Nangarhar remain among the top five provinces of return since 2002. Since 2002 UNHCR facilitated the return of over 5.2M Afghan refugees mainly from neighboring host countries (Pakistan and Iran). Kabul Nangarhar Sar-e-Pul Kunduz Logar Paktya Herat Kandahar Baghlan Laghman Comparison of recorded province of destination with province of origin Top 10 province - 01 Jan - 30 Sep 2018 785 742 728 148 579 542 530 603 422 541 398 1,307 1,099 1,125 1,104 1,320 1,485 1,588 1,880 Origin 3,482 Intended destination Monthly Return Trends from Pakistan and Iran - 01 January 2016-30 Sep 2018 150,000 120,000 90,000 2016 2017 2018 60,000 30,000 0 1,834,537 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual volrep trend from Pakistan, Iran and other countries to Afghanistan 03 Mar 2002-30 Sep 2018 13,274 58,817 372,577 58,460 16,995 38,766 94,556 67,962 112,968 54,552 278,484 365,410 139,804 514,090 761,122 475,639 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 UNHCR / 10 October 2018 4

56% of interviewed Afghan refugees return to their province of origin, while the remaining 44% do not. Nearly 60% of refugees returned after spending over 3 decades in exile. 2 of returned refugees from Pakistan and 16% from Iran were born in exile. Over 90% of the interviewed returnees stated that they had sufficient information to make an informed decision prior to the return. Information mainly obtained through Afghan communities and visits to Afghanistan. Reasons for not returning to the province of origin Perceived insecurity To re-unite with relatives Lack of land Lack of income opportunities Lack of housing/ shelter Lack of basic services Personal dispute Lack of school 0.7% 0.6% 1.9% 5.6% 17.6% 15.9% 12.5% 10. 35.0% Displacement period Awareness about cash grant 53% 3 2 16% 5 13% 1 Pakistan Iran 0% 0% Male Female 2 54% 78% 46% No Yes Communist Born in CoA Mujahedin regime regime Taliban regime Transitional Present government government Sources of Information on Place of Origin and VolRep Program From the Afghan community 64.8% 88.7% Sources of information Visited Afghanistan Through Media Had no information Through UNHCR 1.7% 1. 2. 0.7% 0.7% 0.6% 3.8% 24.3% Place of Origin VolRep Operation sources 8.3% 3.0% UNHCR / 10 October 2018 5

Reasons for Return Over 1,070 newly arrived returnees from Pakistan were interviewed during monitoring in 2018. The main reasons for leaving Pakistan include: a lack of employment opportunities; stricter border controls resulting in separation of families; high cost of living and uncertainty related to the PoR cards extension. 3% of interviewed returnees reported that they or their relatives were arrested in Pakistan within the last year. Reasons for leaving Pakistan - 2018 No employment opportunities 36% Strict border entry requirements 24% High costs of living / high rent 10% Uncertainty related to the PoR cards extension 7% No added protection value of PoR card Fear of arrest and/ or deportation Camp / settlement closures or relocation campaigns Seasonal weather conditions Undocumented family members facing issues / troubles Abuse by police or state authorities 3% 13% Reasons for leaving Pakistan - 2017 No employment opportunities 30% Strict border entry requirements 2 Abuse by police or state authorities 16% High costs of living / high rent Fear of arrest and/ or deportation 9% 8% Uncertainty related to the PoR cards extension No added protection value of PoR card Eviction notice by landlord, police, army Discrimination and/ or harassment Undocumented family members facing issues / troubles 9% The overall protection/asylum conditions in Pakistan has improved since November 2016. Main reasons of return during 2017 and 2018 are almost the same; lack of employment and strict border controls resulting in separation of families were mentioned as the main reasons influenced refugees decision to return. UNHCR / 10 October 2018 6

Incentives for returning to Afghanistan include reunification with family members/relatives; a perception of increased employment opportunities; offers of land allocation, including government assurances of house/land through the Gul Watan campaign 1 ; UNHCR assistance package; and a perceived improvement in the security situation. Reasons for return to Afghanistan 2018 Reunion with family / relatives in Afghanistan 30% Employment opportunities 2 UNHCR's assistance package 16% Land allocation scheme and/or shelter program 15% Improvement in security situation 6% Afghan government Gul Watan campaign 5% 5% Reasons for return to Afghanistan 2017 Land allocation scheme and/or shelter program Improvement in security situation Employment opportunities 20% 19% 20% Reunion with family / relatives in Afghanistan 17% UNHCR's assistance package 10% No longer have a fear of persecution 6% Afghan government Gul Watan campaign 4% 3% 1 Khpal Watan, Gul Watan ("My country, my beautiful country") is the Government of Afghanistan's Ministry of Refugees and Repatriation's campaign launched in July 2016 in Pakistan to encourage Afghans to return home. UNHCR / 10 October 2018 7

Intentions after leaving the Encashment Centre The below findings are based on the interviews carried out at the Encashment Centers. These findings give an indication of returnees intentions upon return which could change after a while when returnees settle in the communities. These findings can also help to compare dynamics among returnees during return and reintegration phases. Stay arrangement after return Relatives' house 40% Own house 17% Rental house 4 After you spend your cash grant, how will you support your family? Will rely on extended family 25% Borrow money from relatives to start up a small business 5% Will sell my assest(s) Returnee women heads of household receiving cash grant, Kabul EC. UNHCR/ M. Haroon, Jul 2018 Upon return, how did you plan to spend the cash grant? Paying transportation cost Buy food and other commodities 38% 30% Rely on daily wage work 6 Will join army/ police 0.3% Rent accomodation 10% 7% Build shelter 4% Did you, your family members or your relatives consider moving to Europe? Investment in livelihood Buy livestock 3% 3% Male 9% 9 Payback loans Female 2 79% Yes No Buy a plot of land to build shelter 10% UNHCR / 10 October 2018 8

[CONTACT US] Donna Corcoran External Relations Officer, Afghanistan Tel.: +93 791990011 Email: corcoran@unhcr.org M. Nadir Farhad Associate Public Information Officer, Afghanistan Tel.: +93 791990018 Email: farhadm@unhcr.org UNHCR / 10 October 2018 9