USING LEMON LAW WORKSHEETS IN JURY TRIALS

Similar documents
On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. 2 This means that the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, six things:

SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No June 5, 1998

Massachusetts Lemon Law Statute

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D09-366

Indiana Lemon Law. Title 24, Article 5, Chapter 13 Trade Regulations; Consumer Sales And Credit Motor Vehicle Protection Buyback Vehicle Disclosure

District of Columbia Lemon Law Statute. For Free Washington D.C. Lemon Law Help Click Here

PART 1 Regulations Governing the Rhode Island Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board

Florida House of Representatives HB 889 By Representative Melvin

CONSUMER ARBITRATION PROGRAM FOR FORD MOTOR COMPANY POWERSHIFT DPS6 TRANSMISSION. FAQs

1 SB By Senator Ward. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 31-MAR-15. Page 0

NEW YORK'S NEW CAR LEMON LAW A GUIDE FOR CONSUMERS

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW YORK'S USED CAR LEMON LAW A GUIDE FOR CONSUMERS

Elected Officials. Rules of. Division 60 Attorney General Chapter 11 Rules for Assistive Devices. 15 CSR Appointment of Arbitration Firm...

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION DARREN VICTORIA. Argued: February 22, 2006 Opinion Issued: June 14, 2006

TAKING A CIVIL VERDICT

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

NOTICE TO THE BAR. Wage Executions and the July 24, 2007 Increase in the Federal Minimum Wage; Amendments to Rules Appendices XI-I, XI-J, and XII-E

THE FAILURE TO CHARGE ON ALL OF THESE MATTERS CONSTITUTES REVERSIBLE ERROR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

OPINION BY JUSTICE LEROY R. HASSELL, SR. v. Record No January 11, 2002

Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

Your verdict in this case will take the form of an answer to. the issue. That issue appears on the verdict sheet which has been

4/11/2017 SMALL CLAIMS LAW UPDATE AND REVIEW PROCEDURE

MODEL INSTRUCTION ASSAULT ON A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ARREST SITUATIONS.

Florida Senate SB 492 By Senator Bennett

ASSAULT IN LAWFUL DEFENSE OF A [FAMILY MEMBER] [THIRD PERSON] (DEFENSE TO ASSAULTS NOT INVOLVING DEADLY FORCE).

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION MEMORANDUM OPINION

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010).

Assembly Bill No. 60 Committee on Transportation

TITLE DIVISION OF PUBLIC UTILUITIES AND CARRIERS

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DIVISION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AND CARRIERS

a. The Act is effective July 4, 1975 and applies to goods manufactured after that date.

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

1 HB By Representative Johnson (R) 4 RFD: Public Safety and Homeland Security. 5 First Read: 09-APR-15. Page 0

208.81F ASSAULT ON AN OFFICER AND SIMPLE ASSAULT ARREST SITUATIONS (ALL ISSUES IN DISPUTE).

1.03 District means any public school district organized under the laws of Colorado, except a junior college district.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Parkinson v. Hyundai Motor America ) Case No. SACV AHS (MLGx) )

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 2 April 2013

: : : : : : : : : : Reversed and Remanded

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 1 May Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 16 March 2017 by Judge W.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

If the defendant [killed] [assaulted] the victim to prevent a forcible

Fundamentals of Evictions

NOTE WELL: Use only with N.C.P.I.--Crim , A, , A, , and when no evidence of deadly force. 1

IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF DOUGLAS COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

THE FAILURE TO CHARGE ON ALL OF THESE MATTERS CONSTITUTES REVERSIBLE ERROR.

Seminar on When Life Gives You Lemon. THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 1999 AND FAIR TRADE PRACTICES IN MALAYSIA

MEMORANDUM (via ) Changes to DWI Seizure and Felony Speeding Elude Seizure Laws

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DIVISION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AND CARRIERS

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 August Appeal by defendant from order entered 15 July 2010 by

SUMMARY Exempts certain manufacturers of electric passenger cars from the statutory. maintenance on motor vehicles. (BDR 43-10)

Case 2:15-cv GW-SS Document 35 Filed 11/02/15 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:523

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF PENDER 13 DHR 09422

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0937n.06. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

In the event you find (have found) the defendant guilty of (name offense), you must then consider and answer the following question:

CAUSE NUMBER DC H. DEBORAH BROCK AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHRIS BROCK Plaintiffs

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. LCB File No. R November 13, 2003

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, LYCOMING COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA OPINION AND ORDER

Case 2:15-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1

The Agricultural Implements Regulations, 1982

Ch. 23 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 22 CHAPTER 23. PUPIL TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PROVISIONS

NO. PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR: Defendant. JURY TRIAL DEMAND

The defendant has been charged with second degree murder. 1

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff Sonic Automotive, Inc. ( Sonic ), submits this memorandum of law in support of

2:12-cv DCN Date Filed 04/09/13 Entry Number 32 Page 1 of 9

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 July Appeal by Plaintiffs from order entered 13 August 2012 by

HESSLER v. CRYSTAL LAKE CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, INC. 788 N.E.2d 405 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs, September 18, TEG ENTERPRISES v. ROBERT MILLER

I. INTRODUCTION CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

June 2017 Supplement to Pattern Jury Instructions for Motor Vehicle Cases

Forfeiture of motor vehicle for impaired driving after impaired driving license revocation; forfeiture for felony speeding to elude arrest.

Passing horses or other draft animals.

Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 2098

Merchants Automotive Group, Inc. Alpine Limousine Service, Inc., et al. BMW of N. Am., LLC and BMW of Manhattan, Inc. No.

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 18 December v. Catawba County No. 10 CRS 1038 MATTHEW LEE ELMORE

WILLIAM MICHAEL BOYKIN, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS RAY MORRISON, RUFUS AARON WILSON, JR. and WILLIE PERRY, Defendants No. COA (Filed 28 December 2001)

H 7129 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Function of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

MICHIGAN. Rental-Purchase Agreement Act

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 5 July 2016

ORDINANCE NO. 62 AN ORDINANCE OF BENNER TOWNSHIP REGULATING MOTOR VEHICLE NUISANCES

ISSUE PRESENTED FINDINGS OF FACT. The Undersigned finds that the following material facts are undisputed.

JERRY WAYNE WHISNANT, JR. Plaintiff, v. ROBERTO CARLOS HERRERA, Defendant NO. COA Filed: 2 November 2004

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/07/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Chapter 42 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION

REGISTRATION SERVICE PROGRAM HANDBOOK

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 December 2014

NO. COA Filed: 20 June Eminent Domain condemnation future use of land airport parking

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF THURSTON. No. 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES HEREIN, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 2104 Filed 10/25/16 Page 1 of 158 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION

2:15-cv RMG Date Filed 09/17/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Case 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SELF-DEFENSE EXAMPLE WITH ALL ASSAULTS INVOLVING DEADLY FORCE.

Barnett Finance Company, Inc. Dealer Retail Installment Agreement

Transcription:

USING LEMON LAW WORKSHEETS IN JURY TRIALS Beverly T. Beal Conference of Superior Court Judges June 20, 2012 THERE ARE NEW CALCULATION SHEETS WITH LEMON LAW PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS TO ASSIST THE TRIAL JUDGES, THE PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTION COMMITTEE HAS PRODUCED CALCULATION SHEETS AS APPENDICES TO LEMON LAW INSTRUCTIONS. THE TRIAL JUDGE MAY WANT TO CONSIDER THE OPTION OF GIVING THE BLANK FORMS TO THE JURY WITH THE VERDICT SHEET, FOR USE DURING DELIBERATIONS. N.C. GENERAL STATUTES, CHAPTER 20, ARTICLE 15A NEW MOTOR VEHICLES WARRANTIES ACT N.C. Gen. Stat. 20-351, et seq. 1

N.C.G.S. 20-351.3 (c) Refunds shall be made to the consumer, lessor, and any lienholders as their interest may appear. The refund to the consumer [ consumer includes a purchaser or a lessee] shall be reduced by a reasonable allowance for the consumer s use of the vehicle. N.C. Gen. Stat. 20-351.3 FORMULA FOR CALCULATING REASONABLE ALLOWANCE FOR THE PLAINTIFF S USE OF THE VEHICLE (a) WHEN THE CONSUMER (PLAINTIFF) IS A PURCHASER (b) (1) WHEN THE PLAINTIFF (CONSUMER) IS A LESSEE REASONABLE ALLOWANCE WHEN THE CONSUMER IS THE PURCHASER N.C.P.I. Civil 754.07, APPENDIX A. A Reasonable Allowance is determined by: 1. Calculating the number of miles used by the plaintiff up to: (a) the date of the third attempt to repair the same nonconformity which is the subject of the claim, or (b) the twentieth cumulative business day when the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair of one or more nonconformities; whichever occurs first; 2

REASONABLE ALLOWANCE, WHEN THE CONSUMER IS THE PURCHASER N.C.P.I. Civil 754.07, APPENDIX A. 2. Multiplying the number of miles in (1) by the purchase price of the vehicle; and REASONABLE ALLOWANCE, WHEN THE CONSUMER IS THE PURCHASER N.C.P.I. Civil 754.07, APPENDIX A. 3. Dividing such amount by 120,000. FORMULA FOR CALCULATING THE PLAINTIFF S DAMAGES WHEN THE PLAINTIFF IS A PURCHASER N.C.P.I. Civil 745.07, APPENDIX B 3

N.C. Gen. Stat. 20-351.3 (b) REFUND WHEN THE CONSUMER IS A LESSEE N.C.P.I. Civil 754.09, APPENDIX A. A Reasonable Allowance is determined by: 1. Calculating the number of miles used by the plaintiff up to: (a) the date of the third attempt to repair the same nonconformity which is the subject of the claim, or (b) the twentieth cumulative business day when the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair of one or more nonconformities; whichever occurs first; N.C. Gen. Stat. 20-351.3 (b) REFUND, WHEN THE CONSUMER IS A LESSEE N.C.P.I. Civil 754.09, APPENDIX A. 2. Multiplying the number of miles in (1) by the lessor s actual lease price (which means the actual purchase cost of the vehicle to the lessor); and N.C. Gen. Stat. 20-351.3 (b) REFUND WHEN THE CONSUMER IS A LESSEE N.C.P.I. Civil 754.09, APPENDIX A. 3. Dividing such amount by 120,000. 4

N.C. Gen. Stat. 20-351.3 (b)(1) FORMULA FOR CALCULATING THE PLAINTIFF S DAMAGES WHEN THE PLAINTIFF IS A LESSEE N.C.P.I. Civil 745.09, APPENDIX B N.C. Gen. Stat. 20-351.3(b)(2) Formula for Calculating the Plaintiff s Damages When the Plaintiff is a Lessor (N.C. Gen. Stat. 20-351.3(b)(2)) N.C.P.I.--Civil 745.11, APPENDIX A PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS N.C.P.I. Civil 745.01 N.C.P.I. Civil 745.03 N.C.P.I. Civil 745.05 N.C.P.I. Civil 745.07 N.C.P.I. Civil 745.09 N.C.P.I. Civil 745.11 5

CALCULATION WORKSHEETS N.C.P.I. Civil 745.07, APPENDIX A N.C.P.I. Civil 745.07, APPENDIX B N.C.P.I. Civil 745.09, APPENDIX A N.C.P.I. Civil 745.09, APPENDIX B N.C.P.I. Civil 745.11, APPENDIX A HYPOTHETICAL, PAGE 1 On June 18, 2012, Jesse C. purchases a brand new red 2012 Lamborghini Aventador. The price is $ 376,000. Sales tax etc., is $1,000. He paid cash. He drives it everyday for a 30 days and it leaks brake fluid. On Monday, July 18 he takes it in for repairs at the dealer. The mileage is 2,000. He picks it up on July 25. HYPOTHETICAL, PAGE 2 Jesse drives it for 60 days and the brakes fail in the Mecklenburg county courthouse parking garage and he hits the wall (no appreciable damages). He returns it for service on August 30. The mileage is 6,000 miles. He picks it up on September 8. 6

HYPOTHETICAL, PAGE 3 Jesse drives it 33 days and the brakes do not work well on his trip to Chapel Hill for the pattern jury instruction committee meeting on October 5. No brake fluid. He returns it on October 8. The mileage is 8,150. Another attempt to repair the brake fluid leak is made. He picks it up on October 17. HYPOTHETICAL, PAGE 4 On October 18, the brakes fail due to no brake fluid, he has a wreck and his girlfriend Gina Maria Josephina suffers a bruise on her latissimus. Their relationship ends. The vehicle is unsafe to drive. Damage estimate is $4,000.00. A wrecker takes it to the dealer on October 19. The mileage is 8,250. HYPOTHETICAL, PAGE 5 Jesse goes to the dealer on October 20, and demands his money back. The dispute results in a civil action by Jesse against the manufacturer. Jury verdict is in Jesse s favor. Calculate the amount to which Jesse C. is entitled as a money damages. 7