COMPARATIVE PROCEDURES STATE FEDERAL TAX REFUND LITIGATION

Similar documents
SUBPOENA IN AN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING

Prepared by Public Counsel s Federal Pro Se Clinic

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Mastering Civil Procedure Checklist

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective February 8, 2013)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Adv. Proc. No. COMPLAINT

Case 4:15-cv CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP VIRGINIA. Norfolk Division. v. Civil Action No. 2:09cv322

cag Doc#413 Filed 04/02/18 Entered 04/02/18 13:54:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, SHANNON L. BROWN n/k/a SHANNON L. HAYES v.

Wine and Cheese: Magistrate Judge and District Judge Pairings. Hon. Dustin Pead Hon. Robert Shelby Hon. David Nuffer Anne Morgan

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective November 17, 2010)

Attorney Grievance Commission, et al. v. Ty Clevenger, No. 64, September Term, 2017

Family Law Rules of Procedure. Table of Contents

Case 1:13-cv MSK-MJW Document 3 Filed 05/17/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

PART THREE CIVIL CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS FAMILY LAW FORMS, COMMENTARY, AND INSTRUCTIONS... 5 CITATIONS TO OPINIONS ADOPTING OR

Case tnw Doc 29 Filed 11/15/16 Entered 11/15/16 14:10:56 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10

Drafting and Issuing Discovery Subpoenas: Maryland

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. September Term No. 29 FELICIA LOCKETT, Petitioner BLUE OCEAN BRISTOL, LLC, Respondent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 19-C-34 SCREENING ORDER

Appellant, Richard L. Massey, Jr., an inmate in the custody of. the Division of Correction ( DOC ) of the Department of Public

Tuesday 28th November, 2006.

acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Litigation ATTORNEY CLIENT RELATIONS GENERAL PROCEDURES & PRACTICE. continued on page 2

United States Court of Appeals

Resolution Through the Courts TEI Audits & Appeals Seminar

Rule Change #2001(16) The Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure Chapter 26. Colorado Rules of Procedure for Small Claims Courts Appendix to Chapter 26

Civil Litigation Forms Library

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Case 1:05-cv IMK-JSK Document 338 Filed 07/02/2008 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

The Five (or More) Forums for Your Trademark Dispute, and How to Choose the Right One (Hint: Don t Choose the ITC)

CTAS e-li. Published on e-li ( July 01, 2018 Courts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:10 cv 00071

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

Civil Procedure Basics. N.C. Rules of Civil Procedure 7/6/2010

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN BAY CITY

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before LUCERO, BALDOCK, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges.

Case 1:15-mc JGK Document 26 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 10

CALENDAR Q. JUDGE PATRICK J. SHERLOCK 2007 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS fax

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 6:4. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL

Monarch Academy Baltimore Campus, Inc., et al. v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners, No. 7, September Term, Opinion by Getty, J.

CTAS e-li. Published on e-li ( May 01, 2018 General Sessions and Other Inferior Courts

Case Doc 28 Filed 04/08/16 EOD 04/08/16 16:05:16 Pg 1 of 10 SO ORDERED: April 8, James M. Carr United States Bankruptcy Judge

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012)

Distinctions with a Difference: A Comparison of Federal and State Court Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Wyoming Judges Benchbook

mg Doc 14 Filed 06/29/18 Entered 06/29/18 13:24:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 13

A SUMMARY OF THE SHORT, SUMMARY, AND EXPEDITED CIVIL ACTION PROGRAMS AROUND THE COUNTRY

Case 0:06-cv JIC Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 14, 2002 Session

LOCAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CALENDARING OF CIVIL CASES DISTRICT COURT DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Appellant, v. Case No. 8:12-cv-2498-T-33 Bankr. No. 8:11-bk CPM ORDER

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 17a0609n.06. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

TITLE XIV TRIALS (6/30/03) 84. The amendment is effective as of June 30, 2003.

Academy of Court- Appointed Masters. Section 2. Appointment Orders

Petitioners, 10-CV-5256 (KMW) (DCF) -against- OPINION & ORDER GOVERNMENT OF THE LAO PEOPLE S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Civil No. 1:13-CV-1211 vs. GLS/TWD Andrew Cuomo, et al.

Civil (Non-Domestic) Differentiated Case Management Plan for Howard County, Maryland

[Case Title]Bli Farms v. Greenstone Farm Credit & Srvc Agcy [Case Number] [Bankruptcy Judge]Bankruptcy Judge Walter Shapero [Adversary

2:16-ap Doc#: 1 Filed: 10/06/16 Entered: 10/06/16 16:16:02 Page 1 of 17

Case acs Doc 18 Filed 03/25/15 Entered 03/25/15 12:56:10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

Case 8:13-mc Document 1 Filed 10/01/13 Page 1 of 9. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Southern Division

Sexual Assault Civil Protection Orders (CPOs) By State 6/2009

OFFICE OF THE CLERK B

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

1. SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE. 2. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT. 3. STAPLE ALL ADDITIONAL PAGES 1/30/2014 3:13CV739

USA v. Frederick Banks

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No AFOLUSO ADESANYA NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 17 September v. New Hanover County Nos. 11 CVM 1575 JOHN MUNN, 11 CVM 1576 Defendant.

HOW TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES

Case 8:16-cv CEH-AAS Document 254 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6051 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Filed. Artie. ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE MARYLAND LLC, et al.,

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Chapter 11

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No JENNIFER KYNER; JODY PRYOR; BOB BEARD, ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Criminal Statutes of Limitations Maryland

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

Case jal Doc 14 Filed 10/03/16 Entered 10/03/16 09:40:35 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR FILING SUIT IN JUSTICE COURT

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case MFW Doc Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case grs Doc 54 Filed 02/02/17 Entered 02/02/17 15:37:11 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10

Case 1:15-cv RDB Document 3-1 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

ADAMS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BUSINESS OF COURTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO.

An Overview of Civil Litigation in the U.S. presented by Martijn Steger May 24, 2014

Court Records Glossary

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016

Transcription:

Official name Maryland Tax Court United States District Court for the District of Maryland United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland United States Court of Federal Claims Website url http://www.txcrt.state.md.us/ http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/ http://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/ http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/ Type of forum Administrative agency - MD. CODE ANN., TAX-GEN. 3-102 Constitutional court - U.S. CONST., Art. III; 28 U.S.C. 132 Statutory court, division of USDC - 28 U.S.C. 151 Statutory court - 28 U.S.C. 171 Judges 5 (-1 vac) specialists - part time, six-year appts - TG 3-106 10 (+5 sr js) generalists - lifetime apps - 28 U.S.C. 133 7 (+1 sr j) bankr. specialists - 14-year term appts - 28 U.S.C. 152 16 (+8 sr js) specialists-15- year appts - 28 U.S.C. 171, 172 Refund jurisdiction TG 13-510(a)(6) 28 U.S.C. 1346(a)(1) 11 U.S.C. 505 28 U.S.C. 1346(a)(1); but no jurisdiction for 6700 or 6701 penalties - 28 U.S.C. 1509 S/L for filing suit 30 days from denial of claim - TG 13-510 Two years from denial of claim - 26 U.S.C. 6532 Two years from denial of claim - 26 U.S.C. 6532 Two years from denial of claim - 26 U.S.C. 6532 Mailbox rule applicable Yes - TG 13-510(c) No provision No provision Modified rule - RCFC 3(b)(2)(C) Constructive exhaustion Six months - TG 13-510(b) Six months - 26 U.S.C. 6532 Six months - 26 U.S.C. 6532 Six months - 26 U.S.C. 6532 Administrative claim Required - TG 13-510(a)(6), 13-514 Required - 26 U.S.C. 7422 Required - 11 U.S.C. 505; 26 U.S.C. 7422 Required - 26 U.S.C. 7422 1

Prepayment of tax Not required, but... Required, with exceptions for divisible taxes - Flora v. U.S., 362 U.S. 145 (1960) Required, with exceptions for divisible taxes, for refund jurisdiction, but... Required, with exceptions for divisible taxes - Flora v. U.S., 362 U.S. 145 (1960) Counterclaims No provision Yes - Fed. R. Civ. P. 13 Yes - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7013 Yes - RCFC 13 3d-party practice No, but consolidation permitted - Code of Md. Regulations 14.12.01.10 Yes - Fed. R. Civ. P. 14 Yes - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7014 Yes - RCFC 14 Consolidation Yes - COMAR 14.12.01.10 Yes - Fed. R. Civ. P. 42 Yes - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7042 Yes - RCFC 42 Deficiency/revision jurisdiction Yes None Yes None Collection jurisdiction None Yes - 26 U.S.C. 7403; 28 U.S.C. 1340 Yes - 26 U.S.C. 7403; 28 U.S.C. 1340 Yes - 26 U.S.C. 7403; 28 U.S.C. 1340, but limited to ctrclms & 3d pty clms Tax injunction jurisdiction None TG 13-505 Limited 26 U.S.C. 7421; 28 U.S.C. 1341 Limited 11 U.S.C. 26 U.S.C. 7421; 28 U.S.C. 1341 Limited 26 U.S.C. 7421 Declaratory jurisdiction Questions of law - TG 13-525 Limited - 28 U.S.C. 2201 Limited - 11 U.S.C. 505; 28 U.S.C. 2201 Limited - 28 U.S.C. 2201 Other jurisdiction None Broad Broad Limited to special subject matter areas, incl. tax 2

Venue Concept not applicable Ind. pltf s res. or corp s place of bus. - 28 U.S.C. 1402(a) Venue of main case Concept not applicable Place of sitting City of Baltimore & 23 county seats-tg 3-104 Baltimore, Cumberland, Denton, Greenbelt - 28 U.S.C. 100 Baltimore, Salisbury, Greenbelt - 28 U.S.C. 152(b) Anywhere in U.S. - 28 U.S.C. 2505 Transfer of venue or place of sitting No provision To district or division where venue proper - 28 U.S.C. 1406; to court where proper - 28 U.S.C. 1631 To another district in int. of justice or for convenience - 28 U.S.C. 1412; Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7087 Place of trial determined by trial judge - RCFC 39(a) Representation of parties Md. lawyers; pro se inds., corp. officers - TG 13-515 USDC D. Md. lawyers; pro se inds. - LR 101.1 USDC D. Md. lawyers; pro se inds. - LR 9010-3, 1 Pro se; lawyers - 28 U.S.C. 2503(a) Rules of procedure COMAR 14.12.01 Fed. R. Civ. P.; Local Rules USDC D. Md. Fed. R. Bankr. P.; Local Rules USBC D. Md. R.C.F.C. Fee for filing None - COMAR 14.12.01.01B $350-28 U.S.C. 1914(a) $250 (not charged if debtor is pltf) - 28 U.S.C. 1930(b) $250-28 U.S.C. 1926 Original pleading Petition of appeal - TG 13-516; COMAR 14.12.01.01A Complaint - Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 Adversary complaint - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7003 Complaint - RCFC 3 Opposing party Comptroller of the Treasury - COMAR 14.12.01.01A United States - 26 U.S.C. 7422(f)(1) United States - 26 U.S.C. 7422(f)(1) United States - 26 U.S.C. 7422(f)(1) Served on whom Comptroller & AG of Md. - COMAR 14.12.01.06B AG in D.C.; USAO in Balt. or Greenbelt - Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i) AG in D.C.; USAO in Balt. or Greenbelt - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7004(b)(4) AG in D.C. - RCFC 4(a) 3

Served by whom Clerk - COMAR 14.12.01.06B Person $18 & not a party or U.S. Marshal - Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2) Person $18 & not party - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7004(a) Clerk - RCFC 4(a) Time limit for service of initial pleading No provision 120 days of filing - Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) 14 days of issuance - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7004(e) No provision Opposing counsel Assistant Attorney General, Comptroller s office Trial Attorney, Tax Division, CTE Trial Attorney, Tax Division, CTE Trial Attorney, Tax Division, CFC Resp. pleading period 30 days - COMAR 14.12.01.02A 60 days - Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(3)(A) 35 days - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012(a) 60 days - RCFC 12(a) Responsive pleading or motion Answer, notice of intention to defend, motion to dismiss - COMAR 14.12.01.02A Answer, motion to dismiss, motion for judgment on the pleadings, motion for summary judgment - Fed. R. Civ. P. 7, 12, 56 Answer, motion to dismiss, motion for judgment on the pleadings, motion for summary judgment - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7007, 7012, 7056 Answer, motion to dismiss, motion for judgment on the pleadings, motion for summary judgment - RCFC 7, 12, 56 Pretrial conference Discretionary, use varies depending on type of case - COMAR 14.12.01.13 Discretionary, held in most cases - Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 Discretionary, use varies widely - Fed. R. Civ. P. 7016 Discretionary, held in most cases - RCFC 16 Discovery Limited Extremely broad-fed. R. Civ. P. 26, et seq. Extremely broad - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7026, et seq. Extremely broad- RCFC 26, et seq. Interrogatories No provision Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7033 RCFC 33 RFPs Document production in connection w/ depositions - TG 13-521(b)(2) Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, 45 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7034, 9016 RCFC 34, 45 4

RFAs No provision Fed. R. Civ. P. 36 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7036 RCFC 36 Depositions TG 13-521(a) & Md. Rules 2-411 - 418 Fed. R. Civ. P. 30, 31 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7030, 7031 RCFC 30, 31 Powers of contempt & sanctions Indirect, enforced thru circuit court - TG 13-522 Inherent - Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32 (1991); Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, 37 Statutory - 11 U.S.C. 105; Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011, 7037 Inherent - Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32 (1991); RCFC 11, 37 Burden of proof Taxpayer - TG 13-528, but Comptroller bears burden w/ fraud penalty - Genie & Co., Inc. v. Comptroller, 107 Md.App. 551, 566 (1995) Generally on taxpayer, except certain fraud penalties & under 26 U.S.C. 7491 Generally on taxpayer, except certain fraud penalties & under 26 U.S.C. 7491 Generally on taxpayer, except certain fraud penalties & under 26 U.S.C. 7491 Rules of evidence Not bound by technical rules - TG 13-524; COMAR 14.12.01.11A Governed by Fed. R. Evid. - Fed. R. Evid. 1101 Governed by Fed. R. Evid. - Fed. R. Evid. 1101 Governed by Fed. R. Evid. - Fed. R. Evid. 1101 Jury trial Fact issues by reference to circuit ct. - TG 13-526; see Clise Coal Co. v. Comptroller, 173 Md.App. 689, 706-07 (2007) Yes - 28 U.S.C. 2402 Yes - 28 U.S.C. 157, 2402 None available Inferior judicial officers Hearing examiners in real property cases - COMAR 14.12.01.15 Magistrate judges & special masters - Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, 53 None Masters - RCFC 53 5

Rationale for decision F & C req d - SG 10-221(b); on motion of party, ct shall provide statement of grounds for decision - COMAR 14.12.01.11B F & C req d in bench trial - Fed. R. Civ. P. 52 F & C req d in bench trial - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7052 F & C req d - RCFC 52 Decisional document Written order required - TG 13-529 Separate document req d - Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) Separate document req d - Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7058 Separate document req d - RCFC 58 1st appeal of right Judicial review in circuit court where any party located or Balt. City - TG 13-532; MD. CODE ANN., STATE GOV T 10-222 Ct. of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 28 U.S.C. 41, 1291 District Court for the District of Maryland - 28 U.S.C. 100, 158 Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 28 U.S.C. 41, 1295 2d appeal of right Court of Special Appeals - SG 10-223(b) None Ct. of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 28 U.S.C. 41, 1291 None Certiorari review Court of Appeals - MD. CODE ANN., CTS. & JUD. PROCS. 12-201 SCUS - 28 U.S.C. 1254 SCUS - 28 U.S.C. 1254 SCUS - 28 U.S.C. 1254 2d certiorari review SCUS - 28 U.S.C. 1257 None None None 6