[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

Similar documents
No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. DAVID JACOBS; GARY HINDES, Appellants,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED Nos (L), (con.), (con.), (con.)

Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT DEFEENDANT-APPELLEE S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

Leave to file reply brief of up to 10,500 words.

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 54 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Nos , ,

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : : : : MOTION TO GOVERN

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT SUSAN L. VAUGHAN, ANDERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER,

[NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2016 Page 1 of 3

UNOPOSSED PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT S AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT S APPROVAL TO ELECTRONIC FILE CASE DOCUMENTS VIA CM/ECF SYSTEM 1

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Plaintiffs-Appellants, Docket Nos (L), 445(Con) DECLARATION OF SARAH S. NORMAND. SARAH S. NORMAND, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1746, declares as

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED ON FEBRUARY 16, 2012] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 16 Filed: 04/23/2012 Pages: 6. Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

Tel: (202)

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 218 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 7 Redacted Version IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. On September 11, 2017, nearly two months after the court heard oral

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (L) (5:15-cv D)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2018] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES ex rel. ADAMS, et al., AURORA LOAN SERVICES, INC., et al.

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 16, 2012] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

RE: In re National Security Letter, Nos , , & [Argued before Judges Ikuta, N.R. Smith, and Murguia on October 8, 2014]

Case 1:14-cv MMS Document 28 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS. Case No C

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT APPELLEES RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS MOTION FOR INITIAL HEARING EN BANC

Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ROSALINA CUELLAR DE OSORIO; et al.

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT IN RE GOOGLE INC. COOKIE PLACEMENT CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. SIERRA CLUB; and VIRGINIA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPELAS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit DAVID JOHN SLATER, WILDLIFE PERSONALITIES, LTD.,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK B

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Decision Filed Mar. 5, 2014 ED PRIETO; COUNTY OF YOLO,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. No. LIGHTING BALLAST CONTROL LLC, Applicant, v. UNIVERSAL LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Respondent.

ORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs-Appellees,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Transcription:

USCA Case #14-5243 Document #1672205 Filed: 04/21/2017 Page 1 of 5 [ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PERRY CAPITAL, LLC, et al., v. Plaintiffs-Appellants, JACOB J. LEW, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Treasury, et al., Consolidated Nos. 14-5243; 14-5254; 14-5260; 14-5262 Defendants-Appellees. UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE RESPONSE TO REHEARING PETITIONS Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27, defendants respectfully request an extension of time in which to file their responses, if any, to the rehearing petitions filed in this case. The responses are currently due May 3, 2017. This is defendants first request for an extension. Counsel for Treasury has contacted counsel for plaintiffs, and plaintiffs do not object. 1. These consolidated cases raise a number of challenges to actions taken by Treasury and FHFA to address the operation of the conservatorships of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). The district court granted defendants motions to dismiss plaintiffs claims. Plaintiffs, a collection of individual and institutional investors,

USCA Case #14-5243 Document #1672205 Filed: 04/21/2017 Page 2 of 5 brought this appeal in October 2014. Oral argument was held on April 15, 2015, and, on February 21, 2017, this Court issued an opinion largely affirming the district court. 2. The institutional investors filed a petition for panel rehearing on March 24, 2017, and, on March 31, 2017, class plaintiffs also filed a petition for panel rehearing. On April 17, 2017, this Court ordered that, insofar as defendants have an interest in the issues raised in each petition, defendants should respond to plaintiff s petitions within 15 days. Defendants responses are therefore currently due on May 3, 2017. 3. An extension of time in which to file defendants responses is necessary in light of prearranged absences, the press of other litigation matters, and the need for consultation within the government. The attorneys with primary responsibility for representing Treasury in this appeal are Mark Stern, Abby Wright, and Gerard Sinzdak. Mr. Stern will be on a prearranged vacation from May 1 to May 8. In addition, Mr. Stern will present oral argument before the en banc Court on May 24 in Raymond J. Lucia Companies v. SEC, No. 15-1345. Ms. Wright is filing the government s brief in EPIC v. FAA, Nos. 16-1297, 16-1302, in this Court on April 28. Ms. Wright will also file a brief on behalf of the United States in Sammons v. United States, No. 17-50201, in the Fifth Circuit on May 10. Mr. Sinzdak will file a brief on behalf of the United States in Campos v. United States, No. 16-51476, in the Fifth Circuit on May 12. A 30-day extension will provide defendants with adequate time for consultation and preparation of responses to the rehearing petitions. Accordingly, defendants 2

USCA Case #14-5243 Document #1672205 Filed: 04/21/2017 Page 3 of 5 respectfully request until June 2 to file their responses, if any, to plaintiffs rehearing petitions. 4. Counsel for Treasury has consulted with counsel for plaintiffs, and plaintiffs do not oppose this motion. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, this Court should extend the time for defendants to file responses to the rehearing petitions until June 2, 2017. Respectfully submitted, MARK B. STERN (202) 514-5089 s/ ABBY C. WRIGHT ABBY C. WRIGHT (202) 514-0718 Attorneys Civil Division, Appellate Staff U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Rm. 7242 Washington, D.C. 20530 3

USCA Case #14-5243 Document #1672205 Filed: 04/21/2017 Page 4 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that the foregoing complies with the type-volume limitation of Fed. R. App. P. 27(d)(2) because it contains 553 words, according to the count of Microsoft Word. /s/ Abby C. Wright Abby C. Wright Counsel for Treasury Abby.wright@usdoj.gov

USCA Case #14-5243 Document #1672205 Filed: 04/21/2017 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 21, 2017, I filed and served the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by causing a copy to be electronically filed via the appellate CM/ECF system. I also hereby certify that the participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and will be served via the CM/ECF system. s/ Abby C. Wright ABBY C. WRIGHT