Dear Patricia Nokes and Mr. Sheriff

Similar documents
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WAINFLEET BYLAW NO

OFFICE CONSOLIDATION FENCE BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER By-Law Number Date Passed Section Amended

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS:

Please note: Retaining walls less than five feet (5') in height do not require a building permit.

REQUESTED COMMON COUNCIL POLICY GUIDE CLARIFICATIONS November 14, 2006 Lisa Veldran, Administrative Assistant

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF NEWBURY BY-LAW A By-law to Prescribe the Height and Type of Fences

Fence By-law. PS-6 Consolidated May 14, As Amended by: PS March 20, 2012 PS May 14, 2013

Embassy Park Architectural Control Committee, ACC. Memo on fencing procedures and requirements

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY ZONING BYLAW 1987 NO AMENDMENT (ZONING BYLAW 2015 UPDATE) BYLAW 2015 NO.

Fences. Call Gopher State One at to identify utility locations prior to digging post holes.

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No "...

ORDINANCE NO. NORTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

MINUTES OF THE WHITEFISH BAY BOARD OF APPEALS Wednesday, August 9, 2006

ZONING RESOLUTION Web Version THE CITY OF NEW YORK. Article XI: Special Purpose Districts Chapter 3: Special Ocean Parkway District

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Friday, October 30, 2009

FROM: General Manager, Planning and Development FILE: (Kwomais Point Park)

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM

Fences. An Information Package for the erection and installation of Fences in the City of Thorold

ONEIDA COUNTY 48 GENESEE STREET, NEW HARTFORD, NEW YORK Telephone: x2332 Fax:

The Corporation of the District of North Vancouver. Bylaw A bylaw to regulate the keeping of domestic hens

Chairperson Verdi-Hus; Vice-Chairperson Kamp; Members: Fahlen, Johnson, Needham and Pagnucco

SECTION 824 "R-1-B" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of North Greenbush 2 Douglas Street Wynantskill, NY 12198

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN BY-LAW NO

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF CLARENCE-ROCKLAND BY-LAW NUMBER BEING A BY-LAW TO REGULATE HEIGHT AND DESCRIPTION OF LAWFUL FENCES

City of Aurora BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING MINUTES November 8, 2017

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD AGENDA

Fences and Walls Handout Excerpts from MBMC

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 02C-09

BROOKWOOD ESTATES HOA

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WATERLOO

Replacement for Section 3. Fences,

: FENCE STANDARDS:

TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Tina Axelrad, Principal City Planner DATE: August 14, 2013

HANDOUT FOR MULMUR TOWNSHIP RATEPAYERS SWIMMING POOLS AND FENCES May 01, 2013

Item No Halifax and West Community Council May 17, 2016

CITY OF KINGSTON. Ontario. By-Law Number A By-Law To Regulate Fences. By-Law Number: Date Passed: September 9, 2014

1.1. By-law means this by-law and any schedule to this by-law as they may from time to time be amended.

PRESENTED: January 15, 2008 FILE: / BYL 1984

FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION

CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ESQUIMALT ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES HELD ON AUGUST 21, 2012 ESQUIMALT COUNCIL CHAMBERS

ORDINANCE NO

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF INNISFIL BY-LAW NO

(3) erect a fence includes altering, constructing, or relocating a fence,

DECISION AND ORDER. TLAB Case File Number: S53 17 TLAB, S45 17 TLAB, S45 17 TLAB, S45 17 TLAB

Owner Information Name: Address of property applying for the variance: Telephone #: address: Mailing address if different:

Thornwood Maintenance Association Deed Restrictions

Members: Mr. Prager Chairman Mr. Rexhouse Member Mr. Casella Member Mr. Johnston Member--Absent Mr. Galotti Member

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA. WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 10th, 2014 at 7:30PM

Notice of Public Hearings and Public Meetings to Consider General Plan or Modifications.

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT HELD IN THE ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, 1024 HURLWOOD LANE, TUESDAY, May 20, 2014 AT 7:00 P.M.

By-Law No OttWatch.ca By-law Archival Project

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS BUTLER MEMORIAL HALL JULY 16, 2018

CITY OF AURORA OHIO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Meeting Minutes June 8, 2016

ARTICLE F. Fences Ordinance

Article 14: Nonconformities

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS

ANN ARBOR CITY APPROVAL NOTICE ORDINANCE NO. ORD ANIMALS (ADDITION OF DUCKS TO THE REFERENCED SECTIONS)

TOWN OF WALLINGFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECEMBER 21, 2009 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES READING OF THE MEETING LEGAL NOTICE:

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. Fence Construction Guidelines

DECISION AND ORDER APPEARANCES. Decision Issue Date Thursday, March 8, 2018

Zoning Board of Appeals 1 DRAFT

Building Code TITLE 15. City Uniform Dwelling Code Reserved for Future Use

BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES THURSDAY, AUGUST 27, 2015

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director / Corporate Manager - Planning and Sustainable Communities

BEING A BY-LAW to regulate Election Signs and to repeal By-law RE

F. Elliot Goldman. November 28, 2011 SENT BY AND HAND DELIVERY

CITY OF EASTPOINTE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 17, 2010 JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN

Township of East Zorra-Tavistock Zoning By-Law Number

Mayor James called the meeting to order at 7:00pm.

BOROUGH OF BERLIN PLANNING BOARD MEETING January 10, 2011

Property Maintenance By-law By-law No

HARVEY CEDARS, NJ Friday, September 2, 2016

TOWN OF ROCKY MOUNT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES APRIL 1, :00 P.M.

Meadowbrook Heights Homeowners Association EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING

Roberts, Hall, Hasman, Hruby, McCrodden, Kingston, Rose

BRAMBLEWOOD ACRES I - PROTECTIVE COVENANTS

WASHINGTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting June 5, Melanie Bryant Theresa Herrs Don Imhoff Roxanne Schottel

APPLICATION NUMBER A REQUEST FOR

The City Council of the City of Etna does hereby ordain as follows: Chapter 8.10 Medical Marijuana

PERMIT COVER PAGE. Is contractor performing work? YES NO. If answered YES than Contractor must provide Proof of Insurance to the Borough

BY-LAW NUMBER of - THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF BRANT. To regulate yard maintenance

ALPHABETICAL ORDINANCES

The applicant is proposing the following modifications of the North Park Isles Community Unit district:

Competition and the rule of law

ORDINANCE NO

City Council of Fort Walton Beach ENGINEERING & UTILITY SERVICES MEMORANDUM

Hansen Park Homeowner s Association 6855 West Clearwater Ave A Kennewick, WA 99336

CITY OF BRAINERD PERMIT TO KEEP CHICKENS

CITY OF WHITEHORSE BYLAW

TOWN OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOUSE BYLAW 14/07V

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

CONSOLIDATED WITH BY-LAW THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MULMUR BY-LAW NO FENCE BY-LAW

Pool Fence By-law PS-5 which address fencing materials generally not in conformity with

TITLE 13 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REGULATIONS 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS

CITY COUNTY ZIP CODE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } } } } } } } } } } Decision and Order

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Transcription:

\,, ~..r...----... of Information and Protection -----Original Messag of Privacyact From: Andrew Davis Sent: Friday, April 08,201 1 3:36 PM To: Patricia Nokes Cc: Mark Sheriff; 6. 14C'), ~W'f'4 'Kerry Davis '; 'Lorraine Van Ooyen Subject: Follow up on Back yard fence bylaw enclosed is a picture Importance: High Dear Patricia Nokes and Mr. Sheriff I would like to take this opportunity to thank you Mrs. Nokes for taking my call today, at 11:30am on April 8, 201 1 and Mr. Sheriff at 15:02 I wanted to include this email message along with the phone message that I left with you for the Mayor and the Mayor's Assistant. I trust that this email may also help clarify some questions the Mayor and or his Executive Assistant, or council may have. Please fotward this email to all the current sitting councilors. I understa"d that it does take time to pass By-laws and that the by-law I am requesting that Oshawa Council pass, is for Fence height restrictions in the backyard. I understand that the By-law wouldn't be implemented in time to benefit my household, unless amendments were made to "Excessive height Fences" that By-law. Residents of Oshawa need there council to protect the most expensive assets in which a person or family have and that is their home and property. Passing a backyard fence height restriction By-law will do that. Oshawa has some amazing views having obstructions like loft+ fences and gazebo's in their yards with out By-laws allows people to do what they want. Oshawa Council should be looking at its fellow neighbouring communities of Durham Region, York and Peel as these communities all currently have a height restriction on Backyard fences from 5ft to 7fi maximum height restriction. OSHAWA currently is the only municipality in Durham Region and most surroundings regions that doesn't have a height restriction for backyard fences. There are already by-laws written that Oshawa could review to help ensure passing a By-law efficiently.

Here is a list of reasons Council should consider for Height restrictions to include; View obstructions many people like my family bought our house because we enjoyed the view that this house has to offer on/ near lake front, trails, and green belts Efficiency - Lower energy costs in summer to have a breeze. - Sun for the winter and summer, Planting - Vegetables, flowers make for nicer looking yards and promote green communities Safety - if there is an emergency and the only exit was to the back yard and a person needed to get out they would have loft+ wall blocking exit. Uniformity - In neighborhoods and overall attractiveness uniformity makes cities look much nicer cleaner and inviting Decreased Property values- If an area all built fences of all different heights some of which go to 10+ feet property values go down same with taxes and that means less revenue for the city. A homeowner that can't sell their home because of what another neighbour has done to Property boarding another property. The selling Homeowners in desperation may sell to undesirables which could increase crime and with crime means more money the City of Oshawa needs to put out on Policing that area. Possible Structural Damage1 Risk of Injury -The fence that my neighbour built as shown in the picture I enclosed shows they have built 3 additions 1 on top of the other. This Fence, bolts screws hardware I am assuming is 20 years plus. We live facing east to west. To the immediate south of us is the lake with no obstructions that means when the wind blows, and it does blow strong at times that this solid fence structure having the stress from the wind may cause the structure to fail and a great potential to cause serious injury to person(s)and dwelling. My hope was that this By-law would have been passed already to avoid more potential additions to the fence. Then if I had called the City inspector to review the structure and helshe deemed it to be unsafe and instructed the neighbour to take the fence down, the neighbour would not be able to reconstruct it because of the new height restriction backyard fence By-law. I don't want to make this call until the By-law is passed. The new By-law will help citizens like myself, and is an opportunity to protect those citizens it couldn't help in the past.

I was surprised to hear from previous council members and current sitting members that they were unaware that we didn't' have a backyard height restriction By-law for fences; The only exception is for your front yard max 3ft and backyard corner lot fence restriction which is also 3ft. My intention to have this By-law passed is to stop other citizens from being harassed and bullied and their property devalued, by a selfish neighbour. Oshawa can stop Neighbour bullying! I would kindly to ask that you keep me up to date on this by-law and progress as to what has been done thus far. Respectfully, Andrew Davis s 14(1), Munrcpal Freedom of Informatron and Protecbon of Prrvacy Act 1 S. 14(1), Municipal Freedom -----Original Message of Information and Protection of Privacy Act From: Andrew Davis I Sent: Wednesday, March 09,201 1 1.38 PM To: 'pnokes@oshawa.cal Subject: Picture of Fence Importance: High Dear Patrica Nokes, As per my conversation yesterday March 8th 201 1 between Mayor Henry and myself, Andrew R. Davis, I have enclosed a photo of the fence structure that my neighbour has built. I had my wife take this picture to show the mere size of the fence I am almost 6 feet in height. The view behind this fence is the view of the lake and new water front trail.

My house is 1533 Connery Crescent, LIJ 8G2 The house that constructed this fence is; 1531 Connery Cres 5 14l 0,eyfr~ofA For ease of reference, here is a link to a map from google maps http://maps.google.ca/maps?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-us:o~cial&c hannel=s&hl=en&q=l533+connery+cres&um=i&ie=utf- 8&hq=&hnear=l533+Connery+Cres cent,+oshawa,+on+li J+8B2&gl=ca&ei=MsF3TaucKcaLrQGBpIHrBg&sa=X&oi=geo code-res ult&ct=title&resnum=l &ved=ocbuq8gewaa My request is that The City of Oshawa would pass a by-law in regards to the maximum height a fence can be in the rear of a yard. a l*\l Mr. ( ~ c l f a 1 has compeleted two sections of the fence and I am afraid he will completely close in the yard at the same height he is currently building in early spring. There is no obvious reason why this fence needs to be extended beyond the existing fence height(seen in the two different fence designs) as he has no pool, animals etc. Thank you for speaking with me and taking the time to listen to our family needs and I believe many other families that are experiencing this very same issue due to the lack of a rear fence height by-law. Respectfully, Andrew R. Davis S. 14(1). Municpal Freedom of Information and Protecbon of Privacy Act