DEFENDING DRINKING AND DRIVING CASES

Similar documents
Canadian Criminal Law and Impaired Driving

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 20, 2011

Bill C-2: Highlights and Issues

Maxime Charron-Tousignant Dominique Valiquet. Publication No C73-E 1 September 2015

Citation: R. v. Smith, 2003 YKTC 52 Date: Docket: T.C Registry: Whitehorse Trial Heard: Carcross

POLICE WARNINGS Effective Date: May 9, 2005 Revised: September 8, 2009

Legislative Council, State of Michigan Courtesy of

Chapter 813 Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2003 EDITION Driving under the influence of intoxicants; penalty

Irrefutably Guilty? A Brief Overview of the New Impaired Driving Amendments 1 By R.S. Prithipaul

Copyright Crash Data Services, LLC All rights reserved.

SENATE, No. 404 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

Table of Contents. Dedication... iii Preface... v Table of Cases... xv. A. General Principles... 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE VEHICLE CODE MISDEMEANOR GUILTY PLEA FORM. 1. My true full name is

VANCOUVER POLICE DEPARTMENT PLANNING, RESEARCH & AUDIT SECTION

VOLUME 1 CONTENTS VOLUME 1. Introduction CHAPTER 1 The Offence of Criminal Negligence Sections 219, 220, 221, 255.1, 249.2, 249.

AN BILLE UM THRÁCHT AR BHÓITHRE 2009 ROAD TRAFFIC BILL Mar a ritheadh ag dhá Theach an Oireachtais As passed by both Houses of the Oireachtas

Driving Under the Influence; House Sub. for SB 374

Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Brandon Oliver. [2011] O.J. No Ontario Court of Justice Brampton, Ontario. W.J. Blacklock J.

AN ACT RELATING TO DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR DRUGS; INCREASING THE PENALTY FOR HOMICIDE BY

Index. All references are to page numbers. assault de minimis non curat lex defence, 32 police officer, on a, 7

SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY

H 5293 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, JUNE 28, 2017

Second Regular Session Sixty-eighth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP

CHAPTER 73: MOTOR VEHICLE CRIMES

holder of a probationary driving licence is convicted under this

Title 5 Traffic Code Chapter 2 Criminal Traffic Code

DWI Bond Conditions. TJCTC Webinar. Thea Whalen Executive Director Texas Justice Court Training Center

1999 WISCONSIN ACT 109

SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM. (Vehicle Code 23152)

*P.G , P.G AND P.G

IC Chapter 5. Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE SUMMARY CONVICTION APPEAL COURT

Bond Conditions in Impaired Driving Cases in Texas

THURMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT

2013 Bill 32. First Session, 28th Legislature, 62 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 32 ENHANCING SAFETY ON ALBERTA ROADS ACT

CRIMINAL LAW PROFESSIONAL STANDARD #2

POLICE SERVICES. Presented By: JOHN HOWARD SOCIETY OF LONDON AND DISTRICT

CHAPTER 500. (Senate Bill 277) Vehicle Laws Speed Monitoring Systems Statewide Authorization and Use in Highway Work Zones

Index. Abbreviations/meanings

CHAPTER 54. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

Type of law: CRIMINAL LAW. A 2015 Alberta Guide to the Law TRAFFIC OFFENCES. Student Legal Services of Edmonton

Order for Occupational Driver s License

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 119,249 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. ANGELA N. LEIVIAN, Appellant,

DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION

TITLE 6A LUMMI NATION CODE OF LAWS CRIMINAL TRAFFIC CODE

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.20, VEHICLE SEIZURE AND IMPOUNDMENT, OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE

RE-INVENTING CRIMINAL JUSTICE:

sample obtained from the defendant on the basis that any consent given by the

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 114,037 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. CITY OF DODGE CITY, Appellee, SHAUN BARRETT, Appellant.

INVENTORY OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF PROBATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Missouri Revised Statutes

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 158

IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF SASKATCHEWAN

Index. Current to Release accused subject to a hospital detention

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Second Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP

LOCAL GOVERNMENT (STREET DRINKING) AMENDMENT ACT 1990 No. 105

DIVISION 34 TRAFFIC DOCKET (Last Modified 12/20//2017)) Tickets may be discussed and/or amended ONLY on Tuesdays and Thursdays

VEHICLE SEIZURE AND REMOVAL REGULATION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT : MTHATHA CASE NO. 1299/06. In the matter between: and THE MINSTER OF SAFETY JUDGMENT

STUDENT LEGAL SERVICES TRAFFIC OFFENCES A GUIDE TO THE LAW IN ALBERTA REGARDING OF EDMONTON COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER

IC Version a Chapter 15. Issuance of Restricted Driver's License Because of Hardship

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION

Petition for Occupational Driver s License

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM. provide for a reduction in the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) level for drivers;

Case Name: R. v. Aulakh. Between Regina, and Surinder Pal Singh Aulakh. [2010] B.C.J. No BCPC M.V.R. (6th) CarswellBC 3091

Rail Safety (Adoption of National Law) Act 2012 No 82

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (ONTARIO) PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE REPORT

Impaired Driving NetLetter(TM) by the Hon. Justice Joseph F. Kenkel

CRIMINAL RULES OF THE ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE RULE 1 GENERAL. (2) Dealing with proceedings justly and efficiently includes

Implied Consent Testing & the Fourth Amendment

02504 PROCEDURE EVIDENTIAL BREATH SPECIMENS: STATIONS PROCEDURE. 2. Risk Assessments / Health & Safety Considerations

This appeal challenges the trial court s determination that the Department of

GTSB Caselaw Update. April, Presented by Christine Shockey, Assistant County Attorney Pottawattamie County Attorney s Office

As Introduced. 130th General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No A B I L L

Iowa Immigration Relief Clinics A Guide on How to Organize an Immigration Relief Clinic

BILL NO. 15. Highway Traffic (Combating Impaired Driving) Amendment Act

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY APPEARANCES: C. Michael Moore, Jackson, Ohio, for appellant.

2018 VT 100. No On Appeal from v. Superior Court, Chittenden Unit, Criminal Division. Walker P. Edelman June Term, 2018

Case Name: R. v. XXXXX-XXXXX. Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Diego G. XXXXX-XXXXX. [2010] O.J. No File No

Table of Contents. Foreword...v Acknowledgments...vii Table of Cases... xxxv. Introduction...1 PART I YEAR IN REVIEW. Year in Review...

Criminal Justice (Forensic Sampling and Evidence) Bill General Scheme

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 3265

Subject Area Breakdown NPPF Step 2 Sergeants Examination Actus Reus (Criminal. Crime Criminal Damage Arson Contamination or Interference

H 5012 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 4 November Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 9 September 2013

Implied consent offenses

Bill C-46 Impaired Driving Act

LEGISLATURE 2013 BILL. (7), (3) and (12) of the statutes; relating to: traffic violations

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

14.12: Judgment and Sentencing at Arraignment or Trial

Substitute for HOUSE BILL No. 2159

v No Kent Circuit Court

Petition for Occupational Driver s License

No. 107,661 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. SHANE A. BIXENMAN, Appellee, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEFENDANT S MOTION TO SUPPRESS HIS STOP, SEIZURE, STATEMENTS, AND BREATHALYZER READING

v) Deletes exemption for lawnmowers and bicycles, which means that driving on either is now covered by impaired driving offense.

Transcription:

Index A.L.E.R.T., see APPROVED SCREENING DEVICE ALCOHOL INFLUENCE REPORT, see APPENDIX G APPROVED INSTRUMENT, see APPENDIX C APPROVED SCREENING DEVICE Charter violations 4.8 Conduct of test calibration 4.5.2 machine, type of 4.5.1 operation of 4.5.3 Demand forthwith 4.2 reasonable suspicion of alcohol in body 4.1 Link between BAC and vehicle operation constitutional concerns, 4.1 Malfunction, evidence of, 7.8 Outcome of test fail 4.6.3 pass 4.6.1 warn 4.6.2 Refusal 4.4 Right to counsel 4.1.1, 4.3 Roadside questioning and testing 4.1.1 See also APPENDIX C BLOOD ALCOHOL CONTENT REPORT, see APPENDIX H BLOOD TESTS Conduct of test 6.6 Demand proper 6.2 forthwith or as soon as practicable 6.3 Reasonable grounds 6.1 Refusal 6.5 Warrant to obtain 6.7 BREATHALYZER TESTS Conduct of test Breath temperatures, 5.6 qualified technician 5.5 approved instrument 5.5 Demand IN-1

DEFENDING DRINKING AND DRIVING CASES Alberta practice: two demands, 5.1 forthwith or as soon as practicable 5.2 Reasonable grounds 5.1 Refusal 5.4 CARE OR CONTROL Proof Admissions 9.1 General 10.1 Ownership 9.3 Witnesses 9.2 CAUSATION, 11.1 CERTIFICATES AND NOTICE OF, see APPENDIX E CHARGES (FORMS), see APPENDIX F CHARTER ISSUES Arrest, unlawful, 13.4.2 Arbitrary detention, 13.4.4 Abuse of process, 13.4.5 Counsel, right to, see RIGHT TO COUNSEL Disclosure, 13.4.1 Exclusion of Evidence, 5.3.2 Licence suspensions, administrative, respecting, 14.4.2 Presumptions of alcoholic content, re, 7.8 Reasons for Detention, 13.4.3 Searches, unlawful, 13.4.2 Sentences, unconstitutional, 13.4.7 Trial procedures, 13.4.6 CONDITIONAL SENTENCE, 14.3 COORDINATION TESTS, 4.1.1, 7.4, 7.8, Appendix C, see PHYSICAL CO- ORDINATION TESTS CRIMINAL CODE, RELATED PROVISIONS, see APPENDIX C and 7.8 DEFENCE, THE, see also, ELEMENTS OF THE OFFENCE TO BE ESTABLISHED BY PROSECUTION Charter issues arrest, unlawful, 13.4.2 arbitrary detention, 4.5.1, 13.4.4 abuse of process, 13.4.5 counsel, right to, see RIGHT TO COUNSEL disclosure, 7.6, 13.4.1 machine manuals 13.4.1(d) IN-2

INDEX police communications 13.4.1(c) records 13.4.1(e) test ampoule 13.4.1(a) video 13.4.1(b) searches, unlawful, 4.5.1, 7.6, 13.4.2 sentences, unconstitutional, 13.4.7 trial procedures, 13.4.6 Disproving an element of the offence, 13.1.2 Carter defence constitutionality of 2008 amendments, 13.1.2(c)(ii) pre-july 2008 amendments 13.1.2(c)(i) post-july 2008 amendments 13.1.2(c)(ii) retrospectivity of 2008 amendments, 13.1.2(c)(ii) last drink defence 13.1.2(a) post-driving consumption 13.1.2(b) Evidence to the contrary 7.8, 13.2 Expert evidence, advance notice of, 13.5 Expert evidence in writing, practice tip, 13.3 General 13.1 Independent blood sample analysis 13.2 Post-driving consumption 13.3 DRIVER S LICENCE, SUSPENSION OF, 14.4.2, APPENDIX D DRIVER RECORD SEARCH, see APPENDIX I DRIVING (OPERATION) Proof admissions 9.1 ownership 9.3 witnesses 9.2 DRIVING PROHIBITION ORDERS, 14.4.1 DRUG EVALUATION OFFICERS, 7.8, Appendix C DRUG EVALUATIONS Conduct of test, 5A.5 base rate fallacy 5A.5.3 drug evaluation test 5A.5.2 physical coordination tests 5A.5.1 Demand 5A.2 Evidentiary value 5A.6 Reasonable grounds 5A.1 Refusal 5A.4 DRUG-IMPAIRED DRIVING, 5.1, 7.8, Appendix C IN-3

DEFENDING DRINKING AND DRIVING CASES ELEMENTS OF THE OFFENCE TO BE ESTABLISHED BY PROSECUTION 11, 13.1.1 EVALUATION OF IMPAIRED OPERATION (DRUGS AND ALCOHOL) REGULATIONS, see APPENDIX C FAILURE TO PROVIDE SAMPLE, see REFUSAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ACT (ONTARIO), see APPENDIX D IGNITION INTERLOCK DEVICE, 14.4.3 IMPAIRMENT, PROOF OF Accident, involvement in 7.2 Admissibility of certificate, 7.8, 7.9.1 Admission 7.1 pre-charter observations, 7.1.1 Blood alcohol readings 7.8 Blood test readings 7.8.2 blood alcohol level, effect 7.8.2(b) results 7.8.2(a) expert testimony relating back 7.8.2.(a)(ii) presumption back 7.8.2(a)(i) Breathalyzer readings 7.8.1 blood alcohol level, effect 7.8.1(c) certificate evidence 7.8.1(a) material time 7.8.1(b) expert testimony relating back 7.8.1(b)(ii) presumption back 7.8.1(b)(i) Driving, nature of 7.2 accident, 7.2.1 Drug evaluation demand, 7.8, Appendix C General 7 Physical symptoms eyes 7.3.1 face 7.3.2 feet, unsteady 7.3.4 odour of alcohol 7.3.3 police evidence, 7.3.6 pre-charter observations, 7.1.1 speech 7.3.5 Physical tests 4.1.1, 7.4, Appendix C Police officer, opinion of 7.5 disparate police evidence, 7.3.6 Regulations re Appendix C Roadside questioning and testing, 7.7 IN-4

INDEX Videotapes 7.6 INITIAL INTERVIEW Documents 2.3 Future obligations of client 2.4 General 2.1 Information checklist 2.2 Record of information 2.2, Appendix A MOTOR VEHICLE Defined 12 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT (BRITISH COLUMBIA), see APPENDIX D OVER 80 Proof Blood test readings 8.2 expert testimony relating back 8.2.1.(b) material time 8.2.1 presumption back 8.2.1(a) Breathalyzer readings 8.1 expert testimony relating back 8.1.1(b) material time 8.1.1 presumption back 7.8, 8.1.1(a) PHYSICAL COORDINATION TESTS Charter violations 4.8 Counsel, Right to 4.3, 4.7.2 Demand 4.2, 4.7.1 General 4.7 Refusal 4.4, 4.73 POLICE Arresting officer, conversation with 1.6, 4.1.1 Physical coordination testing by, 4.1.1, 7.4, 7.8, Appendix C Roadside questioning by 4.1.1 PREPARATION Accident report 3.8 Charge(s) 3.5 Disclosure 3.6 Driving record 3.7 Elements of the offence, proof of 3.10 Examine documentation 3.1 Interview witness 3.2 counsel 3.3 IN-5

DEFENDING DRINKING AND DRIVING CASES Toxicologist s report 3.4 REFUSAL Advice regarding 1.5.3 Approved screening device test, 4.4 Blood test 6.5 Breathalyzer 5.4 Physical coordination test, 4.4, 4.10 Reasonable excuse, 4.4, 5.4 RIGHT TO COUNSEL Admissions, and, 9.1, 10.2 Approved screening device generally, 4.3 proper machine required, 4.5.1 Blood tests 6.4 Breathalyzer tests counsel of choice, right to, 5.3.5 duty counsel, right to information concerning, 5.3.1 duty to hold off where counsel unavailable, 5.3.3 exclusion of evidence, 5.3.2 generally, 5.3 legal aid, right to information concerning, 5.3.1 waiver of right, 5.3.4 Drug evaluations, 5A.3 Internet access and, 5.3.1 Physical coordination tests, 4.9 Roadside questioning, and 4.1.1 SENTENCING Factual considerations 14.1.1, 14.1.2 Curative discharge 14.2 Driving prohibition orders Criminal Code order, 14.4.1 ignition interlock device programs, 14.4.3 provincial licence suspension, 14.4.2 Forfeiture of automobile, 14.6 Ignition interlock device programs, 14.4.3 Increased penalty, notice of intention to seek judicial review of, 13.4.6 Legislation, see Appendix D and 7.8 Penalty conditional sentence, 14.3 driving prohibition, 14.4 Criminal Code order, 14.4.1 IN-6

INDEX ignition interlock device programs, 14.4.3 provincial licence suspension, 14.4.2 fine, 14.1 forfeiture of automobile, 14.6 imprisonment, 14.1 probation, 5.6 unconstitutional, 13.4.6 Stay pending appeal 14.7 Unconstitutional, 13.4.7 Where bodily harm or death is caused, 14.1.2 SUSPENSION, DRIVER S LICENCE, see ALBERTA TRAFFIC SAFETY ACT, BRITISH COLUMBIA MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, AND ONTARIO HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ACT, IN APPENDIX D TELEPHONE CALL, see TELEPHONE INTERVIEW TELEPHONE INTERVIEW, see also INITIAL INTERVIEW Advice intoxication, signs of, 1.5.5 medical samples, 1.5.4 reasonable and probable grounds, 1.5.2 refusal to blow, 1.5.3 release, after, 1.5.6 right to refuse 1.5.1 three hour limit 1.5.2 Information, initial 1.4 Intoxication, signs of 1.5.5 Notes lawyer 1.2 client 1.5.7 Privacy, requirement of 1.3 Release, after 1.5.6 Structuring the call 1.1 TRAFFIC SAFETY ACT (ALBERTA), see APPENDIX D VIDEOTAPE EVIDENCE Charter, and consent to videotaping 7.6 surreptitious videotaping 7.6 videotaping as search and seizure 7.6 Disclosure of 3.6 use by defence 3.6, 7.6 IN-7