IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Similar documents
Case 1:99-mc Document 667 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:13-cv GMS Document 23 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:99-mc Document 476 Filed 09/15/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 43248

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:10-cv TJW Document 1 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/05/10 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Case No. PARTIES

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:10-cv GW-PLA Document 89 Filed 05/12/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:455

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/06/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Transcription:

SEMCON TECH, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Plaintiff, v. TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD., TSMC NORTH AMERICA, TSMC DEVELOPMENT, INC., WAFERTECH, LLC, AND TSMC CHINA COMPANY LIMITED, C.A. No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United States of America, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq., in which Plaintiff Semcon Tech, LLC makes the following allegations against Defendants Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd., TSMC North America, TSMC Development, Inc., Wafertech, LLC, and TSMC China Company Limited (collectively, Defendants ): PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Semcon Tech, LLC ( Semcon ) is a Delaware limited liability company. 2. On information and belief, Defendant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. ( TSMC Ltd. ) is a company organized under the laws of Taiwan that maintains its principal place of business at No. 8, Li-Hsin Road 6, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu, Taiwan 30077. On information and belief, TSMC Ltd. conducts 1

business in the United States through its wholly owned subsidiaries, the relevant ones of which are also named defendants in this action. 3. On information and belief, Defendant TSMC North America ( TSMC- NA ) is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 2585 Junction Avenue, San Jose, CA 95134. On information and belief, TSMC-NA can be served through its registered agent, Steven A Schulman, 2585 Junction Avenue, San Jose, CA 95134. On information and belief, TSMC-NA is wholly owned by TSMC Ltd., and serves as TSMC s exclusive sales agent in North and South America. 4. On information and belief, Defendant TSMC Development, Inc. ( TSMC Development ) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 5509 NW Parker St, Camas, WA 98607. On information and belief, TSMC Development can be served through its registered agent, Corporation Service Company, 2711 Centerville Rd, Ste 400, Wilmington, DE 19808. On information and belief, TSMC Development is a wholly owned subsidiary of TSMC Ltd. 5. On information and belief, Defendant Wafertech, LLC ( Wafertech ) is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 5509 NW Parker St, Camas, WA 98607. On information and belief, Wafertech can be served through its registered agent, Corporation Service Company, 2711 Centerville Rd, Ste 400, Wilmington, DE 19808. On information and belief, Wafertech is a wholly owned subsidiary of TSMC Ltd. 6. On information and belief, Defendant TSMC China Company Limited ( TSMC China ) is a company organized under the laws of the People s Republic of China that maintains its principal place of business at 4000, Wen Xiang Rd., Songjiang, 2

Shanghai, China 201616. On information and belief, TSMC China is a wholly owned subsidiary of TSMC Ltd. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 7. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 8. Defendants are subject to this Court s specific and general personal jurisdiction pursuant to due process and/or the Delaware Long Arm Statute, due to having availed themselves of the rights and benefits of Delaware due to their substantial business in this forum, including: (i) having offered for sale and/or sold products made by an infringing process in Delaware and in this District, having purposely imported/shipped or caused to be imported/shipped products made by an infringing process into Delaware and this District through established distribution channels, and/or having committed acts in this State and District that are the subject of the count set forth herein; and (ii) regularly doing or soliciting business, engaging in other persistent courses of conduct, and/or deriving substantial revenue from goods and services provided to individuals in Delaware and in this District. Defendants TSMC Development and Wafertech have further availed themselves of the rights and benefits of Delaware by incorporating/forming under Delaware law. 9. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), 1391(c) and 1400(b). Defendants TSMC Development and Wafertech are incorporated/formed in this District, and on information and belief, all Defendants have transacted business in this district and have committed acts of patent infringement in this District. 3

COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,156,717 10. Plaintiff Semcon realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-9 above, as if fully set forth herein. 11. Plaintiff Semcon is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 7,156,717 ( the 717 Patent ) titled [In] Situ Finishing Aid Control. The 717 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on January 2, 2007. A true and correct copy of the 717 Patent is included as Exhibit A. 12. Defendants make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import into the United States integrated circuits. Defendants, alone and/or in conjunction with their corporate affiliates, fabricate integrated circuits in the United States and overseas, including in Hsinchu, Taiwan, Tainan, Taiwan, Taichung, Taiwan, Camas, Washington, and Shanghai, China. 13. At least some of the integrated circuits made, used, sold, offered for sale, and/or imported into the United States by Defendants are fabricated using, in part, a process known as chemical-mechanical polishing ( CMP ) performed with the use of Applied Materials Reflexion LK and/or GT CMP systems and/or Ebara F-REX300 CMP systems. 14. On information and belief, Defendants have sold and continue to sell and/or offer for sale integrated circuits fabricated by Defendants and/or Defendants corporate affiliates using, in part, CMP performed with the use of Applied Materials Reflexion LK and/or GT CMP systems and/or Ebara F-REX300 CMP systems to customers in the United States or whom Defendants know or should know import such 4

integrated circuits into the United States. Such customers include, without limitation, Intel Corporation, Qualcomm Incorporated, and/or Xilinx, Inc. 15. On information and belief, Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe the 717 Patent by, among other things, making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States integrated circuits made by a process patented under the 717 Patent. Such integrated circuits include, by way of example and without limitation, integrated circuits fabricated using, in part, CMP performed with the use of Applied Materials Reflexion LK and/or GT CMP systems and/or Ebara F-REX300 CMP systems through a process covered by one or more claims of the 717 Patent, including but not limited to claim 1. By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States integrated circuits made by a process patented under the 717 Patent, Defendants have injured Semcon and are liable to Semcon for infringement of the 717 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a) and (g). 16. As a result of Defendants infringement of the 717 Patent, Plaintiff Semcon is entitled to monetary damages in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendants infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendants, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court. COUNT II INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,656,023 17. Plaintiff Semcon realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-16 above, as if fully set forth herein. 18. Plaintiff Semcon is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 6,656,023 ( the 023 patent ) titled In situ control with lubricant and tracking. The 5

023 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on December 2, 2003. A true and correct copy of the 023 patent is included as Exhibit B. 19. On information and belief, Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe the 023 patent by, among other things, making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States integrated circuits made by a process patented under the 023 patent. Such integrated circuits include, by way of example and without limitation, integrated circuits fabricated using, in part, CMP performed with the use of Ebara F-REX300 CMP systems through a process covered by one or more claims of the 023 patent, including but not limited to claim 1. By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States integrated circuits made by a process patented under the 023 Patent, Defendants have injured Semcon and are liable to Semcon for infringement of the 023 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a) and (g). 20. As a result of Defendants infringement of the 023 Patent, Plaintiff Semcon is entitled to monetary damages in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendants infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendants, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Semcon respectfully requests that this Court enter: a. A judgment in favor of Plaintiff that Defendants have infringed, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, the 717 patent and the 023 patent; b. A judgment and order requiring Defendants to pay Plaintiff its damages, costs, expenses, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest for Defendants 6

infringement of the 717 patent and the 023 patent as provided under 35 U.S.C. 284; and c. A judgment and order requiring Defendants to provide an accounting and to pay supplemental damages to Semcon, including without limitation, prejudgment and post-judgment interest; and d. Any and all other relief as the Court may deem appropriate and just under the circumstances. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, requests a trial by jury of any issues so triable by right. April 18, 2013 OF COUNSEL: Marc A. Fenster Alexander C.D. Giza Jeffrey Z.Y. Liao Russ, August & Kabat 12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90025-1031 (310) 826-7474 mfenster@raklaw.com agiza@raklaw.com jliao@raklaw.com BAYARD, P.A. /s/ Stephen B. Brauerman Richard D. Kirk (rk0922) Stephen B. Brauerman (sb4952) Vanessa R. Tiradentes (vt5398) 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 655-5000 rkirk@bayardlaw.com sbrauerman@bayardlaw.com vtiradentes@bayardlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Semcon Tech LLC 7