IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Currently before the Court for preliminary approval is a settlement (the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2017 Page 1 of 12

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 52 Filed: 12/23/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:463

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 11/14/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 812 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:02-cv LJM-WTL Document 117 Filed 08/16/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

mg Doc 4808 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 08:51:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 88 Filed: 07/06/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1135

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 185 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION AMENDED ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 427 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13


Case 1:15-cv YK Document 84 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. Plaintiff,

nm OPOREPJYINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 193 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 4730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4099

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

CIRCUIT COURT OF WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN. A state court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: //y/20/0

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 55-1 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 38 STIPULATED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 1:17-cv MGC Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2018 Page 1 of 21

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 84 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2795 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 86 Filed: 07/13/18 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 606 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CHAMPS SPORTS BAR & GRILL CO., FASHI0NADVICE.COM, LLC d/b/a SAM MALOUF, ARCHER'S BARBEQUE, LLC, and WOKCHOW DEVELOPMENT, LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV-00012-MHC MERCURY PAYMENT SYSTEMS, LLC and GLOBAL PAYMENTS DIRECT, INC., Defendants. PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of whether the settlement reached by the parties should be preliminarily approved, the proposed settlement class preliminarily certified, and the proposed plan for notifying the class adopted. Having reviewed the proposed settlement agreement, together with its exhibits, and based upon the relevant papers and all prior proceedings in this matter, the Court has determined the proposed settlement satisfies the criteria for preliminary approval, the proposed settlement class should be preliminarily certified, and the

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 2 of 14 proposed notice plan approved. Accordingly, good cause appearing in the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Provisional Certification of the Settlement Class (1) The Court provisionally certifies the following settlement class: All persons who contracted with or through Mercury or were referred by Mercury to Global to receive payment processing services from October 9, 2009 through the date of preliminary approval and who were charged: (a) a card association access fee exceeding the amount of the published access fees current as of the date of the charge, and/or an interchange rate exceeding published interchange rates current as of the date of the charge for those whose contracts provided that such fees and rates would be passed through at cost; or (b) any of the following fees: Regulatory Fee, Data Security Fee, PCI Fee, Monthly Maintenance Fee, Batch Fee, Statement Fee, Annual Fee, Assc Card Accpt & License Fee, and MSA Breach Only Fee. Excluded from the class are Defendants; parents or subsidiaries of any Defendant; any entity in which any Defendant has a controlling interest; Defendants' counsel; the Court and any employees of the Court; and the legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns of any such excluded party. Also excluded are any persons that exclude themselves from the class in accordance with the provisions set forth in the class notice. (2) The Court determines that for settlement purposes the proposed settlement class meets all the requirements of Federal Rule of Procedure Rule 23(a) and (b)(3), namely that the class is so numerous that joinder of all members 2

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 3 of 14 is impractical; that there are common issues of law and fact; that the claims of the class representatives are typical of absent class members; that the class representatives will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class, as they have no interests antagonistic to or in conflict with the class and have retained experienced and competent counsel to prosecute this matter; that common issues predominate over any individual issues; and that a class action is the superior means of adjudicating the controversy. (3) The Court appoints the following as representatives of the proposed settlement class: Champs Sports Bar & Grill Co., Fashionadvice.com LLC d/b/a Sam Malouf, Archer's Barbeque, LLC, and Wokchow Development, LLC. (4) The following lawyers, who were previously appointed by the Court as interim Co-lead Counsel, are designated as Settlement Class Counsel pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g): David M. Bucloier of Bucloier + Miles; Kenneth S. Canfield of Doffermyre Shields Canfield & Knowles, LLC; Adam J. Levitt of DiCello Levitt & Casey, LLC; and E. Adam Webb of Webb, Klase & Lemond LLC. The Court finds that these lawyers are experienced and will adequately protect the interests of the settlement class. Preliminary Approval of the Proposed Settlement (5) Upon preliminary review, the Court finds the proposed settlement is 3

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 4 of 14 fair, reasonable, and adequate, otherwise meets the criteria for approval, and warrants issuance of notice to the settlement class. Accordingly, the proposed settlement is preliminarily approved. (6) Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, on or about July 1, 2017, but not prior to that date. Defendant Mercury Payment Systems, LLC is directed to pay the sum of $52 million (Fifty-Two Million Dollars) into an escrow account to be established and maintained by the escrow agent to be selected by the parties, in coordination with the settlement administrator appointed below, as set out in the settlement. Final Approval Hearing (7) A Final Approval Hearing shall take place before the Court on August 29, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 1905 of the Richard B. Russell Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 75 Ted Tumer Dr., SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3309, to determine, among other things, whether: (a) the proposed settlement class should be finally certified for settlement purposes pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23; (b) the settlement should be finally approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate and, in accordance with the settlement's terms, this matter should be dismissed with prejudice; (c) Class Counsel's application for attorneys' fees and expenses should be approved; and (d) the application for the 4

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 5 of 14 class representatives to receive service awards should be approved. Any other matters the Court deems necessary and appropriate will also be heard. (8) Any settlement class member that has not timely and properly excluded itself from the settlement class in the manner described below, may appear at the Final Approval Hearing in person or through counsel and be heard, to the extent allowed by the Court, regarding the proposed settlement; provided, however, that no class member that has elected to exclude itself from the class shall be entitled to object or otherwise appear, and, further provided, that no class member shall be heard in opposition to the settlement unless the class member complies with the requirements of this Order pertaining to objections, which are described below. Administration (9) Epiq Systems is appointed as the Settlement Administrator, with responsibility for class notice and claims administration. The Settlement Administrator's fees, as approved by the parties, will be paid from the settlement fund pursuant to the settlement agreement. Notice to the Class (10) The notice program set forth in the settlement agreement and the forms of notice and claim form attached as exhibits to the settlement agreement 5

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 6 of 14 satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and thus are approved. Non-material modifications to the exhibits may be made without further order of the Court. The Settlement Administrator is directed to carry out the notice program in conformance with the settlement agreement and to perform all other tasks that the settlement agreement requires. (11) The Court finds that the form, content, and method of giving notice to the settlement class as described in the settlement agreement and exhibits: (a) constitute the best practicable notice to the settlement class; (b) are reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise settlement class members of the pendency of the action, the terms of the proposed settlement, and their rights under the proposed settlement; (c) are reasonable and constitute due, adequate, and sufficient notice to those persons entitled to receive notice; and (d) satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the constitutional requirement of due process, and any other legal requirements. The Court further finds that the notices are written in plain language, use simple terminology, and are designed to be readily understandable by settlement class members. Exclusions from the Class (12) Any settlement class member that wishes to be excluded from the settlement class must mail a written notification of the intent to exclude itself to the 6

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 7 of 14 Settlement Administrator at the address provided in the notice, postmarked no later than August 14, 2017 (the "Opt-Out Deadline"). The written notification must identify the settlement class member and this action; state that the settlement class member has chosen to opt-out or exclude itself from the settlement class; and contain the name, address, position, and signature of the individual who is acting on behalf of the settlement class member. (13) The Settlement Administrator shall provide the parties with copies of all opt-out notifications, and, within ten days after the Opt-Out Deadline, a final list of all that have timely and validly excluded themselves from the settlement class. The final list should be filed with the Court before the Final Approval Hearing. (14) Any settlement class member that does not timely and vahdly exclude itself from the settlement shall be bound by the terms of the settlement. If final judgment is entered, any settlement class member that has not submitted a timely, valid written notice of exclusion from the settlement class shall be bound by all subsequent proceedings, orders, and judgments in this matter, including but not limited to the release set forth in the settlement and final judgment. (15) All those that submit valid and timely notices of exclusion shall not be entitled to receive any benefits of the settlement. 7

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 8 of 14 Objections to the Settlement (16) A settlement class member that complies with the requirements of this Order may object to the settlement, Class Counsel's request for fees and expenses, or the request for service awards to the class representatives. (17) No settlement class member shall be heard, and no papers, briefs, pleadings, or other documents submitted by any settlement class member shall be received and considered by the Court, unless the objection is (a) electronically filed with the Court by the Objection Deadline; or (b) mailed first-class postage prepaid to the Clerk of Court, Class Counsel, and Defendants' Counsel, at the addresses listed in the Long Form Notice available on the settlement website, and postmarked by no later than the Objection Deadline, as specified in the Long Form Notice. Objections shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages. For the objection to be considered by the Court, the objection shall set forth: (a) (b) The name of this action; The name of the objector and the full name, address, email address, and telephone number of the person acting on its behalf; (c) An explanation of the basis upon which the objector claims to be a settlement class member; 8

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 9 of 14 (d) All grounds for the objection, accompanied by any legal support for the objection; (e) The identity of all counsel who represent the objector, including any former or current counsel who may be entitled to compensation for any reason related to the objection to the settlement, the fee application, or the application for service awards; (f) The identity of all counsel representing the objector who will appear at the Final Approval Hearing; (g) The number of times in which the objector has objected to a class action settlement within the five years preceding the date that the objector files the objection, the caption of each case in which the objector has made such an objection, and a copy of any orders relating to or ruling upon the objector's prior objections that were issued by the trial and appellate courts in each case; (h) The number of times in which the objector's counsel and the counsel's law firm have objected to a class action settlement within the five years preceding the date that the objector files the objection, the caption of each case in which the counsel or the firm has made such objection, and a 9

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 10 of 14 copy of any orders related to or ruling upon counsel's or the firm's prior objections that were issued by the trial and appellate courts in each case; (i) If the objector is represented by an attorney who intends to seek fees and expenses from anyone other than the objectors he or she represents, the objection should also include (i) a description of the attorney's legal background and prior experience in connection with class action litigation; (ii) the amount of fees sought by the attorney for representing the objector and the factual and legal justification for the fees being sought; (iii) a statement regarding whether the fees being sought are calculated on the basis of a lodestar, contingency, or other method; (iv) the number of hours already spent by the attorney and an estimate of the hours to be spent in the future; and (v) the attorney's hourly rate; (j) Any and all agreements that relate to the objection or the process of objecting, whether written or verbal, between objector or objector's counsel and any other person or entity; (k) A description of all evidence to be presented at the Final Approval Hearing in support of the objection, including a list of any witnesses, a summary of the expected testimony from each witness, and a copy of any documents or other non-oral material to be presented; 10

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 11 of 14 (1) A statement confirming whetiier the objector intends to personally appear and/or testify at the Final Approval Hearing; and, (m) The objector's signature on the written objection (an attomey's signature is not sufficient). (18) In addition, any settlement class member that objects to the proposed settlement must make itself available to be deposed regarding the grounds for its objection and must provide along with its objection four dates when the objector will be available to be deposed during the period from when the objection is filed through the date ten days before the Final Approval Hearing. (19) Any settlement class member that fails to comply with the provisions in this Order will waive and forfeit any and all rights it may have to object, and shall be bound by all the terms of the settlement agreement, this Order, and by all proceedings, orders, and judgments, including, but not limited to, the release in the settlement agreement if final judgment is entered. Claims Process and Allocation Formula (20) The settlement agreement establishes a process for providing benefits to current customers, who will automatically receive a cash payment unless they opt to receive a credit to be applied to certain goods and services, and former customers, who are eligible to receive a cash payment if they submit a timely, valid 11

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 12 of 14 claim form. The Court preliminarily approves this process, including specifically the Allocation Formula that describes how cash payments will be calculated and is attached as Exhibit 1 to the settlement agreement, and directs that the Settlement Administrator effectuate the claims and distribution process according to the terms of the settlement agreement. (21) Settlement class members that are required to file a claim to receive a cash payment shall do so in accordance with the requirements and procedures specified in the notice and the claim form. If final judgment is entered, settlement class members that are required to file a claim to qualify for a cash payment, namely former customers, but fail to submit a claim in accordance with the requirements and procedures specified in the notice and claim form, shall be forever barred from receiving any such benefit, but will in all other respects be subject to and bound by the provisions of the settlement agreement, including the release included in that agreement, and the final judgment. Termination of the Settlement and Use of this Order (22) This Order shall become null and void and shall be without prejudice to the rights of the parties, all of which shall be restored to their respective positions existing immediately before this Court entered this Order, if the settlement is not finally approved by the Court or is terminated in accordance with 12

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 13 of 14 the terms of the settlement agreement. In such event, the settlement and settlement agreement shall become null and void and be of no further force and effect, and neither the settlement agreement nor the Court's orders, including this Order, relating to the settlement shall be used or referred to for any purpose whatsoever. (23) This Order shall be of no force or effect if fmal judgment is not entered or there is no Effective Date under the terms of the settlement agreement; shall not be construed or used as an admission, concession, or declaration by or against Defendants of any fault, wrongdoing, breach, or liability; shall not be construed or used as an admission, concession, or declaration by or against any settlement class representative or any other settlement class member that its claims lack merit or that the relief requested is inappropriate, improper, or unavailable; and shall not constitute a waiver by any party of any defense or claims it may have in this litigation or in any other lawsuit. Stay of Proceedings (24) Except as necessary to effectuate this Order, this matter and any deadlines set by the Court in this matter are stayed and suspended pending the Final Approval Hearing and issuance of final judgment, or until further order. Continuance of Final Approval Hearing (25) The Court reserves the right to adjourn or continue the Final 13

Case 1:16-cv-00012-MHC Document 78 Filed 05/16/17 Page 14 of 14 Approval Hearing and related deadlines without further written notice to the settlement class. If the Court alters any of those dates or times, the revised dates and times shall be posted on the settlement website. Summary of Deadlines (26) The settlement agreement, as preliminarily approved in this Order, shall be administered according to its terms pending the Final Approval Hearing. Deadlines arising under the settlement agreement and this Order include but are not limited to the following: Notice Deadline: June 15, 2017 Obiection and Opt-Out Deadline: August 14, 2017 Claims Deadline: October 13, 2017 Filing Motion for Final Approval: July 31, 2017 Final Approval Hearing: August 29, 2017 IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of May, 2017. The Honorable Mark H. Cohen United States District Court Judge 14